JobTracker - High memory and native thread usage - google-hadoop

Question

We are running hadoop on GCE with HDFS default file system, and data input/output from/to GCS.
Hadoop version: 1.2.1
Connector version: com.google.cloud.bigdataoss:gcs-connector:1.3.0-hadoop1
Observed behavior: JT will accumulate threads in waiting state, leading to OOM:
2015-02-06 14:15:51,206 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Job initialization failed:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:714)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.addWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:949)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.execute(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1371)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.util.AbstractGoogleAsyncWriteChannel.initialize(AbstractGoogleAsyncWriteChannel.java:318)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.gcsio.GoogleCloudStorageImpl.create(GoogleCloudStorageImpl.java:275)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.gcsio.CacheSupplementedGoogleCloudStorage.create(CacheSupplementedGoogleCloudStorage.java:145)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.gcsio.GoogleCloudStorageFileSystem.createInternal(GoogleCloudStorageFileSystem.java:184)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.gcsio.GoogleCloudStorageFileSystem.create(GoogleCloudStorageFileSystem.java:168)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.fs.gcs.GoogleHadoopOutputStream.<init>(GoogleHadoopOutputStream.java:77)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.fs.gcs.GoogleHadoopFileSystemBase.create(GoogleHadoopFileSystemBase.java:655)
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.create(FileSystem.java:564)
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.create(FileSystem.java:545)
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.create(FileSystem.java:452)
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.create(FileSystem.java:444)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobHistory$JobInfo.logSubmitted(JobHistory.java:1860)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress$3.run(JobInProgress.java:709)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:415)
at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1190)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.initTasks(JobInProgress.java:706)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.initJob(Jobenter code hereTracker.java:3890)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener$InitJob.run(EagerTaskInitializationListener.java:79)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
After looking through the JT logs I found these warnings:
2015-02-06 14:30:17,442 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Failed recovery attempt #0 from primary datanode xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50010
java.io.IOException: Call to /xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50020 failed on local exception: java.io.IOException: Couldn't set up IO streams
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:1150)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:1118)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:229)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy10.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.checkVersion(RPC.java:422)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:414)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:392)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createClientDatanodeProtocolProxy(DFSClient.java:201)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.processDatanodeError(DFSClient.java:3317)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$2200(DFSClient.java:2783)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClient.java:2987)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Couldn't set up IO streams
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:642)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$2200(Client.java:205)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:1249)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:1093)
... 9 more
Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:714)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:635)
... 12 more
This appears to be similar to hadoop bug reporter here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5606
I tried proposed solution by disabling saving job logs into the output path and it solved the problem at the expense of missing logs :)
I also ran jstack on JT and it showed hundreds of WAITING or TIMED_WAITING threads as such:
pool-52-thread-1" prio=10 tid=0x00007feaec581000 nid=0x524f in Object.wait() [0x00007fead39b3000]
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0x000000074d86ba60> (a java.io.PipedInputStream)
at java.io.PipedInputStream.read(PipedInputStream.java:327)
- locked <0x000000074d86ba60> (a java.io.PipedInputStream)
at java.io.PipedInputStream.read(PipedInputStream.java:378)
- locked <0x000000074d86ba60> (a java.io.PipedInputStream)
at com.google.api.client.util.ByteStreams.read(ByteStreams.java:181)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.media.MediaHttpUploader.setContentAndHeadersOnCurrentReque
st(MediaHttpUploader.java:629)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.media.MediaHttpUploader.resumableUpload(MediaHttpUploader.
java:409)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.media.MediaHttpUploader.upload(MediaHttpUploader.java:336)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.services.AbstractGoogleClientRequest.executeUnparsed(Abstr
actGoogleClientRequest.java:419)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.services.AbstractGoogleClientRequest.executeUnparsed(Abstr
actGoogleClientRequest.java:343)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.services.AbstractGoogleClientRequest.execute(AbstractGoogl
eClientRequest.java:460)
at com.google.cloud.hadoop.util.AbstractGoogleAsyncWriteChannel$UploadOperation.run(AbstractGo
ogleAsyncWriteChannel.java:354)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- <0x000000074d864918> (a java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker)
It appears JT is having hard time keeping up communicating with GCS via GCS Connector.
Please advise,
Thank you

Answer 1

At the moment, every open FSDataOutputStream in the GCS connector for Hadoop consumes a thread until it's closed, because a separate thread needs to run the "resumable" HttpRequests while the user of the OutputStream writes bytes intermittently. In most cases, (such as in individual Hadoop tasks), there's only ever one long-lived output stream, and possibly a few shorter-lived ones for writing small metadata/marker files, etc.
In general, there are two possible causes for the OOM you're running into:
You have lots of queued up jobs; every submitted job holds an unclosed OutputStream, and thus consumes a "waiting" thread. However, since you mention you only need to queue up ~10 jobs, this shouldn't be the root cause.
Something is causing a "leak" of the PrintWriter objects, originally created in logSubmitted and added to fileManager. Typically, terminal events (like logFinished will correctly close() all the PrintWriters before removing them from the map via markCompleted, but in theory they may be bugs here or there which can cause one of the OutputStreams to leak without being close()'d. For example, while I haven't had a chance to verify this assertion, it seems that IOException trying to do something like logMetaInfo will "removeWriter" without closing it.
I've verified that at least under normal circumstances, the OutputStream seem to get closed correctly, and my sample JobTracker shows a clean jstack after having successfully run a lot of jobs.
TL;DR: There are some working theories as to why some resource may leak and ultimately prevent necessary threads from being created. You should consider changing hadoop.job.history.user.location to some HDFS location in the meantime, as a way to preserve the job logs in the absence of placing them on GCS.