I have a SQL table called transaction where different type of transactions are stored e.g. Payment arrangements, sent letter and so on.
I have ran a query:
SELECT TOP 6 Case_Ref as Case Ref,TrancRefNO as Tranc RefNO, Date_CCYYMMDD, LetterSent, Arr_Freq,
SMS_Sent_CCYYMMDD
From Transaction
Where (LEN(LetterSent ) >0 OR Arr_Freq >0)
The table looks something like this
Case Ref Tranc RefNO Date_CCYYMMDD LetterSent Arr_Freq SMS_Sent_CCYYMMDD
-------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------------
15001 100 20140425 Stage1
15001 101 20140430 Stage2
15001 102 20140510 30
15001 104 20140610 30
15002 105 20140425 Stage1
15002 106 20140610 30
From the table, I can clearly see that a letter was sent on '20140430' for the case 15001 and the person started arrangements on '20140510'. And a letter was sent on '20140425' for the case 15001 and the person made arrangements on on '20140610'.
I'm trying to create a excel report using C# which will show the total number of cases got arrangements after getting a letter and total number of cases for arrangements after receiving a SMS.
I have tried
select MAX(ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY o3.Date_CCYYMMDD ASC)), o3.
from
(
select o.TrancRefNO, o.Date_CCYYMMDD , sq.LetterSent
from Transaction o
join Transaction sq on sq.TrancRefNO= o.TrancRefNO
and sq.Date_CCYYMMDD <= o.Date_CCYYMMDD
where o.Arr_Freq >0
and len(sq.LetterSent ) > 0
) o2
join Transaction o3 on o3.TrancRefNO= o2.TrancRefNO
But gives me an error :
Msg 4109, Level 15, State 1, Line 2
Windowed functions cannot be used in the context of another windowed function or aggregate.
P.s Title will need to be changed as I don't know what to call it.
SELECT * FROM table as t1
WHERE (LetterSent != '' OR SMS_SENT_CCYYMMDD != '')
AND (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table AS t2
WHERE t1.case_ref = t2.case_ref
AND t1.DATE_CCYYMMDD < t2.DATE_CCYYMMDD
AND Arr_freq > 0) > 1
My assumptions based on what I could glean from your post:
ARR_FREQ!='' indicates that some time of arrangement was made at the specified date
Since NULL is not shown, I'm assuming all values are ''. With null values you will have to use a coalesce command
Hope this helps. I'm not sure about your second question (max date) in the comments. You would need to explain it a bit more.
SELECT TOP 1 ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY Date_CCYYMMDD ASC), mytable.*
FROM mytable
or just
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM mytable
ORDER BY Date_CCYYMMDD ASC
but i guess, you want to get not the MIN date overall, but group by first
SELECT * FROM table where Date =
(SELECT MIN(Date) from table)
Related
I'm looking to filter out rows in the database (PostgreSQL) if one of the values in the status column occurs. The idea is to sum the amount column if the unique reference only has a status equals to 1. The query should not SELECT the reference at all if it has also a status of 2 or any other status for that matter. status refers to the state of the transaction.
Current data table:
reference | amount | status
1 100 1
2 120 1
2 -120 2
3 200 1
3 -200 2
4 450 1
Result:
amount | status
550 1
I've simplified the data example but I think it gives a good idea of what I'm looking for.
I'm unsuccessful in selecting only references that only have status 1.
I've tried sub-queries, using the HAVING clause and other methods without success.
Thanks
Here's a way using not exists to sum all rows where the status is 1 and other rows with the same reference and a non 1 status do not exist.
select sum(amount) from mytable t1
where status = 1
and not exists (
select 1 from mytable t2
where t2.reference = t1.reference
and t2.status <> 1
)
SELECT SUM(amount)
FROM table
WHERE reference NOT IN (
SELECT reference
FROM table
WHERE status<>1
)
The subquery SELECTs all references that must be excluded, then the main query sums everything except them
select sum (amount) as amount
from (
select sum(amount) as amount
from t
group by reference
having not bool_or(status <> 1)
) s;
amount
--------
550
You could use windowed functions to count occurences of status different than 1 per each group:
SELECT SUM(amount) AS amount
FROM (SELECT *,COUNT(*) FILTER(WHERE status<>1) OVER(PARTITION BY reference) cnt
FROM tc) AS sub
WHERE cnt = 0;
Rextester Demo
I have a table like below
id name year
--------------
1 A 2000
2 B 2000
2 B 2000
2 B 2000
5 C 2000
1 D 2001
3 E 2001
as well as you see in the year 2000 we missed id '3' and id '4' and in the year 2001 we missed id '2'. I want to generate my second table which includes missed items.
