I'm facing the following "issue" when trying out cucumber-jvm with an Arabic to Roman Numeral converter - the "then" piece gets converted into several step defs instead of one.
here's my scenario outline:
Scenario Outline:
Given a romanizer
When I romanize <arabic number>
Then I get the <roman numeral>
Examples:
| arabic number | roman numeral |
| 1 | I |
| 2 | II |
| 3 | III |
| 4 | IV |
| 5 | V |
| 6 | VI |
| 7 | VII |
| 8 | VIII |
| 9 | IX |
| 10 | X |
For this, i was expecting the then stepdef to simply be:
I_get_the(String value)
but instead it turns it into one stepdef for each example:
I_get_the_I()
I_get_the_II()
etc.
what am i doing wrong?
Thanks,
Nilesh
use (note the double quotes)
Scenario Outline:
Given a romanizer
When I romanize "<arabic number>"
Then I get the "<roman numeral>"
Related
I have a table that has numbers in string format. Ideally the table should contain 10 digit number in string format, but it has many junk values. I wanted to filter out the records that are not ideal in nature.
Below is the sample table that I have:
+---------------+--------+----------------------------------+
| ID_UID | Length | ##Comment |
+---------------+--------+----------------------------------+
| +112323456705 | 13 | Contains special character |
| 4323456432 | 11 | Contains blank |
| 3423122334 | 10 | As expected, 10 character number |
| 6758439239 | 10 | As expected, 10 character number |
| 58_4323129 | 10 | Contains special character |
| 4567$%6790 | 10 | Contains special character |
| 45684938901 | 11 | Is 11 characters |
| 4568 38901 | 10 | Contains blank |
+---------------+--------+----------------------------------+
Expected Output:
+---------------+--------+----------------------------+
| ID_UID | Length | ##Comment |
+---------------+--------+----------------------------+
| +112323456705 | 13 | Contains special character |
| 4323456432 | 11 | Contains blank |
| 58_4323129 | 10 | Contains special character |
| 4567$%6790 | 10 | Contains special character |
| 45684938901 | 11 | Is 11 characters |
| 4568 38901 | 10 | Contains blank |
+---------------+--------+----------------------------+
Basically I want all the records that dont have 10 digit numbers in them.
I have tried out below query:
SELECT *
FROM t1
WHERE ID_UID LIKE '%[^0-9]%'
But this does not returns any records.
Have created a fiddle for the same.
P.S. The columns length and ##Comment are illustrative in nature.
You want RLIKE not LIKE:
SELECT *
FROM t1
WHERE ID_UID RLIKE '[^0-9]'
Note that % is a LIKE wildcard, not a regular expression wildcard. Also, regular expressions match the pattern anywhere it occurs, so no wildcards are needed for the beginning and end of the string.
If you want to find values that are not ten digits, then be explicit:
SELECT *
FROM t1
WHERE ID_UID NOT RLIKE '^[0-9]{10}$'
I try to create a json select query which can give me back the result on next way.
1 row contains 1 main_message_id and belonging messages. (Like the bottom image.) The json format is not a requirement, if its work with other methods, it will be fine.
I store the data as like this:
+-----------------+---------+----------------+
| main_message_id | message | sub_message_id |
+-----------------+---------+----------------+
| 1 | test 1 | 1 |
| 1 | test 2 | 2 |
| 1 | test 3 | 3 |
| 2 | test 4 | 4 |
| 2 | test 5 | 5 |
| 3 | test 6 | 6 |
+-----------------+---------+----------------+
I would like to create a query, which give me back the data as like this:
+-----------------+-----------------------+--+
| main_message_id | message | |
+-----------------+-----------------------+--+
| 1 | {test1}{test2}{test3} | |
| 2 | {test4}{test5}{test6} | |
| 3 | {test7}{test8}{test9} | |
+-----------------+-----------------------+--+
You can use json_agg() for that:
select main_message_id, json_agg(message) as messages
from the_table
group by main_message_id;
Note that {test1}{test2}{test3} is invalid JSON, the above will return a valid JSON array e.g. ["test1", "test2", "test3"]
If you just want a comma separated list, use string_agg();
select main_message_id, string_ag(message, ', ') as messages
from the_table
group by main_message_id;
I have an influxdb table lets call it my_table
my_table is structured like this (simplified):
+-----+-----+-----
| Time| m1 | m2 |
+=====+=====+=====
| 1 | 8 | 4 |
+-----+-----+-----
| 2 | 1 | 12 |
+-----+-----+-----
| 3 | 6 | 18 |
+-----+-----+-----
| 4 | 4 | 1 |
+-----+-----+-----
However I was wondering if it is possible to find out how many of the metrics are larger than a certain (dynamic) threshold for each time.
