I want to get unique value form table. But all values should be unique.
So suggest how to get.
SELECT DISTINCT ProCode
, id,SubCat
,SmlImgPath
,RupPrice
,ActualPrice
,ProName
FROM product
WHERE ProCode='FZ10003-EBA';
(one day I may be able to post comments!)
SQLFiddle to show normal, distinct and returning a single row
SELECT DISTINCT works fine but it doesn't work the way you want it to work. From the data you posted in the comment under Klas' answer, it's clear you're expecting a single result when there are data differences somewhere in the columns. For example
/Products/CELEBRITY/KANGANA
is completely DISTINCT from
/Products/SALWAR
What you appear to be looking for cannot work with DISTINCT nor can it work with GROUP BY. Basically the only way two (or three, or ten, or 100) rows will become ONE row is if the data in ALL SEVEN COLUMNS in your SELECT are IDENTICAL.
Take a step back and think about what it is, exactly, you're trying to achieve here.
Are you saying that you want one record only? This is called aggregation. In case there are more records then one (three in your example), you would have to decide for each column, which value to show.
Which SubCat, which SmlImgPath, etc. do you want to see in your result line? The maximum value? The minimum? Or the string 'various'? An example:
SELECT
ProCode
, CASE WHEN MIN(id) <> MAX(id) THEN 'various' ELSE MIN(id) END
, MIN(SubCat)
, MAX(SmlImgPath)
, AVG(RupPrice)
, AVG(ActualPrice)
, MAX(ProName)
FROM product
WHERE ProCode='FZ10003-EBA'
GROUP BY ProCode;
DISTINCT refers to all selected columns, so the answer is that your SELECT already does that.
EDIT:
It seems your problem isn't related to DISTINCT. What you want is to get a single row when your search returns multiple rows.
If you don't care which row you get then you can use:
MS SQL Server syntax:
SELECT TOP 1 ProCode
, id,SubCat
,SmlImgPath
,RupPrice
,ActualPrice
,ProName
FROM product
WHERE ProCode='FZ10003-EBA';
MYSQL syntax:
SELECT ProCode
, id,SubCat
,SmlImgPath
,RupPrice
,ActualPrice
,ProName
FROM product
WHERE ProCode='FZ10003-EBA'
LIMIT 1;
Oracle syntax:
SELECT ProCode
, id,SubCat
,SmlImgPath
,RupPrice
,ActualPrice
,ProName
FROM product
WHERE ProCode='FZ10003-EBA'
AND rownum <= 1;
Related
I've spent an inordinate amount of time this morning trying to Google what I thought would be a simple thing. I need to set up an SQL query that selects multiple columns, but only returns one instance if one of the columns (let's call it case_number) returns duplicate rows.
select case_number, name, date_entered from ticket order by date_entered
There are rows in the ticket table that have duplicate case_number, so I want to eliminate those duplicate rows from the results and only show one instance of them. If I use "select distinct case_number, name, date_entered" it applies the distinct operator to all three fields, instead of just the case_number field. I need that logic to apply to only the case_number field and not all three. If I use "group by case_number having count (*)>1" then it returns only the duplicates, which I don't want.
Any ideas on what to do here are appreciated, thank you so much!
You can use ROW_NUMBER(). For example
select *
from (
select *,
row_number() over(partition by case_number) as rn
) x
where rn = 1
The query above will pseudo-randomly pick one row for each case_number. If you want a better selection criteria you can add ORDER BY or window frames to the OVER clause.
First time posting here, hopes it goes well.
I try to make a query with Oracle SQL Developer, where it returns a customer_ID from a table and the time of the payment from another. I'm pretty sure that the problems lies within my logicflow (It was a long time I used SQL, and it was back in school so I'm a bit rusty in it). I wanted to list the IDs as DISTINCT and ORDER BY the dates ASCENDING, so only the first date would show up.
However the returned table contains the same ID's twice or even more in some cases. I even found the same ID and same DATE a few times while I was scrolling through it.
If you would like to know more please ask!
SELECT DISTINCT
FIRM.customer.CUSTOMER_ID,
FIRM.account_recharge.X__INSDATE FELTOLTES
FROM
FIRM.customer
INNER JOIN FIRM.account
ON FIRM.customer.CUSTOMER_ID = FIRM.account.CUSTOMER
INNER JOIN FIRM.account_recharge
ON FIRM.account.ACCOUNT_ID = FIRM.account_recharge.ACCOUNT
WHERE
FIRM.account_recharge.X__INSDATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('14-01-01', 'YY-MM-DD') AND TO_DATE('14-12-31', 'YY-MM-DD')
ORDER
BY FELTOLTES
Your select works like this because a CUSTOMER_ID indeed has more than one X__INSDATE, therefore the records in the result will be distinct. If you need only the first date then don't use DISTINCT and ORDER BY but try to select for MIN(X__INSDATE) and use GROUP BY CUSTOMER_ID.
