I am using DevExtreme and razor pages in a Asp.NetCore web application.
I would like to inject client side delete confirmation dialog when deleting a row.
Currently I'm using an asp-action on the controller to make the call to do the delete.
I'm not sure how/where to do this in client side (cshtml file).
I assume that I'd be somehow using javascript/jquery for this?
Are there existign 3rd party open source libraries that I should use for client side dialogs/message boxes?
DevExtreme DataGrid definition in cshtml file.
#(Html.DevExtreme().DataGrid<Customer>()
.DataSource(Model)
.Columns(columns => {
columns.AddFor(m => m.CustomerName);
columns.AddFor(m => m.CustomerId).CellTemplate(
<form asp-action="DeleteCustomer" method="post">
<input type="hidden" value="<%- data.CustomerId %>" name="CustomerId" />
<input type="image" src="/icon/close.png" />
</form>
</text>).Caption("");
});
Server side control action code:
[HttpPost]
public async Task<IActionResult> DeleteCustomer(Guid customerId)
{
// Call WebApi Service to delete row
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
I believe the datagrid has a built-in function for confirming the delete action on the client side. Might not be exactly what you were looking for but it could be a good start.
Here is the link to the demo page: https://demos.devexpress.com/ASPNetCore/Demo/DataGrid/RowEditingAndEditingEvents/
I have a Razor Page (.cshtml) which is a PDF Template. Now i am required to retreive html as string from the page itself to Save it as a PDF file. In MVC, i could use IRazonEngine interface for the same. But in Blazor what can used to obtain this.
Additionally, if i can use Blazor component instead of a Razor Page, how can i get the string of HTML?
Please help!
This is the sample Razor Page I have
#model UserModel
<div>
<strong>Full Name:</strong>
<div>#Html.DisplayFor(model => model.FullName)</div>
</div>
<div>
<strong>Address:</strong>
<div>#Html.DisplayFor(model => model.Address);</div>
</div>
<div>
<strong>DOB:</strong>
<div>#Html.DisplayFor(model => model.DateOfBirth);</div>
</div>
UPDATE :
I have now used RazorLight.NETCore3 and working smooth.
I think this is not about blazor or mvc pages, but you can use RazorEngine.NetCore library to convert the cshtml and fill in the dynamic data using a model and retrieve the completed html.
Here is a guide on how to do it: https://khalidabuhakmeh.com/generate-outputs-with-razor-engine-in-dotnet-core
Github project: https://github.com/fouadmess/RazorEngine
Here is a simple code which I have used in the past:
public string CompileContent(string content, object model)
{
var stringContent = Engine.Razor.RunCompile(content, Guid.NewGuid().ToString(), null, model);
return stringContent;
}
I am following an online example for creating a wizard control. It involves in serializing the model on the view, then pass it to the controller which Deserialize the model and use. Below is the code for the View,
#using Microsoft.Web.Mvc
#model Sample.Models.RegisterWizardViewModel
#{
var currentStep = Model.Steps[Model.CurrentStepIndex];
ViewBag.Title = "Register";
}
#using (Html.BeginForm())
{
#Html.Serialize("wizard", Model)
#Html.Hidden("StepType", Model.Steps[Model.CurrentStepIndex].GetType())
#Html.EditorFor(x => currentStep, null, "")
if (Model.CurrentStepIndex > 0)
{
<input type="submit" value="Previous" name="prev" />
}
if (Model.CurrentStepIndex < Model.Steps.Count - 1)
{
<input type="submit" value="Next" name="next" />
}
else
{
<input type="submit" value="Finish" name="finish" />
}
}
Now at first I was not finding [Deserialize] attribute in the controller and for that I have installed the MvcContrib package from the NuGet.
The problem I am facing is that #Html.Serialize("wizard", Model) is not found. Also the namespace Microsoft.Web.Mvc could not be resolved. If in the Controller file I use Microsoft.Web.Mvc then it work without a problem but when I use the same namespace in the view then it could not be resolved. What is the difference between System.Web.MVC and Microsoft.Web.MVC? How to resolved the namespace error?
I have also read that #Html.Serialize is not available and it can be accessible through MVC Futures. I have added the package but how to use it to Serialize the model on the View?
Edit: Just like to mention that I have installed the nuget package Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Futures 5.0.0' but I am unable to see any reference in the references folder. There is no Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc or Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Futures reference in the references folder. Where did it go I wonder?
I am trying to create a simple web app in google scripts with the HTML api.
code.gs
function doGet() {
return HtmlService.createHtmlOutputFromFile('index');
}
function processForm(formObject) {
var formBlob = formObject.myFile;
var driveFile = DriveApp.createFile(formBlob);
return driveFile.getUrl();
}
index.html
<script>
function updateUrl(url) {
var div = document.getElementById('output');
div.innerHTML = 'Got it!';
}
</script>
<form id="myForm">
<input name="myFile" type="file" />
<input type="button" value="Submit"
onclick="google.script.run
.withSuccessHandler(updateUrl)
.processForm(this.parentNode)" />
</form>
<div id="output"></div>
The form fails to submit. I´m using google chrome Versión 30.0.1599.101 m
This appears in the console: Uncaught NetworkError: Form submission failed.
