IBM Worklight 6.2 Cannot set status. Response already committed - ibm-mobilefirst

Environment:
IBM Worklight Server 6.2
IBM Liberty profile 8.5.5.1
IBM DB2
Windows 2008 Standard Edition
Whenever a request from Worklight server to Backend, following warning logged in server console.
[10/7/14 1:40:39:192 PDT] 00000056 com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.srt W WARNING: Cannot set status. Response already committed.
[10/7/14 1:40:47:973 PDT] 00000056 com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.srt W WARNING: Cannot set status. Response already committed.
[10/7/14 1:40:57:710 PDT] 00000051 com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.srt W WARNING: Cannot set status. Response already committed.
Read this Link but in my case the application receives data and it works fine.
Can this be ignored since it is warning or a solution is available to solve this?

This warning message can be ignored. It is harmless.
Still, I have opened an internal defect to track it and make sure it will not display anymore.
There is no manual workaround.
If this is important enough for you, you can also open a PMR to receive a fix when available.
Additionally, it'd be great if you could elaborate on when exactly this is happening.

Related

SO_KEEPALIVE issue in Mulesoft

we had a Mulesoft app that basically picks message from queue (ActiveMQ), then posts to target app via HTTP request to target's API.
Runtime: 4.3.0
HTTP Connector version: v1.3.2
Server: Windows, On-premise standalone
However, sometimes the message doesn't get sent successfully after picking from queue , and below message can be found in the log -
WARN 2021-07-10 01:24:46,080 [[masked-app].http.requester.requestConfig.02 SelectorRunner] [event: ] org.glassfish.grizzly.nio.transport.TCPNIOTransport: GRIZZLY0005: Can not set SO_KEEPALIVE to false
java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument: no further information
at sun.nio.ch.Net.setIntOption0(Native Method) ~[?:1.8.0_281]
The flow completed silently without any error after above message, hence no error handling happens.
I found this mentioning it is a known bug on Windows server and won’t affect the well behavior of the application, but the document is failing to set SO_KEEPALIVE to true rather than false.
Looks the message didn't get posted successfully as the target system team can't find corresponding incoming request in their log.
It is not acceptable as the message is critical and no one knows unless the target system realizes something is wrong... Not sure if the SO_KEEPALIVE is failing to be set to false is the root cause, could you please share some thoughts? Thanks a lot in advance.
The is probably unrelated to the warning you mentioned but there doesn't seem to be enough information to identify the actual root cause.
Having said that the version of the HTTP connector is old and it's missing almost 3 years of fixes. Updating the version to the last one should improve the reliability of the application.

Repeated IBM bluemix Node Red app crashing; status 1

My Node Red application in IBM BlueMix is repeatedly crashing - once an hour - with no real error message other than "exited with status: 1."
How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Is there someone from IBM BlueMix support that monitors this that could take a look?
I looked at my logs and there's nothing in there that really says what's going on.
Edit per requests:
The regular log for "OUT/ERR" is scrolling so fast with HTTPD logs that I can't get it to copy/paste. Filtering to "ERR" Channel the only thing I see is below. I believe this is an error which occurs during deploy when the application restarts.
[App/0] ERR js-bson: Failed to load c++ bson extension, using pure JS version
My Node Red application is gathering data from Wink, LIFX, and other IoT services and compiles them together into a Freeboard dashboard.
Caught crash on screenshot here -- not enough cred to post images so it'll only post as a link
The zlib error was fixed in the 0.13.2 Node-RED release (that shipped 19/02/16).
If you re-stage your application is should pick up the new version of Node-RED
You can re-stage the application using the cf command line management application:
cf restage <app name>

Sending worklight client logs to server

We are using worklight 6.0 version. We are using an adapter to accept logs from device and to store in server. The log level is info. But we are getting debug logs with previous timestamps now. What could be the possible reason for this?
I am not sure about the statement regarding timestamps, but if you're getting debug logs in the server that would mean to me that you are not actually sending logs in the correct level. See here: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSZH4A_6.2.0/com.ibm.worklight.monitor.doc/monitor/c_op_analytics_data_capture.html
If you want to send INFO level logs, set WL.Logger.config({level: "INFO"});
Likewise in the server, set INFO for the following logging options: https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSAW57_8.5.5/com.ibm.websphere.wlp.nd.doc/ae/rwlp_logging.html (whichever one you need):
com.ibm.ws.logging
.console.log.level
com.ibm.ws.logging
.message.file.name

Getting VersionConflictEngineException in IBM Mobile First 6.3

I'm receiving the following message on server log in IBM Mobile First 6.3 every time an Adapter is getting called:
Stacktrace
[ERROR ] Error sending bulk request: java.lang.RuntimeException:
failure in bulk execution: [2]: index [worklight], type [devices], id
[b2deefe7-0d15-4ed4-b199-7e42440fc372], message
[VersionConflictEngineException[[worklight][1]
[devices][b2deefe7-0d15-4ed4-b199-7e42440fc372]: version conflict,
current [58], provided [57]]] at
com.ibm.elasticsearch.servlet.DataReceiver.processData(DataReceiver.java:132)
at
com.ibm.elasticsearch.servlet.DataReceiver.processDataLegacy(DataReceiver.java:85)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor57.invoke(Unknown Source) ...
The adapter is executed correctly and the response is returned to the app.
Any idea why this error is happening?
Help will be appreciated.
Thanks.
This is an internal error in analytics. The error itself is actually harmless, however the analytics platform should be catching it... A defect will be logged for the message. In the meantime, if you're not using analytics, you can disable it by removing the WAR files from the Liberty server.
If you are using analytics, then I would recommend clearing out the analytics data folder and restarting the IMF platform (this would remove any data you have stored in analytics). This is assuming that you are running in development mode. The analytics data folder can be in the same directory as the server.xml file for your Liberty server.

Cannot Direct Update after fixpack WL 6.1.0.1

after the fixpack in subject, i cannot manage to direct update my application.
It notify me that there is a new version available, but when i hit Update it keeps saying that the download failed (both on iOS and Android).
I attached my android to adb and i noticed those lines in the console:
Authentication error: Unable to respond to any of these challenges:
{wl-composite-challenge=WWW-Authenticate: WL-Composite-Challenge}
java.io.IOException: Error downloading update file The following
message has been received from the server instead of the expected
application update zip file: HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
/-secure-{"challenges":{"wl_deviceNoProvisioningRealm":{"token":"1or0tj7gnoev1rn06s188j4u9h"},"wl_antiXSRFRealm":{"WL-Instance-Id":"np8c8o3c4dk1k7s79i2ikddfab"}}}/
at
com.worklight.androidgap.plugin.WebResourcesDownloaderPlugin$WebResourcesDownloader.downloadZipFile(WebResourcesDownloaderPlugin.java:364)
To complete the information I deployed the IBM_Worklight_Console with no security role in its web.xml and we have Worklight 6.1.0.1 installed on WAS Network Deployment 7.0.0.23 running AIX.
Before the fixpack, everything worked well.
Thank you
EDIT: here you can see my application-descriptor.xml and my server configuration:
I forgot about this stack, however I found the problem.
When I open my application, the WL Framework asks for new available update. In the same time, my application ask an adapter for some data, before the WL server can response about the Update. So if it arrives first the response of my adpater, then the Update response will contain a different requestID causing a 403 forbidden.
I don't know if I explained it clearly, however the temporary fix is to put updateSilently: true, not disturbing the direct update.