How do I calculate the distance between two points specified by latitude and longitude?
For clarification, I'd like the distance in kilometers; the points use the WGS84 system and I'd like to understand the relative accuracies of the approaches available.
This link might be helpful to you, as it details the use of the Haversine formula to calculate the distance.
Excerpt:
This script [in Javascript] calculates great-circle distances between the two points –
that is, the shortest distance over the earth’s surface – using the
‘Haversine’ formula.
function getDistanceFromLatLonInKm(lat1,lon1,lat2,lon2) {
var R = 6371; // Radius of the earth in km
var dLat = deg2rad(lat2-lat1); // deg2rad below
var dLon = deg2rad(lon2-lon1);
var a =
Math.sin(dLat/2) * Math.sin(dLat/2) +
Math.cos(deg2rad(lat1)) * Math.cos(deg2rad(lat2)) *
Math.sin(dLon/2) * Math.sin(dLon/2)
;
var c = 2 * Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(a), Math.sqrt(1-a));
var d = R * c; // Distance in km
return d;
}
function deg2rad(deg) {
return deg * (Math.PI/180)
}
I needed to calculate a lot of distances between the points for my project, so I went ahead and tried to optimize the code, I have found here. On average in different browsers my new implementation runs 2 times faster than the most upvoted answer.
function distance(lat1, lon1, lat2, lon2) {
var p = 0.017453292519943295; // Math.PI / 180
var c = Math.cos;
var a = 0.5 - c((lat2 - lat1) * p)/2 +
c(lat1 * p) * c(lat2 * p) *
(1 - c((lon2 - lon1) * p))/2;
return 12742 * Math.asin(Math.sqrt(a)); // 2 * R; R = 6371 km
}
You can play with my jsPerf and see the results here.
Recently I needed to do the same in python, so here is a python implementation:
from math import cos, asin, sqrt, pi
def distance(lat1, lon1, lat2, lon2):
p = pi/180
a = 0.5 - cos((lat2-lat1)*p)/2 + cos(lat1*p) * cos(lat2*p) * (1-cos((lon2-lon1)*p))/2
return 12742 * asin(sqrt(a)) #2*R*asin...
And for the sake of completeness: Haversine on Wikipedia.
Here is a C# Implementation:
static class DistanceAlgorithm
{
const double PIx = 3.141592653589793;
const double RADIUS = 6378.16;
/// <summary>
/// Convert degrees to Radians
/// </summary>
/// <param name="x">Degrees</param>
/// <returns>The equivalent in radians</returns>
public static double Radians(double x)
{
return x * PIx / 180;
}
/// <summary>
/// Calculate the distance between two places.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="lon1"></param>
/// <param name="lat1"></param>
/// <param name="lon2"></param>
/// <param name="lat2"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static double DistanceBetweenPlaces(
double lon1,
double lat1,
double lon2,
double lat2)
{
double dlon = Radians(lon2 - lon1);
double dlat = Radians(lat2 - lat1);
double a = (Math.Sin(dlat / 2) * Math.Sin(dlat / 2)) + Math.Cos(Radians(lat1)) * Math.Cos(Radians(lat2)) * (Math.Sin(dlon / 2) * Math.Sin(dlon / 2));
double angle = 2 * Math.Atan2(Math.Sqrt(a), Math.Sqrt(1 - a));
return angle * RADIUS;
}
}
Here is a java implementation of the Haversine formula.
public final static double AVERAGE_RADIUS_OF_EARTH_KM = 6371;
public int calculateDistanceInKilometer(double userLat, double userLng,
double venueLat, double venueLng) {
double latDistance = Math.toRadians(userLat - venueLat);
double lngDistance = Math.toRadians(userLng - venueLng);
double a = Math.sin(latDistance / 2) * Math.sin(latDistance / 2)
+ Math.cos(Math.toRadians(userLat)) * Math.cos(Math.toRadians(venueLat))
* Math.sin(lngDistance / 2) * Math.sin(lngDistance / 2);
double c = 2 * Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(a), Math.sqrt(1 - a));
return (int) (Math.round(AVERAGE_RADIUS_OF_EARTH_KM * c));
}
Note that here we are rounding the answer to the nearest km.
Thanks very much for all this. I used the following code in my Objective-C iPhone app:
const double PIx = 3.141592653589793;
const double RADIO = 6371; // Mean radius of Earth in Km
double convertToRadians(double val) {
return val * PIx / 180;
}
-(double)kilometresBetweenPlace1:(CLLocationCoordinate2D) place1 andPlace2:(CLLocationCoordinate2D) place2 {
double dlon = convertToRadians(place2.longitude - place1.longitude);
double dlat = convertToRadians(place2.latitude - place1.latitude);
double a = ( pow(sin(dlat / 2), 2) + cos(convertToRadians(place1.latitude))) * cos(convertToRadians(place2.latitude)) * pow(sin(dlon / 2), 2);
double angle = 2 * asin(sqrt(a));
return angle * RADIO;
}
Latitude and Longitude are in decimal. I didn't use min() for the asin() call as the distances that I'm using are so small that they don't require it.