Here is the app: https://script.google.com/d/1yrgM20n1ZI99bChN2qtQWgGck36OccLN3A16Gn7tCPvsJw0EcK_ql7C5/edit?usp=sharing
Maybe you should add encoding="multipart/form-data" attribute to form tag.
If not solved already – did you try changing the input type from "button" to "submit"? On top of that I'd also try giving it another value than "Submit" since that might interfere with the actual submit parameter.
I got the DurandalJS StarterKit template on VS2012... All works great...
But in some views I need to do something like that:
#if (Roles.IsUserInRole("Administrators"))
{
<p>Test</p>
}
However with durandal all my views are '.html' files... Is that possible to use '.cshtml' files to access some information like that?
Or is there any other way to do that with durandal?
Junior
I am doing it like this:
Create a generic controller for Durandal views:
public class DurandalViewController : Controller
{
//
// GET: /App/views/{viewName}.html
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Get(string viewName)
{
return View("~/App/views/" + viewName + ".cshtml");
}
}
Register a route:
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Durandal App Views",
url: "App/views/{viewName}.html",
defaults: new { controller = "DurandalView", action = "Get" }
);
Copy Views/web.config to /App/views/web.config (so Razor views work in this location).
This lets me use the normal Durandal conventions (even the html extension for views), and put durandal views as cshtml files in their normal location without adding any more server code.
If you also have static html views, you can also place the cshtml views in a subfolder or use the normal MVC /Views folder.
I wouldn't recommend using ASP.NET MVC with Durandal.
What you are probably looking to do is use the Razor view engine (to get the benefits of a compiler, strong typing etc.) which exists independently from ASP.NET MVC. Just WebAPI for data I/O is more than enough to very efficiently create a Durandal.js application.
If you are interested in using Razor/CSHTML with Durandal and Knockout there is an open source option out there called FluentKnockoutHelpers that may be exactly what you are looking for. It offers much of the 'nice' parts of ASP.NET MVC allowing you to use the awesome abilities of Durandal and Knockout with almost no downfalls.
Source
Live demo using Durandal.js
In a nutshell it provides a bunch of features which makes doing Durandal/Knockout development just as easy as ASP.NET MVC. (You simply provide a C# type that your JavaScript model is based off of for most of the features.) You only have to write JavaScript and un-compiled markup for complicated cases which is unavoidable and no different than MVC! (Except in MVC your code would also likely end up would also be a big jQuery mess which is why you are using Durandal/Knockout in the first place!)
Features:
Painlessly generate Knockout syntax with strongly typed, fluent, lambda expression helpers similar to ASP.NET MVC
Rich intellisense and compiler support for syntax generation
Fluent syntax makes it a breeze to create custom helpers or extend whats built in
OSS alternative to ASP.NET MVC helpers: feel free to add optional features that everyone in the community can use
Painlessly provides validation based on .NET types and DataAnnotations in a few lines of code for all current/future application types and changes
Client side JavaScript object factory (based on C# types) to create new items in for example, a list, with zero headaches or server traffic
Example without FluentKnockoutHelpers
<div class="control-group">
<label for="FirstName" class="control-label">
First Name
</label>
<div class="controls">
<input type="text" data-bind="value: person.FirstName" id="FirstName" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="control-group">
<label for="LastName" class="control-label">
Last Name
</label>
<div class="controls">
<input type="text" data-bind="value: person.LastName" id="LastName" />
</div>
</div>
<h2>
Hello,
<!-- ko text: person.FirstName --><!-- /ko -->
<!-- ko text: person.LastName --><!-- /ko -->
</h2>
Provide FluentKnockoutHelpers with a .NET type and you can do this in style with Intellisense and a compiler in Razor / CSHTML
#{
var person = this.KnockoutHelperForType<Person>("person", true);
}
<div class="control-group">
#person.LabelFor(x => x.FirstName).Class("control-label")
<div class="controls">
#person.BoundTextBoxFor(x => x.FirstName)
</div>
</div>
<div class="control-group">
#person.LabelFor(x => x.LastName).Class("control-label")
<div class="controls">
#person.BoundTextBoxFor(x => x.LastName)
</div>
</div>
<h2>
Hello,
#person.BoundTextFor(x => x.FirstName)
#person.BoundTextFor(x => x.LastName)
</h2>
Take a look at the Source or Live Demo for an exhaustive overview of FluentKnockoutHelper's features in a non-trivial Durandal.js application.
Yes, you can absolutely use cshtml files with Durandal and take advantage of Razor on the server. I assume that also means you want MVC, so you can do that too and use its routing.
If you don;t want the routing then you can set the webpages.Enabled in the web.config, as the other comments suggest.