SELECT DISTINCT FIRM.customer.CUSTOMER_ID,
FIRM.account_recharge.X__INSDATE FELTOLTES
Distinct is applied to both the columns together, which means you will get a distinct ROW for the set of values from the two columns. So, basically the distinct refers to all the columns in the select list.
It is equivalent to a select without distinct but a group by clause.
It means,
select distinct a, b....
is equivalent to,
select a, b...group by a, b
If you want the desired output, then CONCATENATE the columns. The distict will then work on the single concatenated resultset.
How can I use a Distinct or Group by statement on 1 field with a SELECT of All or at least several ones?
Example: Using SQL SERVER!
SELECT id_product,
description_fr,
DiffMAtrice,
id_mark,
id_type,
NbDiffMatrice,
nom_fr,
nouveaute
From C_Product_Tempo
And I want Distinct or Group By nom_fr
JUST GOT THE ANSWER:
select id_product, description_fr, DiffMAtrice, id_mark, id_type, NbDiffMatrice, nom_fr, nouveaute
from (
SELECT rn = row_number() over (partition by [nom_fr] order by id_mark)
, id_product, description_fr, DiffMAtrice, id_mark, id_type, NbDiffMatrice, nom_fr, nouveaute
From C_Product_Tempo
) d
where rn = 1
And this works prfectly!
If I'm understanding you correctly, you just want the first row per nom_fr. If so, you can simply use a subquery to get the lowest id_product per nom_fr, and just get the corresponding rows;
SELECT * FROM C_Product_Tempo WHERE id_product IN (
SELECT MIN(id_product) FROM C_Product_Tempo GROUP BY nom_fr
);
An SQLfiddle to test with.
You need to decide what to do with the other fields. For example, for numeric fields, do you want a sum? Average? Max? Min? For non-numeric fields to you want the values from a particular record if there are more than one with the same nom_fr?
Some SQL Systems allow you to get a "random" record when you do a GROUP BY, but SQL Server will not - you must define the proper aggregation for columns that are not in the GROUP BY.
GROUP BY is used to group in conjunction with an aggregate function (see http://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_groupby.asp), so it's no use grouping without counting, summing up etc. DISTINCT eleminates duplicates but how that matches with the other columns you want to extract, I can't imagine, because some rows will be removed from the result.
I know this has to be an easy select but I am having no luck figuring it out. I've got a table has a field of customer grouping codes and I'm trying to get a count of each distinct character 2 through 6 sets. In my past foxpro experience a simple
select distinct substr(custcode,2,5), count (*) from a group by 1
would work, but this doesn't appear to work in sql server queries. The error message indicated it didn't like using the number reference in the group by so I changed it to custcode but the count just returns 1 for each, as I assume the count is after the distinct occurs so there is only one. If I change the count to count(distinct substring(custcode,2,5)) and remove the first distinct substring I just get a count of how many different codes exist. Can someone point out what I'm doing wrong here? Thanks.
The DISTINCT and GROUP BY are redundant, you just want GROUP BY, and you want to GROUP BY the same thing you are selecting:
select substr(custcode,2,5), count (*)
from a
group by substr(custcode,2,5)
In SQL Server you can use column aliases/numbers in the ORDER BY clause, but not in GROUP BY.
Ie. ORDER BY 1 will order by the first selected column, but many consider it bad practice to use column indexes, using aliases/column names is clearer.
I realize my title probably doesnt explain my situation very well, but I honestly have no idea how to word this.
I am using SQL to access a DB2 database.
Using my screenshot image 1 below as a reference:
column 1 has three instances of "U11124", with three different descriptions (column 2)
I would like this query to return the first instance of "U11124" and its description, but then also unique records for the other rows. image 2 shows my desired result.
image 1
image 2
----- EDIT ----
to answer some of the questions / posts:
technically, it does not need to be the first , just any single one of those records. the problem is that we have three descriptions, and only one needs to be shown, i am now told it does not matter which one.
SELECT STVNST, MAX(STDESC) FROM MY_TABLE GROUP BY STVNST;
In SQL Server:
select stvnst, stdesc
from (
select
stvnst, stdesc
row_number() over (order by stdesc partition by stvnst) row
from table
) a
where row = 1
This method has an advantage over a simple group by, in that it will also work when there's more than two columns in the table.
SELECT STVNST,FIRST(STDESC) from table group by STVNST ORDER BY what_you_want_first
All you need to do is use GROUP BY.
You say you want the first instance of the STDESC column? Well you can't guarntee the order of the rows without another column, however if you want to order by the highest ordered value the following will suffice:
SELECT STVNST, MAX(STDESC) FROM MY_TABLE GROUP BY STVNST;