I am facing issues with patches (minor upgrade) installation (updates) with MSM (merge modules).
I am creating MSI (test.msi) with texst.wxs. And inside text.wxs referring to app.msm file (there is a folder app, which contains so many folders and files. And harvesting this folder and making app.msm file)
Below are steps for making app.msm file.
heat dir "app" -gg -sfrag -template:module -srd -ke -var var.source -out app.wxs
candle -dsource=app app.wxs
light app.wixobj
Below is snippet of test.wxs file
<Directory Id='TARGETDIR' Name='SourceDir'>
<Directory Id='ProgramFilesFolder' Name='PFiles'>
....
....
<Directory Id='Config' Name='Config'>
<Component Id='APP_CLIENT' Guid='*'>
<Component Id='Manual' Guid='*'>
<File Id='Manual' Name='Manual.pdf' DiskId='1' Source='Resources/Manual.pdf'
KeyPath='yes'>
<Shortcut Id="startmenuManual" Directory="ProgramMenuDir"
Name="Instruction Manual" Advertise="yes" />
</File>
</Component>
</Directory>
<Directory Id='exmp_REPO' Name='!(loc.Merge_FolderTitle)'>
<Merge Id="LocalRepository" Language="1033" SourceFile="app.msm" DiskId="1"/>
<Component Id='exmp_REPOSITORY' Guid='*'>
<CreateFolder/>
<RemoveFolder Id='exmp_REPO' On='uninstall' />
</Component>
</Directory>
....
<Feature Id='Complete' Display='expand' Level='1' ConfigurableDirectory='MYAPPPATH'>
<ComponentRef Id='Manual'/>
<ComponentRef Id='App_CLIENT'/>
<ComponentRef Id='exmp_REPOSITORY'/>
...
...
I am able to make major upgrade with my test.wxs by using app.msm (merge module). But not able to make patch with successful installation. Patch install (update) is reflecting in version change in the "Programs and Features" and showing in "View Installed updates". The manual changes also are reflecting with patch update. But whatever the changes in "app" (which are created app.msm and referred in test.wxs) folder are not reflecting.
I have used 2 approaches for making patch, which are mentioend in below urls
1) http://wixtoolset.org/documentation/manual/v3/patching/patch_building.html
2) http://wixtoolset.org/documentation/manual/v3/patching/wix_patching.html
Please help in this regards.
First, I would advise to find out, whether the built patch contains the correct files or not. If not, you have a build problem, that the msm is not updated. If yes, you have most likely a problem with the content of the msm which may be not consistent with it's predecessor (especially GUIDs, table primary keys, etc.).
You can find out and see the content of the patch without installing with tools like Orca and Insted which you can search and download.
Second, using merge modules is highly complicating things, especially for patches, and of limited usefulness, if they are your own and you use them only once. Msms are primarily made for situations, where you need the .msm at least for 2 different MSI packages. I have seen a handfull of problems using merge modules in patches with other tools, BTW. I have no special experience here with WiX+patches+MSMs, but, it's as I said.
Last, but not least, you will have to choose, if you really want to keep this complexity in the future. As I remember, there are other possibilities in WiX to modularize / encapsulate parts of your software.
You can check the versions of files in merge modules and MSI files by opening them with Orca and looking in the File table. Or open the MSI file with Orca and then Transform=>View patch to see changes.
It may be obvious, but a binary versioned file will be replaced by a file with a higher file version. I mention because there is a belief out there that somehow "new" files replace "old" files, and that's wrong. Versions matter.
Generally you need to install a patch with an msiexec command that specifies REINSTALL=ALL REINSTALLMODE=omus. Double-clicking an MSP file will not necessarily just work unless you've arranged for it to do this internally with a custom action that sets them when PATCH is set.
The patch will not work if you break component rules. A common mistake is to remove a component during a patch, and that will result in an "advertised" update that doesn't actually update anything. In a verbose log look for SELMGR entries and text about removal of components is not supported. Setting the MSIENFORCEUPGRADECOMPONENTRULES property to 1 will fail the patch if you've done this.
If a file has no version whether it's overwritten depends on the replacement rules here, and there's some difference if the file is hashed or not:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa370531(v=vs.85).aspx
Also: how do you know the patch isn't working? If you have no file versions then you can't know if a file has been replaced unless you look very carefully. You cannot trust the dates because Windows changes timestamps when a file is installed. You really need to build binary files with file versions because everything like patches, hotfixes, service packs etc will use them to replace binary files. Otherwise for data files use file hashing.
