I am using following code to load contacts using ContactStore. My requirement is to search contacts in ContactStore when key is pressed in a textbox. Below is the code in my View Model.
private async void LoadAllContacts(string searchQuery)
{
ContactStore contactStore = await ContactManager.RequestStoreAsync();
IReadOnlyList<Contact> contacts = null;
// Find all contacts
contacts = await contactStore.FindContactsAsync(searchQuery);
foreach (var item in contacts)
{
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(item.FirstName) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(item.LastName))
{
var contact = new Member
{
FirstName = item.FirstName,
LastName = item.LastName,
FullName = item.DisplayName, //item.HonorificNamePrefix ?? "" + item.FirstName + item.MiddleName ?? "" + item.LastName,
Bio = item.Notes
};
if (item.DataSuppliers != null)
{
foreach (var dataSupplier in item.DataSuppliers)
{
switch (dataSupplier.ToLower())
{
case "facebook":
break;
case "hotmail2":
case "hotmail":
break;
}
}
}
if (item.Thumbnail != null)
{
var thumnailStream = await item.Thumbnail.OpenReadAsync();
BitmapImage thumbImage = new BitmapImage();
thumbImage.SetSource(thumnailStream);
contact.ImageSource = thumbImage;
}
this.Insert(0, contact);
}
}
}
The contacts are loading perfectly in my listview but the problem is that loading contacts from contact store is an extensive task and when user I press text in the textbox quickly then application throws exception.
My question is how can I load contacts efficiently? Means if User pressed 'a' and I call this method and quickly user pressed 'c' so if the results are loaded for 'a' then application should cancel continuing with previous operation and load 'ac' related contacts.
Thanks.
You should read up on the concept of CancellationTokens. That's the idea you're looking for. Lots of examples online.
What is "cancellationToken" in the TaskFactory.StartNew() used for?
http://dotnetcodr.com/2014/01/31/suspending-a-task-using-a-cancellationtoken-in-net-c/
CancellationToken/CancellationTokenSource is C#'s way of managing and cancelling Tasks.
In your case, you would create a CancellationTokenSource, and pass its Token object in your ContactManager.RequestStoreAsync(CancellationToken token) and contactStore.FindContactsAsync(CancellationToken token) methods (any async methods where you're awaiting).
Those two methods should accept a CancellationToken, and sporadically do a token.ThrowIfCancellationRequested().
If at some point you find that you want to stop the current Task and start a new one (for your case, when the user types something new), call CancellationTokenSource.Cancel(), which will kill the running Task thread because of the ThrowIfCancellationRequested().
One thing I want to point out though, is that your code can be optimized even further before going through CancellationTokens. You call ContactStore contactStore = await ContactManager.RequestStoreAsync(); every time. Could you not store that as a member variable?
You can also do tricks such as not running your load contacts method unless the user has stopped typing for 1 second, and I would suggest that you force concurrent Task execution in this case by using a ConcurrentExclusiveSchedular.
Related
I have a problem with joining users to game room.
Controller
[HttpPut("join/")]
public async Task<ActionResult<string>> JoinRoom([FromQuery] int leagueId, [FromQuery] int userId)
{
var data = await classicGameService.JoinRoom(leagueId, userId);
if (data == "")
{
return NotFound();
}
else
{
return Ok(data);
}
}
Service
public async Task<string> JoinRoom(int leaguePosition, int userId)
{
var gameRoom = await
context.ClassicGames.Include(x => x.League)
.FirstOrDefaultAsync(x => x.League.Position == leaguePosition && x.User2 == 0 && x.User2State == (int)EClassicGameUserState.OBSERVER);
if (gameRoom is null)
{
return "";
}
else
{
gameRoom.User2 = userId;
gameRoom.User2State = (int)EClassicGameUserState.STAGNATION;
await context.SaveChangesAsync();
return $"{gameRoom.Id},{gameRoom.User1}";
}
}
When users send request to join simultaneously they getting correct respose for join.