It gave incorrect answers until I passed in the values in Radians - now it's pretty much the same as the values obtained from Apple's Map app :-)
Extra update:
If you are using iOS4 or later then Apple provide some methods to do this so the same functionality would be achieved with:
-(double)kilometresBetweenPlace1:(CLLocationCoordinate2D) place1 andPlace2:(CLLocationCoordinate2D) place2 {
MKMapPoint start, finish;
start = MKMapPointForCoordinate(place1);
finish = MKMapPointForCoordinate(place2);
return MKMetersBetweenMapPoints(start, finish) / 1000;
}
This is a simple PHP function that will give a very reasonable approximation (under +/-1% error margin).
<?php
function distance($lat1, $lon1, $lat2, $lon2) {
$pi80 = M_PI / 180;
$lat1 *= $pi80;
$lon1 *= $pi80;
$lat2 *= $pi80;
$lon2 *= $pi80;
$r = 6372.797; // mean radius of Earth in km
$dlat = $lat2 - $lat1;
$dlon = $lon2 - $lon1;
$a = sin($dlat / 2) * sin($dlat / 2) + cos($lat1) * cos($lat2) * sin($dlon / 2) * sin($dlon / 2);
$c = 2 * atan2(sqrt($a), sqrt(1 - $a));
$km = $r * $c;
//echo '<br/>'.$km;
return $km;
}
?>
As said before; the earth is NOT a sphere. It is like an old, old baseball that Mark McGwire decided to practice with - it is full of dents and bumps. The simpler calculations (like this) treat it like a sphere.
Different methods may be more or less precise according to where you are on this irregular ovoid AND how far apart your points are (the closer they are the smaller the absolute error margin). The more precise your expectation, the more complex the math.
For more info: wikipedia geographic distance
I post here my working example.
List all points in table having distance between a designated point (we use a random point - lat:45.20327, long:23.7806) less than 50 KM, with latitude & longitude, in MySQL (the table fields are coord_lat and coord_long):
List all having DISTANCE<50, in Kilometres (considered Earth radius 6371 KM):
SELECT denumire, (6371 * acos( cos( radians(45.20327) ) * cos( radians( coord_lat ) ) * cos( radians( 23.7806 ) - radians(coord_long) ) + sin( radians(45.20327) ) * sin( radians(coord_lat) ) )) AS distanta
FROM obiective
WHERE coord_lat<>''
AND coord_long<>''
HAVING distanta<50
ORDER BY distanta desc
The above example was tested in MySQL 5.0.95 and 5.5.16 (Linux).
In the other answers an implementation in r is missing.
Calculating the distance between two point is quite straightforward with the distm function from the geosphere package:
distm(p1, p2, fun = distHaversine)
where:
p1 = longitude/latitude for point(s)
p2 = longitude/latitude for point(s)
# type of distance calculation
fun = distCosine / distHaversine / distVincentySphere / distVincentyEllipsoid
As the earth is not perfectly spherical, the Vincenty formula for ellipsoids is probably the best way to calculate distances. Thus in the geosphere package you use then:
distm(p1, p2, fun = distVincentyEllipsoid)
Off course you don't necessarily have to use geosphere package, you can also calculate the distance in base R with a function:
hav.dist <- function(long1, lat1, long2, lat2) {
R <- 6371
diff.long <- (long2 - long1)
diff.lat <- (lat2 - lat1)
a <- sin(diff.lat/2)^2 + cos(lat1) * cos(lat2) * sin(diff.long/2)^2
b <- 2 * asin(pmin(1, sqrt(a)))
d = R * b
return(d)
}
The haversine is definitely a good formula for probably most cases, other answers already include it so I am not going to take the space. But it is important to note that no matter what formula is used (yes not just one). Because of the huge range of accuracy possible as well as the computation time required. The choice of formula requires a bit more thought than a simple no brainer answer.
This posting from a person at nasa, is the best one I found at discussing the options
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/visual/home/proj/tiger/gisfaq.html
For example, if you are just sorting rows by distance in a 100 miles radius. The flat earth formula will be much faster than the haversine.
HalfPi = 1.5707963;
R = 3956; /* the radius gives you the measurement unit*/
a = HalfPi - latoriginrad;
b = HalfPi - latdestrad;
u = a * a + b * b;
v = - 2 * a * b * cos(longdestrad - longoriginrad);
c = sqrt(abs(u + v));
return R * c;
Notice there is just one cosine and one square root. Vs 9 of them on the Haversine formula.
There could be a simpler solution, and more correct: The perimeter of earth is 40,000Km at the equator, about 37,000 on Greenwich (or any longitude) cycle. Thus:
pythagoras = function (lat1, lon1, lat2, lon2) {
function sqr(x) {return x * x;}
function cosDeg(x) {return Math.cos(x * Math.PI / 180.0);}
var earthCyclePerimeter = 40000000.0 * cosDeg((lat1 + lat2) / 2.0);
var dx = (lon1 - lon2) * earthCyclePerimeter / 360.0;
var dy = 37000000.0 * (lat1 - lat2) / 360.0;
return Math.sqrt(sqr(dx) + sqr(dy));
};
I agree that it should be fine-tuned as, I myself said that it's an ellipsoid, so the radius to be multiplied by the cosine varies. But it's a bit more accurate. Compared with Google Maps and it did reduce the error significantly.
pip install haversine
Python implementation
Origin is the center of the contiguous United States.
from haversine import haversine, Unit
origin = (39.50, 98.35)
paris = (48.8567, 2.3508)
haversine(origin, paris, unit=Unit.MILES)
To get the answer in kilometers simply set unit=Unit.KILOMETERS (that's the default).
