I make a vue project using this documentation: https://vuejs.org/guide/quick-start.html#creating-a-vue-application
And I wanted to added tailwind css to this project. So I used this guide (from point 2 Install Tailwind CSS): https://tailwindcss.com/docs/guides/vite#vue
But, I see no changes and get this warning:
warn - No utility classes were detected in your source files. If this is unexpected, double-check the `content` option in your Tailwind CSS configuration.
warn - https://tailwindcss.com/docs/content-configuration
I followed the instuction as it is.
I tried following the content-configuration and I double checked it to see all files in place.
I was expecting tailwind.config.cjs file should be generated but instead tailwind.config.js is generated.
Updates:
On repeating all the steps using this link: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/guides/vite#vue
At step 4:
Add the Tailwind directives to your CSS, When I replace the content for style.css as asked in the step.. Exactly after this point, the error is shown.
Fixed.. Asking in the discord community this was the response:
Thank you for supplying a remotely-hosted repository. It seems to work
fine for me, it could be that you're suffering from a bug that this PR
solves: https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/9650. You
could temporarily try insiders version and see if that fixes it for
you
npm install tailwindcss#insiders
I just gave solution to the same problem. You might have the same...
I had my tailwind.config.js like this:
module.exports = {
content: ["./src**/**/*.{html,js}"],
},
...and I changed the destination folder from "src" to "public", and it worked for me.
Like this:
module.exports = {
content: ["./public/**/*.{html,js}"],
},
Hope this will help you. Good luck and happy coding !
I've got an existing code base in which Vue.js has performance problems. I also see this notice in the browser console:
so I guess an easy fix could be to put Vue into production mode.
In the suggested link I try to follow the instructions for webpack. We're on Webpack version 2.7 (current stable version is 4.20). In the instructions it says that in Webpack 3 and earlier, you’ll need to use DefinePlugin:
var webpack = require('webpack')
module.exports = {
// ...
plugins: [
// ...
new webpack.DefinePlugin({
'process.env.NODE_ENV': JSON.stringify('production')
})
]
}
So in my package.json I've got a build script defined:
To build for production I run yarn run build and it runs a build.js file (paste here) which in turn calls webpack.base.conf.js (paste here) and webpack.prod.conf.js (paste here).
As you can see in the paste I use the DefinePlugin as suggested by the docs.
I also found a file called vue-loader.conf.js (paste here) and to be sure I also added the DefinePlugin in there as well.
I can run yarn run build which ends without errors, but when serve the site over Apache and open the browser it still shows the notification that we're in development mode.
To be sure it actually uses the files created by webpack I completely removed the folder /public/webpack/ and checked that the webinterface didn't load correctly without the missing files and then built again to see if it loaded correctly after the command finished. So it does actually use the files built by this webpack process. But Vue is actually not created in production mode.
What am I doing wrong here?
The problem may be in your 'webpack.base.conf.js' as i suspected, thank you for sharing it, upon searching i've found an issue resolving your 'production not being detected' problem on github here
The solution requires that you change 'vue$': 'vue/dist/vue' to 'vue$': vue/dist/vue.min in production.
You will find the original answer as:
#ozee31 This alias 'vue$': 'vue/dist/vue' cause the problem, use vue/dist/vue.min in production environment.
I was trying to run webpack-4 first time
webpack ./src/js/app.js ./dist/app.bundle.js
it shows warning / error :
WARNING in configuration
The 'mode' option has not been set, webpack will fallback to 'production' for this value. Set 'mode' option to 'development' or 'production' to enable defaults for each environment.
You can also set it to 'none' to disable any default behavior. Learn more: https://webpack.js.org/concepts/mode/
ERROR in multi ./src/js/app.js ./dist/app.bundle.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve './dist/app.bundle.js' in 'D:\wamp64\www\webpack-4'
# multi ./src/js/app.js ./dist/app.bundle.js
Then i tried to change the mode
webpack --mode development
it shows :
ERROR in Entry module not found: Error: Can't resolve './src'
Resolved
Spent a lot of time to find out the solution.
