Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
It is notoriously difficult to get any useful information on CMake as a beginner. So far, I've seen a few tutorials on how to set up some very basic project or another. However, none of these explain the reasoning behind anything that is shown in them, always leaving many holes to fill.
What does calling CMake on a CMakeLists mean? Is it supposed to be called once per build tree or what? How do I use different settings for each build if they all use the same CMakeLists.txt file from the same source?
Why does each subdirectory need its own CMakeLists file? Would it make sense to use CMake on a CMakeLists.txt other than the one at the root of the project? If so, in what cases?
What's the difference between specifying how to build an executable or library from the CMakeLists file in their own subdirectory versus doing it in the CMakeLists file at the root of all source?
Can I make a project for Eclipse and another for Visual Studio, just changing the -G option when calling CMake? Is that even how it's used?
None of the tutorials, documentation pages or questions/answers I've seen so far give any useful insight towards understanding how to use CMake. The examples are just not thorough. No matter what tutorials I read, I feel like I'm missing something important.
There are many questions asked by CMake newbies like me that don't ask this explicitly, but that make obvious the fact that, as newbs, we have no idea how to deal with CMake or what to make of it.
What is CMake for?
According to Wikipedia:
CMake is [...] software for managing the build process of software
using a compiler-independent method. It is designed to support
directory hierarchies and applications that depend on multiple
libraries. It is used in conjunction with native build environments
such as make, Apple's Xcode, and Microsoft Visual Studio.
With CMake, you no longer need to maintain separate settings specific to your compiler/build environment. You have one configuration, and that works for many environments.
CMake can generate a Microsoft Visual Studio solution, an Eclipse project or a Makefile maze from the same files without changing anything in them.
Given a bunch of directories with code in them, CMake manages all the dependencies, build orders and other tasks that your project needs done before it can be compiled. It does NOT actually compile anything. To use CMake, you must tell it (using configuration files called CMakeLists.txt) what executables you need compiled, what libraries they link to, what directories there are in your project and what is inside of them, as well as any details like flags or anything else you need (CMake is quite powerful).
If this is correctly set up, you then use CMake to create all of the files that your "native build environment" of choice needs to do its job. In Linux, by default, this means Makefiles. So once you run CMake, it will create a bunch of files for its own use plus some Makefiles. All you need to do thereafter is type "make" in the console from the root folder every time you're done editing your code, and bam, a compiled and linked executable is made.
How does CMake work? What does it do?
Here is an example project setup that I will use throughout:
simple/
CMakeLists.txt
src/
tutorial.cxx
CMakeLists.txt
lib/
TestLib.cxx
TestLib.h
CMakeLists.txt
build/
The contents of each file are shown and discussed later on.
CMake sets your project up according to the root CMakeLists.txt of your project, and does so in whatever directory you executed cmake from in the console. Doing this from a folder that isn't the root of your project produces what is called an out-of-source build, which means files created during compilation (obj files, lib files, executables, you know) will be placed in said folder, kept separate from the actual code. It helps reduce clutter and is preferred for other reasons as well, which I will not discuss.
I do not know what happens if you execute cmake on any other than the root CMakeLists.txt.
In this example, since I want it all placed inside the build/ folder, first I have to navigate there, then pass CMake the directory in which the root CMakeLists.txt resides.
cd build
cmake ..
By default, this sets everything up using Makefiles as I've said. Here is what the build folder should look like now:
simple/build/
CMakeCache.txt
cmake_install.cmake
Makefile
CMakeFiles/
(...)
src/
CMakeFiles/
(...)
cmake_install.cmake
Makefile
lib/
CMakeFiles/
(...)
cmake_install.cmake
Makefile
What are all of these files? The only thing you have to worry about is the Makefile and the project folders.
Notice the src/ and lib/ folders. These have been created because simple/CMakeLists.txt points to them using the command add_subdirectory(<folder>). This command tells CMake to look in said folder for another CMakeLists.txt file and execute that script, so every subdirectory added this way must have a CMakeLists.txt file within. In this project, simple/src/CMakeLists.txt describes how to build the actual executable and simple/lib/CMakeLists.txt describes how to build the library. Every target that a CMakeLists.txt describes will be placed by default in its subdirectory within the build tree. So, after a quick
make
in console done from build/, some files are added:
simple/build/
(...)
lib/
libTestLib.a
(...)
src/
Tutorial
(...)