It is a big problem for my game.
How to make response for the first user and then for the second?
I tried to change the methods to synchronous and there was the same problem.
If your database supports row versioning, such as Timestamps within SQL Server, you can configure your entities to observe these and reject concurrent changes.
For example to reproduce this kind of issue with an Update statement I have an entity called Game with a Player 1 and Player 2 value which I intend should only be updated once at a time. Concurrent access is a problem within web applications as two requests can come in simultaneously and both "capture" data in the same effective state which is perfectly valid for both to try and update. To simulate this you can use the following code:
using (var context = new TestDbContext())
{
var gameA = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(x => x.GameId == 1 && x.Player2 == null);
using (var context2 = new TestDbContext())
{
var gameB = context2.Games.SingleOrDefault(x => x.GameId == 1 && x.Player2 == null);
if (gameA != null)
gameA.Player2 = "Roy";
if (gameB != null)
gameB.Player2 = "George";
context.SaveChanges();
context2.SaveChanges();
}
}
In this example we use 2 separate DbContext instances representing our two simultaneous requests. Each loads our desired game satisfied that Player2 is empty. We now have 2 object references, one tracked by each DbContext and we tell both instances to set Player2's name. We then tell the contexts to SaveChanges(). The resulting output will be "George". If we reverse the SaveChanges() call order, the output would be "Roy". We don't want to allow the 2nd call to update. We cannot change the fact that both concurrent reads will get the game and be satisfied that Player2 has not been set unless we were to do something drastic like lock the table or row when trying to read the Games, and only unlock it after saving/aborting. (Pessimistic locking) This would potentially lead to big issues with timeouts or deadlocks.
The alternative is optimistic locking. We update our table to include a Timestamp column (in this example named RowVersion), then configure that column in our EF entity:
public class Game
{
[Key]
public int GameId { get; set; }
public string Player1 { get; set; }
public string Player2 { get; set; }
[Timestamp]
public byte[] RowVersion { get; set; }
}
Now if you run the above code, without any changes at all, the first SaveChanges() call will succeed, while the second SaveChanges() will fail with a DbUpdateConcurrencyException which you will need to handle. Basically in your case you'd likely want to return to the client that their game selection failed, refresh the list, and they'd see that the game was no longer available.
If your storage doesn't support optimistic concurrency then things get a bit more tricky. You would need to develop something like a marshal of sorts where join requests are queued to be performed by a single process responsible for updating player state. The initial call would return a status of something like "Joining" along with a Queue ID which would result in a user seeing a spinner while their client continued to poll with that Queue ID for an update from the marshal. The marshal processes the requests on a first come, first serve basis, and evaluates the rules. When a game is empty and allows Player 2 to join, that queued job gets a "Join Successful" status which comes back to the client on the next poll.. The duplicate request processes and finds Player 2 is filled so that Queued job gets a "Join Failed" response for that client on it's next poll. (Serializing the join operation)
Background
The ETrade authentication system has me creating a RequestToken, then executing an Authorization URL, which opens an ETrade page.
The user logs in to authorize the activity on their account.
They receive a pin, which they enter in my app.
I call ExchangeRequestTokenForAccessToken with the RequestToken and the Pin.
Then we are off and running.
Question
The problem is I'm creating a service that runs continuously in the background. There won't be any user to log in. Conversely, I won't be making any trades. Just crunching numbers, looking for stocks that meet certain criteria.
I can't figure how to get this to work unattended.
Thanks, Brad.
Previously, I have used a series of WebRequests and manually added headers to simulate the authorization pages. This worked until about a year ago when ETrade complicated their headers with something that appears to be tracking information. I now use http://watin.org/ to log in, and to strip the Auth Code.
Sloppy code looks like this:
using WatiN.Core; // IE Automation
...
// verify current thread in STA.
