I have a query that seems to work fine.
public interface GameRepository extends JpaRepository<Game,Integer> {
#Query(value="SELECT Cast(bifnb as varchar) bifnb , count(*) FROM (SELECT count(fk_game) as nb FROM public.game INNER JOIN score s on game.id_game = s.fk_game WHERE fk_board_game = 2014 GROUP BY fk_game) as bifnb group by bifnb", nativeQuery = true)
List<StatisticDto> nbplayer();
}
But when I try to use it with JPA and type StatisticDTO , I get the following error:
context with path [/api] threw exception [Request processing failed; nested exception is org.springframework.core.convert.ConverterNotFoundException: No converter found capable of converting from type [org.springframework.data.jpa.repository.query.AbstractJpaQuery$TupleConverter$TupleBackedMap] to type [****.statistics.payload.StatisticDto]] with root cause
So I tried with the same query and : List<Object> nbplayer();
It works but I don't know how to work with a List I prefer to use a StatisticDto.
Assuming StatisticDTO looks like this:
public class StatisticDTO {
private String key;
private Integer value;
// ... getter/setter
}
This query should work:
#Query(value="SELECT Cast(bifnb as varchar) as \"key\" , count(*) as \"value\" FROM (SELECT count(fk_game) as nb FROM public.game INNER JOIN score s on game.id_game = s.fk_game WHERE fk_board_game = 2014 GROUP BY fk_game) as bifnb group by bifnb", nativeQuery = true)
List<StatisticDto> nbplayer();
See this article about transforming results to DTO for more information.
I've quoted the aliases because I think key and value are special keywords.
Is this a correct way of retreiving data from database using linq?
var c= using db in db.c where c.id==id
Is this a correct way of retreiving data from database using linq?
partially yes.
It's better to write your query inside a method like this:
public static Product GetProduct(int id, string name)
{
DBNameDataContext myDB = new DBNameDataContext();
var product = from p in myDB.Products
where p.ID == id
&& p.Name == name
select p;
return product;
}
and then in your main code you can get your Product as below:
var product = GetProduct(5, "C# in Depth");
(Sample code is in C#)
I have a datatable with two columns ID & Role.
Same ID can have multiple roles.
I need to convert this table to a comma separated grouped table.
I am trying to use following query but unable to solve the issue.
LINQ:
From row As DataRow In dtData.Rows.Cast(Of DataRow)
Group row By id = row.Field(Of Integer)("ID") Into Group
Select ID, Role = String.Join(",", From i In Group Select i.Field(Of String)("Role"))
Issue
Any help will be appreciated.
Update 1:
Table structure
Needed table Structure
You could create a linq like in your comments just that this returns a list of arrays of string:
Here is the code:
(From row As DataRow In myDatatable
Group row By id = row.Field(Of String)("ID") Into Group
Select {id, String.Join(",", From i In Group Select i.Field(Of String)("Role"))}).ToList
If you need the result in a datatable you can build a new datatable
Make a for each of result and use the activity Add data row. In ArrayRow add the item and in DataTable the new data table
If you use the activity Output data table you can see the results
I am kind of confused by what you are wanting as the ultimate outcome. An idea that may guide you but not be exactly what you want is you can change a DataTable to an anonymous projection and then get what you want out of that. You can do a 'Select' off a DataTable which enters into an extension method of 'what' do you want to select. If I was to do a new {} without any class or container object after the 'new' I would be scoped to just a method or not. This is a good advantage when you want to mold something for a specific use in just a single method to use tailored to a specific view.
static void Main(string[] args)
{
DataTable d = new DataTable();
d.Columns.Add("ItemName", typeof(string));
d.Columns.Add("MinValue", typeof(float));
d.Columns.Add("MaxValue", typeof(float));
d.Rows.Add("Widget1", 0.1, 0.2);
d.Rows.Add("Widget2", 0.2, 0.4);
d.Rows.Add("Widget3", 0.1, 0.2);
var dataTable = d.AsEnumerable();
//What do you want to select? The new {} without an indicator means anonymous type projection. This will exist only in
// the scope listed.
