I have some custom logging in my plugin and want to include the contents of my tracingService in my custom logging (which is called within a catch block, before the plugin finishes).
I cant seem to access the content of tracingService. I wonder if it is accessible at all?
I tried tracingService.ToString() just incase the devs had provided a useful overload, alas as expected I get name of the class "Microsoft.Crm.Sandbox.SandboxTracingService".
Obviously Dynamics CRM makes use of the tracingService content towards the end of the pipeline if it needs to.
Anybody have any ideas on this?
Kind Regards,
Gary
The tracing service does not provide access to the trace text during execution but that can be overcome by creating your own implementation of ITracingService. Note, you cannot get any text that was written to the trace log prior to the Execute method of your plugin being called - meaning if you have multiple plugins firing you won't get their trace output in the plugin that throws the exception.
public class CrmTracing : ITracingService
{
ITracingService _tracingService;
StringBuilder _internalTrace;
public CrmTracing(ITracingService tracingService)
{
_tracingService = tracingService;
_internalTrace = new StringBuilder();
}
public void Trace(string format, params object[] args)
{
if (_tracingService != null) _tracingService.Trace(format, args);
_internalTrace.AppendFormat(format, args).AppendLine();
}
public string GetTraceBuffer()
{
return _internalTrace.ToString();
}
}
Just instantiate it in your plugin passing in the CRM provided ITracingService. Since it is the same interface it works the same if you pass it to other classes and methods.
public class MyPlugin : IPlugin
{
public void Execute(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
var tracingService = new CrmTracing((ITracingService)serviceProvider.GetService(typeof(ITracingService)));
tracingService.Trace("Works same as always.");
var trace = tracingService.GetTraceBuffer();
}
}
To get the traceInfo string from traceService at runtime I used debugger to interrogate the tracingService contents.
So the trace string is accessible from these expressions...
for Plugins
((Microsoft.Crm.Extensibility.PipelineTracingService)(tracingService)).TraceInfo
for CWA
((Microsoft.Crm.Workflow.WorkflowTracingService)(tracingService)).TraceInfo
You can drill into the tracing service by debugging and extract the expression.
However, at design time neither of these expressions seem to be accessible from any of the standard CRM 2011 SDK dlls... so not sure if its possible as yet.
Related
I've written an Xtext-based plugin for some language. I'm now interested in creating a new independent view (as a separate plugin, though it requires my first plugin), which will interact with the currently-active DSL document - and specifically, interact with the model Xtext parsed (I think it's called the Ecore model?). How do I approach this?
I saw I can get an instance of XtextEditor if I do something like this when initializing my view:
getSite().getPage().addPartListener(new MyListener());
And then, in MyListener, override partActivated and partInputChanged to get an IWorkbenchPartReference, which is a reference to the XtextEditor. But what do I do from here? Is this even the right approach to this problem? Should I instead use some notification functionality from the Xtext side?
Found it out! First, you need an actual document:
IXtextDocument doc = editor.getDocument();
Then, if you want to access the model:
doc.modify(new IUnitOfWork.Void<XtextResource>() { // Can also use just IUnitOfWork
#Override public void process(XtextResource state) throws Exception {
...
}
});
And if you want to get live updates whenever it changes:
doc.addModelListener(new IXtextModelListener() {
#Override public void modelChanged(XtextResource resource) {
for (EObject model : resource.getContent()) {
...
}
}
});
I have the following bootstrap
public class NancyBootStrapper: DefaultNancyBootstrapper
{
protected override void ConfigureRequestContainer(TinyIoC.TinyIoCContainer container, NancyContext context)
{
base.ConfigureRequestContainer(container, context);
var ravenSession = container.Resolve< IRavenSessionProvider >().GetSession();
container.Register( ravenSession );
}
}
When my Nancy app tries to instantiate BlogService using the following constructor
public BlogService(IDocumentSession documentSession)
{
this.documentSession = documentSession;
}
the application blows up stating that it can't resolve document session, I have also tried the following within my test method (removing the constructor injection).
public void BuildCategories()
{
var container = TinyIoCContainer.Current;
documentSession = container.Resolve< IDocumentSession >();
documentSession.Store(new Category{Title = "test"});
documentSession.Store(new Category{Title = ".net"});
documentSession.SaveChanges();
}
This also blows up, pointing out that it can't resolve documentSession.
Now this is the first time I have used either NancyFX or TinyIoC so I could be doing something fundamentally wrong though I should mention that the documentSession does resolve within a Nancy module..
Can any one offer a fix or some suggestions?
When is the BlogService supposed to be instantiated? -My guess would be once for the application, in which case I believe you are registering the session in the wrong bootstrapper method, and should do it in ConfigureApplicationContainer.