There is some errors in the code provided, I've fixed it below.
All the above answers assumes the earth is a sphere. However, a more accurate approximation would be that of an oblate spheroid.
a= 6378.137#equitorial radius in km
b= 6356.752#polar radius in km
def Distance(lat1, lons1, lat2, lons2):
lat1=math.radians(lat1)
lons1=math.radians(lons1)
R1=(((((a**2)*math.cos(lat1))**2)+(((b**2)*math.sin(lat1))**2))/((a*math.cos(lat1))**2+(b*math.sin(lat1))**2))**0.5 #radius of earth at lat1
x1=R1*math.cos(lat1)*math.cos(lons1)
y1=R1*math.cos(lat1)*math.sin(lons1)
z1=R1*math.sin(lat1)
lat2=math.radians(lat2)
lons2=math.radians(lons2)
R2=(((((a**2)*math.cos(lat2))**2)+(((b**2)*math.sin(lat2))**2))/((a*math.cos(lat2))**2+(b*math.sin(lat2))**2))**0.5 #radius of earth at lat2
x2=R2*math.cos(lat2)*math.cos(lons2)
y2=R2*math.cos(lat2)*math.sin(lons2)
z2=R2*math.sin(lat2)
return ((x1-x2)**2+(y1-y2)**2+(z1-z2)**2)**0.5
I don't like adding yet another answer, but the Google maps API v.3 has spherical geometry (and more). After converting your WGS84 to decimal degrees you can do this:
<script src="http://maps.google.com/maps/api/js?sensor=false&libraries=geometry" type="text/javascript"></script>
distance = google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeDistanceBetween(
new google.maps.LatLng(fromLat, fromLng),
new google.maps.LatLng(toLat, toLng));
No word about how accurate Google's calculations are or even what model is used (though it does say "spherical" rather than "geoid". By the way, the "straight line" distance will obviously be different from the distance if one travels on the surface of the earth which is what everyone seems to be presuming.
You can use the build in CLLocationDistance to calculate this:
CLLocation *location1 = [[CLLocation alloc] initWithLatitude:latitude1 longitude:longitude1];
CLLocation *location2 = [[CLLocation alloc] initWithLatitude:latitude2 longitude:longitude2];
[self distanceInMetersFromLocation:location1 toLocation:location2]
- (int)distanceInMetersFromLocation:(CLLocation*)location1 toLocation:(CLLocation*)location2 {
CLLocationDistance distanceInMeters = [location1 distanceFromLocation:location2];
return distanceInMeters;
}
In your case if you want kilometers just divide by 1000.
As pointed out, an accurate calculation should take into account that the earth is not a perfect sphere. Here are some comparisons of the various algorithms offered here:
geoDistance(50,5,58,3)
Haversine: 899 km
Maymenn: 833 km
Keerthana: 897 km
google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeDistanceBetween(): 900 km
geoDistance(50,5,-58,-3)
Haversine: 12030 km
Maymenn: 11135 km
Keerthana: 10310 km
google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeDistanceBetween(): 12044 km
geoDistance(.05,.005,.058,.003)
Haversine: 0.9169 km
Maymenn: 0.851723 km
Keerthana: 0.917964 km
google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeDistanceBetween(): 0.917964 km
geoDistance(.05,80,.058,80.3)
Haversine: 33.37 km
Maymenn: 33.34 km
Keerthana: 33.40767 km
google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeDistanceBetween(): 33.40770 km
Over small distances, Keerthana's algorithm does seem to coincide with that of Google Maps. Google Maps does not seem to follow any simple algorithm, suggesting that it may be the most accurate method here.
Anyway, here is a Javascript implementation of Keerthana's algorithm:
function geoDistance(lat1, lng1, lat2, lng2){
const a = 6378.137; // equitorial radius in km
const b = 6356.752; // polar radius in km
var sq = x => (x*x);
var sqr = x => Math.sqrt(x);
var cos = x => Math.cos(x);
var sin = x => Math.sin(x);
var radius = lat => sqr((sq(a*a*cos(lat))+sq(b*b*sin(lat)))/(sq(a*cos(lat))+sq(b*sin(lat))));
lat1 = lat1 * Math.PI / 180;
lng1 = lng1 * Math.PI / 180;
lat2 = lat2 * Math.PI / 180;
lng2 = lng2 * Math.PI / 180;
var R1 = radius(lat1);
var x1 = R1*cos(lat1)*cos(lng1);
var y1 = R1*cos(lat1)*sin(lng1);
var z1 = R1*sin(lat1);
var R2 = radius(lat2);
var x2 = R2*cos(lat2)*cos(lng2);
var y2 = R2*cos(lat2)*sin(lng2);
var z2 = R2*sin(lat2);
return sqr(sq(x1-x2)+sq(y1-y2)+sq(z1-z2));
}
Here is a typescript implementation of the Haversine formula
static getDistanceFromLatLonInKm(lat1: number, lon1: number, lat2: number, lon2: number): number {
var deg2Rad = deg => {
return deg * Math.PI / 180;
}
var r = 6371; // Radius of the earth in km
var dLat = deg2Rad(lat2 - lat1);
var dLon = deg2Rad(lon2 - lon1);
var a =
Math.sin(dLat / 2) * Math.sin(dLat / 2) +
Math.cos(deg2Rad(lat1)) * Math.cos(deg2Rad(lat2)) *
Math.sin(dLon / 2) * Math.sin(dLon / 2);
var c = 2 * Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(a), Math.sqrt(1 - a));
var d = r * c; // Distance in km
return d;
}
Here is the SQL Implementation to calculate the distance in km,
SELECT UserId, ( 3959 * acos( cos( radians( your latitude here ) ) * cos( radians(latitude) ) *
cos( radians(longitude) - radians( your longitude here ) ) + sin( radians( your latitude here ) ) *
sin( radians(latitude) ) ) ) AS distance FROM user HAVING
distance < 5 ORDER BY distance LIMIT 0 , 5;
For further details in the implementation by programming langugage, you can just go through the php script given here
This script [in PHP] calculates distances between the two points.