Settings.Instance.MakeNewIeInstanceVisible = false;
var ieStaticInstanceHelper = new IEStaticInstanceHelper();
Settings.AutoStartDialogWatcher = false;
using (ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE = new IE())
{
string authCode = "";
ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.GoTo(GetAuthorizationLink());
if (ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.ContainsText("Scheduled System Maintenance"))
{
throw new ApplicationException("eTrade down for maintenance.");
}
TextField user = ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.TextField(Find.ByName("USER"));
TextField pass = ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.TextField(Find.ById("txtPassword"));
TextField pass2 = ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.TextField(Find.ByName("PASSWORD"));
Button btn = ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.Button(Find.ByClass("log-on-btn"));
Button btnAccept = ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.Button(Find.ByValue("Accept"));
TextField authCodeBox = ieStaticInstanceHelper.IE.TextField(Find.First());
if (user != null && pass != null && btn != null &&
user.Exists && pass2.Exists && btn.Exists)
{
user.Value = username;
pass2.Value = password;
btn.Click();
}
btnAccept.WaitUntilExists(30);
btnAccept.Click();
authCodeBox.WaitUntilExists(30);
authCode = authCodeBox.Value;
SavePin(authCode);
}
Current version of Brad Melton's code.
WatiN has changed and no longer contains the IE.AttachToIE function.
So, IEStaticInstanceHelper is now called StaticBrowserInstanceHelper, but that code is hard to find, so I've included it here.
class StaticBrowserInstanceHelper<T> where T : Browser {
private Browser _browser;
private int _browserThread;
private string _browserHwnd;
public Browser Browser {
get {
int currentThreadId = GetCurrentThreadId();
if (currentThreadId != _browserThread) {
_browser = Browser.AttachTo<T>(Find.By("hwnd", _browserHwnd));
_browserThread = currentThreadId;
}
return _browser;
}
set {
_browser = value;
_browserHwnd = _browser.hWnd.ToString();
_browserThread = GetCurrentThreadId();
}
}
private int GetCurrentThreadId() {
return Thread.CurrentThread.GetHashCode();
}
}
ETrade's login pages have changed as well. They have several. All the login pages I checked consistently had a USER field and a PASSWORD field, but the login buttons had various names that look fragile. So if this doesn't work, that's the first thing I'd check.
Second, if I go directly to the auth page, it prompts to log in, but then it frequently doesn't take you to the auth page.
I got more consistent results by going to the home page to log in, then going to the auth page.
static public string GetPin(string username, string password, string logonLink, string authLink) {
// Settings.Instance.MakeNewIeInstanceVisible = false;
var StaticInstanceHelper = new StaticBrowserInstanceHelper<IE>();
Settings.AutoStartDialogWatcher = false;
// This code doesn't always handle it well when IE is already running, but it won't be in my case. You may need to attach to existing, depending on your context.
using (StaticInstanceHelper.Browser = new IE(logonLink)) {
string authCode = "";
// Browser reference was failing because IE hadn't started up yet.
// I'm in the background, so I don't care how long it takes.
// You may want to do a WaitFor to make it snappier.
Thread.Sleep(5000);
if (StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.ContainsText("Scheduled System Maintenance")) {
throw new ApplicationException("eTrade down for maintenance.");
}
TextField user = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.TextField(Find.ByName("USER"));
TextField pass2 = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.TextField(Find.ByName("PASSWORD"));
// Class names of the Logon and Logoff buttons vary by page, so I find by text. Seems likely to be more stable.
Button btnLogOn = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.Button(Find.ByText("Log On"));
Element btnLogOff = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.Element(Find.ByText("Log Off"));
Button btnAccept = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.Button(Find.ByValue("Accept"));
TextField authCodeBox = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.TextField(Find.First());
if (user != null && btnLogOn != null &&
user.Exists && pass2.Exists && btnLogOn.Exists) {
user.Value = username;
pass2.Value = password;
btnLogOn.Click();
}
Thread.Sleep(1000);
if (StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.ContainsText("Scheduled System Maintenance")) {
Element btnContinue = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.Element(Find.ByName("continueButton"));
if (btnContinue.Exists)
btnContinue.Click();
}
btnLogOff.WaitUntilExists(30);
// Here we go, finally.
StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.GoTo(authLink);
btnAccept.WaitUntilExists(30);
btnAccept.Click();
authCodeBox.WaitUntilExists(30);
authCode = authCodeBox.Value;
StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.Close();
return authCode;
}
}
Being able to automate it like this means that I no longer care about how long the token is valid. Thanks BradM!
This was amazingly helpful. I used your code plus what was posted here to automate this (because tokens expire daily): E*Trade API frequently returns HTTP 401 Unauthorized when fetching an access token but not always
I made two edits:
Changed the authorize URL to what was posted here: https://seansoper.com/blog/connecting_etrade.html
For the log on button, changed it to search by ID: Button btnLogOn = StaticInstanceHelper.Browser.Button(Find.ById("logon_button"));
I ran into issues with Watin and setting up the Apartmentstate. So did this:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
System.Threading.Thread th = new Thread(new ThreadStart(TestAuth));
th.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA);
th.Start();
th.Join();
}
Then put the code in the TestAuth method.
I want to get Call Details from Genesys Platform SIP Server.
And Genesys Platform has Platform SDK for .NET .
Anybod has a SIMPLE sample code which shows how to get call details using Platform SDK for .NET [ C# ] from SIP Server?
Extra Notes:
Call Details : especially i wanted to get AgentId for a given call
and
From Sip Server : I am not sure if Sip Server is the best candiate to
take call details. So open to other suggestions/ alternatives
You can build a class that monitor DN actions. Also you watch specific DN or all DN depending what you had to done. If its all about the call, this is the best way to this.
Firstly, you must define a TServerProtocol, then you must connect via host,port and client info.
var endpoint = new Endpoint(host, port, config);
//Endpoint backupEndpoint = new Endpoint("", 0, config);
protocol = new TServerProtocol(endpoint)
{
ClientName = clientName
};
//Sync. way;
protocol.Open();
//Async way;
protocol.BeginOpen();
I always use async way to do this. I got my reason thou :) You can detect when connection open with event that provided by SDK.
protocol.Opened += new EventHandler(OnProtocolOpened);
protocol.Closed += new EventHandler(OnProtocolClosed);
protocol.Received += new EventHandler(OnMessageReceived);
protocol.Error += new EventHandler(OnProtocolError);
Here there is OnMessageReceived event. This event where the magic happens. You can track all of your call events and DN actions. If you go genesys support site. You'll gonna find a SDK reference manual. On that manual quiet easy to understand there lot of information about references and usage.
So in your case, you want agentid for a call. So you need EventEstablished to do this. You can use this in your recieve event;
var message = ((MessageEventArgs)e).Message;
// your event-handling code goes here
switch (message.Id)
{
case EventEstablished.MessageId:
var eventEstablished = message as EventEstablished;
var AgentID = eventEstablished.AgentID;
break;
}
You can lot of this with this usage. Like dialing, holding on a call inbound or outbound even you can detect internal calls and reporting that genesys platform don't.
I hope this is clear enough.
If you have access to routing strategy and you can edit it. You can add some code to strategy to send the details you need to some web server (for example) or to DB. We do such kind of stuff in our strategy. After successful routing block as a post routing strategy sends values of RTargetPlaceSelected and RTargetAgentSelected.
