I am not satisfied with the scrolling behaviour in intellij for page up, page down. It doesn't feel right. It always feels as if I get out of the scope.
Is it possible to adjust the scroll size of page up, page down? Perhaps to half a page or similar.
I had taken #yole's answer and implemented all of the actions he had described in a separate plugin:
There is no way to control this through the settings. What you can do is write a plugin that performs scrolling in the way that you prefer. It's fairly easy: all you need to do is copy the existing
PageUpAction/PageDownAction classes and the methods they call
(EditorActionUtil.moveCaretPageUp/Down) to scroll by as much as you want.
This plugin implements new actions "Partial Page Up" and "Partial Page Down" which allow one to scroll a configurable size of screen definable in the usual IDEA settings dialog.
There's an installable version of the plugin in official JetBrains repository.
There is no way to control this through the settings. What you can do is write a plugin that performs scrolling in the way that you prefer. It's fairly easy: all you need to do is copy the existing PageUpAction/PageDownAction classes and the methods they call (EditorActionUtil.moveCaretPageUp/Down) to scroll by as much as you want.
Since many are inquiring about this, for mac users this can be controlled globally instead by instead scrolling on page up/down using karabiner application and adding the following complex rule:
{
"description": "mmm.karabiner.page.up.down.to.scroll",
"manipulators": [
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_if"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "page_up"
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": -51
}
}
],
"to_delayed_action": {
"to_if_invoked": [
{
"pointing_button": "button1"
}
]
},
"type": "basic"
},
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_unless"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "page_up"
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": -51
}
}
],
"type": "basic"
},
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_if"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "up_arrow",
"modifiers": {
"mandatory": [
"fn"
]
}
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": -51
}
}
],
"to_delayed_action": {
"to_if_invoked": [
{
"pointing_button": "button1"
}
]
},
"type": "basic"
},
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_unless"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "up_arrow",
"modifiers": {
"mandatory": [
"fn"
]
}
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": -51
}
}
],
"type": "basic"
},
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_if"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "page_down"
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": 51
}
}
],
"to_delayed_action": {
"to_if_invoked": [
{
"pointing_button": "button1"
}
]
},
"type": "basic"
},
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_unless"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "page_down"
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": 51
}
}
],
"type": "basic"
},
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_if"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "down_arrow",
"modifiers": {
"mandatory": [
"fn"
]
}
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": 51
}
}
],
"to_delayed_action": {
"to_if_invoked": [
{
"pointing_button": "button1"
}
]
},
"type": "basic"
},
{
"conditions": [
{
"bundle_identifiers": [
"^net.java.openjdk.cmd",
"^com.jetbrains.intellij"
],
"type": "frontmost_application_unless"
}
],
"from": {
"key_code": "down_arrow",
"modifiers": {
"mandatory": [
"fn"
]
}
},
"to": [
{
"mouse_key": {
"vertical_wheel": 51
}
}
],
"type": "basic"
}
]
},
Also do note, to get smooth scrolling, consider down loading Mos application and adjust the preferences if desired.
https://mos.caldis.me/
This might have other consequences on your Mac so you might need to have to adjust other things since your page_up/down is no longer a page_up/down but mouse scrolls instead.
Related
We are currently using GA4 data API and faced the issue when custom dimensions returns value "(not set)".
We were using the following article to set custom dimension for the session count, but we still receiving "(not set)" values.
Example of request:
{
"dateRanges": [
{
"startDate": "2021-09-01",
"endDate": "2021-09-05"
}
],
"offset": 0,
"limit": 100,
"dimensionFilter": {
"filter": {
"fieldName": "eventName",
"stringFilter": {
"matchType": 1,
"value": "screen_view",
"caseSensitive": true
}
}
},
"dimensions": [
{
"name": "customUser:applicationID"
},
{
"name": "customEvent:ga_session_number"
},
{
"name": "dateHour"
},
{
"name": "platform"
},
{
"name": "sessionSource"
},
{
"name": "sessionMedium"
},
{
"name": "sessionCampaignName"
},
{
"name": "deviceCategory"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"name": "userEngagementDuration"
}
]
}
Does anybody have any idea why it may happen?