The project is built, and the executable is ready to be executed. What do you do if you want the executables put in a specific folder? Set the appropriate CMake variable, or change the properties of a specific target. More on CMake variables later.
How do I tell CMake how to build my project?
Here are the contents, explained, of each file in the source directory:
simple/CMakeLists.txt:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
project(Tutorial)
# Add all subdirectories in this project
add_subdirectory(lib)
add_subdirectory(src)
The minimum required version should always be set, according to the warning CMake throws when you don't. Use whatever your version of CMake is.
The name of your project can be used later on, and hints towards the fact you can manage more than one project from the same CMake files. I won't delve into that, though.
As mentioned before, add_subdirectory() adds a folder to the project, which means CMake expects it to have a CMakeLists.txt within, which it will then run before continuing. By the way, if you happen to have a CMake function defined you can use it from other CMakeLists.txts in subdirectories, but you have to define it before you use add_subdirectory() or it won't find it. CMake is smarter about libraries, though, so this is likely the only time you will run into this kind of problem.
simple/lib/CMakeLists.txt:
add_library(TestLib TestLib.cxx)
To make your very own library, you give it a name and then list all the files it's built from. Straightforward. If it needed another file, foo.cxx, to be compiled, you would instead write add_library(TestLib TestLib.cxx foo.cxx). This also works for files in other directories, for instance add_library(TestLib TestLib.cxx ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/foo.cxx). More on the CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR variable later.
Another thing you can do with this is specify that you want a shared library. The example: add_library(TestLib SHARED TestLib.cxx). Fear not, this is where CMake begins to make your life easier. Whether it's shared or not, now all you need to handle to use a library created in this way is the name you gave it here. The name of this library is now TestLib, and you can reference it from anywhere in the project. CMake will find it.
Is there a better way to list dependencies? Definitely yes. Check down below for more on this.
simple/lib/TestLib.cxx:
#include <stdio.h>
void test() {
printf("testing...\n");
}
simple/lib/TestLib.h:
#ifndef TestLib
#define TestLib
void test();
#endif
simple/src/CMakeLists.txt:
# Name the executable and all resources it depends on directly
add_executable(Tutorial tutorial.cxx)
# Link to needed libraries
target_link_libraries(Tutorial TestLib)
# Tell CMake where to look for the .h files
target_include_directories(Tutorial PUBLIC ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/lib)
The command add_executable() works exactly the same as add_library(), except, of course, it will generate an executable instead. This executable can now be referenced as a target for things like target_link_libraries(). Since tutorial.cxx uses code found in the TestLib library, you point this out to CMake as shown.
Similarly, any .h files #included by any sources in add_executable() that are not in the same directory as the source have to be added somehow. If not for the target_include_directories() command, lib/TestLib.h would not be found when compiling Tutorial, so the entire lib/ folder is added to the include directories to be searched for #includes. You might also see the command include_directories() which acts in a similar fashion, except that it does not need you to specify a target since it outright sets it globally, for all executables. Once again, I'll explain CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR later.
simple/src/tutorial.cxx:
#include <stdio.h>
#include "TestLib.h"
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
test();
fprintf(stdout, "Main\n");
return 0;
}
Notice how the "TestLib.h" file is included. No need to include the full path: CMake takes care of all that behind the scenes thanks to target_include_directories().
Technically speaking, in a simple source tree like this you can do without the CMakeLists.txts under lib/ and src/ and just adding something like add_executable(Tutorial src/tutorial.cxx) to simple/CMakeLists.txt. It's up to you and your project's needs.
What else should I know to properly use CMake?
(AKA topics relevant to your understanding)
Finding and using packages: The answer to this question explains it better than I ever could.
Declaring variables and functions, using control flow, etc.: check out this tutorial that explains the basics of what CMake has to offer, as well as being a good introduction in general.
CMake variables: there are plenty, so what follows is a crash course to get you on the right track. The CMake wiki is a good place to get more in-depth information on variables and ostensibly other things as well.
