Do SQL from non-empty table in MS Access - sql

Suppose you have two tables in MS Access, Table1 and Table2 with the same structure (i.e. the same columns). I would like to write a query where if Table1 is empty then I have to get the data from Table2 else get the data from Table1.
I am not sure how to use IIF statements in such a way.

Just an idea. Don't have MS-Access on my machine, but SQL Server accepts it:
SELECT Col1, Col2, ... FROM (
SELECT 1 AS TAG, Col1, Col2, ... FROM Table1
UNION
SELECT 2 AS TAG, Col1, Col2, ... FROM Table2) AS TBL_PARENT
WHERE TBL_PARENT.TAG = (SELECT MIN(TAG) FROM
(SELECT TOP 1 1 AS TAG FROM Table1
UNION
SELECT TOP 1 2 AS TAG FROM Table2) AS TBL)
Explanation
If Table1 is empty, the SELECT MIN(TAG) will return 2, otherwise 1. The WHERE clause will then filter out all the rows that belong to the desired table. The outer-most SELECT is only being used becuz SQL Server doesn't allow using column alias (TAG is an alias here) in WHERE clause. Thus we have to create a temporary TBL_PARENT, so that we could access TAG column.

Since you require a somewhat conditional setting and MS Access does not run trigger or transact SQL, consider using VBA in addition to a stored or VBA SQL query.
Of course figure out which form event trigger --OnOpen, OnClick, AfterInsert, AfterUpdate-- to place this in:
IF DCount("ID", "Table1") = 0 Then
'VBA Recordset Query
db.OpenRecordset Table2sSQLString, dbOpenDynaset
'Stored SQL Query
DoCmd.OpenQuery "Table2Query"
Else
'VBA Recordset Query
db.OpenRecordset Table2SQLString, dbOpenDynaset
'Stored SQL Query
DoCmd.OpenQuery "Table1Query"
End If

Related

How to make a query where every column is a parallel count of a subquery?

I need to render a query such that every column contains the count of a respective table.
The code I have now is:
SELECT COUNT(table1.Id),
COUNT(table2.Id),
COUNT(table3.Id)
FROM table1,
table2,
table3
WHERE table1.done = 'No' OR
table2.done = 'No' OR
table3.done = 'No' OR
But I need the query to return the same result values as if every table would be counted independently, like:
SELECT COUNT(tableX.Id) FROM tableX WHERE talbeX.done = 'No'
where the 'X' stands for 1,2 or 3.
How can this be achived with SQL?
Thanks beforhand for the help.
Just use a nested sub query, exactly as you have explained it:
SELECT
(SELECT COUNT(table1.Id) FROM table1 WHERE table1.done = 'No') as T1Count,
(SELECT COUNT(table2.Id) FROM table2 WHERE table2.done = 'No') as T2Count,
(SELECT COUNT(table3.Id) FROM table3 WHERE table3.done = 'No') as T3Count,
(SELECT COUNT(tableN.Id) FROM tableN) as TNCount;
This will query the tables independently so you are free to use what ever additional criteria you may need without trying to correlate the results from each query
FROM in this case is not strictly necessary in the outer query as we are not returning rows from any specific table, there is no table that we could specify in the from clause. Each RDBMS has their own convention for these types of queries, MS SQL Server and Oracle are to predominant database engines used in Outsystems
If we did specify a table in FROM then this would return 1 row for every record in that table, which is inefficient and not required. So it is important that we do not include a FROM clause.
Transact-SQL - FROM
The FROM clause is usually required on the SELECT statement. The exception is when no table columns are listed, and the only items listed are literals or variables or arithmetic expressions.
ORACLE - DUAL Table
DUAL is a table automatically created by Oracle Database along with the data dictionary. DUAL is in the schema of the user SYS but is accessible by the name DUAL to all users. It has one column, DUMMY, defined to be VARCHAR2(1), and contains one row with a value X. Selecting from the DUAL table is useful for computing a constant expression with the SELECT statement. Because DUAL has only one row, the constant is returned only once. Alternatively, you can select a constant, pseudocolumn, or expression from any table, but the value will be returned as many times as there are rows in the table.
Update - OP is using Oracle!
After attempting the solution, OP responded that it raised the following error:
Error in advanced query SQL2: ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected
The ORA prefix of this error number indicates that the data store is actually an Oracle implementation, so we need to append the FROM DUAL to the query.
SELECT
(SELECT COUNT(table1.Id) FROM table1 WHERE table1.done = 'No') as T1Count,
(SELECT COUNT(table2.Id) FROM table2 WHERE table2.done = 'No') as T2Count,
(SELECT COUNT(table3.Id) FROM table3 WHERE table3.done = 'No') as T3Count,
(SELECT COUNT(tableN.Id) FROM tableN) as TNCount
FROM DUAL;

Ibatis SQL query

I have the below query :
Select top 20 * from tab
--(first query)
union all
Select '0' as id,'PR' as BU,tab.name,tab.desc from tablename tab
inner join tablename1 tab1 ON tab1.name=tab.name and tab1.desc=tab.desc
--(second query)
union all
Select '0' as id,'BR' as BU,tab.name,tab.desc from tablename tab
inner join tablename1 tab1 ON tab1.name=tab.name and tab1.desc=tab.desc
--(third query)
Here i am trying to put the filter in the above query if i pass 'PR' as BU it should give me results of query 1 and query 2 but right now it is giving me results of all the three queries.
I need the results on basis of parameter of BU
There are no parameters in your SQL but this is something that ibatis can help you with. By using dynamic SQL you can have ibatis generate multiple prepared statements and using the correct one at runtime based on input.

