im trying to rewrite the following code:
W_WHERE := ' PD.NIF(+) = p.NIF and pd.num_colegiado(+) = p.num_colegiado AND PD.FECHA_INICIO(+) <= SYSDATE
AND NVL(PD.FECHA_FIN(+), SYSDATE) >= SYSDATE AND D.ID_DIRECCION(+) = PD.ID_DIRECCION AND p.num_colegiado = coleg.num_colegiado';
into normal JOIN notation, could anybody help me ?
PS. PD is for PERSONA_DIRECCION table and P is for PERSONA table
Explicit joins get their name from specifying explicitly what kind of join you use on the table (CROSS JOIN, INNER JOIN, LEFT OUTER JOIN etc.)
So you will have to re-write the query such that you replace the comma-separated tables in your FROM clause with explicit joins (INNER JOIN and LEFT JOIN here). Then move your join criteria to the ON clause in question:
select ...
from colleg
inner join p on p.num_colegiado = coleg.num_colegiado
left join pd on pd.nif = p.nif and
pd.num_colegiado = p.num_colegiado and
pd.fecha_inicio <= sysdate and
nvl(pd.fecha_fin, sysdate) >= sysdate
left join d on d.id_direccion = pd.id_direccion;
There is nothing implicit here. In Oracle, "(+) =" is a "normal JOIN notation" (as you said) for outer join. If you don't want outer join, just remove the (+).
See this SO answer for the explanation.
Related
I'm new to SQL and I'm not certain why I am getting this error. I am trying to left join a sub-query to another query in sql developer.
This is the first query,
SELECT DISTINCT
tl.species,
ag.age
FROM
age_list ag,
tree_list tl
WHERE
ag.tree_id = tl.tree_id
And then the sub-query I would like to left join where the tree_id = tree_number is,
SELECT DISTINCT
sl.tree_spon,
sl.tree_number
FROM spon_list sl
WHERE
sl.tree_spon < 10
When trying to do this I've tried to use,
SELECT DISTINCT
tl.species,
ag.age,
q1.tree_spon
FROM
age_list ag,
tree_list tl
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT
sl.tree_spon,
sl.tree_number
FROM spon_list sl
WHERE sl.tree_spon < 10) q1 on q1.tree_number = tree_list.tree_id
WHERE
ag.tree_id = tl.tree_id
Whatever I change in terms of the alias' for the columns and tables I always get the error, "ORA-00904: invalid identifier error", and that "tree_list.tree_id is invalid identifier", though separately the queries run fine.
Can anyone help, is it an issue with both queries joining on the tl.tree_id?
You can use the ANSI join syntax throughout (rather than mixing in legacy comma joins), joining on ag.tree_id = sl.tree_number (or tl.tree_id = sl.tree_number but they're both equal given the previous join) and putting the filter on sl.tree_spon < 10 into the ON clause as well:
SELECT DISTINCT
tl.species,
ag.age,
sl.tree_spon,
sl.tree_number
FROM age_list ag
INNER JOIN tree_list tl
ON (ag.tree_id = tl.tree_id)
LEFT OUTER JOIN spon_list sl
ON (ag.tree_id = sl.tree_number AND sl.tree_spon < 10)
Change tree_list.tree_id to tl.tree_id
I would like to know how I can do operations between a column and a subquery, what I want to do is add to the field Subtotal what was obtained in the subquery Impuestos, the following is the query that I am using for this case.
Select
RC.PURCHID;
LRC.VALUEMST as 'Subtotal',
isnull((
select sum((CONVERT(float, TD1.taxvalue)/100)*LRC1.VALUEMST ) as a
FROM TAXONITEM TOI1
inner join TAXDATA TD1 ON (TD1.TAXCODE = TOI1.TAXCODE and RC.DATAAREAID = TD1.DATAAREAID)
inner join TRANS LRC1 on (LRC1.VEND = RC.RECID)
WHERE TOI1.TAXITEMGROUP = PL.TAXITEMGROUP and RC.DATAAREAID = TOI1.DATAAREAID
), 0) Impuestos
from VEND RC
inner join VENDTABLE VTB on VTB.ACCOUNTNUM = RC.INVOICEACCOUNT
inner join TRANS LRC on (LRC.VEND = RC.RECID)
inner join PURCHLINE PL on (PL.LINENUMBER =LRC.LINENUM and PL.PURCHID =RC.PURCHID)
where year (RC.DELIVERYDATE) =2021 and RC.PURCHASETYPE =3 order by RC.PURCHID;
Hope someone can give me some guidance when doing operations with subqueries.
