I am an absolute novice with Apache Geronimo, so my forgive my obvious ignorance.
Apache Geronimo ships with older versions of the HTTPCore and HTTPClient libraries. The current version of OpenID requires at least v4.1 of both HTTPCore and HTTPClient. I have found the OSGi Bundle page in the Geronimo Console, and see how to use this to install a new bundle. I also see that existing bundles have an "update" option, although this does not seem to update either of these bundles to the latest version.
Is there an easy magical way to just update these? If I need to download bundles for the appropriate version, where, exactly, would I go to download them? I've located and downloaded JARs for these two libraries, and have included them in my project and been able to package it with Maven, but this doesn't (apparently) deploy the updated versions into Geronimo (i.e., it loads the old versions and I get runtime errors).
If I had bundles for the later version, the UI is pretty obvious as to how to install them - will that replace the existing version, or will I then have both versions installed? Will this present a runtime issue? If so, how do I remove the exiting bundle (I see no way via the UI to accomplish this).
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
David Mullin
Related
I'm using Mule Server 3.8 EE which brings commons-lang 2.4 with it. A third-party library in my project needs commons-lang 2.6, because it uses a method that was introduced in this version.
So when I just start my application, I get a java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
Is there a way to update the dependency in the runtime? What I tried so far:
including commons-lang 2.6 in my app -> no effect, the one from the runtime is picked up first
replacing the jar directly in the runtime -> errors in studio, that the 2.4 jar is missing
so maybe i am late BUT -- this is your answer. Add the libraries that are newer in the jar distribution to the Build Path. Under Java Build Path screen you should see the libraries listed. I needed to use Apache http-client 4.5.6 and that's very interesting because it brings with it a lot of other dependencies, so your question was VERY relevant. The solution is to rely on JAVA (and not mule -- oops Anypoint or whatever) conventions and make sure the JVM loads my class files first. Then, it won't load the old ones from mule's jar. And so I went to the tab Order and Export, and moved Mule to the bottom. This simple, trivial change makes it work. I think if we would work with command line and vim, we would all know this. But all the IDE gui and everything else makes us forget the simplest things. Please use it in good health. :)
I have been using Eclipse Helios/Luna with plugin installation of clearcase plugin 8.0.1.x version and have imported the base code.
Recently, when trying to change the config-spec to update the build files, the process is running for hours continuously even without a single file.
Previously, we had Clearcase version as 7.0.x version and the corresponding plugin installed on Eclipse Helios without facing any issues.
But, have been facing issues during update of files after the upgrade of clearcase server to 8.0.x and with the corresponding client plugin in eclipse.
Also, tried manual update from repository for the whole folder. Still no luck.
But, if I know manually update the file one by one individually, it is going fine.
As the number of files in the project is more, it would not be efficient for us.
Can someone provide some alternatives to resolve this problem?
As a workaround, we have been creating new views everytime there is an update to the config-spec.
One workaround would be to switch to dynamic views, supported in the latest 8.x version of ClearTeam/ClearCase. No reload needed with those kind of views.
The other would be to test with a minimal config spec, and load rules making sure you are loading only as few files as possible (jsut to check that those files do update when you change the config spec).
It can also depends on the exact version of your ClearCase installation.
There are some patches for hanging issue (like "PM48668 Problem: The IBM Rational ClearTeam Explorer may hang intermittently when many views are started.")
I'm trying to build an embedded simple web browser for an embedded device and I've decided to use WebKit / WebKitGTK+. However, our device uses a Linux environment somewhat based on CentOS 5.8. I haven't been able to find any RPMS or mention of support for WebKit / WebKitGTK+ for CentOS 5.8 while doing several web searches.
Does anybody know if it's possible to build an older version of WebKitGTK+ such as 1.2.6-2.el6_0 which works well on CentOS 6.3? Are any RPMS available for CentOS 5.8?
The goal here is to be able to run a relatively current, at least 1.2.6 version of WebKitGTk on CentOS 5.8
Note: I was able to sort everything out. Just took a long time compiling all of the dependencies in the correct order with the correct options. I was able to get WebKitGTK 1.6.0 running on Centos 5.8.
You shouldn't have any problems building an old version of webkit if you can install the older versions of libraries that it requires.
If you have older or newer versions of GTK+ etc installed than the old version of webkit requires it may need quite a bit of porting to compile.
I'm not aware of any RPMs that meet your requirements
Depending on the compilation options you should be able to compile the dependencies in an isolated directory. With each library you typically use the --prefix option to specify the destination. Then when compiling something that depends on that library, you typically have an option to specify where to look for that library - something like --with-libraryname=/path/to/library. You want to check ./configure --help of each thing you're compiling to get the correct options.
It'll be quite a bit of work, but you should be able to compile everything you need into an isolated directory without replacing anything on the system. I would highly recommend you avoid doing this in root to ensure you have the right options.
With the new firefox we are shipping more and more libraries as the XPom interfaces we interact with are changing. We are at 10 dlls and increasing, each with a size of almost 2M.
This size is a concern for some users.
While we look at restructuring the library to seperate the parts we can make common between them, we are thinking about how we might reduce space on the disk while supporting version upgrades.
