I am trying to understand Class type in Objective-C. May I ask what is the different between Class type and NSObject type? It sounds like Class type does something similar like NSObject correct?
I believe this has been asked several times... but I couldn't find any old instance, so anyway.
Unlike C++-like languages, classes are actual regular object instances in OBJC.
When you call [NSObject class], it returns a live object which contains class methods and extra informations. These are synthesized by compiler, and this actually provides all the class related features.
Class is the type for for these class objects.
One more thing. Because the Class objects are objects, they also have class object, and these are called meta-class. See here for more details:
http://www.cocoawithlove.com/2010/01/what-is-meta-class-in-objective-c.html
Also, you may be confused because most of types in Cocoa are using NSObject as a root class. But it is just a convention, and actually a class doesn't have to subclass NSObject.
No NSObject is not the same as Class.
In Objective C, classes are objects. A class like NSObject in an instance the Class type. It is correct to say NSObject is of type Class, just like you would say an instance of NSObject is of type NSObject.
Class is a an object also, but it's type is the meta-class which really isn't for beginners.
A class is a template, e.g. a human
An object is an instance of a class, e.g. bob the human
an NSObject is the root class of most Objective-C classes (e.g NSTextField, NSButton, etc)
So, NSButton inherits the properties from NSObject, and is also a class (a child class). If you create a button, that button is now an instance (object), of type NSButton (class), which inherits from: NSControl : NSView : NSResponder : NSObject in that order, descending.
More info:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Reference/Foundation/Classes/NSObject_Class/Reference/Reference.html
Related
Class extensions #interface Class () are a lot more powerful and can inject variables into the class. Categories #interface Class (Category) can't.
What other differences are there, and when should one use a category over a class extension?
The main difference is that with an extension, the compiler will expect you to implement the methods within your main #implementation, whereas with a category you have a separate #implementation block. So you should pretty much only use an extension at the top of your main .m file (the only place you should care about ivars, incidentally) -- it's meant to be just that, an extension.
A class extension bears some similarity to a category, but it can only be added to a class for which you have the source code at compile time (the class is compiled at the same time as the class extension). The methods declared by a class extension are implemented in the #implementation block for the original class so you can’t, for example, declare a class extension on a framework class, such as a Cocoa or Cocoa Touch class like NSString.
The syntax to declare a class extension is similar to the syntax for a category, and looks like this:
#interface ClassName ()
#end
Because no name is given in the parentheses, class extensions are often referred to as anonymous categories.
Unlike regular categories, a class extension can add its own properties and instance variables to a class. If you declare a property in a class extension, like this:
#interface XYZAnimal () {
id _someCustomInstanceVariable;
}
...
#end
IMHO, it's best to think of class extensions as private interface to a class. The primary interface (in your .h file) acts as the public interface which defines the class's behavioural contract with other classes.
Use class extensions to Hide Private Information
Class extensions are often used to extend the public interface with additional private methods or properties for use within the implementation of the class itself. It’s common, for example, to define a property as readonly in the interface, but as readwrite in a class extension declared above the implementation, in order that the internal methods of the class can change the property value directly.
As an example, the XYZPerson class might add a property called uniqueIdentifier, designed to keep track of information like a Social Security Number in the US.
It usually requires a large amount of paperwork to have a unique identifier assigned to an individual in the real world, so the XYZPerson class interface might declare this property as readonly, and provide some method that requests an identifier be assigned, like this:
#interface XYZPerson : NSObject
...
#property (readonly) NSString *uniqueIdentifier;
- (void)assignUniqueIdentifier;
#end
In order for the XYZPerson class to be able to change the property internally, it makes sense to redeclare the property in a class extension that’s defined at the top of the implementation file for the class:
#property (readwrite) NSString *uniqueIdentifier;
Note: The readwrite attribute is optional, because it’s the default. You may like to use it when redeclaring a property, for clarity.
Categories are an Objective-C language feature that let you add new methods to an existing class. Extensions are a special case of categories that let you define methods that must be implemented in the main implementation block.
Private declarations can be in class extensions, which mainly are some properties, because we have no need to declare a method before we call it.
ios extension similiar to c#,java abstract class or interface
ios category similiar to c# class extension
The Scenario
I have a situation where a base class called AbstractRequest has a delegate property of type id <AbstractRequestDelegate> declared in the header file:
#property (nonatomic, assign) id <AbstractRequestDelegate> delegate;
The abstract delegate protocol contains a few required methods, and as indicated with the word 'abstract', both the AbstractRequest and the AbstractRequestDelegate are intended to be subclasses/extended.