var data = dataTable.Select(x => new { ItemName = x[0], MinValue = x[1], MaxValue = x[2] }).ToList();
//My 'data' type is now well typed for it's properties in the scope it's in.
var joined = String.Join(", ", data.Select(x => x.ItemName).ToList());
Console.WriteLine(joined);
Console.WriteLine($"{data.Count}");
Console.ReadLine();
}
EDIT 1-26-18
Strange I thought I updated the code yesterday. To get a reusable object you could bind your front end to, you just make a POCO like so:
public class Foo
{
public string Bar { get; set; }
public string MinAndMax { get; set; }
}
While you could make another DataTable, frankly DataTables are like WinForms. They get the job done, but they are archaic and not friendly to do Linq with as easily as just a well formed POCO. And if you get into using Linq it will play better with well formed objects and they are easy to create.
var data = dataTable.Select(x => new Foo { Bar = x[0].ToString(), MinAndMax = $"{x[1]} {x[2]}" }).ToList();
//My 'data' type is now well typed for 'Foo' class and it's properties in the scope it's in.
var joined = String.Join(", ", data.Select(x => $"{x.Bar} {x.MinAndMax}").ToList());
I'm currently using Entity Framework for my db access but want to have a look at Dapper. I have classes like this:
public class Course{
public string Title{get;set;}
public IList<Location> Locations {get;set;}
...
}
public class Location{
public string Name {get;set;}
...
}
So one course can be taught at several locations. Entity Framework does the mapping for me so my Course object is populated with a list of locations. How would I go about this with Dapper, is it even possible or do I have to do it in several query steps?
Alternatively, you can use one query with a lookup:
var lookup = new Dictionary<int, Course>();
conn.Query<Course, Location, Course>(#"
SELECT c.*, l.*
FROM Course c
INNER JOIN Location l ON c.LocationId = l.Id
", (c, l) => {
Course course;
if (!lookup.TryGetValue(c.Id, out course))
lookup.Add(c.Id, course = c);
if (course.Locations == null)
course.Locations = new List<Location>();
course.Locations.Add(l); /* Add locations to course */
return course;
}).AsQueryable();
var resultList = lookup.Values;
See here https://www.tritac.com/blog/dappernet-by-example/
Dapper is not a full blown ORM it does not handle magic generation of queries and such.
For your particular example the following would probably work:
Grab the courses:
var courses = cnn.Query<Course>("select * from Courses where Category = 1 Order by CreationDate");
Grab the relevant mapping:
var mappings = cnn.Query<CourseLocation>(
"select * from CourseLocations where CourseId in #Ids",
new {Ids = courses.Select(c => c.Id).Distinct()});
Grab the relevant locations
var locations = cnn.Query<Location>(
"select * from Locations where Id in #Ids",
new {Ids = mappings.Select(m => m.LocationId).Distinct()}
);
Map it all up
Leaving this to the reader, you create a few maps and iterate through your courses populating with the locations.