For instance, user has FireFox 3.6 and 4.0 installed and when our product is installed we install a dll for each version. When Firefox is 4.0 upgraded (say to 6.0) how might we now install from the msi the missing dll for 6.0 support.
Any ideas on how we could achieve this?
Are we worrying for no reason?
My first thought was we 'AllowAdvertise' and when FF tries to load the dll as directed by chrome it will cause the install, it doesn't seem to work.
My first reaction is to suggest that you move away from XPCOM and towards js-ctypes. After all, this is the direction that Mozilla is pushing extension developers (see Wladimir Palant's comments for example). If there isn't anything in your binary code that absolutely positively requires use of XPCOM, you'll be much happier to ship a DLL that interfaces with JS when needed via js-ctypes.
I guess that your extension is Windows-only so supporting multiple platforms is not an issue. A possible short-term solution:
Have a separate extension package for each Firefox version, mark it as compatible with this Firefox version only (e.g. minVersion 4.0 and maxVersion 4.*).
When your extension is installed, install the version that is compatible with user's installed Firefox version.
Make sure that your extensions have an updateURL entry that is pointing to your server. It is important to have %APP_VERSION% in the URL.
Make sure to test Firefox betas and prepare a new extension version in time for the next Firefox release (releases are scheduled on Tuesdays every 6 weeks, next release being on September 27th).
Configure your server to indicate different packages as updates depending on the Firefox version used. So an update check with %APP_VERSION% 4.0.1 would be sent to extension-ff4.xpi while %APP_VERSION% 6.0 would get extension-ff6.xpi.
Firefox will always check for extension updates when the application is updated. If you can give it a compatible update it will install it. But preparing new packages every six weeks requires tons of effort and I guess that you want to refactor your code/move to js-ctypes ASAP. Oh, and I think that you need to ignore the unlikely scenario that some user has more than one Firefox version installed.
I want to bundle JRE 6.0 together with my java application. All my source code reside in CVS. My client will check-out the code and build it themselves. Should I store JRE in CVS?
I normally advocate putting most everything in source control, but this seems a little excessive. Why ?
the JRE is readily available from http://java.sun.com
it doesn't change that often. I'd expect you to specify a minimum version for your code to run against (e.g. 1.5, 1.6 etc.)
I would not put a JDK or JRE into a source code repository:
It is bad practice to put externally versioned things into your version control because it usually leads to over-constraining, obscuring and/or hard-wiring your app's external dependencies. (Maven or Ivy are good solutions for dealing with external dependencies, though not in this case,)
Putting binaries into version control is a bad idea for some version control systems.
But I think your real problem (actually, your user's organization's problem) is the IT folks who refuse to contemplate upgrading the JRE:
They need to be made aware of the
fact that they can install multiple
JRE versions on the one machine, and
configure apps to launch with the JRE
version they require. (It is trivial
on Linux ...)
They need to be made aware of the fact
that their policy is an impediment to
progress.
They need to be made aware of the fact
that their policy is a potential security
issue. If they force users to deploy their
own copies of JDKs / JREs in random places,
it will be difficult to ensure that JRE security
patches get applied. (Besides, 1.4.2 is due
to be end-of-life'd soonish, and security
patches for it will cease.)
EDIT: and there is also the legal question of whether "redistributing" a JRE out of your source code repository is a violation of Sun's click-through JRE/JDK download license. (I don't know ...)
As best practice, you shouldn't keep any binary files in the source control system. For Java developers there is maven that does it's work better in versioning jar files. The reason is that we want to keep our source repository as small as possible so it is faster for those that checks out our code for the first time.
But if you still want to keep binary files in the source control, it would be best to avoid using CVS, because CVS is bad in versioning binary files. You can search with google, why it is bad. If you use SVN, then it still okay because SVN handles binary files much better than CVS.
I see nothing wrong with storing the JRE in CVS.
However, it's not so important whether you do or not as long as your script can pull it as part of the build. For example, if you want to host a downloadable jre.zip on an HTTP server, or point to it in a Maven repo, that's just as good.
Well won't your client all ready have the JRE if you expect him to compile the code before running it? The JDK contains the JRE.
Depends a lot on what you use to handle dependencies. If you use Maven, then create a maven package with the stuff you need, and host it on a local repository.
If you just have CVS (like we do) then it is fine to create big binary packages (since you will need them) which you can then put in CVS. Just be aware that they should be static for best CVS performance.
ALso note that the jsmooth package can create an EXE file of your jar with an JRE embedded in it. This might solve your deployment problem.
For remote compilation, Eclipse can work with a plain JRE. You just need to tell Eclipse where JRE you already have prepared above is located on the disk. There is also a folder inside the Eclipse distribution where the launcher looks automatically.
I'm wondering about the client building the application themselves. It will require some kind of Java compiler, most probably javac wich is part of the JDK. So your client will not only need a JRE, but a JDK as well (unless they will be using Jikes or another alternative compiler).
javac is capable of generating bytecode for previous versions of Java, so using a newer compiler should not pose any problems.
Personally, I would not include large binaries like a JRE as part of my own repository. The JRE can be considered very stable and just listing the minimum version required should be enough. Installing a JRE is also something quite different than installing a single Java application. The two activities should not be mixed.