2nd table :
From-id to-id name year
--------------------------------
3 4 null 2000
2 null null 2001
Which method in a SQL query can solve my problem?
Gaps and Islands in Sequences is the name of this problem. you read this article
Here's something to get you started:
WITH cte AS
(
SELECT *
FROM
(VALUES
(1),(2),(3),(4),(5)
) Tally(number)
), cte2 as
(
SELECT DISTINCT [year]
FROM
(VALUES
(2000),(2000),(2001)
)tbl([year])
), cte3 as
(
SELECT *
FROM cte
CROSS JOIN cte2
)
SELECT *
FROM cte3
LEFT OUTER JOIN YourTable ON cte3.number = YourTable.id AND cte3.[year] = YourTable[year)
A few notes: please avoid using reserved keywords as column names (such as year).
Furthermore, since I didn't know how you'd handle multiple missing ranges I did not format the output to reflect a range. For example: What would be your expected output if only one row with id=3 would be in your table?
I'd probably use ROW_NUMBER for this
This query gives you what the correct ID should be (if I interpreted your question right):
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY yr ORDER BY name, yr) as "Correct ID", *
FROM misorder
It assigns a row number (so a number starting from 1 increasing by 1 every time the year is the same).
And to let you know which ones are missing I think this should be a working solution:
WITH missing AS
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY yr ORDER BY name, yr) as "Correct ID", *
FROM misorder
)
SELECT * FROM missing
WHERE "Correct ID" != "id"
It takes the first query as a base to select only those records where the assumed correct ID is not equal to the currently assigned ID. You can turn this into a query to include the ranges you mentioned, but not sure if that is really necessary.
Hope this helps.
I am doing a project creating an admission system for a college; the technologies are Java and Oracle.
In one of the tables, pre-generated serial numbers are stored. Later, against those serial numbers, the applicant's form data will be entered. My requirement is that when the entry process is completed I will have to generate a Lot wise report. If during feeding pre-generated serial numbers any sequence numbers went missing.
For example, say in a table, the sequence numbers are 7001, 7002, 7004, 7005, 7006, 7010.
From the above series it is clear that from 7001 to 7010 the numbers missing are 7003, 7007, 7008 and 7009
Is there any DBMS function available in Oracle to find out these numbers or if any stored procedure may fulfill my purpose then please suggest an algorithm.
I can find some techniques in Java but for speed I want to find the solution in Oracle.
A solution without hardcoding the 9:
select min_a - 1 + level
from ( select min(a) min_a
, max(a) max_a
from test1
)
connect by level <= max_a - min_a + 1
minus
select a
from test1
Results:
MIN_A-1+LEVEL
-------------
7003
7007
7008
7009
4 rows selected.
Try this:
SELECT t1.SequenceNumber + 1 AS "From",
MIN(t2.SequenceNumber) - 1 AS "To"
FROM MyTable t1
JOIN MyTable t2 ON t1.SequenceNumber < t2.SequenceNumber
GROUP BY t1.SequenceNumber
HAVING t1.SequenceNumber + 1 < MIN(t2.SequenceNumber)
Here is the result for the sequence 7001, 7002, 7004, 7005, 7006, 7010:
From To
7003 7003
7007 7009
This worked but selects the first sequence (start value) since it doesn't have predecessor. Tested in SQL Server but should work in Oracle
SELECT
s.sequence FROM seqs s
WHERE
s.sequence - (SELECT sequence FROM seqs WHERE sequence = s.sequence-1) IS NULL
Here is a test result
Table
-------------
7000
7001
7004
7005
7007
7008
Result
----------
7000
7004
7007
To get unassigned sequence, just do value[i] - 1 where i is greater first row e.g. (7004 - 1 = 7003 and 7007 - 1 = 7006) which are available sequences
I think you can improve on this simple query
This works on postgres >= 8.4. With some slight modifications to the CTE-syntax it could be made to work for oracle and microsoft, too.