I've been playing & digging into both NancyFx and the TinyIoC code bases and have figured out how to fix this issue... I don't like the fix... but hay it works :)
Basically, I am creating a RavenDB document session in the bootstrapper method configureRequestContainer as it is best practice to use the request as your unit of work scope.
Unfortunately anything that is auto wired by tinyIoC within configureApplicationContainer does not have any constructor injection performed using the child container being used by the Nancy request (this includes those that are marked as MultiInstance or as PerRequestSingleton.
To get around this, you need to re-register any components that depend on your per request components within the same child container.
As I said, I don't like the fix, but it is ultimately a fix :)
My silverlight solution has 3 project files
Silverlight part(Client)
Web part(Server)
Entity model(I maintained the edmx along with Metadata in a seperate project)
Metadata file is a partial class with relavent dataannotation validations.
[MetadataTypeAttribute(typeof(User.UserMetadata))]
public partial class User
{
[CustomValidation(typeof(UsernameValidator), "IsUsernameAvailable")]
public string UserName { get; set; }
}
Now my question is where I need to keep this class UsernameValidator
If my Metadata class and edmx are on Server side(Web) then I know I need to create a .shared.cs class in my web project, then add the proper static method.
My IsUserAvailable method intern will call a domainservice method as part of asyc validation.
[Invoke]
public bool IsUsernameAvailable(string username)
{
return !Membership.FindUsersByName(username).Cast<MembershipUser>().Any();
}
If my metadata class is in the same project as my domain service is in then I can call domain service method from my UsernameValidator.Shared.cs class.
But here my entity models and Metadata are in seperate library.
Any idea will be appreciated
Jeff wonderfully explained the asyc validation here
http://jeffhandley.com/archive/2010/05/26/asyncvalidation-again.aspx
but that will work only when your model, metadata and Shared class, all are on server side.
There is a kind of hack to do this. It is not a clean way to do it it, but this is how it would probably work.
Because the .shared takes care of the code generation it doesn't complain about certain compile errors in the #if brackets of the code. So what you can do is create a Validator.Shared.cs in any project and just make sure it generates to the silverlight side.
Add the following code. and dont forget the namespaces.
#if SILVERLIGHT
using WebProject.Web.Services;
using System.ServiceModel.DomainServices.Client;
#endif
#if SILVERLIGHT
UserContext context = new UserContext();
InvokeOperation<bool> availability = context.DoesUserExist(username);
//code ommited. use what logic you want, maybe Jeffs post.
#endif
The compiler will ignore this code part because it does not meet the condition of the if statement. Meanwhile on the silverlight client side it tries to recompile the shared validator where it DOES meet the condition of the if-statement.
Like I said. This is NOT a clean way to do this. And you might have trouble with missing namespaces. You need to resolve them in the non-generated Validator.shared.cs to finally let it work in silverlight. If you do this right you can have the validation in silverlight with invoke operations. But not in your project with models and metadata like you would have with Jeff's post.
Edit: I found a cleaner and better way
you can create a partial class on the silverlight client side and doing the following
public partial class User
{
partial void OnUserNameChanging(string value)
{
//must be new to check for this validation rule
if(EntityState == EntityState.New)
{
var ctx = new UserContext();
ctx.IsValidUserName(value).Completed += (s, args) =>
{
InvokeOperation invop = (InvokeOperation) s;
bool isValid = (bool) invop.Value;
if(!isValid)
{
ValidationResult error = new ValidationResult(
"Username already exists",
new string[] {"UserName"});
ValidationErrors.Add(error;
}
};
}
}
}
This is a method generated by WCF RIA Services and can be easily partialled and you can add out-of-band validation like this. This is a much cleaner way to do this, but still this validation now only exists in the silverlight client side.
Hope this helps
Here is the situation:
Silverlight 3 Application hits an asp.net hosted WCF service to get a list of items to display in a grid. Once the list is brought down to the client it is cached in IsolatedStorage. This is done by using the DataContractSerializer to serialize all of these objects to a stream which is then zipped and then encrypted. When the application is relaunched, it first loads from the cache (reversing the process above) and the deserializes the objects using the DataContractSerializer.ReadObject() method. All of this was working wonderfully under all scenarios until recently with the entire "load from cache" path (decrypt/unzip/deserialize) taking hundreds of milliseconds at most.
On some development machines but not all (all machines Windows 7) the deserialize process - that is the call to ReadObject(stream) takes several minutes an seems to lock up the entire machine BUT ONLY WHEN RUNNING IN THE DEBUGGER in VS2008. Running the Debug configuration code outside the debugger has no problem.
