#All
Can you guys please suggest, how can we use J-meter to benchmark the performance of uplaod content to cors amazon s3.
we are using plupload module in drupal. We need to click on "Add Files", and select the file.
Then, the request will go to cors amazon s3 server.
We want to user J-meter for benchmarking with a set of users.
This should be your starting point,
https://github.com/bigstepinc/jmeter_s3_custom_sampler
First of all I would recommend recording your file upload action via HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder
Once you have the script skeleton you need to care about authentication and correlation. See i.e. A JMeter test plan for Drupal for details.
As soon as you are able to replay your test script up to "Add files" page check out Performance testing: Upload and Download Scenarios with Apache JMeter for a set of instructions on proper simulating file upload.
You may with to parametrize files along with MIME types so not only one file could be uploaded during performance test. Take a look at CSV Data Set Config element.
Related
I have static content uploaded on S3 bucket.
When I hit URL for the First time, the contents take while to load. It has a single html page with multiple CSS and JS.
So is there any kind on configuration needed at S3 level to optimize.
I am trying to figure out settings such as number of connections like we have in Apache.
There are no configurations available for Amazon S3. It just works!
Some ideas for speeding your download:
Create a bucket that is located closer to you/your users (less latency)
Zip your files before uploading to Amazon S3 (faster download)
Check the Network console in your web browser to determine where the time is being taken
I'm using AjaXplorer to give access to my clients to a shared directory stored in Amazon S3. I installed the SD, configured the plugin (http://ajaxplorer.info/plugins/access/s3/) and could upload and download files but the upload size is limited to my host PHP limit which is 64MB.
Is there a way I can upload directly to S3 without going over my host to improve speed and have S3 limit, no PHP's?
Thanks
I think that is not possible, because the server will first climb to the PHP file and then make transfer to bucket.
Maybe
The only way around this is to use some JQuery or JS that can bypass your server/PHP entirely and stream directly into S3. This involves enabling CORS and creating a signed policy on the fly to allow your uploads, but it can be done!
I ran into just this issue with some inordinately large media files for our website users that I no longer wanted to host on the web servers themselves.
The best place to start, IMHO is here:
https://github.com/blueimp/jQuery-File-Upload
A demo is here:
https://blueimp.github.io/jQuery-File-Upload/
This was written to upload+write files to a variety of locations, including S3. The only tricky bits are getting your MIME type correct for each particular upload, and getting your bucket policy the way you need it.
Current Situation
I have a project on GitHub that builds after every commit on Travis-CI. After each successful build Travis uploads the artifacts to an S3 bucket. Is there some way for me to easily let anyone access the files in the bucket? I know I could generate a read-only access key, but it'd be easier for the user to access the files through their web browser.
I have website hosting enabled with the root document of "." set.
However, I still get an 403 Forbidden when trying to go to the bucket's endpoint.
The Question
How can I let users easily browse and download artifacts stored on Amazon S3 from their web browser? Preferably without a third-party client.
I found this related question: Directory Listing in S3 Static Website
As it turns out, if you enable public read for the whole bucket, S3 can serve directory listings. Problem is they are in XML instead of HTML, so not very user-friendly.
There are three ways you could go for generating listings:
Generate index.html files for each directory on your own computer, upload them to s3, and update them whenever you add new files to a directory. Very low-tech. Since you're saying you're uploading build files straight from Travis, this may not be that practical since it would require doing extra work there.
Use a client-side S3 browser tool.
s3-bucket-listing by Rufus Pollock
s3-file-list-page by Adam Pritchard
Use a server-side browser tool.
s3browser (PHP)
s3index Scala. Going by the existence of a Procfile, it may be readily deployable to Heroku. Not sure since I don't have any experience with Scala.
Filestash is the perfect tool for that:
login to your bucket from https://www.filestash.app/s3-browser.html:
create a shared link:
Share it with the world
Also Filestash is open source. (Disclaimer: I am the author)
I had the same problem and I fixed it by using the
new context menu "Make Public".
Go to https://console.aws.amazon.com/s3/home,
select the bucket and then for each Folder or File (or multiple selects) right click and
"make public"
You can use a bucket policy to give anonymous users full read access to your objects. Depending on whether you need them to LIST or just perform a GET, you'll want to tweak this. (I.e. permissions for listing the contents of a bucket have the action set to "s3:ListBucket").
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/AccessPolicyLanguage_UseCases_s3_a.html
Your policy will look something like the following. You can use the S3 console at http://aws.amazon.com/console to upload it.
{
"Version":"2008-10-17",
"Statement":[{
"Sid":"AddPerm",
"Effect":"Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "*"
},
"Action":["s3:GetObject"],
"Resource":["arn:aws:s3:::bucket/*"
]
}
]
}
If you're truly opening up your objects to the world, you'll want to look into setting up CloudWatch rules on your billing so you can shut off permissions to your objects if they become too popular.
https://github.com/jupierce/aws-s3-web-browser-file-listing is a solution I developed for this use case. It leverages AWS CloudFront and Lambda#Edge functions to dynamically render and deliver file listings to a client's browser.
