I am trying to setup a filter that is similar to a defect view within a Trend chart. The filter in the defect view is:
(State < Closed) AND (Severity <= Major) AND (Tags !contains Not a Stop Ship)
I cannot seem to get the Tags find to work correctly. Any suggestions?
this.myTrendChart = Ext.create('Rally.ui.chart.Chart', {
storeType: 'Rally.data.lookback.SnapshotStore',
storeConfig: {
find: {
_TypeHierarchy: "Defect",
State: {
$lt: "Closed"
},
Severity: {
$lte: "Major"
},
Tags: {
$ne: "Not a Stop Ship"
},
_ProjectHierarchy: ProjectOid
},
hydrate: ["Priority"],
fetch: ["_ValidFrom", "_ValidTo", "ObjectID", "Priority"]
},
calculatorType: 'My.TrendCalc',
calculatorConfig: {},
chartConfig: {
chart: {
zoomType: 'x',
type: 'line'
},
title: {
text: 'Defects over Time'
},
xAxis: {
type: 'datetime',
minTickInterval: 3
},
yAxis: {
title: {
text: 'Number of Defects'
}
}
}
});
Based on reviewing the JSON messages, I figured out the tag needed to be the ObjectId. Once I found this, I replaced "Not a Stop Ship" with the ObjectId value and the filter worked correctly.
Related
I need to filter data, including or excluding, multiple possible options in a column, but I don't know how to do it.
this only shows me a "single" select below the column name, with the possible options, but I can't select multiple of them, and I can't find an option to do that.
I need to filter by 2 rooms or multiple users, but the selection is not multiple, and there is no option to do it.
Now I have this HTML code:
<v-client-table id="messages" style="width:100%;" ref="table_reference" :options="table_options" :columns="table_fields" v-model="messages_array">
</v-client-table>
and this table configuration (messages, and other vars excluded):
const app2 = {
el: "#messages-container",
data() {
return {
table_options: {
filterByColumn: true,
texts: {
filterPlaceholder: ""
},
selectable: {
mode: 'single', // or 'multiple'
only: function(row) {
return true // any condition
},
selectAllMode: 'all',
programmatic: false
},
sortIcon: {
base: 'fa fas',
up: 'fa-long-arrow-alt-up',
down: 'fa-long-arrow-alt-down',
is: 'fa-sort'
},
listColumns: {
user_id: [],
room: [],
status: []
},
sortable: ['user_id', 'status', 'room', "created"],
filterable: ['user_id', "room", "status"],
headings: {
id: '#',
user_id: 'Name',
navigator_info: 'Details',
message: 'Message',
room: 'Room',
status: 'Status',
created: 'Date',
response_to: 'Actions'
}
},
table_fields: ["id", "user_id", "message", "room", "status", "created"],
}
}
};
I think this is a common use of a data table, and there should be a way to do it. I would appreciate your help. Thank you very much in advance!
I am using rally lookback API and creating a defect trend chart. I need to filter defects that do not have a tag "xyz".
Using the following:
this.myTrendChart = Ext.create('Rally.ui.chart.Chart', {
storeType: 'Rally.data.lookback.SnapshotStore',
storeConfig: {
find: {
_TypeHierarchy: "Defect",
State: { $lt: "Closed"},
Tags.Name: { $nin: ["xyz"] },
_ProjectHierarchy: projectOid,
_ValidFrom: {$gte: startDateUTC}
}
},
calculatorType: 'Calci',
calculatorConfig: {},
chartConfig: {
chart: {
zoomType: 'x',
type: 'line'
},
title: {
text: 'Defect trend'
},
xAxis: {
type: 'datetime',
minTickInterval: 7
},
yAxis: {
title: {
text: 'Number of Defects'
}
}
}
});
This does not return any data. Need help with the filter for tags.
Tags is a collection of tag-oids so you'll need to find and use the oid of the tag vs the name, at which point it'll just be Tags: { $nin: [oid] }. Caveat: technically, due to how expensive it is, $nin is unsupported (https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/doc/#/manual/48e0589f681160fc316a8a4802dc389f)...but it doesn't throw an error so maybe it works anyway.