How to define destination for an append query Microsoft Access

I'm trying to append two tables in MS Access at the moment. This is my SQL View of my Query at the moment:
INSERT INTO MainTable
SELECT
FROM Table1 INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.University = Table2.University;
Where "University" is the only field name that would have similarities between the two tables. When I try and run the query, I get this error:
Query must have at least one destination field.
I assumed that the INSERT INTO MainTable portion of my SQL was defining the destination, but apparently I am wrong. How can I specify my destination?
You must select something from your select statement.
INSERT INTO MainTable
SELECT col1, col2
FROM Table1 INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.University = Table2.University;
Besides Luke Ford's answer (which is correct), there's another gotcha to consider:
MS Access (at least Access 2000, where I just tested it) seems to match the columns by name.
In other words, when you execute the query from Luke's answer:
INSERT INTO MainTable
SELECT col1, col2
FROM ...
...MS Access assumes that MainTable has two columns named col1 and col2, and tries to insert col1 from your query into col1 in MainTable, and so on.
If the column names in MainTable are different, you need to specify them in the INSERT clause.
Let's say the columns in MainTable are named foo and bar, then the query needs to look like this:
INSERT INTO MainTable (foo, bar)
SELECT col1, col2
FROM ...
As other users have mentioned, your SELECT statement is empty. If you'd like to select more that just col1, col2, however, that is possible. If you want to select all columns in your two tables that are to be appended, you can use SELECT *, which will select everything in the tables.

SELECT-CASE-IN-SELECT error: [SQL0115] Comparison operator IN not valid. In query db2

i have a problem in a db2 query
I tried run this query
SELECT t.* ,
CASE WHEN column in (SELECT data FROM otherTable WHERE conditions...)
then 5
else 0
end as 'My new data'
FROM table t
WHERE conditions....
But get error
[Error Code: -115, SQL State: 42601] [SQL0115] Comparison operator IN not valid.
When i change the sub-query to where statement like this
SELECT t.*
FROM table t
WHERE column in (SELECT data FROM otherTable WHERE conditions...)
Works fine
Why not work in the case statement? It is a limitation of db2?
And could make an equivalent behavior?
One way to do this is to left join to the table and check if it is not null.
In most cases this will be the fastest way because SQL servers are optimized to perform joins very quickly (but will depend on a number of factors including data model, indexes, data size, etc).
Like this:
SELECT t.* ,
CASE WHEN othertable.data is not null
then 5
else 0
end as 'My new data'
FROM table t
left join otherTable ON otherTable.column = data
WHERE conditions....
Try with using exists condition as below (put the column value in the where clause of subquery) :
SELECT t.* ,
CASE WHEN exists (SELECT data FROM otherTable WHERE conditions... and column=val)
then 5
else 0
end as 'My new data'
FROM table t
WHERE conditions....

Optionally use a UNION from another table in T-SQL without using temporary tables or dynamic sql?

I have two sql server tables with the same structure. In a stored procedure I have a Select from the first table. Occasionally I want to select from the second table as well based on a passed in parameter.
I would like a way to do this without resorting to using dynamic sql or temporary tables.
Pass in param = 1 to union, anything else to only return the first result set:
select field1, field2, ... from table1 where cond
union
select field1, field2, ... from table2 where cond AND param = 1
If they are both the exact same structure, then why not have a single table with a parameter that differentiates the two tables? At that point, it becomes a simple matter of a case statement on the parameter on which results set you receive back.
A second alternative is dual result sets. You can select multiple result sets out of a stored procedure. Then in code, you would either use DataReader.NextResult or DataSet.Tables(1) to get at the second set of data. It will then be your code's responsibility to place them into the same collection or merge the two tables.
A THIRD possibility is to utilize an IF Statement. Say, pass in an integer with the expected possible values of 1,2, 3 and then have something along this in your actual stored procedure code
if #Param = 1 Then
Select From Table1
if #Param = 2 THEN
Select From Table2
if #Param = 3 Then
Select From Table1 Union Select From Table 2
A fourth possibility would be to have two distinct procedures one which runs a union and one which doesn't and then make it your code's responsibility to determine which one to call based on that parameter, something like:
myCommandObject.CommandText = IIf(myParamVariable = true, "StoredProc1", StoredProc2")
It's pretty easy.
/* Always return tableX */
select colA, colB
from tableX
union
select colA, colB
from tableY
where #parameter = 'IncludeTableY' /* Will union with an empty set otherwise */
If this isn't immediately apparent (it often isn't), consider the examples below. The primary thing to remember is that the if the where clause evaluates to true for a row, it is returned otherwise it's discarded.
This always evaluates to true so every row is returned.
select *
from tableX
where 1 = 1
This always evaluates to false so no rows are returned (sometimes used as a quick and dirty get-me-the-columns query).
select *
from tableX
where 1 = 0
this will return values from either table, depending on if you passed a value on the parameter
select field1, field2, ... from table1 where #p1 is null
union
select field1, field2, ... from table2 where #p1 is not null
you just need to add the rest of your criteria for the where clause
Use a view.
CREATE view_both
AS
SELECT *, 1 AS source
FROM table1
UNION ALL
SELECT *, 2 AS source
FROM table2
SELECT * FROM view_both WHERE source < #source_flag
The optimizer determines which, or both, tables to use based on source without requiring it to be indexed.