You may want to edit some variables without rebuilding the build tree. Use ccmake for this (it edits the CMakeCache.txt file). Remember to configure when done with the changes and then generate makefiles with the updated configuration.
Read the previously referenced tutorial to learn about using variables, but long story short:
set(<variable name> value) to change or create a variable.
${<variable name>} to use it.
CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR: The root directory of source. In the previous example, this is always equal to /simple
CMAKE_BINARY_DIR: The root directory of the build. In the previous example, this is equals to simple/build/, but if you ran cmake simple/ from a folder such as foo/bar/etc/, then all references to CMAKE_BINARY_DIR in that build tree would become /foo/bar/etc.
CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR: The directory in which the current CMakeLists.txt is in. This means it changes throughout: printing this from simple/CMakeLists.txt yields /simple, and printing it from simple/src/CMakeLists.txt yields /simple/src.
CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR: You get the idea. This path would depend not only on the folder the build is in, but also on the current CMakeLists.txt script's location.
Why are these important? Source files will obviously not be in the build tree. If you try something like target_include_directories(Tutorial PUBLIC ../lib) in the previous example, that path will be relative to the build tree, that is to say it will be like writing ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib, which will look inside simple/build/lib/. There are no .h files in there; at most you will find libTestLib.a. You want ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/lib instead.
CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS: Flags to pass on to the compiler, in this case the C++ compiler. Also worth noting is CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_DEBUG which will be used instead if CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is set to DEBUG. There are more like these; check out the CMake wiki.
CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY: Tell CMake where to put all executables when built. This is a global setting. You can, for instance, set it to bin/ and have everything neatly placed there. EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH is similar, but deprecated, in case you stumble upon it.
CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY: Likewise, a global setting to tell CMake where to put all library files.
Target properties: you can set properties that affect only one target, be it an executable or a library (or an archive... you get the idea). Here is a good example of how to use it (with set_target_properties().
Is there an easy way to add sources to a target automatically? Use GLOB to list everything in a given directory under the same variable. Example syntax is FILE(GLOB <variable name> <directory>/*.cxx).
Can you specify different build types? Yes, though I'm not sure about how this works or the limitations of this. It probably requires some if/then'ning, but CMake does offer some basic support without configuring anything, like defaults for the CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_DEBUG, for instance.
You can either set your build type from within the CMakeLists.txt file via set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE <type>) or by calling CMake from console with the appropriate flags, for example cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug.
Any good examples of projects that use CMake? Wikipedia has a list of open-source projects that use CMake, if you want to look into that. Online tutorials have been nothing but a letdown to me so far in this regard, however this Stack Overflow question has a pretty cool and easy-to-understand CMake setup. It's worth a look.
Using variables from CMake in your code: Here's a quick and dirty example (adapted from some other tutorial):
simple/CMakeLists.txt:
project (Tutorial)
# Setting variables
set (Tutorial_VERSION_MAJOR 1)
set (Tutorial_VERSION_MINOR 1)
# Configure_file(<input> <output>)
# Copies a file <input> to file <output> and substitutes variable values referenced in the file content.
# So you can pass some CMake variables to the source code (in this case version numbers)
configure_file (
"${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/TutorialConfig.h.in"
"${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/src/TutorialConfig.h"
)
simple/TutorialConfig.h.in:
// Configured options and settings
#define Tutorial_VERSION_MAJOR #Tutorial_VERSION_MAJOR#
#define Tutorial_VERSION_MINOR #Tutorial_VERSION_MINOR#
The resulting file generated by CMake, simple/src/TutorialConfig.h:
// Configured options and settings
#define Tutorial_VERSION_MAJOR 1
#define Tutorial_VERSION_MINOR 1
With clever use of these you can do cool things like turning off a library and such. I do recommend taking a look at that tutorial as there are some slightly more advanced things that are bound to be very useful on larger projects, sooner or later.
For everything else, Stack Overflow is brimming with specific questions and concise answers, which is great for everyone except the uninitiated.
Related
I have a scenario that I think is very similar to this one: CMake add_custom_command/_target in different directories for cross-compilation, however the solution for that issue isn't working for me.