I see several potential problems here, maybe even in addition to the other answers:
when you heat up files for your merge modules -gg autogenerates new component guids. This will not work with patches, since it'll basically add a bunch of new components (new guids each time!!). Also, you'll remove components this way, which is something you shouldn't do and which cannot be done easily, unless you still include the original merge module. And then you'll end up with path problems.
The tutorial for wix patching uses wixpdb files for diffing the original and the updated installer. With wixpdb files, merge modules will not be patched, irrespective of whether files changed in them or not. You will need to do administrative installations and then diff on the msi itself. You'll still have problem #1.
your wxs snippet is bad. At least the xml element is never correctly closed. Your Feature also has a MergeRef somewhere?
Some tips:
you can view what your patches do with a program called Orca. Open the original msi, then just drag your msp patch file on top of it.
rather don't use merge modules, they complicate things. You can also use heat to generate a fragment which you then simply include into your wix project.
use the wix patching approach (Patch element, not the PatchCreation element). It's easier, but you have the same control
don't autogenerate guids if you plan to update those autogenerated components with a patch. It won't be a problem with major upgrades :)
Just one important issue of a number of potential reasons while files are not updated correctly: You write, in your .msm is a high number of unversioned files, like .xml, etc.
Important rule:
EVERY unversioned file which is changed on the PC AFTER the first MSI install not by the MSI engine itself (e.g. you edited a config.xml file or so), will be normally NEVER updated by MSI again, not by patch and not by Major Upgrade. (With normally I mean, you have to take special actions, like uninstalling or especially specifying those files as socalled companion files).
Related
When uninstalling my application, I'd like to configure the Wix setup to NOT to remove few files that were added as part of the installation. It seems like the uninstaller removes all the files that were originally installed from the MSI file. How do I do that?
Here are my files which I wish to keep it forever
<Binary Id="RootCABinary" SourceFile="Assets\Certificates\RootCA.cer" />
<Binary Id="SubCABinary" SourceFile="Assets\Certificates\SubCA.cer" />
I have used WixIIsExtension.dll to install these certificates to the windows store.
Overwrite: Is it important that the file never gets overwritten? If so, add
"Never Overwrite" to your component. WiX attribute: NeverOverwrite="yes". Remember to test upgrade scenarios!
Permanent Component: As stated by Pavel, you can set a component permanent:
<Component Permanent="yes">
<File Source="License.rtf" />
</Component>
Blank GUID: Another way to do it is to set a blank component GUID. It essentially means "install and then leave alone". No repair or uninstall should be done (remember to add NeverOverwrite="yes" if the file should never be overwritten):
<Component Guid="" Feature="MainApplication">
<File Source="SubCA.cer" KeyPath="yes" />
</Component>
Read-Only Copy: I sometimes install files to a per-machine path (for example somewhere under program files) and then copy them to a per-user location (somewhere in the user-profile) on application launch, and then do operations on them that entail that the files should not be deleted. This is good in cases where you want to do something that change the files in question (they need to be writable). Then it is good to "untangle" them from deployment concerns (files will not be meddled with by installer operations at all - the installer has no knowledge of them). The original read-only copy installed to program files can be uninstalled though (no longer needed?).
Other approaches: You can also create such files using custom actions during installation (usually text files only), you can download the file in question from your web site on application launch (makes the file easy to manage and update / replace? Vulnerable to connection problems - firewalls, etc...) and the application can create the file using "internal defaults" in the main executable on launch. And there are no doubt further approaches that I can't recall.
Put your binaries in a separate WiX component and make it permanent. Have a look at this thread as well
We have a MSI built with wix that installs our ruby based product. When we released the first version there was a bug. Upgrades would overwrite changes to a ruby config file (gemrc), effectively breaking the product in some cases.
I've been trying to get MSI to not remove or replace the config file on upgrades, without success.
What i have now is:
<InstallExecuteSequence>
<RemoveExistingProducts After="InstallExecuteAgain" />
</InstallExecuteSequence>
<Directory Id="embeddedDir" Name="embedded">
<Directory Id="embeddedEtcDir" Name="etc">
<Component Id="gemrcComponent" Guid="uuid..." NeverOverwrite='yes' Permanent='yes'>
<File Id='gemrc' Name='gemrc'
Source='$(var.ProjectSourceDir)\embedded\etc\gemrc.default' Vital='yes' KeyPath='yes' />
</Component>
</Directory>
</Directory>
However, going from the current version (1.0) to the new version (1.1) will leave the installation with no gemrc at all. Going forward it works, so going from 1.1 to 1.2 it leaves the existing (modified) file.