-- EXPLAIN ANALYZE
WITH missing AS (
WITH RECURSIVE fullhouse AS (
SELECT MIN(num)+1 as num
FROM numbers n0
UNION ALL SELECT 1+ fh0.num AS num
FROM fullhouse fh0
WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT * FROM numbers ex
WHERE ex.num > fh0.num
)
)
SELECT * FROM fullhouse fh1
EXCEPT ( SELECT num FROM numbers nx)
)
SELECT * FROM missing;
Here's a solution that:
Relies on Oracle's LAG function
Does not require knowledge of the complete sequence (but thus doesn't detect if very first or last numbers in sequence were missed)
Lists the values surrounding the missing lists of numbers
Lists the missing lists of numbers as contiguous groups (perhaps convenient for reporting)
Tragically fails for very large lists of missing numbers, due to listagg limitations
SQL:
WITH MentionedValues /*this would just be your actual table, only defined here to provide data for this example */
AS (SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT LEVEL + 7000 seqnum
FROM DUAL
CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 10000)
WHERE seqnum NOT IN (7003,7007,7008,7009)--omit those four per example
),
Ranges /*identifies all ranges between adjacent rows*/
AS (SELECT seqnum AS seqnum_curr,
LAG (seqnum, 1) OVER (ORDER BY seqnum) AS seqnum_prev,
seqnum - (LAG (seqnum, 1) OVER (ORDER BY seqnum)) AS diff
FROM MentionedValues)
SELECT Ranges.*,
( SELECT LISTAGG (Ranges.seqnum_prev + LEVEL, ',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY 1)
FROM DUAL
CONNECT BY LEVEL < Ranges.diff) "MissingValues" /*count from lower seqnum+1 up to lower_seqnum+(diff-1)*/
FROM Ranges
WHERE diff != 1 /*ignore when diff=1 because that means the numers are sequential without skipping any*/
;
Output:
SEQNUM_CURR SEQNUM_PREV DIFF MissingValues
7004 7002 2 "7003"
7010 7006 4 "7007,7008,7009"
One simple way to get your answer for your scenario is this:
create table test1 ( a number(9,0));
insert into test1 values (7001);
insert into test1 values (7002);
insert into test1 values (7004);
insert into test1 values (7005);
insert into test1 values (7006);
insert into test1 values (7010);
commit;
select n.n from (select ROWNUM + 7001 as n from dual connect by level <= 9) n
left join test1 t on n.n = t.a where t.a is null;
The select will give you the answer from your example. This only makes sense, if you know in advance in which range your numbers are and the range should not too big. The first number must be the offset in the ROWNUM part and the length of the sequence is the limit to the level in the connect by part.
I would have suggested connect by level as Stefan has done, however, you can't use a sub-query in this statement, which means that it isn't really suitable for you as you need to know what the maximum and minimum values of your sequence are.
I would suggest a pipe-lined table function might be the best way to generate the numbers you need to do the join. In order for this to work you'd need an object in your database to return the values to:
create or replace type t_num_array as table of number;
Then the function:
create or replace function generate_serial_nos return t_num_array pipelined is
l_first number;
l_last number;
begin
select min(serial_no), max_serial_no)
into l_first, l_last
from my_table
;
for i in l_first .. l_last loop
pipe row(i);
end loop;
return;
end generate_serial_nos;
/
Using this function the following would return a list of serial numbers, between the minimum and maximum.
select * from table(generate_serial_nos);
Which means that your query to find out which serial numbers are missing becomes:
select serial_no
from ( select *
from table(generate_serial_nos)
) generator
left outer join my_table actual
on generator.column_value = actual.serial_no
where actual.serial_no is null
SELECT ROWNUM "Missing_Numbers" FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= (SELECT MAX(a) FROM test1)
MINUS
SELECT a FROM test1 ;
Improved query is:
SELECT ROWNUM "Missing_Numbers" FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= (SELECT MAX(a) FROM test1)
MINUS
SELECT ROWNUM "Missing_Numbers" FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL < (SELECT Min(a) FROM test1)
MINUS
SELECT a FROM test1;
Note: a is column in which we find missing value.
Try with a subquery:
SELECT A.EMPNO + 1 AS MissingEmpNo
FROM tblEmpMaster AS A
WHERE A.EMPNO + 1 NOT IN (SELECT EMPNO FROM tblEmpMaster)
select A.ID + 1 As ID
From [Missing] As A
Where A.ID + 1 Not IN (Select ID from [Missing])
And A.ID < n
Data: ID
1
2
5
7
Result: ID
3
4
6
Trying to find the best way to write this SQL statement.
I have a customer table that has the internal credit score of that customer. Then i have another table with definitions of that credit score. I would like to join these tables together, but the second table doesn't have any way to link it easily.
The score of the customer is an integer between 1-999, and the definition table has these columns:
Score
Description
And these rows:
60 LOW
99 MED
999 HIGH
So basically if a customer has a score between 1 and 60 they are low, 61-99 they are med, and 100-999 they are high.
I can't really INNER JOIN these, because it would only join them IF the score was 60, 99, or 999, and that would exclude anyone else with those scores.