public static function getDistanceOfTwoPoints($source, $dest, $unit='K') {
$lat1 = $source[0];
$lon1 = $source[1];
$lat2 = $dest[0];
$lon2 = $dest[1];
$theta = $lon1 - $lon2;
$dist = sin(deg2rad($lat1)) * sin(deg2rad($lat2)) + cos(deg2rad($lat1)) * cos(deg2rad($lat2)) * cos(deg2rad($theta));
$dist = acos($dist);
$dist = rad2deg($dist);
$miles = $dist * 60 * 1.1515;
$unit = strtoupper($unit);
if ($unit == "K") {
return ($miles * 1.609344);
}
else if ($unit == "M")
{
return ($miles * 1.609344 * 1000);
}
else if ($unit == "N") {
return ($miles * 0.8684);
}
else {
return $miles;
}
}
here is an example in postgres sql (in km, for miles version, replace 1.609344 by 0.8684 version)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.geodistance(alat float, alng float, blat
float, blng float)
RETURNS float AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
v_distance float;
BEGIN
v_distance = asin( sqrt(
sin(radians(blat-alat)/2)^2
+ (
(sin(radians(blng-alng)/2)^2) *
cos(radians(alat)) *
cos(radians(blat))
)
)
) * cast('7926.3352' as float) * cast('1.609344' as float) ;
RETURN v_distance;
END
$BODY$
language plpgsql VOLATILE SECURITY DEFINER;
alter function geodistance(alat float, alng float, blat float, blng float)
owner to postgres;
Java implementation in according Haversine formula
double calculateDistance(double latPoint1, double lngPoint1,
double latPoint2, double lngPoint2) {
if(latPoint1 == latPoint2 && lngPoint1 == lngPoint2) {
return 0d;
}
final double EARTH_RADIUS = 6371.0; //km value;
//converting to radians
latPoint1 = Math.toRadians(latPoint1);
lngPoint1 = Math.toRadians(lngPoint1);
latPoint2 = Math.toRadians(latPoint2);
lngPoint2 = Math.toRadians(lngPoint2);
double distance = Math.pow(Math.sin((latPoint2 - latPoint1) / 2.0), 2)
+ Math.cos(latPoint1) * Math.cos(latPoint2)
* Math.pow(Math.sin((lngPoint2 - lngPoint1) / 2.0), 2);
distance = 2.0 * EARTH_RADIUS * Math.asin(Math.sqrt(distance));
return distance; //km value
}
I made a custom function in R to calculate haversine distance(km) between two spatial points using functions available in R base package.
custom_hav_dist <- function(lat1, lon1, lat2, lon2) {
R <- 6371
Radian_factor <- 0.0174533
lat_1 <- (90-lat1)*Radian_factor
lat_2 <- (90-lat2)*Radian_factor
diff_long <-(lon1-lon2)*Radian_factor
distance_in_km <- 6371*acos((cos(lat_1)*cos(lat_2))+
(sin(lat_1)*sin(lat_2)*cos(diff_long)))
rm(lat1, lon1, lat2, lon2)
return(distance_in_km)
}
Sample output
custom_hav_dist(50.31,19.08,54.14,19.39)
[1] 426.3987
PS: To calculate distances in miles, substitute R in function (6371) with 3958.756 (and for nautical miles, use 3440.065).
To calculate the distance between two points on a sphere you need to do the Great Circle calculation.
There are a number of C/C++ libraries to help with map projection at MapTools if you need to reproject your distances to a flat surface. To do this you will need the projection string of the various coordinate systems.
You may also find MapWindow a useful tool to visualise the points. Also as its open source its a useful guide to how to use the proj.dll library, which appears to be the core open source projection library.