Solution: Add index.js file into src folder.
That's it!.. solved :)
During Research, I found some facts about webpack 4 :
webpack 4 doesn’t need a configuration file by default!
webpack 4 there is no need to define the entry point: it will take ./src/index.js as the default!
Met this problem when deploying on now.sh
Solution: Use Default Behavior
Move entry point to src/index.js.
This leverage webpack#4 default value for entry:
By default its value is ./src/index.js, but you can specify a
different (or multiple entry points) by configuring the entry property
in the webpack configuration.
Solution: Be Specific
As #Lokeh pointed out, if you don't want to change your JS file location you can always use path.resolve() in your webpack.config.js:
entry: path.resolve(__dirname, 'src') + '/path/to/your/file.js',
Adding a context explicitly in webpack.config.js fixed issue for me. Adapt the following piece of code in your project:
context: __dirname + '/src',
entry: './index.js',
webpack ./src/js/app.js --output ./dist/app.bundle.js --mode development
This worked for me. I had the same trouble, it is because of a new version of webpack
webpack version 4.46.0
Perhaps someone gets stuck during migration from webpack 4 to 5.
in case of multiple webpack config files and if anyone uses merge:
Say webpack.common.js relies on some variables passed from cli eg:
module.export = (env) => {
const {myCustomVar} = env;
return {
// some common webpack config that uses myCustomVar
}
}
When you require common config in say webpack.prod.js:
const { merge } = require('webpack-merge'); // <-- `merge` is now named import if you are using > v5
const common = require('./webpack.common.js');
const getProdConfig = () => {....}
module.exports = (env) => {
return merge(common(env), getProdConfig()); // <-- here, `call` common as its exported as a fn()
};
I had a similar error and was able to resolve it with the command webpack src/index.js -o dist/bundle.js the -o did the trick. The issue wasn't the location of index.js it was missing the operator for defining the output path location.
See https://webpack.js.org/api/cli/
Version of webpack was 4.44.1
Other solutions didn't work. I solved this by adding this to package.json
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1",
"build": "webpack" //this
},
Then npm run build and it works. At first i've tried with npx webpack. Would love to know why it works.
Just leaving this here, incase someone is not paying attention to the details like me, I had the same error, but because my webpack config file was named webpack.config instead on webpack.config.js, so my custom configurations were never picked and webpack was falling back to the defaults entry "src/index.js"
As of webpack ^4.29.6 you don't need any configuration file so instead of giving path in package.json we need to write simply "build": "webpack" and keep index.js as entry point in src folder. However if you want to change entry point you can do so in webpack config file
For Rails 6 application this steps worked for me:
1) bundle exec rails webpacker:install
system will reinstall webpacker but will rewrite few files:
modified: config/webpack/environment.js
modified: config/webpacker.yml
modified: package.json
modified: yarn.lock
2) Return configs to initial state:
git checkout config/webpack/environment.js
git checkout config/webpacker.yml
package.json and yarn.lock you can leave as they are
Spent a lot of time similarly to others to get around this annoying problem. Finally changed webpack.config.js as follows:-
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, './src'), //src instead of dist
publicPath: '/src/', //src instead of dist
filename: 'main.js' //main.js instead of build.js
}
...as Edouard Lopez and Sabir Hussain mentioned that you don't need to mention an entry point, removed that also and the app compiled after a long frustration.
So my problem, which I would wager is a lot of people's problem is that I set the entry path based on my whole app root. So in my case, it was /client/main.ts. But because my webpack.config.js file was actually inside /client, I had to move into that folder to run webpack. Therefore my entry was now looking for /client/client/main.ts.
So if you get this error you need to really look at your entry path and make sure it is right based on where you are running webpack and where your webpack.config.js file is. Your entry path needs to be relative to where you are running webpack. Not relative to your app root.
