I have a Dockerfile, in which im trying to run a deamon that starts a java process.
If I embed the script in the Dockerfile, like so.
RUN myscript.sh
When I run /bin/bash on the resulting container, I see no entries from jps.
However, I can easily embed the script as CMD in which case, when i issue
docker run asdfg
I see the process start normally.
So, my question is, when we start a background async process in a Dockerfile, is it always the case that its side effects will be excluded from the container?
Background-processes needs to be started at container-start, not image build.
So your script needs to run via CMD or ENTRYPOINT.
CMD or ENTRYPOINT can still be a script, containing multiple commands. But I would imagine in your case, if you want several background processes, that using example supervisord would be your best option.
Also, check out some already existing Dockerfiles to get an idea of how it all fits together.
Related
...is there like compiling the project and make it run to be autoexecutable?
Sorry for the general question. I have been doing little projects with server side and I find that always I need to write "npm start" or so to make the whole start working.
My doubt is, Do these projects need to be compiled somehow or it is just as is, a simple line runs the coded files and that works like a server side?
Also, should not a server side able to run by itself (by definition) when the system restarts? So far, I needed to create bat files/start folder in windows to make then run in case of restart.
According to NPM documentation:
npm start
This runs an arbitrary command specified in the package’s "start" property of its "scripts" object. If no "start" property is specified on the "scripts" object, it will run node server.js.
To start the server you have to start a process and that process is started by npm start. If processes are killed they cannot be brought back to life by themselves. If the process is killed (eg when you restart) you have to make sure a new process is automatically spawned. You can accomplish this in multiple ways. You could use services (for example systemctl in Debian). You could also use tools like Kubernetes which can automatically restart a container in case of a crash.
Another possbile solution to use something like Respawn which allows you to respawn a process if it crashes from NodeJS code. Of course, it can also be accomplished with plain NodeJS.
I have a unique problem using jmeter SSH command.
I use this step to run spark jobs.
the problem is that one of the commands not working, to clarify it connects and not get response and just wait and wait for hours, and nothing displayed on screen.
I know how to work with the tool, and this behavior is special for this script alone.
All other script worked, I duplicate one that worked for example
sudo /run_stg.sh this command worked
sudo /run_off2-stg.sh this command not worked
if I run the job manually via jenkins it worked
if I entered to command line and use plik ssh it worked,
the problem is just Jmeter, that is waiting and waiting and I can not understand for what?
the job is about 3 minutes, and I wait for response in Jmeter for 4 hours and nothing Jmeter just waiting.
in the console log I set to trace level and nothing, absolutely no idea how to start handle this issue in Jmeter.
an anyone please assists how to make Jmeter to write what happened?
or just to know if he connect or anything
since this behavior all the test can not be performed
Most probably you are as usual misconfiguring the SSH Command sampler.
The idea is not to run the script per se, you need to delegate the script execution to the Unix Shell, for example Bash this way you will be able to combine several commands together, see the output, amend debugging level, etc.
So I would recommend setting your command to something like /bin/bash -c -x /your/script.sh
Another guess, given you use sudo it might be the case that the sudo command simply waits for the password (which JMeter never provides), if this is the case try amending your script permissions using chmod command and allowing your user its execution without root privileges.
And finally, given you're able to run your command using "plik ssh" (whatever it is) you can run it using OS Process Sampler
More information: How to Run External Commands and Programs Locally and Remotely from JMeter
Jenkins version: 1.574
I created a simple job which performs the following:
Using "Execute shell script on remote host using SSH" as one of the BUILD steps, I'm just calling a shell script. This shell script performs stop and start operations on Tomcat to restart an application on the target machine.
I have a valid username, password, port defined for the target SSH server in Jenkins Global settings.
I saw this behavior that when I run a Jenkins job and call the restart script (which gets the application name as parameter $1), it works fine, but as soon as "Execute shell script on remote host using SSH" step completes, I see the new process dies on the remote/target application server.
If I run the script from the target/remote server itself, everything works fine and the new process/PID remains live forever, but running the same script from Jenkins, though I don't see any errors and everything works as expected, the new process dies as soon as the above mentioned SSH step is complete and control comes back to the next BUILD step in Jenkins job OR the Jenkins job is complete.
I saw a few posts/blogs and tried setting: BUILD_ID=dontKillMe in the Jenkins job (in various places i.e. Prepare Environment variables and also using Inject Environment variables...). When the job's particular build# is complete, I can see Environment Variables for that build# does say BUILD_ID=dontKillMe as its value (instead of the default Timestamp tag value).
I tried putting nohup before calling the restart script, i.e.,
nohup restart_tomcat.sh "${app}"
I also tried:
BUILD_ID=dontKillMe nohup restart_tomcat.sh "${app}"
This doesn't give any error and creates a nohup.out file on the remote server (but I'm not worried about it as the restart_tomcat.sh script itself creates its own LOG file which I'm "cat"ing after the restart_tomcat.sh script is complete. cat'ing on the log file is performed using another "Execute shell script on remote host using SSH" build step, and it successfully shows the log file created by the restart script).