In subdir/CMakeLists.txt I have:
add_custom_command(OUTPUT foo.h foo.cpp COMMAND ... DEPENDS foo.xml)
add_custom_target(generate_foo DEPENDS foo.h foo.cpp)
and then CMakeLists.txt:
add_executable(MyTarget
subdir/foo.h
subdir/foo.cpp
${OTHER_SOURCES})
add_dependencies(MyTarget generate_foo)
add_subdirectory(subdir)
This fails with "Cannot find source file: subdir/foo.h". The documentation for add_dependencies suggests that it will ensure that generate_foo builds before MyTarget, but if that's the case it looks like it's at least trying to access all source files before either target builds. Am I doing something wrong here? How can I compile source files that are generated by a custom target/command in a subdirectory?
The problem is that the GENERATED file property (that CMake uses to determine if it needs to check that a file exists at configure time) is not visible outside the directory in which the file is generated. The problem goes away in CMake 3.20. This is explained here.
I usually solve this problem by compiling generated source files into a static or object library in the subdirectory, then linking to that, since targets are globally visible. You can also explicitly set the GENERATED property on the generated files in the scope you wish to use them, but this hack breaks the encapsulation gained by using a subdirectory.
It's also worth noting that you can do away with the custom target and the call to add_dependencies because the generated files are already dependencies of the executable (this has always has been the case AFAIK).
I am trying to compile gtest from source (instead of using the existing installed version). I am working on a catkin based cmake project.
I have added the sourcecode from https://github.com/google/googletest to my workspace and included the folder with add_subdirectory.
However, I get a nameclash with the existing gtest:
CMake Error at src/test_env/GTest/googletest/cmake/internal_utils.cmake:151 (add_library):
add_library cannot create target "gtest" because another target with the
same name already exists. The existing target is a shared library created
in source directory "/usr/src/gtest". See documentation for policy CMP0002
for more details.
From other posts, and the googletest instructions itself (https://github.com/google/googletest/tree/master/googletest#incorporating-into-an-existing-cmake-project) I understand that this should be no problem.
I think the problem might lie in how catkin handles gtest. And, admittedly, normally I could just use the installed version. But I want to make sure, that everyone uses the same (bundled) version of gtest.
Any suggestions and hints are welcomed.
Okay, so the error message is actually quite clear. A cmake "target" is "something that will be produced by the build", be it a library, or an executable, or something else. So, the problem is that you are trying to add a target named "gtest", and catkin already does the same thing. Both would produce the library "libgtest.so", and of course there can only be one of those in the same folder. You could rename "your" gtest by changing the target name in googletest/CMakelists.txt, but I would strongly advise you to not do that.
In my opinion, gtest shouldn't even be a shared library at all, especially if you are using different build flags for different projects in your repository. There is an alternative, and that is basically only including the gtest source code in a folder, and then including the header files and source files in your unittests main.cpp. googletest already comes with helpers for that, that is src/gtest-main.cc.
This is how I would structure it:
Add the gtest version you want as submodule to git (in case you use git). This way, you have a specified version for all projects in your repo, and can update it in a different branch. I will call that folder "GTEST_DIR".
Write your unittests in .cpp files, that #include <gtest/gtest.h>, one per hpp you want to test, and #include both the hpp and the cpp in your test.cpp. This enforces the separation of your tests from other classes and makes it very easy to switch out dependent classes with mocks or fake objects. You will not need a main() function, as that one is already in gtest-main.cc.
Write a cmake macro like this:
macro(add_gtest NAME FILES)
add_executable(my_gtest_$NAME
$FILES
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest.cc
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest-death-test.cc
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest-filepath.cc
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest-port.cc
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest-printers.cc
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest-test-part.cc
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest-typed-test.cc
GTEST_DIR/src/gtest-main.cc
)
target_include_directories(my_gtest_$NAME GTEST_DIR/include)
endmacro()
Of course, you can make this more complicated or less complicated, but that is the gist. Of course, compile times will be longer this way over using gtest as a shared library, but it actually makes sure your units get tested in isolation, which is very valueable in my opinion. Also, you can use ccache to greatly improve compile times in this scenario, because the gtest object files never change. Also, this will make sure gtest is compiled with exactly the flags you want it to. You could for example create 2 separate unit tests for the same class, one with exceptions enabled and one without.
