Apologies for posting a new question but I just can't think how to search for this question.
I'm creating a Crystal Report with multiple parameters and at the moment each one is connected by an ‘AND’ in the Report > Selection Formulas part of the report (not the SQL command part).
I haven’t fully authored the report and it contains lots of arrays to deal with multiple text values and wildcard searches but I think my question should be more around logic than the technical functions.
So…
Parameters are for things like product code, date range, country, batch number etc.
Currently the parameters I’m concerned with are Faults and keyword searches for complaints against products.
(Query 1) If all other parameters are set to default I can enter Fault Combination = ‘Assembly – Code’ and that gives me 17 records.
(Query 2) Entering keyword = ‘%unit%’ gives me 55 records.
The 2 parameters are connected by an AND so if I use Fault Combination = ‘Assembly – Code’ and Keyword = ‘%unit%’ then I get 12 records. If the connect the 2 queries with OR then I get 12 records.
If I compare the unique records, in excel, between query 1 & 2 then there are 60 records with Fault Combination = ‘Assembly – Code’ OR keyword = ‘%unit%.
How can write the parameter formula to get the 60 unique records with one query?
Many thanks!
Gareth
Edit - Code Added
This is the segment i'm concerned with. The arrays are defined earlier in the statement and the '*' & '%' parts of the query below are just to deal with the different wildcard operators between SQL and Crystal. There are a lot of other parameters but these 3 are the only ones that need the OR kind or connection.
Hope that helps!
(IF "%" LIKE array_fn2
THEN ((ISNULL({Command.FaultNoun})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultNoun} LIKE '*'))
ELSE IF {Command.RecordType} = 'Complaint'
THEN ({Command.FaultNoun} like array_fn2)
ELSE ((ISNULL({Command.FaultNoun})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultNoun} LIKE '*'))) AND
(IF "%" LIKE array_fa2
THEN ((ISNULL({Command.FaultAdjective})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultAdjective} LIKE '*'))
ELSE IF {Command.RecordType} = 'Complaint'
THEN ({Command.FaultAdjective} like array_fa2)
ELSE ((ISNULL({Command.FaultAdjective})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultAdjective} LIKE '*'))) AND
(IF ("%" LIKE array_k2) OR ({Command.RecordType} = 'Sale')
THEN ((ISNULL({Command.ActualStatements})=TRUE) OR ({Command.ActualStatements} LIKE '*')
OR (ISNULL({Command.ResultsAnalysis})=TRUE) OR ({Command.ResultsAnalysis} LIKE '*')
OR (ISNULL({Command.Observation})= TRUE) OR ({Command.Observation} LIKE '*'))
ELSE
({Command.ActualStatements} like array_k2) OR
({Command.ResultsAnalysis} like array_k2) OR
({Command.Observation} like array_k2))
Related
I have a requirement where I need to change the order in which records are printed in a Report. I need to order the records by a substring of a field of the records.
There is an OPNQRYF as below before the call to the report RPG is made:
OVRDBF FILE(MOHDL35) SHARE(*YES)
BLDQRYSLT QRYSLT(&QRYSLT) +
SELECT((CHARDT *GE &FRDATE F2) +
(CHARDT *LE &TODATE F2) +
(HDPLVL *EQ 'FS' F2) +
(HDMPLT *EQ &PLANT F2))
OPNQRYF FILE((*LIBL/MOHDL35)) +
QRYSLT(&QRYSLT) +
KEYFLD(*FILE) +
MAPFLD((ZONEDT HDAEDT *ZONED 8 0) +
(CHARDT ZONEDT *CHAR 8))
One way I see how to do this is to do a RUNSQL to create a temp table in qtemp with the MOHDL35 records in the required order. The substr SQL function would help to achieve this much easier. This should have the same structure as that of MOHDL35 (FIELD NAMES, RECORD FORMAT)
Then replace the use of this file in the RPG program with the newly created table name. I havent tried this yet, but would this work? does it sound like a good idea? Are there any better suggestions?
