I am currently trying to use LibUSB to directly access the firmware controller on a USB device. How do I directly download firmware off a USB device so it can be modified later (using either the SCSI commands or the LibUSB library)?
The closest thing you'll find to a standard here is the USB Device Firmware Update (or "DFU") protocol. However, there are a number of major caveats:
Most USB devices do not have updatable firmware at all. The majority of devices have their functionality fully defined in hardware, or in mask ROM.
Of the devices that do have updatable firmware, most do not use USB DFU to do so.
Even of the few devices that do support USB DFU, most do not support the "UPLOAD" command to retrieve firmware from a device. (It serves very little purpose in most devices.)
If you run into one of the rare devices that does fully support DFU, you may be able to interact with it using dfu-util. However, this is very unlikely.
Related
For testing purposes I need to power off a USB device from my computer programmatically. The microprocessor in the USB device is ARM Cortex M4.
I have tried using Devcon, although the device was disabled, power was still provided to the device.
I have also tried to disable the USB root hubs ,that also didn't work.
I have read some other posts indicating that a SSR could be used, this option is not desired. I would rather choose the software solution(if there is one of course).
Some other answers have indicated that this is an OS issue, and some others a chip-set architecture issue.
So my question is what options are there available. And also is this purely something dependent on the computer side or do we need to implement something on the USB device side as well.
Thank you in advance.
How is it possible to determine the commands to operate a usb device, if that device comes from another operating system and traffic monitoring software cannot be installed on that OS. The only method i can think of is sending random commands to the device, until the device responds, but this seems implausible for more complex commands, and potentially dangerous. For example, consider the DualShock 4 controller. Sony has not made an official driver for this device, so what method can i use to create a linux driver for it?
Get a hardware protocol analyzer. Then you won't need to install any software on the host or device under test. Here is one that I have used:
http://www.totalphase.com/products/beagle-usb12/
I am looking forward to implement some file operations on a USB device which will be plugged into a microcontroller-based bench-top device. The device does not have any OS/RTOS and only runs on a firmware code that I plan to develop.
The firmware will have all the necessary functionalities (UART, timer, SPI, I2C, external memory controller etc) that an embedded device usually has.
My questions are:
Can the libusb library be incorporated into the firmware that I plan to develop?
Does the libusb work in non-operating system based environment? Or will I have to choose an OS that I can port onto the microcontroller and then use the libusb library in user space?
libusb is currently only supported on Linux, OS X, Windows, Windows CE, Android, and OpenBSD/NetBSD. So yes, it does require an underlying OS. Unless your microcontroller is an ARM that can run Linux, it would not be possible to run libusb without porting the low-level code to your microcontroller hardware and making it work without an OS which would be a huge amount of work.
If you have a microcontroller with USB capability, it is very likely the manufacturer already has a library to access the USB functionality, and/or there are third-party libraries available.
I have been tasked with writing a USB driver for our embedded software to send raw data to Host. This will be used to send some logging data to host. We are using iMX31 litekit for development.
From the documents that I have read on USB, my understanding is that the embedded device will be in device mode only. Also it will only be communicating with host machine.
So can any one guide me here? Any article, reference or code is welcome.
Some things to consider:
Is this a high bandwidth device like a camera or data recorder, or a low bandwidth device?
For low bandwidth, I would strongly consider making your device act as a USB HID class. This is the device class that supports keyboards, mice, joysticks, gamepads, and the like. It is relatively easy to send data to nearly any application, and it generally doesn't require that you write a custom device driver on the host side. That latter feature alone is often worth the cost of lightly contorting your data into the shape assumed by the HID class. All the desktop operating systems that do USB can use HID devices, so you get broad compatibility fairly easily.
For high bandwidth, you would still be better served if your device fits one of the well established device classes, where a stock device driver on the host end of the wire can be used. One approach that often works is to use the Mass Storage class, and emulate a disk drive containing one file. Then, your device simply mounts on the host as if it were a disk, and you communicate by reading and writing to one (or a few) file.
I would expect there to be a fair amount of sample code out there for any serious USB device chipset that implements either or both of HID and Mass Storage.
If you really must wander into fully custom device territory, then you will need to be building device drivers for each host platform. The open source libusb library can be of some help, if its license is compatible with your project. There are also ways in newer versions of Windows to develop USB drivers that run in user mode using the User Mode Driver Framework that have many of the same advantages of libusb, but are not portable off the Windows platform.
The last custom device I worked on was based on a Cypress device, and we were able to ship their driver and an associated DLL to make our application code easier to build. I don't know off the cuff if there is any equivalent available for your device.
For a really good overview, I recommend the USB FAQ, and the latest edition of Jan's book, USB Complete.
The rest of my team will make for my application a simple non-standard USB microphone, but until they finish it I will have to emulate it, for integration testing purposes.
Is there any risk in a physical loopback? Yes there is
Will a physical loopback work? Only with a USB bridge
There is any way to create a logical loopback? (MSDN has something about this)
There is any general purpose USB emulator software?
In case there is many options available I'd rather work it .NET/Matlab/Python solutions.
Edit: Proof of concept here
I strongly recommend this project, USB IP. It is a way of connecting USB devices over the network. There is a Windows client.
What this means is, you install the client on your Windows computer.
This device then expects to talk to a USB device connected to a Linux computer, the server:
What you now do, is either create a fake device driver for Linux, that looks like is connected to a physical USB device, but in reality is just logic pretending to be your USB device. There are tutorials for writing USB drivers for Linux. Or you create your own stub driver for the Device Control Manager (see picture above). This stub driver could run on Windows or Linux, it wouldn't matter. It could even run on the same Windows machine which is the USB client.
The DSF USB Loopback Device mentioned in the question itself, would be the same kind of solution as a stub driver for the Device Control Manager, but taking Linux out of the picture altogether.
You can write virtual USB device using QEMU.
You can duplicate already existing device, like the dev-serial.c found in this QEMU repository and change it for your needs.
After you write and compile your USB device you can simply attach it to your VM using the QEMU command line interface.