One thing that seems to look suspicious is that when you turn on stop on Exceptions, you can see that the ReadObject() throws many, many System.FormatException's indicating that a number was not in the correct format. When I turn off "Just My Code" thousands of these get dumped to the screen. None go unhandled. These occur both on the read back from the cache AND on a deserialization at the conclusion of a web service call to get the data from the WCF Service. HOWEVER, these same exceptions occur on my laptop development machine that does not experience the slowness at all. And FWIW, my laptop is really old and my desktop is a 4 core, 6GB RAM beast.
Again, no problems unless running under the debugger in VS2008. Anyone else seem this? Any thoughts?
Here is the bug report link: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/539609/very-slow-performance-deserializing-using-datacontractserializer-in-a-silverlight-application-only-in-debugger
EDIT: I now know where the FormatExceptions are coming from. It seems that they are "by design" - they occur when when I have doubles being serialized that are double.NaN so that that xml looks like NaN...It seems that the DCS tries to parse the value as a number, that fails with an exception and then it looks for "NaN" et. al. and handles them. My problem is not that this does not work...it does...it is just that it completely cripples the debugger. Does anyone know how to configure the debugger/vs2008sp1 to handle this more efficiently.
cartden,
You may want to consider switching over to XMLSerializer instead. Here is what I have determined over time:
The XMLSerializer and DataContractSerializer classes provides a simple means of serializing and deserializing object graphs to and from XML.
The key differences are:
1.
XMLSerializer has much smaller payload than DCS if you use [XmlAttribute] instead of [XmlElement]
DCS always store values as elements
2.
DCS is "opt-in" rather than "opt-out"
With DCS you explicitly mark what you want to serialize with [DataMember]
With DCS you can serialize any field or property, even if they are marked protected or private
With DCS you can use [IgnoreDataMember] to have the serializer ignore certain properties
With XMLSerializer public properties are serialized, and need setters to be deserialized
With XmlSerializer you can use [XmlIgnore] to have the serializer ignore public properties
3.
BE AWARE! DCS.ReadObject DOES NOT call constructors during deserialization
If you need to perform initialization, DCS supports the following callback hooks:
[OnDeserializing], [OnDeserialized], [OnSerializing], [OnSerialized]
(also useful for handling versioning issues)
If you want the ability to switch between the two serializers, you can use both sets of attributes simultaneously, as in:
[DataContract]
[XmlRoot]
public class ProfilePerson : NotifyPropertyChanges
{
[XmlAttribute]
[DataMember]
public string FirstName { get { return m_FirstName; } set { SetProperty(ref m_FirstName, value); } }
private string m_FirstName;
[XmlElement]
[DataMember]
public PersonLocation Location { get { return m_Location; } set { SetProperty(ref m_Location, value); } }
private PersonLocation m_Location = new PersonLocation(); // Should change over time
[XmlIgnore]
[IgnoreDataMember]
public Profile ParentProfile { get { return m_ParentProfile; } set { SetProperty(ref m_ParentProfile, value); } }
private Profile m_ParentProfile = null;
public ProfilePerson()
{
}
}
Also, check out my Serializer class that can switch between the two:
using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.Text;
using System.Xml;
using System.Xml.Serialization;
namespace ClassLibrary
{
// Instantiate this class to serialize objects using either XmlSerializer or DataContractSerializer
internal class Serializer
{
private readonly bool m_bDCS;
internal Serializer(bool bDCS)
{
m_bDCS = bDCS;
}
internal TT Deserialize<TT>(string input)
{
MemoryStream stream = new MemoryStream(input.ToByteArray());
if (m_bDCS)
{
DataContractSerializer dc = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(TT));
return (TT)dc.ReadObject(stream);
}
else
{
XmlSerializer xs = new XmlSerializer(typeof(TT));
return (TT)xs.Deserialize(stream);
}
}
internal string Serialize<TT>(object obj)
{
MemoryStream stream = new MemoryStream();
if (m_bDCS)
{
DataContractSerializer dc = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(TT));
dc.WriteObject(stream, obj);
}
else
{
XmlSerializer xs = new XmlSerializer(typeof(TT));
xs.Serialize(stream, obj);
}
// be aware that the Unicode Byte-Order Mark will be at the front of the string
return stream.ToArray().ToUtfString();
}
internal string SerializeToString<TT>(object obj)
{
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
XmlWriter xmlWriter = XmlWriter.Create(builder);
if (m_bDCS)
{
DataContractSerializer dc = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(TT));
dc.WriteObject(xmlWriter, obj);
}
else
{
XmlSerializer xs = new XmlSerializer(typeof(TT));
xs.Serialize(xmlWriter, obj);
}
string xml = builder.ToString();
xml = RegexHelper.ReplacePattern(xml, RegexHelper.WildcardToPattern("<?xml*>", WildcardSearch.Anywhere), string.Empty);
xml = RegexHelper.ReplacePattern(xml, RegexHelper.WildcardToPattern(" xmlns:*\"*\"", WildcardSearch.Anywhere), string.Empty);
xml = xml.Replace(Environment.NewLine + " ", string.Empty);
xml = xml.Replace(Environment.NewLine, string.Empty);
return xml;
}
}
}
This is a guess, but I think it is running slow in debug mode because for every exception, it is performing some actions to show the exception in the debug window, etc. If you are running in release mode, these extra steps are not taken.