A few disjointed facts that may help:
When a SELECT statement returns only one row with one column, you can enclose that statement in parenthesis and use it as a plain value. In your case, let's say that select sum(......= TOI1.DATAAREAID returns 500. Then, your outer select's second column is equivalent to isnull(500,0)
You mention in your question "subquery Impuestos". Keep in mind that, although you indeed used a subquery as we mentioned earlier, by the time it was enclosed in parentheses it is not treated as a subquery (more accurately: derived table), but as a value. Thus, the "Impuestos" is only a column alias at this point
I dislike and avoid subqueries before the from, makes things much harder to read. Here is a solution with apply which will keep your code mostly intact:
Select
RC.PURCHID,
LRC.VALUEMST as 'Subtotal',
isnull(subquery1.a, 0) as Impuestos
from VEND RC
inner join VENDTABLE VTB on VTB.ACCOUNTNUM = RC.INVOICEACCOUNT
inner join TRANS LRC on (LRC.VEND = RC.RECID)
inner join PURCHLINE PL on (PL.LINENUMBER =LRC.LINENUM and PL.PURCHID =RC.PURCHID)
outer apply
(
select sum((CONVERT(float, TD1.taxvalue)/100)*LRC1.VALUEMST ) as a
FROM TAXONITEM TOI1
inner join TAXDATA TD1 ON (TD1.TAXCODE = TOI1.TAXCODE and RC.DATAAREAID = TD1.DATAAREAID)
inner join TRANS LRC1 on (LRC1.VEND = RC.RECID)
WHERE TOI1.TAXITEMGROUP = PL.TAXITEMGROUP and RC.DATAAREAID = TOI1.DATAAREAID
) as subquery1
where year (RC.DELIVERYDATE) =2021 and RC.PURCHASETYPE =3 order by RC.PURCHID;
I need to cross join two tables but the joining conditions are:
Select FutureInventory.Item,
To_Number(Concat(Location, Channel_Id)) Location,
From V_CUST_FUTURE_INV_POSITION FutureInventory,
xx_Item_Loc_Info_V ItemLoc
Where FutureInventory.Item(+) = ItemLoc.Item
And To_Number(Concat(Location, Channel_Id))(+) = ItemLoc.Loc;
I want to outer join the column To_Number(Concat(Location, Channel_Id)) with ItemLoc.Loc
where to put the (+) sign
First, use explicit join syntax - the old (+) is hard to read and easy to get wrong. Second, use the || operator instead of the CONCAT function - again, easier to read. So we end up with
Select FutureInventory.Item,
To_Number(Location || Channel_Id) Location,
From xx_Item_Loc_Info_V ItemLoc
LEFT OUTER JOIN V_CUST_FUTURE_INV_POSITION FutureInventory,
ON FutureInventory.Item = ItemLoc.Item And
To_Number(Location || Channel_Id) = ItemLoc.Loc
To do an outer join in Oracle, you use the appropriate JOIN type -- just as in all other databases. I think the logic you want is:
select FutureInventory.Item,
To_Number(Concat(Location, Channel_Id)) as Location,
from xx_Item_Loc_Info_V ItemLoc LEFT JOIN
V_CUST_FUTURE_INV_POSITION FutureInventory,
on FutureInventory.Item = ItemLoc.Item AND
To_Number(Concat(Location, Channel_Id)) = ItemLoc.Loc;
I have encountered very strange behavior of my query and I wasted a lot of time to understand what causes it, in vane. So I am asking for your help.
SELECT count(*) FROM main_table
LEFT JOIN front_table ON front_table.pk = main_table.fk_front_table
LEFT JOIN info_table ON info_table.pk = front_table.fk_info_table
LEFT JOIN key_table ON key_table.pk = COALESCE(info_table.fk_key_table, front_table.fk_key_table_1, front_table.fk_key_table_2)
LEFT JOIN side_table ON side_table.fk_front_table = front_table.pk
WHERE side_table.pk = (SELECT MAX(pk) FROM side_table WHERE fk_front_table = front_table.pk)
OR side_table.pk IS NULL
Seems like a simple join query, with coalesce, I've used this technique before(not too many times) and it worked right.
In this query I don't ever get nulls for side_table.pk. If I remove coalesce or just don't use key_table, then the query returns rows with many null side_table.pk, but if I add coalesce join, I can't get those nulls.
It seems key_table and side_table don't have anything in common, but the result is so weird.
Also, when I don't use side_table and WHERE clause, the count(*) result with coalesce and without differs, but I can't see any pattern in rows missing, it seems random!