I don't know what I'm missing at this point, but as soon as the restart_tomcat.sh step is complete, the new PID/process on the remote/target server dies.
How can I fix this?
I've been through this myself.
On my first iteration, before I knew about Jenkins ProcessTreeKiller, I ended up just daemonizing Tomcat. The Apache Tomcat documentation includes a section on running as a daemon.
You can also try disabling the ProcessTreeKiller for your whole Jenkins instance, if it's relatively small (read the first link for information).
The BUILD_ID=dontKillMe should be passed to the shell, and therefore it should be in your command line, not in Jenkins global configuration or job parameters.
BUILD_ID=dontKillMe restart_tomcat.sh "${app}" should have worked without problems.
You can also try nohup restart_tomcat.sh "${app}" & with the & at the end.
My solution (it worked after trying everything else) in Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty Tahr) (Amazon AWS - Amazon EC2), Jenkins 1.601:
Exec command: (setsid COMMAND < /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 &);
Exec in PTY: DISABLED
// Example COMMAND=socat TCP4-LISTEN:1337,fork TCP4:127.0.0.1:1338
I created this Transfer as my last one.
#!/bin/ksh
export BUILD_ID=dontKillMe
I added the above line to the start of my script and the issue was resolved.
Hello people.
I'm using Jenkins as CI server and I need to run some performance test using Jmeter. I've setup the plugin and configured my workspace and everything works ok, but I have to do some steps manually and I want a bit more of "automation".
Currently i have some small programs in a remote server. These programs make some specific validations, for instance (just to explain): validates e-mail addresses, phone numbers, etc.
So, before I run the build in jenkins, I have to manually start the program (file.sh) I want:
I have to use putty (or any othe ssh client) to conect to the server and then run, for instance, the command
./email_validation.sh
And the Jmeter test runs in a correct way, and when the test is done I have to manually "shut down" the program I started. But what I want is trying to start the program I need in Jenkins configuration (not manually outside Jenkins, but in "execute shell" or "execute remote shell using ssh" build step).
I have tried to start it, but it get stuck, because when Jenkins build finds the command
./email_validation.sh
the build stops, it waits for the command to finish and then it will continue the other build steps, but obviously, I need this step not to finish until the test is executed.
Is there a way to achieve this? Thanks
Run your command as a background process by adding the & symbol at the end of the command and use the nohup command in case the parent process gets a hangup signal, e.g.
nohup /path/to/email_validation.sh &
If the script produces any output, it will go by default to the file nohup.out in the current directory when the script was launched.
You can kill the process at the end of the build by running:
pkill email_validation.sh
I am working on a website powered by Node. So I have made a simple Dockerfile that adds my site's files to the container's FS, installs Node and runs the app when I run the container, exposing the private port 80.
But if I want to change a file for that app, I have rebuild the container image and re-run it. That takes some seconds.
Is there an easy way to have some sort of "live sync", NFS like, to have my host system's app files be in sync with the ones from the running container?
This way I only have to relaunch it to have changes apply, or even better, if I use something like supervisor, it will be done automatically.
You can use volumes in order to do this. You have two options:
Docker managed volumes:
docker run -v /src/path nodejsapp
docker run -i -t -volumes-from <container id> bash
The file you edit in the second container will update the first one.
Host directory volume:
docker run -v `pwd`/host/src/path:/container/src/path nodejsapp
The changes you make on the host will update the container.
If you are under OSX, those kind of volume shares can become very slow, especially with node-based apps ( a lot of files ). For this issue, http://docker-sync.io can help, by providing a volume-share like synchronisation, without using volume shares, this usually speeds up your container read/write speed of the code-directory from 50-80 times, depending on what docker-machine you use.
For performance see https://github.com/EugenMayer/docker-sync/wiki/4.-Performance and for easy examples how to use it, see the boilerplates https://github.com/EugenMayer/docker-sync-boilerplate for your case the unison example https://github.com/EugenMayer/docker-sync-boilerplate/tree/master/unison is the one you would need for NFS like sync
docker run -dit -v ~/my/local/path:/container/path/ myimageId
For /container/path/ you could use for instance /usr/src/app.
The flags:
-d = detached mode,
-it = interactive,
-v + paths = specifies the volume.
(If you just care about the volume, you can drop the -dit flag.)
Docker run reference
I use Scaffold's File Sync functionality for this. It gets the job done, and without needing overly complex configuration.
Setting up Scaffold in my project was as simple as installing Skaffold (through chocolatey, since I'm on Windows), running skaffold init --generate-manifests in my project folder, and answering a couple questions it asked.