I've never done this, so I really don't know id it would work, but have you tried just setting that one assembly to run in release mode while all others are set to debug? If I'm right, it may solve your problem. If I'm wrong, then you only waste 1 or 2 minutes.
About your debugging problem, have you tried to disable the exception assistant ? (Tools > Options > Debugging > Enable the exception assistant).
Another point should be the exception handling in Debug > Exceptions : you can disable the user-unhandled stuff for the CLR or only uncheck the System.FormatException exception.
Ok - I figured out the root issue. It was what I alluded to in the EDIT to the main question. The problem was that in the xml, it was correctly serializing doubles that had a value of double.NaN. I was using these values to indicate "na" for when the denominator was 0D. Example: ROE (Return on Equity = Net Income / Average Equity) when Average Equity is 0D would be serialized as:
<ROE>NaN</ROE>
When the DCS tried to de-serialize it, evidently it first tries to read the number and then catches the exception when that fails and then handles the NaN. The problem is that this seems to generate a lot of overhead when in DEBUG mode.
Solution: I changed the property to double? and set it to null instead of NaN. Everything now happens instantly in DEBUG mode now. Thanks to all for your help.
Try disabling some IE addons. In my case, the LastPass toolbar killed my Silverlight debugging. My computer would freeze for minutes each time I interacted with Visual Studio after a breakpoint.
I noticed in the protobuf-net changelog that IList<> was supported but I'm getting the "Cannot create an instance of an interface" exception. If I change to IEnumerable<> then life is good. Does this sound correct?
// Client call
public override IList<IApplicationWorkflow> Execute(IRoleManagement service)
{
IList<ApplicationWorkflowMessagePart> list = service.RetrieveWorkflows(roleNames);
IList<IApplicationWorkflow> workflows = new List<IApplicationWorkflow>(list.Count);
foreach (ApplicationWorkflowMessagePart a in list)
{
workflows.Add(new ApplicationWorkflowImpl(a));
}
return workflows;
}
// Service contract
[OperationContract, ProtoBehavior]
[ServiceKnownType(typeof (ServiceFault))]
[FaultContract(typeof (ServiceFault))]
IList<ApplicationWorkflowMessagePart> RetrieveWorkflows(string[] roleNames);
// Service implementation
public IList<ApplicationWorkflowMessagePart> RetrieveWorkflows(string[] roleNames)
{
IList<IApplicationWorkflow> workflows = manager.RetrieveApplicationWorkflows(roleNames);
IList<ApplicationWorkflowMessagePart> workflowParts = new List<ApplicationWorkflowMessagePart>();
if (workflows != null)
{
foreach (IApplicationWorkflow workflow in workflows)
{
workflowParts.Add(
ModelMediator.GetMessagePart<ApplicationWorkflowMessagePart, IApplicationWorkflow>(workflow));
}
}
return workflowParts;
}
Thanks,
Mike
Also, is there document site that has this and other answers? I hate to be asking newb questions. :)
Currently it will support IList<T> as a property, as long as it doesn't have to create it - i.e. allowing things like (attributes not shown for brevity):
class Order {
private IList<OrderLine> lines = new List<OrderLine>();
public IList<OrderLine> Lines {get {return lines;}}
}
I would have to check, but for similar reasons, I expect it would work with Merge, but not Deserialize (which is what the WCF hooks use). However, I can't think of a reason it couldn't default to List<T>... it just doesn't at the moment.
The simplest option is probably to stick with List<T> / T[] - but I can have a look if you want... but I'm in a "crunch" on a (work) project at the moment, so I can't lift the bonnet today.
Re "this and other answers"... there is a google group, but that is not just protobuf-net (protobuf-net is simply one of many "protocol buffers" implementations).
You are also free to log an issue on the project site. I do mean to collate the FAQs and add them to the wiki on the site - but time is not always my friend...
But hey! I'm here... ;-p