I visited a remote site the other day where I will be seeing people at in the future. While there I had a user choose "SITEX - CONSULT ROOM 1" Calendar, right click and go into to the Calendar properties --> Permission --> Add .. and add my name as an Owner.
Now returning to my own machine and Outlook it doesn't seem to come up, and I cannot seem to work out the name when searching for it.
Is there any way in VBA to search Exchange server for the Calendar(s) shared to me?
No, you can get a list of mailboxes to which you have delegate access (that information is stored in the AD and is accessible through the Extended MAPI or Redemption), but per-folder access rights are stored on the folder itself. There is no master list.
Related
I wrote an app script which provides a web UI for data entry into a team calendar. I published it using G-Suite super admin account and added it as Trusted App under Security/API Permissions. "Trust domain owned apps" is checked under "Internal App Settings".
When a G-Suite user in our organization tries to access the app, he sees
"The developer of ShiftSchedulingApp, admin#_our_organization_.org, needs your permission to access your data on Google."
Those brave enough to click "Review Permissions" are taken to the next message:
"ShiftSchedulingApp wants to access your Google Account. See, edit, share, and permanently delete all the calendars you can access using Google Calendar"
Of course nobody wants to risk losing all the calendars on their Google Account and this is where it ends.
How do I get rid of this misleading message? It's not Google account, it's their organization account on G-Suite. It's not all their calendars, it's the shared team calendar only. It's adding data, not permanently deleting calendars. It's published by their administrator in their G-Suite, not an unknown 3rd party.
I spent days trying to make this message go away but no luck. App must be executed as an accessing user and not as publishing user because their user ID determines what shifts they can fill on a calendar.
I'd appreciate any hints pointing me the right direction.
I experimented with variations of the two-app approach as suggested.
The app which provides the UI needs to read the calendar to display available shifts - so I can't get away from the user authorization prompt.
Another variation I tried was having one app do everything and run as me, and another do nothing but return Session.getActiveUser(). I tried calling the 2nd one from the 1st one on the client side via XMLHttpRequest. It would be ideal for my needs - but I hit CORS error as apps URL is script.google.com but it actually gets redirected to script.googleusercontent.com. There doesn't seem to be a way to set CORS in Google App Script.
Although I was not able to find a way to avoid prompting users for authorization when executing the app as accessing user, it turns out my reasons for doing that were based on a false premise.
I chose to publish app as accessing user because I thought that's the only way to get accessing user Id - which is true for non-G Suite accounts.
However, when app is published by a G Suite account, the app can get accessing user ids within the same G Suite domain even when it's set to execute as publishing user.
Thanks Niek and TheMaster for your help!
If you just need user ID, why do you ask for all those permissions?
Possible Solutions:
2 web-apps- One running as you and another as user accessing (with only profile) permission. The second one will be the actual web interface and POST necessary information to the first one with privileges. OR
Implement your own web-app Google-sign in1
Use the least permissive2 scope3
I have created a book using GitBook. I want only specific set of people to be able to read my book. These set of people should be able to access it by logging in somewhere or by any other method. How shall I achieve this?
Even if the link is public, how shall I restrict the users who see it?
(I don't want to add them in the collaborators list)
As mention in "How can I grant read-only access to a private book? "
There are two ways to grant read-only access to a private book:
by inviting him as Collaborator, or
by creating an Access Key.
So in your case, providing your book is private (private GitHub repo), an access key is a solution, but you cannot easily control the set of people using it; ie: you can only control the set you are giving the token to.
So that means you have to provide your own front-end, with user account management, in order to give access to the book. But GitBook itself does not have such mechanism.
I am developing a POC (SahrePoint 2010) where I can demonstrate that the users can be granted certain permissions on a list for a Date range (for example contribute access for a selected week). I will be breaking permission inheritance and create unique permissions for a list.
I would like the permissions to be revoked automatically after the expiry date. Also, I would like to do this using the Manage Permissions list (_layouts/user.aspx) so that I don't have to maintain a separate list.
I have a couple of questions regarding this:
1. I assume that the custom permissions for any list must be stored n some list. How can get to know in which list the permissions are getting stored?
2. If at all I get to know in which list the permissions are getting stored, will I be able to add columns to that particular list?
I hope that the question is clear.
Permissions are not stored in any list. Rather, every securable object (including sites, lists, folders, and items) has a Role Assignments property that indicates what groups/users currently have access, and what their permissions are (if not inherited).
See the SPRoleAssignment class documentation for more information.
Note that the User Information list is not a "Manage Permissions" list; it stores profile information about users who access the site, but does not store any permission-related information. Further, it's not a typical list at all, in that it does not show up in the SPWeb.Lists collection for a subsite, and its fields are automatically populated by SharePoint's User Profile Service. While you could potentially add more columns to it, you'd be better off using a separate list to store and track your permission information instead of contaminating the site collection user info list.
To have permission changes take place based on an expiry date, you'll need to implement a time-based solution that runs on a regular basis to see if any changes need to be made, such as a custom timer job, a custom site workflow that runs on a schedule, or a Windows scheduled task.
No matter the research that I do, I can't find anywhere the information to get access to the Exchange information on the active directory.
I am using userprincipal and accountmanagement already to access the AD user's info. Is there a similar way for Exchange?
I just want to read the following:
ActiveSync enabled
Mailbox Size Quota
The proxies
These information are all available in the "user and computer Active Directory" that we have access to. I just need to figure out how to access them. Is there a class for that already?
regards,
ActiveSync enabled
Use the ProtocolSetting Attribute
Mailbox Size Quota
This would only be set if the user has a specific Mailbox Quota value set by default this would be null and the Mailbox Database setting would be used see http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2006/09/20/3394913.aspx. The Ad attributes for this are mDBStorageQuota,mDBOverQuotaLimit,mDBOverHardQuotaLimit,mDBUseDefaults
The Proxies
Use the proxyAddresses attribute https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679424(v=vs.85).aspx
I'm trying to make the "Edit" button on the Project form to only be visible if the user logged into the system is the Project Manager of that project. I've been reading various answers online regarding this, gathering some understanding of Access Rights vs. Record Rules but I haven't been able to get this working. To my understanding, Access Rights over-ride Record Rules. So, if I create a record rule under the group "Project/User" that has read and write access with the domain as the following:
[('user_id','=',user.id)]
This will be over-ridden by the Access Rights for Project/User anyway? So How would I get this to work?
Thanks to anyone who can help.
As far as I know, Record Rules can override Access Rights.
Here is an example where record rules are used to change the base_user edit capabilities depending on the Task state: https://github.com/OCA/project-service/tree/8.0/project_baseuser/security
However, the "edit" button is not dynamically visible depending on the Task Status: it's always visible but the rules may or may not allow to write upon "Save".
Access Control List is checked before Record Rules.
Because Access Control List is a CRUD security on models (create/read/update/delete).
Only if ACL is passed next record level security comes in.
As far as I understood you want to give Project User permission to edit his own projects (he is in group Project User not Project Manager but set as Project Manager for exact Project by Project Manager group user LOL).
I did this by doing the following:
1) Give project users Project Manager role.
2) Restrict them to only modify own projects by creating a Global rule (no group is set) with the following domain on update / delete operations:
['|', ('user_id','=',user.id),('create_uid','=',user.id)]
P,S, Here is screenshot - http://awesomescreenshot.com/0083nqyf76
For the model project.project, provide the write permission only to the group project manager.Go to settings/techical/security. There you can see the access control list. CHeck what all group is provided to the project.project model.for every group other than project manager, remove the write permission