When trying to write an OOT block for Gnuradio, I ran cmake ../, and then make. The make process successfully builds some objects, but when it gets to the step:
Linking CXX executable test-XXXXXXXX
there is the problem:
libgnuradio-XXXXXXXX.so: undefined reference to 'YYYYYYYY'
YYYYYYYY is a function defined in a .cc file, which I add to the _impl.cc for the block using a header. This source is apparently not being found, despite being in the same source directory as the _impl.cc file.
Cmake explicitly warns not to make any modifications to the generated Makefile, and it is a fairly complex makefile anyway, so I would be hesitant to try messing with it. Is there another way to direct make to include that additional source when linking?
Your best bet is to look at the CMakeLists.txt at the top of your OOT folder. It is most likely that you are seeing a link problem and that a package dependency is not satisfied. The cmake find_package utility can be used to determine if a dependency is available on the system. If you look at the cmake/Modules directory under the main OOT folder, there should be a couple of examples. Cmake ships with many modules so it's likely what you need will exist.
By adding some find_package logic to the main CMakeLists.txt file, and then blowing away the build directory and making it again and executing "cmake ../", the dependency issue should be apparent. Put another way, whatever libgnuradio-*.so thinks is missing must belong to a package that is not installed on your system. Using find_package will confirm it, and then the answer is to install it.
Look at some other CMakeLists.txt files, say, in gr-digital, for find_package examples.
I have a specific question which serves as context for a more general question.
There is a scientific package called LAMMPS, and it is usually used as an executable. However, it supports use as a "library". To try to do things right, I put it in /usr/local/lib/lammps. It contains a lammps/src/ directory, which has around 40 source files. Using the instructions provided, I compiled lammps as a .so file in lammps/src/liblammps_serial.so.
I also have separate code in "~/code/ljtube/". This uses cmake to try to find the library. Thus, I wrote a FindLAMMPS.txt so that I could use
FIND_PACKAGE (lammps)
in my CMakeLists. I modified the libtool config file to search in /usr/local/ successfully. I found that it searches in /usr/local/lib/ for a .so file and in /usr/local/include/ for a .h file. So I made a dynamic link to the .so file in /usr/local/lib/, and I copied the .h file from the lammps/src/ to /usr/local/include/.
CMake can now find those two files, but it cannot link to anything else in lammps/src/. It seems absurd to need to make a separate FIND_PACKAGE for each of the .h's I want to include (group.h, fix.h, force.h, pair.h, etc.). It also seems ridiculous to dump the whole package of .h files into the /usr/local/include/ directory. I will be using this code both locally and on a cluster, and possibly distributing it to other group members.
How can I make CMake find what I want to find without hard coding in the location of /usr/local/lib/lammps/src/? Phrased more generically, how should I manage large packages like these to make them easy to link to in the code I write, even if the original developer did not use the best conventions?
(As a side note, I am using a shared library because it seems like the right choice, but I'm not especially married to it. Should I be using a static library? Is there a way for CMake to find an already-compiled library relative to the current source directory, and might that be a better way to implement this? I know that I will be using LAMMPS in multiple projects, so having a local shared copy superficially seems to make the most sense.)
Normally a find_package call yields a variable specifying the path to the "includes" folder of the package. This would then be added in the caller's CMakeLists.txt via include_directories.
For example, to use find_package for boost, you could do:
find_package(Boost) # sets ${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS} and ${Boost_LIBRARIES}
if(Boost_FOUND)
include_directories(${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS})
add_executable(foo foo.cc)
target_link_libraries(foo ${Boost_LIBRARIES})
endif()
Regarding your side note, you could use find_library and/or find_path to find the library and its headers given a known location.
Both these commands can be invoked in such a way as to avoid searching in common locations, e.g. by setting PATHS to the known location and using NO_DEFAULT_PATH in the find commands.
Another alternative is for your projects to make use of the ExternalProject_Add function which is described in more detail in this article. From this article:
The ExternalProject_Add function makes it possible to say “download this project from the internet, run its configure step, build it and install it”
A downside to this approach is that each of your projects would end up with its own copy of the third party sources and lib.