Here is my java implementation for calculation distance via decimal degrees after some search. I used mean radius of world (from wikipedia) in km. İf you want result miles then use world radius in miles.
public static double distanceLatLong2(double lat1, double lng1, double lat2, double lng2)
{
double earthRadius = 6371.0d; // KM: use mile here if you want mile result
double dLat = toRadian(lat2 - lat1);
double dLng = toRadian(lng2 - lng1);
double a = Math.pow(Math.sin(dLat/2), 2) +
Math.cos(toRadian(lat1)) * Math.cos(toRadian(lat2)) *
Math.pow(Math.sin(dLng/2), 2);
double c = 2 * Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(a), Math.sqrt(1-a));
return earthRadius * c; // returns result kilometers
}
public static double toRadian(double degrees)
{
return (degrees * Math.PI) / 180.0d;
}
Here's the accepted answer implementation ported to Java in case anyone needs it.
package com.project529.garage.util;
/**
* Mean radius.
*/
private static double EARTH_RADIUS = 6371;
/**
* Returns the distance between two sets of latitudes and longitudes in meters.
* <p/>
* Based from the following JavaScript SO answer:
* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27928/calculate-distance-between-two-latitude-longitude-points-haversine-formula,
* which is based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haversine_formula (error rate: ~0.55%).
*/
public double getDistanceBetween(double lat1, double lon1, double lat2, double lon2) {
double dLat = toRadians(lat2 - lat1);
double dLon = toRadians(lon2 - lon1);
double a = Math.sin(dLat / 2) * Math.sin(dLat / 2) +
Math.cos(toRadians(lat1)) * Math.cos(toRadians(lat2)) *
Math.sin(dLon / 2) * Math.sin(dLon / 2);
double c = 2 * Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(a), Math.sqrt(1 - a));
double d = EARTH_RADIUS * c;
return d;
}
public double toRadians(double degrees) {
return degrees * (Math.PI / 180);
}
For those looking for an Excel formula based on WGS-84 & GRS-80 standards:
=ACOS(COS(RADIANS(90-Lat1))*COS(RADIANS(90-Lat2))+SIN(RADIANS(90-Lat1))*SIN(RADIANS(90-Lat2))*COS(RADIANS(Long1-Long2)))*6371
Source
there is a good example in here to calculate distance with PHP http://www.geodatasource.com/developers/php :
function distance($lat1, $lon1, $lat2, $lon2, $unit) {
$theta = $lon1 - $lon2;
$dist = sin(deg2rad($lat1)) * sin(deg2rad($lat2)) + cos(deg2rad($lat1)) * cos(deg2rad($lat2)) * cos(deg2rad($theta));
$dist = acos($dist);
$dist = rad2deg($dist);
$miles = $dist * 60 * 1.1515;
$unit = strtoupper($unit);
if ($unit == "K") {
return ($miles * 1.609344);
} else if ($unit == "N") {
return ($miles * 0.8684);
} else {
return $miles;
}
}
Here is the implementation VB.NET, this implementation will give you the result in KM or Miles based on an Enum value you pass.
Public Enum DistanceType
Miles
KiloMeters
End Enum
Public Structure Position
Public Latitude As Double
Public Longitude As Double
End Structure
Public Class Haversine
Public Function Distance(Pos1 As Position,
Pos2 As Position,
DistType As DistanceType) As Double
Dim R As Double = If((DistType = DistanceType.Miles), 3960, 6371)
Dim dLat As Double = Me.toRadian(Pos2.Latitude - Pos1.Latitude)
Dim dLon As Double = Me.toRadian(Pos2.Longitude - Pos1.Longitude)
Dim a As Double = Math.Sin(dLat / 2) * Math.Sin(dLat / 2) + Math.Cos(Me.toRadian(Pos1.Latitude)) * Math.Cos(Me.toRadian(Pos2.Latitude)) * Math.Sin(dLon / 2) * Math.Sin(dLon / 2)
Dim c As Double = 2 * Math.Asin(Math.Min(1, Math.Sqrt(a)))
Dim result As Double = R * c
Return result
End Function
Private Function toRadian(val As Double) As Double
Return (Math.PI / 180) * val
End Function
End Class
I condensed the computation down by simplifying the formula.
Here it is in Ruby:
include Math
earth_radius_mi = 3959
radians = lambda { |deg| deg * PI / 180 }
coord_radians = lambda { |c| { :lat => radians[c[:lat]], :lng => radians[c[:lng]] } }
# from/to = { :lat => (latitude_in_degrees), :lng => (longitude_in_degrees) }
def haversine_distance(from, to)
from, to = coord_radians[from], coord_radians[to]
cosines_product = cos(to[:lat]) * cos(from[:lat]) * cos(from[:lng] - to[:lng])
sines_product = sin(to[:lat]) * sin(from[:lat])
return earth_radius_mi * acos(cosines_product + sines_product)
end
function getDistanceFromLatLonInKm(lat1,lon1,lat2,lon2,units) {
var R = 6371; // Radius of the earth in km
var dLat = deg2rad(lat2-lat1); // deg2rad below
var dLon = deg2rad(lon2-lon1);
var a =
Math.sin(dLat/2) * Math.sin(dLat/2) +
Math.cos(deg2rad(lat1)) * Math.cos(deg2rad(lat2)) *
Math.sin(dLon/2) * Math.sin(dLon/2)
;
var c = 2 * Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(a), Math.sqrt(1-a));
var d = R * c;
var miles = d / 1.609344;
if ( units == 'km' ) {
return d;
} else {
return miles;
}}
Chuck's solution, valid for miles also.