You can do that with OPNQRYF by using the MAPFLD parameter like this:
OPNQRYF FILE((JCVCMP))
KEYFLD((*MAPFLD/PART))
MAPFLD((PART '%SST(VCOMN 2 5)'))
The fields in JCVCOMN are now sorted like this:
VENNO VCMTP VCMSQ VCOMN
----- ----- ----- -------------------------
1,351 ICL 3 Let's see what wow
1,351 ICL 1 This is a test
1,351 NDA 2 another comment
1,351 NDA 1 more records
Notice that the records are sorted by the substring of VCOMN starting with the second character.
So here is your OPNQRYF with multiple key fields specified
OPNQRYF FILE((*LIBL/MOHDL35))
QRYSLT(&QRYSLT)
KEYFLD((*MAPFLD/CHARDT) (*MAPFLD/HDPROD))
MAPFLD((ZONEDT HDAEDT *ZONED 8 0) (CHARDT ZONEDT *CHAR 8)
(HDPROD '%SST(HDPROD 1 2) *CAT %SST(HDPROD 10 12)
*CAT %SST(HDPROD 13 16)'))
Some notes: I am guessing that HDAEDT is a PACKED number. If so, you don't need to map it to a ZONED number just to get it to a character value. If you need the ZONED value, that is ok (but PACKED should work just as well). Otherwise, you can just use:
MAPFLD((CHARDT HDAEDT *CHAR 8))
Also in your OVRDBF, you need to make sure you choose the correct Override Scope OVRSCOPE. The IBM default is OVRSCOPE(*ACTGRPDFN). OPNQRYF also has a scope OPNSCOPE. You need to make sure that the OVRSCOPE, the OPNSCOPE, and the program using the table all use the same activation group. There are a lot of different combinations. If you can't make it work, you can always change them all to *JOB, and that will work. But there is nothing intrinsic about OPNQRYF that prevents it from working from a CLP.
I would try creating a view with all the table fields plus the substring'd column, and then use OPNQRYF with that instead of the table, specifying the substring'd column as the KEYFLD. That would probably be simpler (& potentially quicker) than copying the whole lot into QTEMP every time.
I wrote an Access add-in (VBA) which works perfectly fine on my and other test servers, but on one server I encountered a very strange problem. When I execute the query with the data condition, I get the correct results (which are none). When I add the date condition I get more results than before. These results do not even match with my other conditions. I use the exact same database on both servers.
Here is the Query:
select BE.* from dbo.KHKBuchungserfassung AS BE
left join KHKSachkonten AS SSK on BE.KtoSoll = SSK.SaKto and BE.Mandant = SSK.Mandant
left join KHKSachkonten AS HSK on BE.KtoHaben = HSK.SaKto and BE.Mandant = HSK.Mandant
where ((((BE.KtoSollTyp = 1) or (BE.KtoSollTyp = 2)) and (HSK.Kontenart = 'BF' or HSK.Kontenart = 'BG')) or
(((BE.KtoHabentyp = 1) or (BE.KtoHabentyp = 2)) and (SSK.Kontenart = 'BF' or SSK.Kontenart = 'BG')))
and BE.Mandant= 88 and BE.Buchungsdatum>={d '2016-01-01'} AND BE.Buchungsdatum<={d '2016-06-30'}
If I execute this on that specific server with from date < a specific date ('2016-02-24') it also works perfectly fine (e.g. '2016-01-01' & '2016-06-30'). Any given date higher than this one gives results that violate my first condition... (the one in the parenthesis). I already checked the number of parenthesis. I also rotated the places of the given conditions. In addition to that, I am pretty sure my DBMS would give me an error if there is a problem with my syntax (not sure though).
This is the Result Set:
Dim rs As ADODB.Recordset
sQry = ...
Set rs = goMandant.oData.rsOpenRecordset(sQry, adOpenStatic)
Do Until rs.EOF
...
I am sorry that I can not provide test data due to juridical reasons, but if you would also select SSK.Kontenart and HSK.Kontenart there would be 'NULL' on both sides which is not at all possible in my first condition...
I would also like to note that this is my first question and if I made any mistakes, I would appreciate it if you told me.