Real query:
SELECT ECHANGE.EXC_AUTO_KEY, STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STR_AUTO_KEY FROM EXCHANGE
LEFT JOIN WO_BOM ON WO_BOM.WOB_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.WOB_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN VIEW_WO_SUB ON VIEW_WO_SUB.WOO_AUTO_KEY = WO_BOM.WOO_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN STOCK stock3 ON stock3.STM_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.STM_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN STOCK stock2 ON stock2.STM_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.ORIG_STM
LEFT JOIN CONSIGNMENT_CODES con2 ON con2.CNC_AUTO_KEY = stock2.CNC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN CONSIGNMENT_CODES con3 ON con3.CNC_AUTO_KEY = stock3.CNC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN CI_UTL ON CI_UTL.CUT_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.CUT_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN PART_CONDITION_CODES pcc2 ON pcc2.PCC_AUTO_KEY = stock2.PCC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN PART_CONDITION_CODES pcc3 ON pcc3.PCC_AUTO_KEY = stock3.PCC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN STOCK_RESERVATIONS ON STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STM_AUTO_KEY = stock3.STM_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN WAREHOUSE wh2 ON wh2.WHS_AUTO_KEY = stock2.WHS_ORIGINAL
LEFT JOIN SM_HISTORY ON (SM_HISTORY.STM_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.ORIG_STM AND SM_HISTORY.WOB_REF = EXCHANGE.WOB_AUTO_KEY)
LEFT JOIN RC_DETAIL ON stock3.RCD_AUTO_KEY = RC_DETAIL.RCD_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN RC_HEADER ON RC_HEADER.RCH_AUTO_KEY = RC_DETAIL.RCH_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN WAREHOUSE wh3 ON wh3.WHS_AUTO_KEY = COALESCE(RC_DETAIL.WHS_AUTO_KEY, stock3.WHS_ORIGINAL, stock3.WHS_AUTO_KEY)
WHERE STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STR_AUTO_KEY = (SELECT MAX(STR_AUTO_KEY) FROM STOCK_RESERVATIONS WHERE STM_AUTO_KEY = stock3.STM_AUTO_KEY)
OR STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STR_AUTO_KEY IS NULL
Removing LEFT JOIN WAREHOUSE wh3 gives me about unique EXC_AUTO_KEY values with a lot of NULL STR_AUTO_KEY, while leaving this row removes all NULL STR_AUTO_KEY.
I recreated simple tables with numbers with the same structure and query works without any problems o.0
I have a feeling COALESCE is acting as a REQUIRED flag for the joined table, hence shooting the LEFT JOIN to become an INNER JOIN.
Try this:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM main_table
LEFT JOIN front_table ON front_table.pk = main_table.fk_front_table
LEFT JOIN info_table ON info_table.pk = front_table.fk_info_table
LEFT JOIN key_table ON key_table.pk = NVL(info_table.fk_key_table, NVL(front_table.fk_key_table_1, front_table.fk_key_table_2))
LEFT JOIN (SELECT fk_, MAX(pk) as pk FROM side_table GROUP BY fk_) st ON st.fk_ = front_table.pk
NVL might behave just the same though...
I undertood what was the problem (not entirely though): there is a LEFT JOIN VIEW_WO_SUB in original query, 3rd line. It causes this query to act in a weird way.
When I replaced the view with the other table which contained the information I needed, the query started returning right results.
Basically, with this view join, NVL, COALESCE or CASE join with combination of certain arguments did not work along with OR clause in WHERE subquery, all rest was fine. ALthough, I could get the query to work with this view join, by changing the order of joined tables, I had to place table participating in where subquery to the bottom.
I'm trying to pass this query to inner join, but it does not know how?
This is the query I want to use InnerJoin with these values where
SELECT
ticket.id_ticket,
ticket.id_rede,
historico.id_historico,
historico.id_ticket,
centro.id_centro,
eqpto.id_eqpto,
eqpto.nome,
centro.sigla_centro,
interface.id_interface,
interface.id_eqpto,
interface.desig,
tecnologia.descricao,
interface.id_tecnologia,
tecnologia.id_tecnologia,
eqpto.id_centro,
eqpto.id_rede
FROM
app_gpa_ticket.ticket,
app_gpa_ticket.historico,
dados_v3.centro,
dados_v3.eqpto,
dados_v3.interface,
dados_v3.tecnologia
WHERE
ticket.id_ticket = historico.id_ticket AND
centro.id_centro = eqpto.id_centro AND
eqpto.id_eqpto = interface.id_eqpto AND
eqpto.id_rede = ticket.id_rede AND
tecnologia.id_tecnologia = interface.id_tecnologia;
Thank you!
I think you are trying to go to the standard (explicit) syntax. What you need to do is take what would be your JOIN operators in the WHERE clause and move them near the table itself. What you need to know is what tables on the left (Before the INNER JOIN operator you are joining to the right (After the INNER JOIN operator)
SELECT
ticket.id_ticket,
ticket.id_rede,
historico.id_historico,
historico.id_ticket,
centro.id_centro,
eqpto.id_eqpto,
eqpto.nome,
centro.sigla_centro,
interface.id_interface,
interface.id_eqpto,
interface.desig,
tecnologia.descricao,
interface.id_tecnologia,
tecnologia.id_tecnologia,
eqpto.id_centro,
eqpto.id_rede
FROM app_gpa_ticket.ticket
INNER JOIN app_gpa_ticket.historico ON ticket.id_ticket = historico.id_ticket
INNER JOIN dados_v3.eqpto ON eqpto.id_rede = ticket.id_rede
INNER JOIN dados_v3.interface ON eqpto.id_eqpto = interface.id_eqpto
INNER JOIN dados_v3.centro ON centro.id_centro = eqpto.id_centro
INNER JOIN dados_v3.tecnologia ON tecnologia.id_tecnologia = interface.id_tecnologia