I'm assuming, that the reason it doesn't work is because it uses the old 1.0 MSI to remove the existing installation, and that version has the gemrc file marked as part of the product that needs to be removed.
This means the only way i could get around this is using custom actions (copy the file to a temp path before installation, and then move it back afterwards.
Or something similar). Is there a better/easier way?
Some of the reasons you may be seeing this are as follows, but there's not enough information to say which might apply in your cases:
If you originally had a major upgrade scheduled "early" (InstallInitialize or sooner) then the upgrade would completely uninstall the older product and then install the new one. This would look like an overwrite of the config file, but strictly speaking it's not. You do not say if you ever identified the actual root cause of this issue or if the major upgrade was scheduled differently.
In a major upgrade scheduled after InstallExecuteAgain, the upgrade installs on top of the old product and follows file replacement rules. So if the config file had really been updated after install it would not be replaced.
If the component id of the config file changed between any of the setups then you'd see it removed (even in an InstallExecuteAgain upgrade). File sharing is ref counted by component id, so if the upgrade has a component id for the config file that is not the same as the previous installs then you'd see strange behavior because the ref count of the previous file means it would be removed, but you're attempting to install another of the same name with different id.
You should do your upgrades with verbose MSI logging enabled to see what happens to the config file. If it's not clear from that, then post it somewhere accessible for others to look at.
I'd like to parse merge module files into two different locations. Is it possible?
<Directory Id="TARGETDIR" Name="SourceDir">
<Directory Id="MergeRedirectFolder">
<Component Id="LoggerClient" Guid="*">
<File Id="log4net" Name="log4net.dll" Source="..\..\_Release\log4net.dll" KeyPath='yes' />
<File Id="LoggerLibrary" Name="LoggerLibrary.dll" Source="..\..\_$(var.Configuration)\LoggerLibrary.dll" />
<File Id="app.config" Name="app.config.xml" Source="..\..\_Release\app.config.xml" />
<File Id="msvcr110.dll" Name="msvcr110.dll" Source="c:\windows\sysWoW64\msvcr110.dll" />
</Component>
</Directory>
</Directory>
</Module>
<Merge Id ="MergeModule.msm" Language ="!(loc.Lang)" SourceFile ="_$(var.Configuration)\MergeModule.msm" DiskId ="1" />
I want the second file to copy to a different folder than the other files.
There is a concept for that, it is called a retargetable merge module. I have avoided used it - the concept doesn't seem right to me. I have not tried to make one with Wix.
I think you could combine a Wix include file (simple sample) with the new auto-generated component guids to deploy such duplicated files reliably by adding an Include statement where appropriate. You must not hard code the guids in this case, but let them be auto generated by the Wix compiler and linker.
Also have a read of WixLibs (Wix library files): http://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2008/10/10/what-are-.wixlibs-and-why-would-you-use-them/
Wix documentation; http://wixtoolset.org/documentation/manual/v3/overview/files.html
Merge modules are for installing common runtimes and genuinly shared files. Typically C and C++ runtimes and other, similar libraries that should be available in the latest version for all applications.
Your files look like they are part of your application folder, with the exception of msvcr110.dll which you should remove and allow to be loaded from the system folder.
If the remaining files have no per-machine registration (COM for example or COM Interop), you can duplicate them in several folders without interference, yes, but why not load them from a shared location inside your own application folder structure?
%ProgramFiles%\My Company\My Shared Runtimes
%ProgramFiles%\My Company\My Apps\My App 1\
%ProgramFiles%\My Company\My Apps\My App 2\
These sample folders you "own" and you can deploy things here however you like. Not so for shared, system folders. You could make your own merge module for shared components between your applications into "My Shared Runtimes" and make your applications aware of the shared location "....\MySharedRuntimes\"
It depends on what you mean by different locations. You can build a merge module with 4 files, each in their own component and directory. One could go to the CommonFilesFolder; another to the SystemFolder; another to...you get the idea. So it's potentially easy if you make each file its own component in its own directory. However you've got them all under TARGETDIR, so you're going the wrong direction. You just define the other directory and that other component and file and you might be done, unless there's more to the question than meets the eye.
I would suggest contacting me privately for a few 30-60 minute conversation on MSI, component rules, Merge Modules and file set theory. It's too much to write. In a nutshell I would advise more merge modules.