In Mysql use the following function pass the parameters as using POINT(LONG,LAT)
CREATE FUNCTION `distance`(a POINT, b POINT)
RETURNS double
DETERMINISTIC
BEGIN
RETURN
GLength( LineString(( PointFromWKB(a)), (PointFromWKB(b)))) * 100000; -- To Make the distance in meters
END;
I have a camera (in a custom 3D engine) that accepts a quaternion for the rotation transform. I have two 3D points representing a camera and an object to look at. I want to calculate the quaternion that looks from the camera to the object, while respecting the world up axis.
This question asks for the same thing without the "up" vector. All three answers result in the camera pointing in the correct direction, but rolling (as in yaw/pitch/roll; imagine leaning your head onto your ear while looking at something).
I can calculate an orthonormal basis of vectors that match the desired coordinate system by:
lookAt = normalize(target - camera)
sideaxis = cross(lookAt, worldUp)
rotatedup = cross(sideaxis, lookAt)
How can I create a quaternion from those three vectors? This question asks for the same thing...but unfortunately the only and accepted answer says ~"let's assume you don't care about roll", and then goes about ignoring the up axis. I do care about roll. I don't want to ignore the up axis.
A previous answer has given a valid solution using angles. This answer will present an alternative method.
The orthonormal basis vectors, renaming them F = lookAt, R = sideaxis, U = rotatedup, directly form the columns of the 3x3 rotation matrix which is equivalent to your desired quaternion:
Multiplication with a vector is equivalent to using said vector's components as the coordinates in the camera's basis.
A 3x3 rotation matrix can be converted into a quaternion without conversion to angles / use of costly trigonometric functions. Below is a numerically stable C++ snippet which does this, returning a normalized quaternion:
inline void CalculateRotation( Quaternion& q ) const {
float trace = a[0][0] + a[1][1] + a[2][2];
if( trace > 0 ) {
float s = 0.5f / sqrtf(trace + 1.0f);
q.w = 0.25f / s;
q.x = ( a[2][1] - a[1][2] ) * s;
q.y = ( a[0][2] - a[2][0] ) * s;
q.z = ( a[1][0] - a[0][1] ) * s;
} else {
if ( a[0][0] > a[1][1] && a[0][0] > a[2][2] ) {
float s = 2.0f * sqrtf( 1.0f + a[0][0] - a[1][1] - a[2][2]);
q.w = (a[2][1] - a[1][2] ) / s;
q.x = 0.25f * s;
q.y = (a[0][1] + a[1][0] ) / s;
q.z = (a[0][2] + a[2][0] ) / s;
} else if (a[1][1] > a[2][2]) {
float s = 2.0f * sqrtf( 1.0f + a[1][1] - a[0][0] - a[2][2]);
q.w = (a[0][2] - a[2][0] ) / s;
q.x = (a[0][1] + a[1][0] ) / s;
q.y = 0.25f * s;
q.z = (a[1][2] + a[2][1] ) / s;
} else {
float s = 2.0f * sqrtf( 1.0f + a[2][2] - a[0][0] - a[1][1] );
q.w = (a[1][0] - a[0][1] ) / s;
q.x = (a[0][2] + a[2][0] ) / s;
q.y = (a[1][2] + a[2][1] ) / s;
q.z = 0.25f * s;
}
}
}
Source: http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/geometry/rotations/conversions/matrixToQuaternion
Converting this to suit your situation is of course just a matter of swapping the matrix elements with the corresponding vector components:
// your code from before
F = normalize(target - camera); // lookAt
R = normalize(cross(F, worldUp)); // sideaxis
U = cross(R, F); // rotatedup
// note that R needed to be re-normalized
// since F and worldUp are not necessary perpendicular
// so must remove the sin(angle) factor of the cross-product
// same not true for U because dot(R, F) = 0
// adapted source
Quaternion q;
double trace = R.x + U.y + F.z;
if (trace > 0.0) {
double s = 0.5 / sqrt(trace + 1.0);
q.w = 0.25 / s;
q.x = (U.z - F.y) * s;
q.y = (F.x - R.z) * s;
q.z = (R.y - U.x) * s;
} else {
if (R.x > U.y && R.x > F.z) {
double s = 2.0 * sqrt(1.0 + R.x - U.y - F.z);
q.w = (U.z - F.y) / s;
q.x = 0.25 * s;
q.y = (U.x + R.y) / s;
q.z = (F.x + R.z) / s;
} else if (U.y > F.z) {
double s = 2.0 * sqrt(1.0 + U.y - R.x - F.z);
q.w = (F.x - R.z) / s;
q.x = (U.x + R.y) / s;
q.y = 0.25 * s;
q.z = (F.y + U.z) / s;
} else {
double s = 2.0 * sqrt(1.0 + F.z - R.x - U.y);
q.w = (R.y - U.x) / s;
q.x = (F.x + R.z) / s;
q.y = (F.y + U.z) / s;
q.z = 0.25 * s;
}
}
(And needless to say swap y and z if you're using OpenGL.)
Assume you initially have three ortonormal vectors: worldUp, worldFront and worldSide, and lets use your equations for lookAt, sideAxis and rotatedUp. The worldSide vector will not be necessary to achieve the result.
Break the operation in two. First, rotate around worldUp. Then rotate around sideAxis, which will now actually be parallel to the rotated worldSide.