I'm creating EMR cluster from Step Functions using below code,
"spinning_emr_cluster": {
"Type": "Task",
"Resource": "arn:aws:states:::elasticmapreduce:createCluster.sync",
"Parameters": {
"Name": "CombineFiles",
"VisibleToAllUsers": true,
"ReleaseLabel": "emr-5.29.0",
"Applications": [
{
"Name": "Spark"
}
],
"ServiceRole": "EMR_DefaultRole",
"JobFlowRole": "EMR_EC2_DefaultRole",
"LogUri": "s3://awsmssqltos3/emr_logs/",
"Instances": {
"KeepJobFlowAliveWhenNoSteps": true,
"InstanceFleets": [
{
"Name": "Master",
"InstanceFleetType": "MASTER",
"TargetOnDemandCapacity": 1,
"InstanceTypeConfigs": [
{
"InstanceType": "m1.large"
}
]
},
{
"Name": "Slave",
"InstanceFleetType": "CORE",
"TargetOnDemandCapacity": 1,
"InstanceTypeConfigs": [
{
"InstanceType": "m1.large"
}
]
}
]
}
},
"ResultPath": "$.CreateClusterResult",
"Next": "lambda"
I want to add bootstrap actions while creating the cluster from AWS Step Functions. I have tried searching online but could not find any syntax for that.
"BootstrapActions": [
{
"Name": "CustomBootStrapAction",
"ScriptBootstrapAction": {
"Path": "",
"Args": []
}
}
]
Please Add above code inside Parameters Block.
Problem with using mapObject function properly.
Trying to retain existing array structure but calculate number of vehicles and properties and update the existing array that contains the value.
GENERAL data comes from one source, VEHICLE data comes from another source, PROPERTY data comes from another source. So when merging, I have to update GENERAL data with count of other source data.
Also GENERAL is an array object, it will always have 1. So using GENERAL[0] is safe and fine.
Original Payload
[
{
"commId": "1",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "TODO",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V1-1"
},
{
"ID": "V1-2"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P1-1"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "2",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "TODO",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V2-1"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P2-1"
},
{
"ID": "P2-2"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "3",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "TODO",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V3-1"
},
{
"ID": "V3-2"
},
{
"ID": "V3-3"
}
]
}
]
Tried using map to loop through the payload and tried modifying 2 attribute but only managed to map one but even that is showing wrong output.
test map (item, index) -> {
(item.GENERAL[0] mapObject (value, key) -> {
(key): (value == sizeOf (item.VEHICLE)
when (key as :string) == "VEHICLE_COUNT"
otherwise value)
})
}
Expected output:
[
{
"commId": "1",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "2",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "1"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V1-1"
},
{
"ID": "V1-2"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P1-1"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "2",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "1",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "2"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V2-1"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P2-1"
},
{
"ID": "P2-2"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "3",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "3",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "0"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V3-1"
},
{
"ID": "V3-2"
},
{
"ID": "V3-3"
}
]
}
]
Getting totally wrong output so far:
[
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": false,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
},
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": false,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
},
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": false,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
]
Edited: Update for dynamic transform
The below dataweave transform is not particularly attractive, but it might work for you.
Thanks to Christian Chibana for helping me find a dynmaic answer by answering this question: Why does Mule DataWeave array map strip top level objects?
%dw 1.0
%output application/json
---
payload map ((item) ->
(item - "GENERAL") ++
GENERAL: item.GENERAL map (
$ - "VEHICLE_COUNT"
- "PROPERTY_COUNT"
++ { VEHICLE_COUNT: sizeOf (item.VEHICLE default []) }
++ { PROPERTY_COUNT: sizeOf (item.PROPERTY default []) }
)
)
It is dynamic, so everything should be copied across as it comes in, with only the two fields you want being updated.
The output for this transform with the input you supplied is below. Only difference from your desired is that the counts are shown as numbers rather than strings. If you really need them as strings you can cast them like (sizeOf (comm.VEHICLE default [])) as :string,
[
{
"commId": "1",
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V1-1"
},
{
"ID": "V1-2"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P1-1"
}
],
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": 2,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": 1
}
]
},
{
"commId": "2",
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V2-1"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P2-1"
},
{
"ID": "P2-2"
}
],
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": 1,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": 2
}
]
},
{
"commId": "3",
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V3-1"
},
{
"ID": "V3-2"
},
{
"ID": "V3-3"
}
],
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": 3,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": 0
}
]
}
]
I'm trying to create a new spreadsheet using spreadsheets#create, with specified row groups.