Try this:
>
Genesyslab.Platform.Contacts.Protocols.ContactServer.Requests.JirayuGetInteractionContent
JirayuGetInteractionContent =
Genesyslab.Platform.Contacts.Protocols.ContactServer.Requests.JirayuGetInteractionContent.Create();
JirayuGetInteractionContent.InteractionId = "004N4aEB63TK000P";
Genesyslab.Platform.Commons.Protocols.IMessage respondingEventY =
contactserverProtocol.Request(JirayuGetInteractionContent);
Genesyslab.Platform.Commons.Collections.KeyValueCollection keyValueCollection =
((Genesyslab.Platform.Contacts.Protocols.ContactServer.Events.EventGetInteractionContent)respondingEventY).InteractionAttributes.AllAttributes;
We are getting AgentID and Place as follows,
Step-1:
Create a Custome Command Class and Add Chain of command In ExtensionSampleModule class as follows,
class LogOnCommand : IElementOfCommand
{
readonly IObjectContainer container;
ILogger log;
ICommandManager commandManager;
public bool Execute(IDictionary<string, object> parameters, IProgressUpdater progress)
{
if (Application.Current.Dispatcher != null && !Application.Current.Dispatcher.CheckAccess())
{
object result = Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(DispatcherPriority.Send, new ExecuteDelegate(Execute), parameters, progress);
return (bool)result;
}
else
{
// Get the parameter
IAgent agent = parameters["EnterpriseAgent"] as IAgent;
IIdentity workMode = parameters["WorkMode"] as IIdentity;
IAgent agentManager = container.Resolve<IAgent>();
Genesyslab.Desktop.Modules.Core.Model.Agents.IPlace place = agentManager.Place;
if (place != null)
{
string Place = place.PlaceName;
}
else
log.Debug("Place object is null");
CfgPerson person = agentManager.ConfPerson;
if (person != null)
{
string AgentID = person.UserName;
log.DebugFormat("Place: {0} ", AgentID);
}
else
log.Debug("AgentID object is null");
}
}
}
// In ExtensionSampleModule
readonly ICommandManager commandManager;
commandManager.InsertCommandToChainOfCommandAfter("MediaVoiceLogOn", "LogOn", new
List<CommandActivator>() { new CommandActivator()
{ CommandType = typeof(LogOnCommand), Name = "OnEventLogOn" } });
enter code here
IInteractionVoice interaction = (IInteractionVoice)e.Value;
switch (interaction.EntrepriseLastInteractionEvent.Id)
{
case EventEstablished.MessageId:
var eventEstablished = interaction.EntrepriseLastInteractionEvent as EventEstablished;
var genesysCallUuid = eventEstablished.CallUuid;
var genesysAgentid = eventEstablished.AgentID;
.
.
.
.
break;
}
I am trying to develop a search filter and making use of the HTML5 history API to reduce the number of requests sent to the server. If the user checks a checkbox to apply a certain filter I am saving that data in the history state, so that when the user unchecks it I am able to load the data back from the history rather than fetching it again from the server.
When the user checks or unchecks a filter I am changing the window URL to match the filter that was set, for instance if the user tries to filter car brands only of a certain category I change the URL like 'cars?filter-brand[]=1'.
But when mutiple filters are applied I have no way of figuring out whether to load the data from the server or to load it from the history.
At the moment I am using the following code.
pushString variable is the new query string that will be created.
var back = [],forward = [];
if(back[back.length-1] === decodeURI(pushString)){ //check last back val against the next URL to be created
back.pop();
forward.push(currentLocation);
history.back();
return true;
}else if(forward[forward.length-1] === decodeURI(pushString)){
forward.pop();
back.push(currentLocation);
history.forward();
return true;
}else{
back.push(currentLocation); //add current win location
}
You can check if your filters are equivalent.