I had this problem when changing between React/Rails gems. Running rails webpacker:install restored me to the Rails webpacker defaults, but also overwrote all of my config files. Upon closer inspection, the culprit turned out to be my webpack/development.js file, which in a previous gem version had gotten modified from this Rails webpacker default:
process.env.NODE_ENV = process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development'
const environment = require('./environment')
module.exports = environment.toWebpackConfig()
Once I restored the file to those contents, this error went away. Specifically I had been missing the module.exports = environment.toWebpackConfig() line, which apparently is pretty important for those who want to avoid Rails webpacker thinking it needs a src/index.js file (it doesn't)
This is driving me insane, so I'm hoping someone might see something that I'm missing. Thank you for your help in advance.
I have a gulp file and I have installed via npm, babel-core, babel-preset-es2015, babel-preset-react. From researching online and in high hopes even though this might not be right, I have renamed the gulp file to be gulpfile.babel.js and I have created a .babelrc file with
{
"presets": ["es2015"]
}
I am using browsersync and when I launch the gulp task the html file loads, but the index.js I have includes 'import React....'. This files causing the error in the JS console that says 'Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token import'.
I thought the es2015 npm packages I have should be taking care of that ES6 syntax?
In the gulp file the task that I thought was suppose to take care of that is;
// convert jsx to JS
gulp.task('babelFiles', function() {
return gulp.src('js/*.(jsx|js)')
.pipe(babel({
compact: false
}))
.pipe(gulp.dest('js'))
.pipe(browserSync.reload({
stream: true
}))
});
The gulp task that is responsible for launching this is:
// Default task
gulp.task('default', ['babelFiles', 'browserSync']);
I am puzzled as to what could be wrong here?
Any ideas would be much much appreciated!
There are two problems:
Gulp seems like doesn't support you syntax for file extension mask:
gulp.src('js/*.(jsx|js)') // not working
gulp.src('js/*.{js,jsx}') // working
You piping from js directory to js directory but since there are no matches because of the problem (1) it makes you believe the babel is not working
Update
Gulp uses glob syntaxt to match files - according to glob syntax the qualifier for amount of items should be included before ( | ) - in our case following syntax would be valid
gulp.src('js/*.#(js|jsx)')
where # means match exactly one occurrence of pattern after #.
In your case there was no qualifier presented
I'm trying to learn elm programing language from here. And it bugs me to manually do page refresh with every little change.
I see that elm-reactor doesn't support live realoading anymore. But what can i do unthil the next release?
I usually use elm-live.
It is very simple and easy to use if you are just compiling Elm to js.
Solved! - gulp magic saves the day!
(this solution works only with Chrome) Here is what I did - based on this: ( Thanks janiczek !! :))
Inside your root directory add a new file named gulpfile.js
Paste this content inside:
gulpfile.js:
evar gulp = require('gulp');
var elm = require('gulp-elm');
var concat = require('gulp-concat');
var plumber = require('gulp-plumber');
var livereload = require('gulp-livereload');
var path = ['*.elm']; // here you adjust the path according with your needs.
// For ex: 'scr/**/*.elm' - maps to every folder and file nested inside the src folder.
gulp.task('elm-init', elm.init);
gulp.task('elm', ['elm-init'], function(){
return gulp.src(path)
.pipe(plumber())
.pipe(elm())
.pipe(concat('elmapp.compiled.js'))
.pipe(gulp.dest('js'))
.pipe(livereload());
});
gulp.task('default',['watch']);
gulp.task('watch', function(){
livereload.listen();
gulp.watch(path,['elm']);
});
You must have gulp installed globally if not run:
npm install gulp -g
Install the gulp dependencies:
npm install gulp-elm gulp-concat gulp-plumber gulp-livereload
Install this extension: (chrome only)
run elm-reactor and open your page in Chrome.
From inside your terminal, at root directory (or wherever your gulpfile.js is) run: gulp
With the elm page tab open, Press LiveReload button on the Chorme Extension. like below and make sure it says:
You are good to go! :)
Elm compiler doesn't like .js files around, so you will still see 2 errors. Ignore them. For me , everything else works as expected.