What is the optimize Query for this situation
So the Situation is a User is following many XY user and these XY have got events, So what will the best and optimize query to get all the events from his followers XY in sorted form (sort by Date). I have got create Date in my schema
This is my User Schema
var userSchema = new Schema({
followers:[{
type: Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'XY'
}]
});
var User = mongoose.model('User',userSchema);
module.exports = User;
Here is My XY schema
var XY= new Schema({
events:[{
type: Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'Event'
}],
});
var XY= mongoose.model('XY',XY);
module.exports = XY;
Try this.
User.aggregate([
{ $match: { _id: mongoose.Types.ObjectId(<userId here>) } },
{ $unwind: { path: "$followers" } },
{ $lookup: { from: 'XY', localField: 'followers', foreignField: '_id', as: 'followers' } },
{ $unwind: { path: "$followers" } },
{ $unwind: { path: "$followers.events" } },
{ $lookup: { from: 'Event', localField: 'followers.events', foreignField: '_id', as: 'followers.events' } },
{ $unwind: { path: "$followers.events" } },
{ $sort: { "followers.events.createdDate": **-1** } }, // -1 -> desc, 1 -> asc
{
"$project":
{
"_id": "$followers.events._id",
"createdDate": "$followers.events.createdDate",
// populate other event details here accordingly
}
}
], function (err, events, next) {
});
$lookup lets you populate a sub-document from a different schema.
After populating, the resultant documents will be an array, so $unwind is used before working on them.
note that $unwind is also used before doing a $lookup here as the field we are trying to populate is itself an array.
I see that Hierarchical trees are labeled as experimental on the Rally site (https://help.rallydev.com/apps/2.0rc3/doc/#!/api/Rally.ui.grid.TreeGrid). I wanted to build an app using the hierarchical tree and I had a few questions about the features. Is it possible to filter the tree or no? Also can i add up the totals of the tasks for a given userstory (estimate, todo, actual, etc) and list that total as the userstory value? Is there another way to get a list of the userstories with the tasks in a list beneath it?
A not-treegrid example: this app that uses group and summary features in a grid of tasks in current iteration grouped by workproduct (user story), where Estimate values of individual tasks are summed up. Full code is in this github repo.
launch: function() {
var that = this;
var today = new Date().toISOString();
var stories = Ext.create('Rally.data.wsapi.Store', {
model: 'UserStory',
fetch: ['Tasks'],
filters: [
{
property: 'Iteration.StartDate',
operator: '<=',
value: today
},
{
property: 'Iteration.EndDate',
operator: '>=',
value: today
}
]
});
stories.load().then({
success: this.loadTasks,
scope: this
}).then({
success:function(results) {
that.makeGrid(results);
},
failure: function(){
console.log("oh noes!")
}
});
},
loadTasks: function(stories){
console.log("load tasks",stories)
var promises = [];
_.each(stories, function(story){
var tasks = story.get('Tasks');
if (tasks.Count > 0) {
tasks.store = story.getCollection('Tasks',{fetch:['Name','FormattedID','Estimate','State','Blocked','WorkProduct']});
promises.push(tasks.store.load());
}
});
return Deft.Promise.all(promises);
},
makeGrid: function(results){
var tasks = _.flatten(results);
var data = [];
_.each(tasks, function(task){
data.push(task.data);
})
_.each(data, function(record){
record.Story = record.WorkProduct.FormattedID + " " + record.WorkProduct.Name;;
})
this.add({
xtype: 'rallygrid',
showPagingToolbar: true,
showRowActionsColumn: true,
editable: false,
store: Ext.create('Rally.data.custom.Store', {
data: data,
groupField: 'Story',
}),
features: [{ftype:'groupingsummary'}],
columnCfgs: [
{
xtype: 'templatecolumn',text: 'ID',dataIndex: 'FormattedID',width: 100,
tpl: Ext.create('Rally.ui.renderer.template.FormattedIDTemplate'),
summaryRenderer: function() {
return "Estimate Total";
}
},
{
text: 'Name',dataIndex: 'Name',
},
{
text: 'State',dataIndex: 'State',xtype: 'templatecolumn',
tpl: Ext.create('Rally.ui.renderer.template.ScheduleStateTemplate',
{
states: ['Defined', 'In-Progress', 'Completed'],
field: {
name: 'State'
}
})
},
{
text: 'Estimate',dataIndex: 'Estimate',
summaryType: 'sum',
},
{
text: 'WorkProduct',dataIndex: 'WorkProduct',
renderer: function(val, meta, record) {
return '' + record.get('WorkProduct').FormattedID + '';
}
},
]
});
}
Update: If you want to filter the task store include a filter here:
tasks.store = story.getCollection('Tasks',{fetch:['Name','FormattedID','Estimate','State','Blocked','WorkProduct'],filters:{property: 'State',operator: '<',value: 'Completed'}});
A treegrid example: Rally.ui.grid.TreeGrid you referred is still a work in progress. I have not seen a working example of a story hierarchy using a treegrid but it does not mean it's impossible.