Regards
TK
I have following sql query in my hbm file. The SCHEMA, A and B are schema and two tables.
select
*
from SCHEMA.A os
inner join SCHEMA.B o
on o.ORGANIZATION_ID = os.ORGANIZATION_ID
where
case
when (:pass = 'N' and os.ORG_ID in (:orgIdList)) then 1
when (:pass = 'Y') then 1
end = 1
and (os.ORG_SYNONYM like :orgSynonym or :orgSynonym is null)
This is a pretty simple query. I had to use the case - when to handle the null value of "orgIdList" parameter(when null is passed to sql IN it gives error). Below is the relevant java code which sets the parameter.
if (_orgSynonym.getOrgIdList().isEmpty()) {
query.setString("orgIdList", "pass");
query.setString("pass", "Y");
} else {
query.setString("pass", "N");
query.setParameterList("orgIdList", _orgSynonym.getOrgIdList());
}
This works and give me the expected output. But I would like to know if there is a better way to handle this situation(orgIdList sometimes become null).
There must be at least one element in the comma separated list that defines the set of values for the IN expression.
In other words, regardless of Hibernate's ability to parse the query and to pass an IN(), regardless of the support of this syntax by particular databases (PosgreSQL doesn't according to the Jira issue), Best practice is use a dynamic query here if you want your code to be portable (and I usually prefer to use the Criteria API for dynamic queries).
If not need some other work around like what you have done.
or wrap the list from custom list et.
I have a report with a table in Rails where users can optionally set filters like selecting a location or picking a range of dates and update the table via an ajax request.
Can I write this where clause so that it any date/blanks or all locations?
#orders = Order.where('created_at <= ? AND ? <= created_at AND location_id = ?', date_order_start, date_order_end, loc_filter)
The query above fails on blanks (e.g., "") and if I put nils they translate to nulls in the SQL.
To solve this problem right now I have a bunch of conditional statements that check whether value is present in the ajax request and then creates a different where clause depending on the case. My current conditionals are unwieldy, error prone and not scalable.
Searches on things like "wildcard sql" end up leading me to text searches (i.e., %) which I don't think fits in this case.
I am running on Rails 3.2 with postgresql.
I sometimes use an array of query statements and arguments like this:
queries = []
args = []
if some_condition
queries.push("created_at <= ?")
args.push(whatever_date)
end
if another_condition
queries.push("created_at >= ?")
args.push(another_date)
end
#order = Order.where(queries.join(" AND "), *args)
I'm a newbie at Hibernate so excuse me if some of this is glaringly obvious but it's been a very, very long day. I am trying to create and execute a simple query in Hibernate and Toad/Oracle.
The Toad/Oracle sql reads:
select
count(*)
from
fpps_owner.fee_claim_payment_lines l,
fpps_owner.fee_claim_payments p
where
l.fee_claim_payment_id = p.fee_claim_payment_id and
p.claim_index = 87167895
The above returns 10 records, which is correct
The following Java code returns 0 records, which is NOT correct
String sLinesAvailable =
"select count(*) from " +
"fpps_owner.fee_claim_payment_lines l, fpps_owner.fee_claim_payments p " +
"where " +
"l.fee_claim_payment_id = p.fee_claim_payment_id and p.claim_index = :id";
Query qLinesAvailable = em.createNativeQuery(sLinesAvailable);
qLinesAvailable.setParameter("id", "87167895"); // fails
qLinesAvailable.setParameter("id", 87167895); // fails
List<Object> out = (List<Object>) qLinesAvailable.getResultList();
BigDecimal x = (BigDecimal) out.get(0);
Returns 0 records. Using .getSingleResult() also returns 0 records.
What am I missing here?
Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
If you are not seeing any malformed query errors, it seems like the parameter is not binding correctly.
To debug, I'd print out that SQL statement the line after you set the parameter. This is the only way you can see the SQL after the parameter is set in order to compare it with Toad.
What does your binding file look like? Maybe you have a different name in there for the ID, so it's not able to find it based on the name. Trying binding with the parameter's order value, just as a test.
This might give some ideas: http://www.mkyong.com/hibernate/hibernate-parameter-binding-examples/
Best of luck! We've all been there :)
What happens when you try:
(Number) query.getSingleResult();
Your query isn't returning a list, but rather just a count.
Good luck.