Producing a simple line graph - sql

I am using MS Access 2007. This is a really simple problem, but I cannot work out how to do it.
I have the following table produced from a query:
1 2 3 4
1000 5500 9500 3000
I want to produce a line chart of the data.
The columns headings are respectively:
SumOfA1 SumOfA2 SumOfA3 SumOfA4
How do I do this?

Here's what Excel can do with it:

Related

Import/Insert Excel Range and SSIS variables into SQL table?

I have an SSIS package that is to ingest a number of Excel files with similar structures but irregular names and import them into a SQL table. Along with the data from the excel files, I have a number of variables that are set and different with each file (User::ExcelFileName, User::VarMonth, User::VarProgram, User::VarYear, etc). All of the table data from the Excel files are going to the same destination table, but for each row of data alongside the Excel dataset I want to insert a column for each variable to pass through as well into SQL. An example of my dataset is below:
Excel
ID
Name
Foo
Bar
111
Bob
88yu
117
112
Jim
JKL
A TU
113
George
FTD
19900
SSIS Variables (set during execution)
User::ExcelFileName = c:\temp\excelfile1.xlsx
User::VarMonth = Jan
User::VarProgram = Daily
User::VarYear = 2023
Desired SQL Destination:
ExcelFileName
VarMonth
VarProgram
VarYear
ID
Name
Foo
Bar
c:\temp\excelfile1.xlsx
Jan
Daily
2023
111
Bob
88yu
117
c:\temp\excelfile1.xlsx
Jan
Daily
2023
112
Jim
JKL
A TU
c:\temp\excelfile1.xlsx
Jan
Daily
2023
113
George
FTD
19900
I've tried a few configurations and I've referenced this post for piping in variable data into SQL, but I haven't gotten a working model yet.
Worth noting, Excel COnnection is dynamic and set to run within a Foreach Loop container to iterate through my Excel sources. Any advice or guidance would be appreciated!
It sounds like you want a Derived Column task.
in the task, just add the new columns you want, and map the variables to the column.

How can I detect similarity of names in the same columns

Guys I have a dataset like this:
`
df = pd.DataFrame(data = ['John','gal britt','mona','diana','molly','merry','mony','molla','johnathon','dina'],\
columns = ['Name'])
df
`
it gives this output
Name
0 John
1 gal britt
2 mona
3 diana
4 molly
5 merry
6 mony
7 molla
8 johnathon
so I imagine that to get all names across each other and detect the similarity I will use df.merge(df,how = "cross" )
The thing is the real data is 40000 rows and performing this will result in a very big dataset which I don't have the memory for.
any algorithm or idea would really help and I'll adjust the logic to my purposes
I tried working with vaex instead of pandas to work with this huge amount of data but still I run into the problem of insufficient memory allocation.
In short: I KNOW that this algorithm or way of thinking about such problem is wrong and inefficient.

Transpose a large dataset

I have a lot of data for each User ID that needs to be organized by column rather than by row as it is currently. I have tried standard transposition methods but cannot figure this out. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Current data set:
UserId Item Value(mL)
1 AAA 12
1 AAB 21
1 AAC 31
2 AAA 15
2 AAB 21
2 AAC 34
2 AAD 16
Desired outcome:
UserID AAA AAB AAC AAD
1 12 21 31
2 15 21 34 16
With formula:
=SUMIFS($C:$C,$A:$A,$F2,$B:$B,G$1)
Copy over and down.
As #skkakkar stated: with Pivot Table
There is an excel paste option called "transpose" that will allow you to accomplish this. Select your data and copy it. Then go to the target cell and go to paste options and press "T" or click the transpose button.
EDIT:
There are other ways of solving this, as Scott has shown in his answer. If you are performing this on a large data set, my solution will be the fastest by far, but his solution is also very sleek. In addition, this won't work to only keep non-duplicate headers. You will need to do a bit of work to have this work the exact way the poster wanted.

Excel VBA SubTotals

Excel build-in functions are, at most of the time, effective. However, there are some functions really like implemented half-way and some how dictated their usage. The SUBTOTAL function is one of them.
My data is presented in the following format:
Value Count
100 20
102 3
105 4
102 5
And I want to build a table in this format:
Value Count
100 20
101 0
102 8
103 0
104 0
105 4
I've read this in SO but my situation is a bit differ. Pivot table will be able to give you the subtotals of the values appears in the original data and I don't want to have a loop to insert missing values in the original data (if it is gonna to be a loop over the original data, the loop could use to build the table - which I would prefer to avoid at all)

SPSS Compute Variable

Below is some data:
Test Day1 Day2 Score
A 1 2 100
B 1 3 62
C 3 4 90
D 2 4 20
E 4 5 80
I am trying to take the values from column 'day' and 'day2' and use them to select the row number for the column score. For example for Test A I would like to find the sum of 100 and 62 because that is the values of the first and second rows of score. Test B I would like to find the sum of 100, 62 and 90.
Is their anyway to do this in the Compute Variable window? Found in the menu Transform-Compute Variable?
I tried the following:
Score(MEAN(VALUE(Day1), VALUE(DAY2)))
This is not the proper way to call the cell location of Score and I received an error.
Can anyone help?
Thank you!
You really have two different datasets here. One is a dataset of scores numbered 1 through 5.
The other is a dataset that includes indexes into the score dataset. So the steps would be something like this.
First take the scores dataset and transpose it so that it has one row and 5 columns (Data>Transpose)
Then match that dataset to each case in the main dataset (Data>Merge Files>Add Variables).
Next you have to resort to using syntax directly.
You would declare a vector for the scores (VECTOR)
Finally, you use COMPUTE to index into the scores.
For your real problem, I suppose that you might have batches of scores and maybe there are some gaps. The Restructure Data Wizard can help you generalize this - convert cases into variables, but let's not go there yet.
HTH,
Jon Peck