So lets say I want to know how many of the metrics (columns) are higher than 5,
I would want to do something like this:
select fieldcount(/m*/) from my_table where /m*/ > 5
Returning:
1
1
2
0
I am relatively restricted in structuring the database as I'm using diamond collector (python) which takes care of all datacollection for me and flushes it to my influxdb without me telling what the tables should look like.
EDIT
I am aware of a possible solution if I hardcode the threshold and add a third metric named mGreaterThan5:
+-----+-----+------------------+
| Time| m1 | m2 |mGreaterThan5|
+=====+=====+====+=============+
| 1 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
+-----+-----+----+-------------+
| 2 | 1 | 12 | 1 |
+-----+-----+----+-------------+
| 3 | 6 | 18 | 2 |
+-----+-----+----+-------------+
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
+-----+-----+----+-------------+
However this means that I cant easily change this threshold to 6 or any other number so thats why I would prefer a better solution if there is one.
EDIT2
Another similar problem occurs with trying to retrieve the highest x amount of metrics. Eg:
On Jan 1st what were the highest 3 values of m? Given table:
+-----+-----+----+-----+----+-----+----+
| Time| m1 | m2 | m3 | m4 | m5 | m6 |
+=====+=====+====+=====+====+=====+====+
| 1/1 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 |
+-----+-----+----+-----+----+-----+----+
Am I screwed if I keep the table structured this way?
I'm asking for a best practive when creating some tables for localization of an Web Interface in sqlite3
In my first intetion I wanted to create a table with the different languages, and another on for the Messeage Code and Entries.
tblLanguage
+------------+-------------+---------+
| idLangCode | txtLangName | txtCode |
+------------+-------------+---------+
| 1 | English | en |
| 2 | German | de |
| 3 | French | fr |
| 4 | Spanish | es |
| 5 | Chinese | zh |
+------------+-------------+---------+
tblMessageText
+----+-------+--------------------------+------------+
| Id | Code | Message | LanguageID |
+----+-------+--------------------------+------------+
| 1 | 20500 | Set Point changed | 1 |
| 2 | 20500 | Sollwert geändert | 2 |
| 3 | 20500 | Punto de ajuste cambiado | 5 |
+----+-------+--------------------------+------------+
So in the second table I would have several rows with the same Message Code but whith an different language text.
The other possibility would be to have just one table with just one row for each Message Code but an Column for each language.
tblMessageTextMulti
+----+-------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------------------+
| id | Code | txtMessageText_EN | txtMessageText_DE | txtMessageText_ES |
+----+-------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------------------+
| 1 | 20500 | Set Point changed | Sollwert geändert | Punto de ajuste cambiado |
+----+-------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------------------+
My team likes the second solution with just one table more, because it just has one entry for each Message Code, and you see all Language text side by side.
What I like on the first solution is, that I could dynmically Query the langugage with just on line in php:
$query = 'SELECT * FROM qryInfoMessage WHERE idLangCode=' .$Language;
For the second solution with one table I can not store the query itself in the database, because I have to change the Column name in my query dynmically. So I have to put this together in php.
$query = 'SELECT Code, txtMessageText_EN FROM tblMessageTextMulti;
What I dont show here is that my query is much more complex, whith string substitution and date time conversion.
Beside that, what are the advantages or disadvantages of this solutions. Which one should be more perfomant and what is the best practice?
I have create a couple of Scenarios in fitnesse using Xebium/Selenium. They works nice but I'd like to create a decision table from one of my scenario.
So I try with the following:
| Verifiera ärendet | selenium driver fixture |
| tabellRadsNr | längd | bredd | grisar | höns | getter | får | kod | felbeskrivning |
| 19 | 50 | 20 | 201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | R110 | Nekad |
And ends up with:
Could not invoke constructor for VerifieraÄrendet[1]
The instance decisionTable_25. does not exist
The scenario "Verifiera ärendet" works when I run it by itself so I guess that I am missing something....
The problem was that I mixed up parameter names and their value names. So the structure basically is
| scenarioname parametername2 |
| parametervaluename1 | parametervaluename2 |
| row1value1 | row1value2 |
| row2value1 | row2value2 |