Caveat the in trick will work if you have less than 2100 lookups (Sql Server), if you have more you probably want to amend the query to select * from CourseLocations where CourseId in (select Id from Courses ... ) if that is the case you may as well yank all the results in one go using QueryMultiple
No need for lookup Dictionary
var coursesWithLocations =
conn.Query<Course, Location, Course>(#"
SELECT c.*, l.*
FROM Course c
INNER JOIN Location l ON c.LocationId = l.Id
", (course, location) => {
course.Locations = course.Locations ?? new List<Location>();
course.Locations.Add(location);
return course;
}).AsQueryable();
I know I'm really late to this, but there is another option. You can use QueryMultiple here. Something like this:
var results = cnn.QueryMultiple(#"
SELECT *
FROM Courses
WHERE Category = 1
ORDER BY CreationDate
;
SELECT A.*
,B.CourseId
FROM Locations A
INNER JOIN CourseLocations B
ON A.LocationId = B.LocationId
INNER JOIN Course C
ON B.CourseId = B.CourseId
AND C.Category = 1
");
var courses = results.Read<Course>();
var locations = results.Read<Location>(); //(Location will have that extra CourseId on it for the next part)
foreach (var course in courses) {
course.Locations = locations.Where(a => a.CourseId == course.CourseId).ToList();
}
Sorry to be late to the party (like always). For me, it's easier to use a Dictionary, like Jeroen K did, in terms of performance and readability. Also, to avoid header multiplication across locations, I use Distinct() to remove potential dups:
string query = #"SELECT c.*, l.*
FROM Course c
INNER JOIN Location l ON c.LocationId = l.Id";
using (SqlConnection conn = DB.getConnection())
{
conn.Open();
var courseDictionary = new Dictionary<Guid, Course>();
var list = conn.Query<Course, Location, Course>(
query,
(course, location) =>
{
if (!courseDictionary.TryGetValue(course.Id, out Course courseEntry))
{
courseEntry = course;
courseEntry.Locations = courseEntry.Locations ?? new List<Location>();
courseDictionary.Add(courseEntry.Id, courseEntry);
}
courseEntry.Locations.Add(location);
return courseEntry;
},
splitOn: "Id")
.Distinct()
.ToList();
return list;
}
Something is missing. If you do not specify each field from Locations in the SQL query, the object Location cannot be filled. Take a look:
var lookup = new Dictionary<int, Course>()
conn.Query<Course, Location, Course>(#"
SELECT c.*, l.Name, l.otherField, l.secondField
FROM Course c
INNER JOIN Location l ON c.LocationId = l.Id
", (c, l) => {
Course course;
if (!lookup.TryGetValue(c.Id, out course)) {
lookup.Add(c.Id, course = c);
}
if (course.Locations == null)
course.Locations = new List<Location>();
course.Locations.Add(a);
return course;
},
).AsQueryable();
var resultList = lookup.Values;
Using l.* in the query, I had the list of locations but without data.
Not sure if anybody needs it, but I have dynamic version of it without Model for quick & flexible coding.
var lookup = new Dictionary<int, dynamic>();
conn.Query<dynamic, dynamic, dynamic>(#"
SELECT A.*, B.*
FROM Client A
INNER JOIN Instance B ON A.ClientID = B.ClientID
", (A, B) => {
// If dict has no key, allocate new obj
// with another level of array
if (!lookup.ContainsKey(A.ClientID)) {
lookup[A.ClientID] = new {
ClientID = A.ClientID,
ClientName = A.Name,
Instances = new List<dynamic>()
};
}
// Add each instance
lookup[A.ClientID].Instances.Add(new {
InstanceName = B.Name,
BaseURL = B.BaseURL,
WebAppPath = B.WebAppPath
});
return lookup[A.ClientID];
}, splitOn: "ClientID,InstanceID").AsQueryable();
var resultList = lookup.Values;
return resultList;
There is another approach using the JSON result. Even though the accepted answer and others are well explained, I just thought about an another approach to get the result.
Create a stored procedure or a select qry to return the result in json format. then Deserialize the the result object to required class format. please go through the sample code.
using (var db = connection.OpenConnection())
{
var results = await db.QueryAsync("your_sp_name",..);
var result = results.FirstOrDefault();
string Json = result?.your_result_json_row;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(Json))
{
List<Course> Courses= JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<Course>>(Json);
}
//map to your custom class and dto then return the result
}
This is an another thought process. Please review the same.
I am using LINQ to SQL queries to return data in my application. However I find it is now needful for me to return the column Names. Try as I might I have been completely unable to find out how to do this on the internet.
So if my LINQ entity table has the properties (Last_Name, First_name, Middle_Name) I need to return:
Last_name
First_Name
Middle_name
rather than the usual
Smith
John
Joe
You could certainly do it with some LINQ-To-Xml directly against the ".edmx" file or the embedded model resources in the compiled assembly.