One example of this would be the subclass ConcreteRequest and extended protocol ConcreteRequestDelegates, that both add extra methods to the abstract ones. The intention is that both the abstract and concrete class methods can send messages to the single assigned delegate instance.
At a certain point in time the ConcreteRequest would like to call a method on the delegate that is defined by ConcreteRequestDelegate. Because the type of the delegate is id , the compiler will give a warning that this method might not be implemented.
ConcreteRequest.m:38: warning:
property 'delegate' requires method
'-delegate' to be defined - use
#synthesize, #dynamic or provide a
method implementation
The Problem
This warning is justified, for the property is after all typed to id <AbstractRequestDelegate>. In order to fix this, I want to make clear to the compiler that the delegate assigned to the concrete instance must be of type id <ConcreteRequestDelegate>. This sounded perfectly reasonable to me, so I put in a new property in the ConcreteRequest header, hoping to override the abstract one:
#property (nonatomic, assign) id <ConcreteRequestDelegate> delegate;
But this is where the compiler disagrees with me, probably with good reason. I would have thought it would give a warning for overriding a super class' property with the wrong type, but instead it just demands me to re-synthesize this new property. I don't want to go there, because then the super class' methods won't have access to the same delegate property.
The Question
Is there a way to 're-declare' the property in the concrete subclass with the added type information? Or can you spot the error in my thinking, for maybe this is a fairly common problem that I just haven't come across until now?
Cheers,
EP.
P.S. All class and protocol names appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real class and protocol names, open source or patented, is purely coincidental.
The warning already gave the right clue. I used #dynamic in the overriding subclass and all is good.
Just synthesize id<ConcreteRequestDelegate>delegate in the ConcreteRequest.m it will work fine...It won't create any problem.
I have a class that is derived of UITableViewController and handles everything related with a specific type of tables. Let's call it Class T
In may main application class, Class A, I have methods to populate other areas of the screen as, for instance, a map.
While I'm populating my table within Class T, I would like to call the Class A method that plots the x,y points on the map.
Is this possible? What should be the correct way to do this?
When I though about this approach, I was expecting that invoking [super ...] inside Class T would call the Class A methods, as this is the owner class of the instance, but ofcourse it call the parent class, in my case the UITableViewController.
Thank you,
Pedro
If A is your main application class, you should be able to access the application instance with [UIApplication sharedApplication], cast it to the class A type, and call the APIs you need to call.
Why not define a ClassAProtocol and then add a property "classADelegate" in Class T?
ClassAProtocol will define a method like:
-(void)plotXYOnMapFromData:(id)someObjectContainingDataToPlot;
So in the Class T interface you will add:
#property (assign) id classADelegate;
and then when you instantiate, let's say from instanceA (instance of Class A), instanceT (instance of Class T) you will do:
instanceT.classADelegate = instanceA;
Finally inside Class T you can call the plotting method in this way:
[classADelegate plotXYOnMapFromData:myDataToPlot];
The advantage of the delegate pattern in this case is that Class T just need to know only one small piece of ClassA, which is the protocol, and ClassA is able to communicate with T thanks to its implementation of the protocol.
I know of a couple of rules regarding Objective-C categories:
Category methods should not override existing methods (class or instance)
Two different categories implementing the same method for the same class will result in undefined behavior
I would like to know what happens when I override one of my own category methods in the same category. For example:
#interface NSView (MyExtensions)
- (void)foo; // NSView category implementation
#end
#interface MyClass : NSView
{ }
#end
#interface MyClass (MyExtensions)
- (void)foo; // MyClass category implementation
#end
With these interfaces defined, which method will be executed when I run the following code?
MyClass * instance = [[MyClass alloc] initWith...];
[instance foo];
[instance release];
Note: With my compiler, the MyClass implementation takes precedence, but I'm not sure if that is guaranteed to occur, or simply one specific flavor of undefined behavior.
To extend on drawnonward answer:
It's matter of hierarchy. Categories are really just a means of organizing source files. When compiled, all the methods of a class, including the ones defined in any category, end up in the same file.
Anything you could do in a regular class interface you can do in a category and anything you shouldn't do in a regular class interface you shouldn't do in a category.
So:
Category methods should not override
existing methods (class or instance)
You can use methods defined in the regular class interface to override inherited methods so you can override inherited methods in a category.