Axis1 = worldUp
Angle1 = (see below)
Axis2 = cross(lookAt, worldUp) = sideAxis
Angle2 = (see below)
Each of these rotations correspond to a quaternion using:
Q = cos(Angle/2) + i * Axis_x * sin(Angle/2) + j * Axis_y * sin(Angle/2) + k * Axis_z * sin(Angle/2)
Multiply both Q1 and Q2 and you get the desired quaternion.
Details for the angles:
Let P(worldUp) be the projection matrix on the worldUp direction, i.e., P(worldUp).v = cos(worldUp,v).worldUp or using kets and bras, P(worldUp) = |worldUp >< worldUp|. Let I be the identity matrix.
Project lookAt in the plane perpendicular to worldUp and normalize it.
tmp1 = (I - P(worldUp)).lookAt
n1 = normalize(tmp1)
Angle1 = arccos(dot(worldFront,n1))
Angle2 = arccos(dot(lookAt,n1))
EDIT1:
Notice that there is no need to compute transcendental functions. Since the dot product of a pair of normalized vectors is the cosine of an angle and assuming that cos(t) = x, we have the trigonometric identities:
cos(t/2) = sqrt((1 + x)/2)
sin(t/2) = sqrt((1 - x)/2)
If somebody search for C# version with handling every matrix edge cases (not input edge cases!), here it is:
public static SoftQuaternion LookRotation(SoftVector3 forward, SoftVector3 up)
{
forward = SoftVector3.Normalize(forward);
// First matrix column
SoftVector3 sideAxis = SoftVector3.Normalize(SoftVector3.Cross(up, forward));
// Second matrix column
SoftVector3 rotatedUp = SoftVector3.Cross(forward, sideAxis);
// Third matrix column
SoftVector3 lookAt = forward;
// Sums of matrix main diagonal elements
SoftFloat trace1 = SoftFloat.One + sideAxis.X - rotatedUp.Y - lookAt.Z;
SoftFloat trace2 = SoftFloat.One - sideAxis.X + rotatedUp.Y - lookAt.Z;
SoftFloat trace3 = SoftFloat.One - sideAxis.X - rotatedUp.Y + lookAt.Z;
// If orthonormal vectors forms identity matrix, then return identity rotation
if (trace1 + trace2 + trace3 < SoftMath.CalculationsEpsilon)
{
return Identity;
}
// Choose largest diagonal
if (trace1 + SoftMath.CalculationsEpsilon > trace2 && trace1 + SoftMath.CalculationsEpsilon > trace3)
{
SoftFloat s = SoftMath.Sqrt(trace1) * (SoftFloat)2.0f;
return new SoftQuaternion(
(SoftFloat)0.25f * s,
(rotatedUp.X + sideAxis.Y) / s,
(lookAt.X + sideAxis.Z) / s,
(rotatedUp.Z - lookAt.Y) / s);
}
else if (trace2 + SoftMath.CalculationsEpsilon > trace1 && trace2 + SoftMath.CalculationsEpsilon > trace3)
{
SoftFloat s = SoftMath.Sqrt(trace2) * (SoftFloat)2.0f;
return new SoftQuaternion(
(rotatedUp.X + sideAxis.Y) / s,
(SoftFloat)0.25f * s,
(lookAt.Y + rotatedUp.Z) / s,
(lookAt.X - sideAxis.Z) / s);
}
else
{
SoftFloat s = SoftMath.Sqrt(trace3) * (SoftFloat)2.0f;
return new SoftQuaternion(
(lookAt.X + sideAxis.Z) / s,
(lookAt.Y + rotatedUp.Z) / s,
(SoftFloat)0.25f * s,
(sideAxis.Y - rotatedUp.X) / s);
}
}
This realization based on deeper understanding of this conversation, and was tested for many edge case scenarios.
P.S.
Quaternion's constructor is (x, y, z, w)
SoftFloat is software float type, so you can easyly change it to built-in float if needed
For full edge case safe realization (including input) check this repo.
lookAt
sideaxis
rotatedup
If you normalize this 3 vectors, it is a components of rotation matrix 3x3. So just convert this rotation matrix to quaternion.
I am trying to determine the midpoint between two locations in an MKMapView. I am following the method outlined here (and here) and rewrote it in Objective-C, but the map is being centered somewhere northeast of Baffin Island, which is no where near the two points.
My method based on the java method linked above:
+(CLLocationCoordinate2D)findCenterPoint:(CLLocationCoordinate2D)_lo1 :(CLLocationCoordinate2D)_loc2 {
CLLocationCoordinate2D center;
double lon1 = _lo1.longitude * M_PI / 180;
double lon2 = _loc2.longitude * M_PI / 100;
double lat1 = _lo1.latitude * M_PI / 180;
double lat2 = _loc2.latitude * M_PI / 100;
double dLon = lon2 - lon1;
double x = cos(lat2) * cos(dLon);
double y = cos(lat2) * sin(dLon);
double lat3 = atan2( sin(lat1) + sin(lat2), sqrt((cos(lat1) + x) * (cos(lat1) + x) + y * y) );
double lon3 = lon1 + atan2(y, cos(lat1) + x);
center.latitude = lat3 * 180 / M_PI;
center.longitude = lon3 * 180 / M_PI;
return center;
}
The 2 parameters have the following data:
_loc1:
latitude = 45.4959839
longitude = -73.67826455
_loc2:
latitude = 45.482889
longitude = -73.57522299
The above are correctly place on the map (in and around Montreal). I am trying to center the map in the midpoint between the 2, yet my method return the following:
latitude = 65.29055
longitude = -82.55425
which somewhere in the arctic, when it should be around 500 miles south.