<add key="webpages:Enabled" value="true" />
I don't recommend that you use .cshtml files as views directly. You're better off placing the .cshtml files behind a controller.
For example, take the HotTowel sample, edit /App/main.js, and replace the function definition with the following:
define(['durandal/app',
'durandal/viewLocator',
'durandal/system',
'durandal/plugins/router',
'durandal/viewEngine',
'services/logger'],
function (app, viewLocator, system, router, viewEngine, logger) {
Note that we added a reference to the Durandal viewEngine. Then we need to replace
viewLocator.useConvention();
with
viewLocator.useConvention('viewmodels', '../../dynamic');
viewEngine.viewExtension = '/';
The first argument to viewLocation.useConvention sets the /Apps/viewmodels/ directory as the location for the view models js files, but for the view location, uses the URL http://example.com/dynamic/, with an extension of '/'. So that if Durandal is looking for the view named 'shell', it will reference http://example.com/dynamic/shell/ (this is because the view directory is mapped relative to the viewmodels directory, hence /App/viewmodels/../../dynamic will give you simply /dynamic).
By convention, this previous URL (http://example.com/dynamic/shell/) will be mapped to the controller DynamicController, and the action "Shell".
After this, you simply add a controller - DynamicController.cs, like this:
// will render dynamic views for Durandal
public class DynamicController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Shell()
{
return View();
}
public ActionResult Home()
{
return View();
}
public ActionResult Nav()
{
return View();
}
public ActionResult Details()
{
return View();
}
public ActionResult Sessions()
{
return View();
}
public ActionResult Footer()
{
return View();
}
}
Create .cshtml files for each of the above actions. This way you get to use controllers, server side IoC et al to generate dynamic views for your SPA.
DurandaljS is a client framework which forms mainly a solid base for single-page apps (SPA).
I assume you are using asp.net web API as your server technology. In that case, you can determine the user's role inside your API controller and based on that return data to the client. On the client you can use Knockout "if" binding in order to show / hide certain areas of your page.
What you perhaps can do is placing this code in the Index.cshtml.
Following link shows how to customize moduleid to viewid mapping
http://durandaljs.com/documentation/View-Location/
by convention durandal tries to find view url in following steps
1) Checke whether object has getView() function which returns either dom or a string ( url for the view)
2) If object does not have getView function then checks whether object has viewUrl property
3) If above two steps fails to produce url or a DOM view drundal falls to default convention
which maps moduleid xyz.js to view xyz.html using view url ( path of Views folder ) defined in main.js
so for moduleid xyz.js path of the view will be views/xyz.html
you can overwrite this default mapping behavior by overwriting convertModuleIdToViewId function.
So there are many ways you can customize your view url for specific model (.js object)
I made an extension to Durandal which gives you the ability to place an applicationContent div in your cshtml file together with the applicationHost div. In applicationContent you can now use both ASP .Net MVC syntax together with knockout bindings.
Only thing I did was put some extra code in the viewLocator.js file which looks for an applicationContent div:
locateViewForObject: function(obj, area, elementsToSearch) {
var view;
if (obj.getView) {
view = obj.getView();
if (view) {
return this.locateView(view, area, elementsToSearch);
}
}
if (obj.viewUrl) {
return this.locateView(obj.viewUrl, area, elementsToSearch);
}
view = document.getElementById('applicationContent');
if (view) {
return this.locateView(view, area, elementsToSearch);
}
var id = system.getModuleId(obj);
if (id) {
return this.locateView(this.convertModuleIdToViewId(id), area, elementsToSearch);
}
return this.locateView(this.determineFallbackViewId(obj), area, elementsToSearch);
},
Your original cshtml file can now do something like this:
<div class="row underheader" id="applicationContent">
<div class="small-5 columns">
<div class="contentbox">
#using (Html.BeginForm("Generate", "Barcode", FormMethod.Post, Attributes.Create()
.With("data-bind", "submit: generateBarcodes")))
{
<div class="row formrow">
<label for="aantalBijlagen">#Translations.Label_AantalBijlagen</label>
</div>
<div class="row">
<select name="aantalBijlagen" class="small-6 columns">
<option>0</option>
<option>1</option>
<option>2</option>
<option>3</option>
<option>4</option>
</select>
</div>
<div class="row">
<button class="button right" type="submit" id="loginbutton"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-cog"></span> #Translations.Action_Generate</button>
</div>
}
</div>
</div>
<div class="small-7 columns" data-bind="if: hasPdfUrl">
<div class="contentbox lastcontent">
<iframe data-bind="attr: {src: pdf_url}"></iframe>
</div>
</div>
You can find my fork of the durandal project here and a small blogpost of what and how I did this here.
I'm not very familiar with DurandalJS but because it's a client-side system, it should make no difference what technology is used on the server to generate the HTML markup. So if you use Razor CSHTML files to generate the HTML on the server, DurandalJS should work just fine with it.
If you're getting a particular error then please share that error, but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work.