However, you would never try to have to two identical method definitions in the same ordinary interface so you should never have a method in a category that has the same name as a method in either the ordinary interface or another category on the same class. Since all the method definitions end up in the same compiled file, they would obviously collide.
Two different categories implementing
the same method results in undefined
behavior
That should be rewritten to say "Two different categories implementing the same method for the same class results in undefined behavior." Again, because all the methods for any one class end up in the same file, having two methods in the same class would obviously cause weirdness.
You can use categories to provide methods that override superclass methods because a class and its superclass are two distinct classes.
If your ever confused about whether a category will cause problem just ask yourself this: "Would the methods in the category work if I copied and pasted them all into the class' .h/.m files?" If the answer is "yes" then you're in the clear. If "no", then you've got problems.
Each method of each class has an implementation. A category adds or replaces a method for a specific class. That means the behavior you are seeing, where MyClass has one foo and NSView has another foo, is well defined. Any instance of MyClass will have a different foo than any instance of NSView that is not a MyClass, just as if foo had been defined in the main implementation and not a category. You should even be able to call [super foo] from MyClass to access the foo defined for NSView.
What is the difference between a Category and a Class Extension. I believe both are used to add custom methods in existing classes. Can someone throw light on this? Examplification with code will be really appreciated.
A category is a way to add methods to existing classes. They usually reside in files called "Class+CategoryName.h", like "NSView+CustomAdditions.h" (and .m, of course).
A class extension is a category, except for 2 main differences:
The category has no name. It is declared like this:
#interface SomeClass ()
- (void) anAdditionalMethod;
#end
The implementation of the extension must be in the main #implementation block of the file.
It's quite common to see a class extension at the top of a .m file declaring more methods on the class, that are then implemented below in the main #implementation section of the class. This is a way to declare "pseudo-private" methods (pseudo-private in that they're not really private, just not externally exposed).
Category
=> In Objective C, when you want to add some more functionality to a class without inheritance, you simply use category for it.
=> it comes with its own .h and .m file
=> Category uses to add new method not properties.
Class Extension
-> In Objective C, when you want to make behaviour of some property private you use class extension.
-> it comes with **.h** file only.
-> mainly for properties.
Note: when we add a new file and select a option of objective c
category shows category and "category on" not "subclass of" so it
shows like
#interface className (categoryName)
#end
-You will get two file .h and .m with file name as (className+categoryName.h and className+categoryName.m)
and in extension case you will get
#interface className()
#end
-You will get only one file with name as className_extensionName.h
In category you don't own the class but in extension you are.
Category is a way to add methods to a class whether or not source code is available, meaning you can add category to foundation classes like NSString and also to your own custom classes.
Extension can only be added to the classes whose source code is available because compiler compiles the source code and extension at the same time.
We can add extra instance variables and properties in class extension but not in category.
Any variable and method inside the extension is not even accessible to inherited classes.
Category and extension both are basically made to handle large code base, but category is a way to extend class API in multiple source files while extension is a way to add required methods outside the main interface file.
Use category when you have to break your same class code into different source files according to different functionalities, and extension when you just need to add some required methods to existing class outside the main interface file.
Also, when you need to modify a publicly declared instance variable in a class, for example,
readonly to readwrite, you can re-declare it in extension.
Extension: To make methods private and to add properties of our own custom class, not of Apple class.
Category: To add more methods in existing class not the property, it can be used for both custom class and Apple class like NSString.
We can also have properties Using set associated property in category class.
#interface SomeClass (Private)
#property (nonatomic, assign) id newProperty;
#end
NSString * const kNewPropertyKey = #"kNewPropertyKey";
#implementation SomeClass (Private)
#dynamic newProperty;
- (void)setNewProperty:(id)aObject
{
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, kNewPropertyKey, aObject, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_ASSIGN);
}
- (id)newProperty
{
return objc_getAssociatedObject(self, kNewPropertyKey);
}
#end
Refer : http://inchoo.net/dev-talk/ios-development/how-to-add-a-property-via-class-category/
#interface SomeClass ()
- (void) anAdditionalMethod;
#end
I think it is not the way to declare Category.