When I tested a story hierarchy, child stories did not appear under epic stories, however a story/task hierarchy worked. The filtering worked too. Here is an example:
Ext.define('CustomApp', {
extend: 'Rally.app.App',
componentCls: 'app',
launch:function(){
Ext.create('Rally.data.wsapi.TreeStoreBuilder').build({
models: ['userstory'],
autoLoad: true,
filters:[
{
property: 'Name',
operator: 'contains',
value: 'story'
}
],
enableHierarchy: true
}).then({
success: function(store) {
var grid = Ext.create('Ext.Container', {
items: [{
xtype: 'rallytreegrid',
columnCfgs: [
'Name',
'Owner'
],
store: store
}]
});
that.add(grid);
}
});
}
The screenshot below shows that tasks are nested under a child story as expected,but the child story is not nested under parent. The grid is filtered by Name as expected:
Not sure if this is possible. In my example I am using json as the source but this could be any size. In my example on fiddle I would use this data in a shared fashion by only binding two columns ProductFamily (xAxis) and Value (yAxis) but I would like to be able to group the columns by using an aggregate.
In this example without the grouping it shows multiple columns for FamilyA. Can this be grouped into ONE column and the values aggregated regardless of the amount of data?
So the result will show one column for FamilyA of Value 4850 + 4860 = 9710 etc.?
A problem with all examples online is that there is always the correct amount of data for each category. Not sure if this makes sense?
http://jsfiddle.net/jqIndy/ZPUr4/3/
//Sample data (see fiddle for complete sample)
[{
"Client":"",
"Date":"2011-06-01",
"ProductNumber":"5K190",
"ProductName":"CABLE USB",
"ProductFamily":"FamilyC",
"Status":"OPEN",
"Units":5000,
"Value":5150.0,
"ShippedToDestination":"CHINA"
}]
var productDataSource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
data: dr,
//group: {
// field: "ProductFamily",
//},
sort: {
field: "ProductFamily",
dir: "asc"
},
//aggregate: [
// { field: "Value", aggregate: "sum" }
//],
//schema: {
// model: {
// fields: {
// ProductFamily: { type: "string" },
// Value: { type: "number" },
// }
// }
//}
})
$("#product-family-chart").kendoChart({
dataSource: productDataSource,
//autoBind: false,
title: {
text: "Product Family (past 12 months)"
},
seriesDefaults: {
overlay: {
gradient: "none"
},
markers: {
visible: false
},
majorTickSize: 0,
opacity: .8
},
series: [{
type: "column",
field: "Value"
}],
valueAxis: {
line: {
visible: false
},
labels: {
format: "${0}",
skip: 2,
step: 2,
color: "#727f8e"
}
},
categoryAxis: {
field: "ProductFamily"
},
legend: {
visible: false
},
tooltip: {
visible: true,
format: "Value: ${0:N0}"
}
});
The Kendo UI Chart does not support binding to group aggregates. At least not yet.
My suggestion is to:
Move the aggregate definition, so it's calculated per group:
group: {
field: "ProductFamily",
aggregates: [ {
field: "Value",
aggregate: "sum"
}]
}
Extract the aggregated values in the change handler:
var view = products.view();
var families = $.map(view, function(v) {
return v.value;
});
var values = $.map(view, function(v) {
return v.aggregates.Value.sum;
});
Bind the groups and categories manually:
series: [ {
type: "column",
data: values
}],
categoryAxis: {
categories: families
}
Working demo can be found here: http://jsbin.com/ofuduy/5/edit
I hope this helps.