The below query gets the field (not column) names. If you need the columns then just change the query to suit.
var edmxNS = XNamespace.Get(#"http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/06/edmx");
var schemaNS = XNamespace.Get(#"http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2006/04/edm");
var xd = XDocument.Load(#"{path}\Model.edmx");
var fields =
from e in xd
.Elements(edmxNS + "Edmx")
.Elements(edmxNS + "Runtime")
.Elements(edmxNS + "ConceptualModels")
.Elements(schemaNS + "Schema")
.Elements(schemaNS + "EntityType")
from p in e
.Elements(schemaNS + "Property")
select new
{
Entity = e.Attribute("Name").Value,
Member = p.Attribute("Name").Value,
Type = p.Attribute("Type").Value,
Nullable = bool.Parse(p.Attribute("Nullable").Value),
};
Lets assume you're talking about the Contact Table in the assembly named YourAssembly in a Context called MyDataContext
Using Reflection against a Table
You can use reflection to get the properties like you would any type
var properties = from property in
Type.GetType("YourAssembly.Contact").GetProperties()
select property.Name
;
foreach (var property in properties)
Console.WriteLine(property);
As shaunmartin notes this will return all properties not just Column Mapped ones. It should also be noted that this will return Public properties only. You'd need to include a BindingFlags value for the bindingAttr Parameter of GetProperties to get non-public properties
Using the Meta Model
You can use the Meta Model System.Data.Linq.Mapping to get the fields ( I added IsPersistant to only get the Column Mapped properties)
AttributeMappingSource mappping = new System.Data.Linq.Mapping.AttributeMappingSource();
var model = mappping.GetModel(typeof (MyDataContext));
var table = model.GetTable(typeof (Contact));
var qFields= from fields in table.RowType.DataMembers
where fields.IsPersistent == true
select fields;
foreach (var field in qFields)
Console.WriteLine(field.Name);
Using Reflection from a query result
If on the other hand you wanted it from a query result you can still use reflection.
MyDataContextdc = new MyDataContext();
Table<Contact> contacts = dc.GetTable<Contact>();
var q = from c in contacts
select new
{
c.FirstName,
c.LastName
};
var columns = q.First();
var properties = (from property in columns.GetType().GetProperties()
select property.Name).ToList();
I stumbled upon this answer to solve my own problem and used Conrad Frix 's answer. The question specified VB.NET though and that is what I program in. Here are Conrad's answers in VB.NET (they may not be a perfect translation, but they work):
Example 1
Dim PropertyNames1 = From Prprt In Type.GetType("LocalDB.tlbMeter").GetProperties()
Select Prprt.Name
Example 2
Dim LocalDB2 As New LocalDBDataContext
Dim bsmappping As New System.Data.Linq.Mapping.AttributeMappingSource()
Dim bsmodel = bsmappping.GetModel(LocalDB2.GetType())
Dim bstable = bsmodel.GetTable(LocalDB.tblMeters.GetType())
Dim PropertyNames2 As IQueryable(Of String) = From fields In bstable.RowType.DataMembers
Where fields.IsPersistent = True
Select fields.Member.Name 'IsPersistant to only get the Column Mapped properties
Example 3
Dim LocalDB3 As New LocalDBDataContext
Dim qMeters = From mtr In LocalDB3.tblMeters
Select mtr
Dim FirstResult As tblMeter = qMeters.First()
Dim PropertyNames3 As List(Of String) = From FN In FirstResult.GetType().GetProperties()
Select FN.Name.ToList()
To display the results:
For Each FieldName In PropertyNames1
Console.WriteLine(FieldName)
Next
For Each FieldName In PropertyNames2
Console.WriteLine(FieldName)
Next
For Each FieldName In PropertyNames3
Console.WriteLine(FieldName)
Next
Please also read Conrad's answer for notes on each method!