I don't want to do a case statement with the static numbers, because our scores may change in the future and I don't want to have to update my initial query when/if they do. I also cannot create any tables or functions to do this- I need to create a SQL statement to do it for me.
EDIT:
A coworker said this would work, but its a little crazy. I'm thinking there has to be a better way:
SELECT
internal_credit_score
(
SELECT
credit_score_short_desc
FROM
cf_internal_credit_score
WHERE
internal_credit_score = (
SELECT
max(credit.internal_credit_score)
FROM
cf_internal_credit_score credit
WHERE
cs.internal_credit_score <= credit.internal_credit_score
AND credit.internal_credit_score <= (
SELECT
min(credit2.internal_credit_score)
FROM
cf_internal_credit_score credit2
WHERE
cs.internal_credit_score <= credit2.internal_credit_score
)
)
)
FROM
customer_statements cs
try this, change your table to contain the range of the scores:
ScoreTable
-------------
LowScore int
HighScore int
ScoreDescription string
data values
LowScore HighScore ScoreDescription
-------- --------- ----------------
1 60 Low
61 99 Med
100 999 High
query:
Select
.... , Score.ScoreDescription
FROM YourTable
INNER JOIN Score ON YourTable.Score>=Score.LowScore
AND YourTable.Score<=Score.HighScore
WHERE ...
Assuming you table is named CreditTable, this is what you want:
select * from
(
select Description, Score
from CreditTable
where Score > 80 /*client's credit*/
order by Score
)
where rownum = 1
Also, make sure your high score reference value is 1000, even though client's highest score possible is 999.
Update
The above SQL gives you the credit record for a given value. If you want to join with, say, Clients table, you'd do something like this:
select
c.Name,
c.Score,
(select Description from
(select Description from CreditTable where Score > c.Score order by Score)
where rownum = 1)
from clients c
I know this is a sub-select that executed for each returning row, but then again, CreditTable is ridiculously small and there will be no significant performance loss because of the the sub-select usage.
You can use analytic functions to convert the data in your score description table to ranges (I assume that you meant that 100-999 should map to 'HIGH', not 99-999).
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 with x as (
2 select 60 score, 'Low' description from dual union all
3 select 99, 'Med' from dual union all
4 select 999, 'High' from dual
5 )
6 select description,
7 nvl(lag(score) over (order by score),0) + 1 low_range,
8 score high_range
9* from x
SQL> /
DESC LOW_RANGE HIGH_RANGE
---- ---------- ----------
Low 1 60
Med 61 99
High 100 999
You can then join this to your CUSTOMER table with something like
SELECT c.*,
sd.*
FROM customer c,
(select description,
nvl(lag(score) over (order by score),0) + 1 low_range,
score high_range
from score_description) sd
WHERE c.credit_score BETWEEN sd.low_range AND sd.high_range
I've been stuck for quite a while now trying to get this query to work.
Here's the setup:
I have a [Notes] table that contains a nonunique (Number) column and a nonunique (Result) column. I'm looking to create a SELECT statement that will display each distinct (Number) value where the count of the {(Number), (Result)} tuple where Result = 'NA' is > 25.
Number | Result
100 | 'NA'
100 | 'TT'
101 | 'NA'
102 | 'AM'
100 | 'TT'
200 | 'NA'
200 | 'NA'
201 | 'NA'
Basically, have an autodialer that calls a number and returns a code depending on the results of the call. We want to ignore numbers that have had an 'NA'(no answer) code returned more than 25 times.
My basic attempts so far have been similar to:
SELECT DISTINCT n1.Number
FROM Notes n1
WHERE (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Notes n2
WHERE n1.Number = n2.Number and n1.Result = 'NA') > 25
I know this query isn't correct, but in general I'm not sure how to relate the DISTINCT n1.Number from the initial select to the Number used in the subquery COUNT. Most examples I see aren't actually doing this by adding a condition to the COUNT returned. I haven't had to touch too much SQL in the past half decade, so I'm quite rusty.
you can do it like this :
SELECT Number
FROM Notes
WHERE Result = 'NA'
GROUP BY Number
HAVING COUNT(Result) > 25
Try this:
SELECT Number
FROM (
SELECT Number, Count(Result) as CountNA
FROM Notes
WHERE Result = 'NA'
GROUP BY Number
)
WHERE CountNA > 25
EDIT: depending on SQL product, you may need to give the derived table a table correlation name e.g.
SELECT DT1.Number
FROM (
SELECT Number, Count(Result) as CountNA
FROM Notes
WHERE Result = 'NA'
GROUP
BY Number
) AS DT1 (Number, CountNA)
WHERE DT1.CountNA > 25;