Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
In my application some time the SQL active connections were increasing abruptly. During the period we can't access the database from Management studio itself.
This problem occurs every 1 hour or 2 hours once and it stands for 20 minutes. I have checked the CPU utilization and RAM utilization, during the period no CPU resources were used. Once the problem resolved all the connections are released and the system start using the CPU resources after that only.
What I need to check for this problem? There is no additional process / program accessing the database during the period.
If you run SQL Server Profiler, to see the sql calls being made, which may give you a clue to the cause?
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Im trying to install windows server 2012 on virtual box via a bootable usb but it just reaches to this screen and hangs indefinitely, I've allocated 2GB of RAM and 15GB of space for the virtual HDD, not getting any error messages just stuck at this screen.
That's the correct window you're on. Have you tried closing the alerts on top?
Maybe the press any key to boot..... is behind those alerts?
And give atleast 3 GB ram to run smoothly
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to use my main PC and my secondary PC that I don't use often at the same time but have only one monitor
I don't want to buy a new monitor just for this though, if you have any idea how to render both of the computers to the monitor at the same time please answer
Picture in Picture (showing both inputs at the same time) is a Monitor feature. Unless your monitor's software is capable of doing that, there is no possibility to achieve what you want.
Some newer monitors might have the capabilities of doing what you need, depending on the price range.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
Short question and hopefully a positive answer:
Is it possible to create a virtual CPU that consists from multible real cores?
So lets say you have a 4x3.5 GHz CPU, can you create a vCPU that is 1x14GHz ?
Why do it?
If there is a software which is heavily CPU using, but can just use one thread, it would boost up the program.
I am not very advanced with hardware tech, but I guess there is no way to do that.
Thanks.
So lets say you have a 4x3.5 GHz CPU, can you create a vCPU that is 1x14GHz ?
No. As the expression goes -- nine women cannot make a baby in one month.
Each instruction executed by a virtual CPU can potentially be dependent on anything that previously happened on that CPU. There's no way to run an instruction (or a group of instructions) before all of the previous instructions have been completed. That leaves no room for another physical CPU to speed things up.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Overall, I need to be able to run backup jobs which are already in place, but are failing whenever run, see my last thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/1edqsx/ive_been_asked_to_backup_windows_servers_using/[1]
Today, I've been trying to clean the tape drive using a cleaning cartridge which we bought. I inserted the tape, imported it, and marked it as the cleaning slot within backup exec.
Now, however, I'm running into new problems I haven't encountered. First of all, when I try to perform a clean job within Backup Exec, the job starts and makes it to 17%, at which point it returns to 10 percent . It just does this cycle over and over again, never getting above 17%.
Next, I tried inventorying the tape library. I run the job and it begins, but always freezes indefinitely at 30%.
Does anybody have an idea what might be happening, and what I might do to get it working properly?
Verify that the firmware on the hardware is up to date. Also be sure that you are using Symantec drivers on the tape drives. You can do this by running the Tapeinst.exe command.
Edit... Also posted on your Redit thread
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
On the production server when xp_readerrorlog cmd is run the size will show approx 500000 daily i have to recycle error logs the errorlogs contains messages of all the successful login and not successfull login details. i need both the information please suggest what i can do.
If you're capturing every single login and failed login into your error log along with all the other stuff that gets written to the error log, then your error log is just going to grow and there's nothing you can do about that.
If you need to capture logins and you're using SQL Server 2008 or better, I'd suggest taking a look at Extended Events. This will output to a different file, which you'll still have to manage, but it won't be filling up your error logs.
For 2005 & earlier you can do similar work with a server-side trace, but it's not as efficient as extended events. Here's an article on how to set up a server-side trace from Gail Shaw.