In the API Explorer, I am entering in the JSON below. which corresponds to the following appearance:
No errors are flagged or returned when I execute the call, but when the sheet is created, the specified grouping is not created - only the values are set.
{ "properties": {
"title": "Test Spreadsheet",
"locale": "en"
},
"sheets": [
{ "properties": {"title": "Test1"},
"data": [
{
"startRow": 0,
"startColumn": 0,
"rowData": [
{ "values": [
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "Top1" } }
]
},
{ "values": [
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "Top2" } }
]
},
{ "values": [
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "" } },
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "Top2A" } }
]
},
{ "values": [
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "" } },
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "Top2B" } }
]
},
{ "values": [
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "" } },
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "Top2C" } }
]
},
{ "values": [
{ "userEnteredValue": { "stringValue": "Top3" } }
]
}
]
}
],
"rowGroups": [
{ "range": {
"dimension": "ROWS",
"startIndex": 2,
"endIndex": 5
}
}
]
}
]
}
Even when I create the rowGroups JSON directly on the page, with its structured editor to make sure it is properly defined, the created spreadsheet still doesn't group the specified rows. I have triple-checked all my objects from the top down, and can't see what I am doing wrong.
I try to add service worker to my project after updating to angular 5 and have some problems. I add imports to app.module.ts:
import {ServiceWorkerModule} from '#angular/service-worker';
import {environment} from '../environments/environment';
...
environment.production ? ServiceWorkerModule.register('/ngsw-worker.js') : [],
execute $ ng set apps.0.serviceWorker=true to allow service workers in project
generate config:
{
"index": "/index.html",
"assetGroups": [
{
"name": "app",
"installMode": "prefetch",
"resources": {
"files": [
"/index.html"
],
"versionedFiles": [
"/*.bundle.css",
"/*.bundle.js",
"/*.chunk.js"
]
}
},
{
"name": "assets",
"installMode": "lazy",
"updateMode": "prefetch",
"resources": {
"files": [
"/assets/**"
]
}
}
],
"dataGroups": [
{
"name": "api-performance",
"urls": [
"/",
"/main",
"/login",
"/select-content"
],
"cacheConfig": {
"strategy": "performance",
"maxSize": 100,
"maxAge": "3d"
}
}
]
}
And manifest:
{
"name": "App",
"short_name": "App",
"start_url": "/login",
"theme_color": "#00a2e8",
"background_color": "#00a2e8",
"display": "standalone",
"icons": [
{
"src": "assets\/icons\/android-icon-36x36.png",
"sizes": "36x36",
"type": "image\/png",
"density": "0.75"
},
{
"src": "assets\/icons\/android-icon-48x48.png",
"sizes": "48x48",
"type": "image\/png",
"density": "1.0"
},
{
"src": "assets\/icons\/android-icon-72x72.png",
"sizes": "72x72",
"type": "image\/png",
"density": "1.5"
},
{
"src": "assets\/icons\/android-icon-96x96.png",
"sizes": "96x96",
"type": "image\/png",
"density": "2.0"
},
{
"src": "assets\/icons\/android-icon-144x144.png",
"sizes": "144x144",
"type": "image\/png",
"density": "3.0"
},
{
"src": "assets\/icons\/android-icon-192x192.png",
"sizes": "192x192",
"type": "image\/png",
"density": "4.0"
}
]
}
Then build it in production:
ng build --prod --aot=false --build-optimizer=false
Http-server run in SSL mode, but lsit of service workers in chrome dev-tools is clear. What's wrong? May be this flags broke it --aot=false --build-optimizer=false?
Seems to be a problem in registering service worker in module where also importing AngularFire2. I found solution how to register SW in main.ts, that's work:
platformBrowserDynamic().bootstrapModule(AppModule).then(() => {
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator && environment.production) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('ngsw-worker.js');
}
}).catch(err => console.log(err));