Good time,
I'm trying to create the uninstallable patch (msp file) which should contain the newly added files. The file is added in following maner:
<Directory Id="Some Dir">
<Directory Id="MYDIR" Name="Some Name">
<Component Id="Some Component" Guid="{GUID}" KeyPath="yes">
<File Id="README.txt" Name="README.txt" Source="to_install\README.txt" KeyPath="no"/>
<File Id="default.cfg" Name="default.cfg" Source="to_install\default.cfg" KeyPath="no"/>
... // some more files
</Component>
...
...
I've also tried using the DirectoryRef but got the same results.
The "MYDIR" directory is used in other places also and several other files are already installed there, but the patch is adding new files, and the installation log shows that the CreateDirectory table becomes modified and the uninstallation for patch becomes disabled.
What is a correct way to do it using WiX?
KeyPath :
This value points to a file or folder belonging to the component that the installer uses to detect the component.
It is creating entry in CreateFolder of MSI because of KeyPath is provide at component level that is taking installation folder as its key so your patch become not uninstallable.
Provide KeyPath at one of the file of component that is the most important for that component. So it does not make entry into CreatFolder table of MSI and your patch become uninstallable.
Whether a patch is uninstallable isn't really related to a piece of WiX source like that. One thing you definitely need for an uninstallable patch is a PatchMetadata table that says that the patch is uninstallable, as here:
http://wixtoolset.org/documentation/manual/v3/patching/patch_building.html
or here, see PatchMetadata table if you use a PCP file, AllowRemoval:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa370344(v=vs.85).aspx
So there are some things you need to do during patch creation to make the patch uninstallable that are nothing to do with your WiX source. It's not clear from your question how you are creating the patch correctly.
Even if you get the patch generation working, there are some rules that must be followed, described here:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367850(v=vs.85).aspx
where it says (for example) that you can't change the component ids of any existing installed items. Create a verbose log when installing the patch and look for messages like SELMGR and entries saying removl of components is not supported, and if that has happened it means the patch will not apply correctly.
I have an application with several files that contain configuration parameters and other data that changes as the user uses the application. These files can change with newer versions of my software, but the user can also modify them (or they may be changed by the application itself). Basically, I'm looking for a solution to prevent the users' changes to these files from being overwritten but also a way to install the potentially updated files when the user upgrades my software.
With RPM on *NIX you could use the %config function to define a file as a configuration file and RPM would then rename the existing file (if it existed) and install the new one on an upgrade (maybe not ideal, but I could live with something like this for WiX).
I'd like to install my config files to a subdirectory or even a different name (e.g. default.cfg) and then use the <CopyFile> element in WiX to copy the files to their correct locations. This way, the default files would get removed on install and overwritten on an upgrade, but the actual user files would stay the same. Unfortunately with <CopyFile>, Windows Installer still wants to manage (and remove) the destination file.
I've also considered using the QtExec action in WixUtilExtension to basically do "copy default.cfg reallocation.cfg" but this wouldn't quite work and it is a bit of a hack.
What is the correct way to handle this?
My recommendation is usually to have the user editable content in a separate file and manage that via the application instead of the install. That also means the separate file is "user content" and should be left out of the install.
I've found trying to do migration of user data declaratively to be deceptively difficult. Trying to do it at setup time when you need to think through install, uninstall, repair, patching and rollback for all of those cases only makes it worse.
For example, what does the RPM behavior do on "repair". Copy the user data out of the way and replace it with a good file? That's probably correct 60% - 80% of the time. And uninstall, should the file be removed? That's tricky if the user is going to just upgrade to the next version.
Again, better to let them decide what to do with their tweaks to the configuration. IMHO.
I think there is no "clean" way to do this, because a msi project must be able to uninstall itself completely by design. I think the best way to solve this, is by using a custom action which executes a batch file and put your configfile update logic in that batch file. The custom action looks like this (only relevant parts):
<Directory Id="MYDIR" Name="MyDir">
<Component Id="update.cmd" Guid="YOUR-GUID">
<File Id="update.cmd" Name="update.cmd" KeyPath="yes"
Source="source\update.cmd" />
</Component>
</Directory>
<CustomAction Id='RunUpdate' Directory='MYDIR'
ExeCommand='[SystemFolder]cmd.exe /c update.cmd' Return='ignore'/>
<InstallExecuteSequence>
<Custom Action='RunUpdate' After='InstallFinalize'>NOT Installed</Custom>
</InstallExecuteSequence>