Category must have a name
#interface SomeClass (XYZ)
- (void) anAdditionalMethod;
#end
for example
#interface NSMutableArray (NSMutableArrayCreation)
+ (id)arrayWithCapacity:(NSUInteger)numItems;
- (id)initWithCapacity:(NSUInteger)numItems;
#end
Declared for NSMutableArray by Apple
ios extension similiar to c#,java abstract class or interface
ios category similiar to c#,java class extension
Categories
Categories are used when you are creating file containing large number of methods.So they provide you with the facility to break a single class into different modules.Also if any changes are made to the categories the compiler does not waste time to compile the entire project.Categories are not able to add new variable or properties and look upto their parent class .You can override a method in a category but it isnt a good idea because the method cannot further be overridden.Also the flow can be effected because all categories have the same hierarchial level and hence two categories belonging to same parent class may exist at run time.Also protected methods can be created using categories
Extensions
Extensions enable you to override the property or add new property to the existing parent class.Syntatically same to categories they do not have name and are represented as #interface class()
No .m file is present and method declared in extension have to be implemented in #implementation of parent file
More help at this link
Here is my understanding :
Extensions are usually used to add extra features to our own "custom class". We can add private methods or properties extending the class interface which can be used within the implementation of the class.
Extensions are to be written within the same file as the class. Hence you cannot write extensions for pre defined types like String, Float, etc.
On the other hand Categories can be used to add extra methods to a pre existing classes. Example we can create our own methods by extending String class. Note that we cannot create extra properties in the categories. Also main advantage of categories is we can write the categories in any other file, outside the file where your class exits.
Also while creating categories you are supposed to give a name for it within the brackets.
But for extension no name is required. Hence some times they are also called anonymous categories.
Categories and Extensions
A category allows you to add methods to an existing class—even to one for which you do not have the source. Categories are a powerful feature that allows you to extend the functionality of existing classes without subclassing. Using categories, you can also distribute the implementation of your own classes among several files. Class extensions are similar, but allow additional required APIs to be declared for a class in locations other than within the primary class #interface block.
Adding Methods to Classes
You can add methods to a class by declaring them in an interface file under a category name and defining them in an implementation file under the same name. The category name indicates that the methods are additions to a class declared elsewhere, not a new class. You cannot, however, use a category to add additional instance variables to a class.
The methods the category adds become part of the class type. For example, methods added to the NSArray class in a category are included as methods the compiler expects an NSArray instance to have in its repertoire. Methods added to the NSArray class in a subclass, however, are not included in the NSArray type. (This matters only for statically typed objects because static typing is the only way the compiler can know an object’s class.)
Category methods can do anything that methods defined in the class proper can do. At runtime, there’s no difference. The methods the category adds to the class are inherited by all the class’s subclasses, just like other methods.
The declaration of a category interface looks very much like a class interface declaration—except the category name is listed within parentheses after the class name and the superclass isn’t mentioned. Unless its methods don’t access any instance variables of the class, the category must import the interface file for the class it extends:
#import "ClassName.h"
#interface ClassName ( CategoryName )
// method declarations
#end
Note that a category can’t declare additional instance variables for the class; it includes only methods. However, all instance variables within the scope of the class are also within the scope of the category. That includes all instance variables declared by the class, even ones declared #private.
There’s no limit to the number of categories that you can add to a class, but each category name must be different, and each should declare and define a different set of methods.
Extensions
Class extensions are like anonymous categories, except that the methods they declare must be implemented in the main #implementation block for the corresponding class. Using the Clang/LLVM 2.0 compiler, you can also declare properties and instance variables in a class extension.
A common use for class extensions is to redeclare property that is publicly declared as read-only privately as readwrite:
#interface MyClass : NSObject
#property (retain, readonly) float value;
#end
// Private extension, typically hidden in the main implementation file.
#interface MyClass ()
#property (retain, readwrite) float value;
#end
// Notice that (in contrast to a category) no name is given in the parentheses in the second #interface block.
It is also generally common for a class to have a publicly declared API and to then have additional methods declared privately for use solely by the class or the framework within which the class resides. Class extensions allow you to declare additional required methods for a class in locations other than within the primary class #interface block, as illustrated in the following example:
#interface MyClass : NSObject
- (float)value;
#end
#interface MyClass () {
float value;
}
- (void)setValue:(float)newValue;
#end
#implementation MyClass
- (float)value {
return value;
}
- (void)setValue:(float)newValue {
value = newValue;
}
#end
The implementation of the setValue: method must appear within the main #implementation block for the class (you cannot implement it in a category). If this is not the case, the compiler emits a warning that it cannot find a method definition for setValue:.
For official documentation follow this link: source