I am trying to create bindings using the kml schema http://schemas.opengis.net/kml/2.2.0/ogckml22.xsd and the gx extension schema https://developers.google.com/kml/schema/kml22gx.xsd
I have no trouble generating and using the bindings generated from the ogckml22 schema. I am unclear as to how to incorporate the extension schema into these bindings.
You don't incorporate the schema into those bindings. You generate a new bindings module for the extending schema (which has its own namespace), and make sure it references the existing bindings. Something like this[*]:
pyxbgen \
--archive-path='&pyxb/bundles/opengis//' \
--schema-location=http://code.google.com/apis/kml/schema/kml22gx.xsd \
--module=kml22gx
The bindings for kml22gx will be subclasses of the pyxb.bundles.opengis.ogckml22 bindings that are being extended.
Look at the file pyxb/bundles/opengis/scripts/genbind which is what generates the bindings in PyXB itself. Several of the namespaces extend other OpenGIS namespaces for which bindings were generated in an earlier invocation of pyxbgen.
([*] When you do this, you may get an AssertionError. Comment out the assertion; it seems to be too restrictive.)
Related
This question is likely a particular XAML application. XAML is a custom markup to instantiate objects and, as such, define custom applications. Note that, it serves to both declare WPF user interfaces and WWF workflows. It would also help to specify, e.g., a custom source-code change detection solution. To avoid getting in deeper in unnecessary details. I need to design a custom XAML-based model that, like the one for WPF and the one for WWF do, allows me to declare a custom application on top of XAML, without having to create a WPF or WWF project. Is this sort of third-part XAML-like provider possible to build?
<Approach>
<PrimitiveExample
OriginalType={Type syntax:LiteralSyntax}
ModifiedType={Type syntax:LiteralSyntax}
Propagation.Matched={Binding MatchedPropagationCommand}>
...
</PrimitiveExample>
...
<Approach/>
Let us see it this way. Is there a way to get a stand-alone XAML file that works as follows?
a) There will be a project item, e.g., named "Stand-alone XAML".
b) I create a new "Stand-alone XAML" item named, e.g., "Solution.sccd", and I add it to a console application, class library, or many other projects. This because it will be a sort of smart .config.
c) I can set up a root instance in "Solution.sccd" (likely containing a lot of nested instances) - this is natural for XAML.
d) When declaring instances in "Solution.sccd", I can use features like attached properties, binding, and many other smart features or markup extensions that can be used with WPF or WWF, but this will not be a WPF or WWF project.
e) I can instantiate the declared root instance, e.g., with simple code line like "var rootObject = XAMLInstanceCreator.Create(Solution.sccd)", and use that object.
Does this make sense now?
Regards, Guillermo.
How can I use wsimport (or any other tool that provides similar funcionality for that matter) to generate the required files to talk to a JAX-WS webservice, but not only have it add JAXB annotation to the request/response classes, but also add Jackson annotations?
In the big picture, I do not want to duplicate, I want to reuse the generated classes for a REST service. If the above is not possible, is there any other way that saves me from duplicating everything?
As mentioned in a comment, Jackson has a JAXB Annotations module, that can use JAXB annotated classes beside / instead of standard Jackson annotated ones...
See: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-module-jaxb-annotations
I'm trying to use JavaFX in my android device, with the help of javafxports.
I used the XStream to parse some XML file in my program.
When i compile them, the javafxports outputs the following warnings:
Note: there were 9 classes trying to access annotations using reflection.
You should consider keeping the annotation attributes
(using '-keepattributes *Annotation*').
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#attributes)
Note: there were 32 classes trying to access generic signatures using reflection.
You should consider keeping the signature attributes
(using '-keepattributes Signature').
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#attributes)
Note: there were 56 unresolved dynamic references to classes or interfaces.
You should check if you need to specify additional program jars.
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#dynamicalclass)
Note: there were 3 class casts of dynamically created class instances.
You might consider explicitly keeping the mentioned classes and/or
their implementations (using '-keep').
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#dynamicalclasscast)
Note: there were 39 accesses to class members by means of introspection.
You should consider explicitly keeping the mentioned class members
(using '-keep' or '-keepclassmembers').
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#dynamicalclassmember)
Note: you're ignoring all warnings!
The output .apk can be installed and run until it calls the xstream classes to read annotations in my classes. The reason is actually described in the warnings.
So my question is, how can i disable the proguard when generating .apk, or send it a custom proguard.pro configuration.
And my build.gradle is almost the same as that in the helloworld example.
Thanks.
I am using axis2 wsdl2java script to generate client side stubs with the data binding classes being generated separately using the -u option. The generated data binding classes are using the ADB data binder and all the classes are inheriting from the ADBBean. I want the classes to implement the Serializable interface. Is there a way to do this. I have been researching this for a while and haven't been able to find a concrete solution. I need the data binders to be generated separately instead of being inner classes.
We have two assemblies, DataContracts and Core. We are currently using svcutil to generate our DataContracts, while referencing Core. We've got a couple of extension methods on different enum types that would be useful on the client side.
Is there any way to get svcutil to include these extension methods into our generated proxies file?
Any methods that you want exposed you need to have as part of the operational contract. I don't know of any other way to expose the metadata in the WSDL without learning more about how the WSDLImporter works. Irregardless - Metadata is only contracts - you can't share operations/behaviors in your metadata. The only way to share method behaviors (your extensions) is to include them in the shared contract/core assembly or expose them as operation contracts.
The classes generated by svcutil are partial. Therefore the functionality of those classes can be split in multiple files. One file is the one generated by the svcutil with the functionality exposed by the service. Other files could contain the functionality you want to append, which is not part of the data contract.
More info on partial classes Partial Classes and Methods (C# Programming Guide) on MSDN