I have the following directory layout:
main_folder
+ static_lib1
+ executable
Both 'static_lib1' and 'executable' have a full CMakeLists so that they can be
built independently.
The 'executable' depends on 'static_lib1'. It uses find_package() to locate 'static_lib1'.
The main_folder contains a CMakeLists that includes both 'static_lib1' and 'executable' via add_subdirectory for conveniently building the whole project in one go.
Everything works fine if I manually build 'static_lib1' and then 'executable'. But when running the CMakeLists from the main folder, I get an error because find_package is unable to find the library files from 'static_lib1' which have not yet been built.
How can I resolve this while keeping the CMakeLists files separate (i.e. without including the static_lib's CMakeLists from the executable's CMakeLists)?
In executable's CMakeLists.txt you can check if you are building stand-alone or as part of project:
if( CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR STREQUAL CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR )
# stand-alone build
find_package(static_lib1)
else()
include_directories(../static_lib1)
link_directories(../static_lib1)
...
target_link_libraries(executable static_lib1)
endif()
Switch from a file-based approach to a target-based approach for handling the dependency from executable to static_lib1.
The original problem occurred because executable called find_package for locating static_lib1, which then attempted to fill a variable like STATIC_LIB1_LIBRARY with the paths to the library files by calling find_library. executable then consumes the content of that variable in a target_link_libraries(executable ${STATIC_LIB1_LIBRARY}) call. The problem here is, since those library files only get generated as part of the build, that call to find_library will not be able to find anything.
Building executable needs to support two scenarios here:
Building standalone, where a pre-compiled version of static_lib1 is located somewhere on the disc.
Building from main_folder, where both executable and static_lib1 are part of the same build.
The approach from the question supports scenario 1, but not scenario 2.
Instead of using using a variable to communicate a dependency between the two builds, use a target. The CMakeLists.txt for static_lib1 likely creates a library target like add_library(static_lib1 [...]). In executable we now simply do target_link_libraries(executable PUBLIC static_lib1). This is sufficient to support scenario 2.
To also allow for scenario 1 at the same time, we look at the call to find_package(static_lib1) in the CMakeLists.txt for executable. Instead of providing a variable like before, this call now needs to provide a target static_lib1 for consumption.
So we adapt the find script for static_lib1 to the following behavior:
If a target static_lib1 already exists, there's nothing to be done and the find script can just return (this is scenario 2).
Otherwise, we call find_library to locate the library file on disc (as before in the original approach) and then create a new imported target: add_library(static_lib1 STATIC IMPORTED). We then configure all relevant properties of the static library to that target. For instance, to add the location of the library file, we could do
set_target_properties(static_lib1 PROPERTIES
IMPORTED_LINK_INTERFACE_LANGUAGES "CXX"
IMPORTED_LOCATION ${STATIC_LIB1_LIBRARY}
)
To support multi-config generators like MSVC, instead of setting IMPORTED_LOCATION and IMPORTED_LINK_INTERFACE_LANGUAGES, you will want to set the configuration specific properties like IMPORTED_LOCATION_DEBUG and IMPORTED_LOCATION_RELEASE instead. Since this can get quite tedious to do manually, you can have CMake generate this information (and a bunch of other convenient stuff) for you in a package script. The find mechanism for package scripts works slightly different under the hood, but the code in the CMakeLists.txt for executable will look just the same, a simple call to find_package(static_lib1). The main difference is that this call will then not dispatch to a hand-written find script, but to a package script that was automatically generated by CMake as part of the build process of static_lib1.
I guess I will leave this answer for posterity since only recently I have searched for a solution to this problem and found out that...
Since CMake 3.24 it is possible!
It is possible to override subsequent calls to find_package() with FetchContent_Declare() flag OVERRIDE_FIND_PACKAGE.
Your
add_subdirectory("path/to/static_lib1")
call has to be replaced in main_folder/CMakeLists.txt with:
include(FetchContent)
FetchContent_Declare(
static_lib1
SOURCE_DIR "path/to/static_lib1"
OVERRIDE_FIND_PACKAGE
)
Any calls to find_package(static_lib1) will call FetchContent_MakeAvailable() for you, virtually making it identical to add_subdirectory() call.
You can read more about OVERRIDE_FIND_PACKAGE in CMake documentation.