I would like to know if magento adminhtml can be separated with front end on two different web servers.
I have two linux box setups and I would like install onto magento admin on of of them and front-end onto another. Any suggestions? Does anyone knows how to do it?
Thanks guys for your time.
Related
I have a developer that came to me with and issue. He is remotely managing one of his sites on one of our development servers and all of a sudden he lost all of the icons in IIS for this specific site..
All other sites display his icons correctly and when I have him test on another computer everything displays correctly.. So what could have gone wrong on his machine? It was working but is now not working.. Any help here would be greatly appreciated.. Never seen this before and cant seem to figure out what caused it to just go away.. There should be so many more options for him.. Plus if you can see he lost the ability to see the folders on this site also.. And it is every site on this server.. But like I said it is just on his computer, he goes to a different computer he has access to everything..
Guess I cant post a picture.. But if you need to see it I can send it to you if you need to see what I am talking about..
Come to find out he was ignoring the prompt that he was getting saying that there were new versions of the tools to download on his machine that are on the server.. He just hit Cancel instead of selecting them and hitting ok to install the DLL's and enabling them.
We have a DotNetNuke installation that we have on a dev environment and we are setting it up on our live server now. Everything looks great and is working just fine that regard. We were wondering if it was possible that once a page has been updated or created on our dev server and we're happy with it, is there a simple and easy way to push that page to the live server?
Dev has it's own database.
Live has a different database to itself.
We have seen some programs like SQL Sync but we do not want to push all pages from dev to live because there might still be some pages being worked on when another one finishes so we must have a way to push individual pages instead of everything.
Thank you so much for any help!
you can use Exporting And Importing feature in dotnetnuke it allows you to export a single page or whole web site you can follow this links for helo
Page import export
Great article to look for
We have a website which advertises a competition on TV each month. When the advert runs the website gets around 4000 submissions and this causes it to crash
The website runs off Silverstripe and is hosted on Apache.
I have read about queuing, and this sounds like the solution but I have spoken to the Silverstripe dev and the Server admin and both say that the other needs to make this happen.
My question is should the queuing be done on the website or the server?
To help Silverstripe handle lots of requests you can install the Static Publishing module:
http://www.silverstripe.org/introducing-the-static-publish-queue-module/
Your developer would implement that on the website.
This will create a flat version of your website that is served to users. This greatly reduces server load.
What kind of server are you running? You can get many different types these days... for example some do load balancing etc which might help prevent the crashing.
Also there are plenty of third party applications that you could integrate with to help you with job queuing like http://www.iron.io/ or http://aws.amazon.com/sqs/.
Another option is to find a module for silverstripe that already exists... I had a really quick look on github and found a one that might do the job you require -
https://github.com/silverstripe-australia/silverstripe-queuedjobs
Let me know how you get on :)
Good overview of all the areas to look at for SilverStripe on http://www.silverstripe.org/improving-silverstripe-performance/.
I am trying to make a new website on an IIS server, of which has websites that are using Windows Authentication just fine. However, for the life of me, I cannot figure out why my new website refuses access (401.2)
Basically, I create a new website and add a single .html file ("Hello, World"). I can access it just fine. But turn off Anonymous, leaving on Windows Authentication, I get prompted for ID/PWD, ending always a 401.2
So, I decided to make a new website as a copy of the existing working website on the same webserver. I've even gone and made the new website share the same App Pool and the same Physical Path. This way, as far as I can tell, the only possible differences between the two websites is now the IIS configuration of the two sites. Still can't authenticate.
I've switched the bindings, doesn't help.
I've even compared the settings in applicationHost.config, making sure they're equal.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
I've used this article several times for problems like these with some success: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david.wang/archive/2005/07/14/howto-diagnose-iis-401-access-denied.aspx Hope it helps!
I was advised to try running iisreset from the command line. This turns out to be what I needed all along. Seems some configuration changes do not get applied properly, even when restarting the particular website, until IIS itself is restarted.
I am suggested by a friend to use nginx for my site http://www.imgzzz.com . its an image hosting site with loads of traffic.
Currently im on a vps ..CentOS 5.4 x64 , Apache
Most views are on image pages. So far to decrease the load on server i have done cache of almost all data like user details, image name, path, category details etc.
Still i have to go with about 3 sql queries every page/view.
Addition of Views
Displaying Views
Addition of user ad views with respect to their ads shown
Considering the traffic from social media sites like digg, stumbleupon. per second online user peaks upto 1500-2500. So i guess you can get the idea of php queries per second.. Sometimes it causes the server to lag.
The rest of the stuff on image pages is static. So now do you guys suggest nginx or any other better option for my server?
Thanks in advance :)
Edit : This is a custom system not any cms
I would recommend using nginx as your static file server. I run nginx for this and it works great, and I could vouch for alot of other people I know that uses it. It's fast and reliable.