Comparing Objects
This is a simple function that takes two files, and lets you know if they're equivalent (note: not prototype safe for simplicity).
function objEqual(a, b) {
function toStr(o){
var keys = [], values = [];
for (k in o) {
keys.push(k);
values.push(o[k]);
}
keys.sort();
values.sort();
return JSON.stringify(keys)
+ JSON.stringify(values);
}
return toStr(a) === toStr(b);
}
demo
Using the URL
Pass the query part of the URL (window.location.search) to this function. It'll give you an object you can compare to another object using the above function.
function parseURL(url){
var obj = {}, parts = url.split("&");
for (var i=0, part; part = parts[i]; i++) {
var x = part.split("="), k = x[0], v = x[1];
obj[k] = v;
}
return obj;
}
Demo
History API Objects
You can store the objects with the History API.
window.history.pushState(someObject, "", "someURL")
You can get this object using history.state or in a popState handler.
Keeping Track of Things
If you pull out the toStr function from the first section, you can serialize the current filters. You can then store all of the states in an object, and all of the data associated.
When you're pushing a state, you can update your global cache object. This code should be in the handler for the AJAX response.
var key = toStr(parseUrl(location.search));
cache[key] = dataFromTheServer;
Then abstract your AJAX function to check the cache first.
function getFilterResults(filters, callback) {
var cached = cache[toStr(filters)]
if (cached != null) callback(cached);
else doSomeAJAXStuff().then(callback);
}
You can also use localstorage for more persistent caching, however this would require more advanced code, and expiring data.
I am new to Zend and very keen to learn, so I would really appreciate some help and guidance.
I am trying to create a 'method in a class' that will save the session variables of product pages visited by members to a site i.e
i,e examplesite com/product/?producttype= 6
I want to save the number 6 in a session variable. I also do not want to have a global session for the entire site; I just want it for selected pages. So, I guess I have to have Zend_Session::start() on the selected page; but I am not clear how this should be done.
Should I instantiate it in the page view page. i.e products page or do this in the indexAction() method for the products page. I have attempted to instantiate it below but it did not work.
public function rememberLastProductSearched()
{ //my attempt to start a session start for this particular page.
Zend_Session::start();
}
$session->productSearchCategory = $this->_request->getParam('product-search-category');
return" $session->productSearchCategory ";
}
else
{
//echo " nothing there
return " $session->productSearchCategory";
//";
}
}
With the rememberLastProductSearched() method I was trying to get the method to first check whether the user had searched for a new product or just arrived at the page by default. i.e whether he had used the get() action to search for a new product. If the answer is no, then I wanted the system to check whether their had been a previous saved session variable. so in procedural syntax it would have gone like this:
if(isset($_Get['producttype']))
{
//$dbc database connection
$producttype = mysqli_real_escape_string($dbc,trim($_GET['producttype']));
}
else
if(isset($_SESSION['producttype'])){
$producttype = mysqli_real_escape_string($dbc,trim($_SESSION['producttype']));
}
Can you please help me with the Zend/oop syntax. I am totally confused how it should be?
you're asking about simple work flow in an action, it should begin something like:
//in any controller
public function anyAction()
{
//open seesion, start will be called if needed
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace('products');
//get value
$productCategory = $this->getRequest()->getParam('producttype');
//save value to namespace
$session->productType = $productCategory;
//...
}
now to move this off to a separate method you have to pass the data to the method...
protected function rememberLastProductSearched($productType)
{
//open seesion, start will be called if needed
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace('products');
$session->productType = $productType;
}
So now if you want to test for presence of a value...
//in any controller
public function anyAction()
{
//open seesion, call the namespace whenever you need to access it
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace('products');
if (!isset($session->productType)) {
$productCategory = $this->getRequest()->getParam('producttype');
//save value to session
$this->rememberLastProductSearched($productCategory)
} else {
$productCategory = $session->productType;
}
}
That's the idea.
Be mindful of your work flow as it can sometimes be very simple to inadvertently overwrite your session values.
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace("productSearch");
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('producttype')) { //isset GET param ?
$session->productType = $this->getRequest()->getParam('producttype');
$searchedProductType = $session->productType;
} else { //take the session saved value
if ($session->productType) {
$searchedProductType = $session->productType;
}
}
//now use $searchedProductType for your query