In case someone need code in Swift, I have written library function in Swift to calculate the midpoint between MULTIPLE coordinates:
// /** Degrees to Radian **/
class func degreeToRadian(angle:CLLocationDegrees) -> CGFloat {
return ( (CGFloat(angle)) / 180.0 * CGFloat(M_PI) )
}
// /** Radians to Degrees **/
class func radianToDegree(radian:CGFloat) -> CLLocationDegrees {
return CLLocationDegrees( radian * CGFloat(180.0 / M_PI) )
}
class func middlePointOfListMarkers(listCoords: [CLLocationCoordinate2D]) -> CLLocationCoordinate2D {
var x = 0.0 as CGFloat
var y = 0.0 as CGFloat
var z = 0.0 as CGFloat
for coordinate in listCoords{
var lat:CGFloat = degreeToRadian(coordinate.latitude)
var lon:CGFloat = degreeToRadian(coordinate.longitude)
x = x + cos(lat) * cos(lon)
y = y + cos(lat) * sin(lon)
z = z + sin(lat)
}
x = x/CGFloat(listCoords.count)
y = y/CGFloat(listCoords.count)
z = z/CGFloat(listCoords.count)
var resultLon: CGFloat = atan2(y, x)
var resultHyp: CGFloat = sqrt(x*x+y*y)
var resultLat:CGFloat = atan2(z, resultHyp)
var newLat = radianToDegree(resultLat)
var newLon = radianToDegree(resultLon)
var result:CLLocationCoordinate2D = CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: newLat, longitude: newLon)
return result
}
Detailed answer can be found here
Updated For Swift 5
func geographicMidpoint(betweenCoordinates coordinates: [CLLocationCoordinate2D]) -> CLLocationCoordinate2D {
guard coordinates.count > 1 else {
return coordinates.first ?? // return the only coordinate
CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 0, longitude: 0) // return null island if no coordinates were given
}
var x = Double(0)
var y = Double(0)
var z = Double(0)
for coordinate in coordinates {
let lat = coordinate.latitude.toRadians()
let lon = coordinate.longitude.toRadians()
x += cos(lat) * cos(lon)
y += cos(lat) * sin(lon)
z += sin(lat)
}
x /= Double(coordinates.count)
y /= Double(coordinates.count)
z /= Double(coordinates.count)
let lon = atan2(y, x)
let hyp = sqrt(x * x + y * y)
let lat = atan2(z, hyp)
return CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: lat.toDegrees(), longitude: lon.toDegrees())
}
}
Just a hunch, but I noticed your lon2 and lat2 variables are being computed with M_PI/100 and not M_PI/180.
double lon1 = _lo1.longitude * M_PI / 180;
double lon2 = _loc2.longitude * M_PI / 100;
double lat1 = _lo1.latitude * M_PI / 180;
double lat2 = _loc2.latitude * M_PI / 100;
Changing those to 180 might help you out a bit.
For swift users, corrected variant as #dinjas suggest
import Foundation
import MapKit
extension CLLocationCoordinate2D {
// MARK: CLLocationCoordinate2D+MidPoint
func middleLocationWith(location:CLLocationCoordinate2D) -> CLLocationCoordinate2D {
let lon1 = longitude * M_PI / 180
let lon2 = location.longitude * M_PI / 180
let lat1 = latitude * M_PI / 180
let lat2 = location.latitude * M_PI / 180
let dLon = lon2 - lon1
let x = cos(lat2) * cos(dLon)
let y = cos(lat2) * sin(dLon)
let lat3 = atan2( sin(lat1) + sin(lat2), sqrt((cos(lat1) + x) * (cos(lat1) + x) + y * y) )
let lon3 = lon1 + atan2(y, cos(lat1) + x)
let center:CLLocationCoordinate2D = CLLocationCoordinate2DMake(lat3 * 180 / M_PI, lon3 * 180 / M_PI)
return center
}
}
It's important to say that the formula the OP used to calculate geographic midpoint is based on this formula which explains the cos/sin/sqrt calculation.
This formula will give you the geographic midpoint for any long distance including the four quarters and the prime meridian.
But, if your calculation is for short-range around 1 Kilometer, using a simple average will produce the same midpoint results.
i.e:
let firstPoint = CLLocation(....)
let secondPoint = CLLocation(....)
let midPointLat = (firstPoint.coordinate.latitude + secondPoint.coordinate.latitude) / 2
let midPointLong = (firstPoint.coordinate.longitude + secondPoint.coordinate.longitude) / 2
You can actually use it for 10km but expect a deviation - if you only need an estimation for a short range midpoint with a fast solution it will be sufficient.
I think you are over thinking it a bit. Just do:
float lon3 = ((lon1 + lon2) / 2)
float lat3 = ((lat1 + lat2) / 2)
lat3 and lon3 will be the center point.