To use it, a simple CloudFormation template will create an S3 bucket and have your file server interface up and running in just a few minutes.
There are many viable alternatives, as already suggested by other posters, but I believe this approach has a unique range of benefits:
Completely serverless and built for web-scale.
Open source and free to use (though, of course, you must pay AWS for resource utilization -- such S3 storage costs).
Simple / static client browser content:
No Ajax or third party libraries to worry about.
No browser compatibility worries.
All backing systems are native AWS components.
You never share account credentials or rely on 3rd party services.
The S3 bucket remains private - allowing you to only expose parts of the bucket.
A custom hostname / SSL certificate can be established for your file server interface.
Some or all of the host files can be protected behind Basic Auth username/password.
An AWS WebACL can be configured to prevent abusive access to the service.
Is it possible to upload a file to S3 from a remote server?
The remote server is basically a URL based file server. Example, using http://example.com/1.jpg, it serves the image. It doesn't do anything else and can't run code on this server.
It is possible to have another server telling S3 to upload a file from http://example.com/1.jpg
upload from http://example.com/1.jpg
server -------------------------------------------> S3 <-----> example.com
If you can't run code on the server or execute requests then, no, you can't do this. You will have to download the file to a server or computer that you own and upload from there.
You can see the operations you can perform on amazon S3 at http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/APIRest.html
Checking the operations for both the REST and SOAP APIs you'll see there's no way to give Amazon S3 a remote URL and have it grab the object for you. All of the PUT requests require the object's data to be provided as part of the request. Meaning the server or computer that is initiating the web request needs to have the data.
I have had a similar problem in the past where I wanted to download my users' Facebook Thumbnails and upload them to S3 for use on my site. The way I did it was to download the image from Facebook into Memory on my server, then upload to Amazon S3 - the full thing took under 2 seconds. After the upload to S3 was complete, write the bucket/key to a database.
Unfortunately there's no other way to do it.
I think the suggestion provided is quite good, you can SCP the file to S3 Bucket. Giving the pem file will be a password less authentication, via PHP file you can validate the extensions. PHP file can pass the file, as argument to SCP command.
The only problem with this solution is, you must have your instance in AWS. You can't use this solution if your website is hosted in other Hosting Providers and you are trying to upload files straight to S3 Bucket.
Technically it's possible, using AWS Signature Version 4, Assuming your remote server is the customer in the image below, you could prepare a form in the main server, and send the form fields to the remote server, for it to curl it. Detailed example here.
you can use scp command from Terminal.
1)using terminal, go to the place where there is that file you want to transfer to the server
2) type this:
scp -i yourAmazonKeypairPath.pem fileNameThatYouWantToTransfer.php ec2-user#ec2-00-000-000-15.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com:
N.B. Add "ec2-user#" before your ec2blablbla stuffs that you got from the Ec2 website!! This is such a picky error!
3) your file will be uploaded and the progress will be shown. When it is 100%, you are done!
I have a website that allows users to search for music tracks and download those they they select as mp3.
I have the site on my server and all of the mp3s on s3 and then distributed via cloudfront. So far so good.
The client now wishes for users to be able to select a number of music track and then download them all in bulk or as a batch instead of 1 at a time.
Usually I would place all the files in a zip and then present the user a link to that new zip file to download. In this case, as the files are on s3 that would require I first copy all the files from s3 to my webserver process them in to a zip and then download from my server.
Is there anyway i can create a zip on s3 or CF or is there someway to batch / group files in to a zip?
Maybe i could set up an EC2 instance to handle this?
I would greatly appreciate some direction.
Best
Joe
I am afraid you won't be able to create the batches w/o additional processing. firing up an EC2 instance might be an option to create a batch per user
I am facing the exact same problem. So far the only thing I was able to find is Amazon's s3sync tool:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/reference/s3/sync.html
In my case, I am using Rails + its Paperclip addon which means that I have no way to easily download all of the user's images in one go, because the files are scattered in a lot of subdirectories.
However, if you can group your user's files in a better way, say like this:
/users/<ID>/images/...
/users/<ID>/songs/...
...etc., then you can solve your problem right away with:
aws s3 sync s3://<your_bucket_name>/users/<user_id>/songs /cache/<user_id>
Do have in mind you'll have to give your server the proper credentials so the S3 CLI tools can work without prompting for usernames/passwords.
And that should sort you.
Additional discussion here:
Downloading an entire S3 bucket?
s3 is single http request based.
So the answer is threads to achieve the same thing
Java api - uses TransferManager
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSJavaSDK/latest/javadoc/com/amazonaws/services/s3/transfer/TransferManager.html
You can get great performance with multi threads.
There is no bulk download sorry.