Primefaces p:fileUpload - do something on beginning and end of upload (multiple files) - file-upload

Primefaces 4.0 has nice component to upload files, including multiple files at once. By some dark miracle, it actually works.
Code:
<p:fileUpload fileUploadListener="#{someBean.handleSingleFileUpload}"
mode="advanced" multiple="true" auto="true" dragDropSupport="true"
update=":form_info" sizeLimit="100000" allowTypes="/(\.|\/)(xml)$/" />
Problem is that listener someBean.handleSingleFileUpload is called once for each file. I dealt with that nicely, but I cannot see any way to execute some code at beginning and on end of entire upload process. IMO rather large oversight.
For example:
at beginning clear info textarea
now multiple files are uploaded simultaneously...
at end reload something based on data that was just uploaded
Of course, things at beginning and end should be executed only once, regardless of amount of files. Is there any way to do that? In primefaces docs for p:fileUpload there are no other attribute calling bean method than fileUploadListener.

Well, I ended up simply using counter. Obvious in hindsight, eh. Example:
private int eventCounter = 0;
public void handleSingleFileUpload(FileUploadEvent event)
{
beginImport();
try
{
// code to import file, for example parse xml
} catch (Exception ex)
{
ex.printStackTrace(); /// or whatever
} // block catch Exception
finally
{
finishImport();
} // block finally
}
private synchronized void beginImport()
{
if (eventCounter == 0)
{
// insert code to execute before first file is started
} // block if just started
eventCounter++;
}
private synchronized void finishImport()
{
eventCounter--;
if (eventCounter < 0) eventCounter = 0; // Just in case...
if (eventCounter > 0) return; // not really finished yet
// insert code to execute when last file is done
}
It is hackish solution and I fear that in some cases it could call begin-n-finish pair twice (it should not do begin or finish code twice in row) and that could theoretically interfere with ongoing import of n-th file.
It works for me, at least for now. Will see how it holds when xml will have thousands or more of entries instead of dozen. I would prefer something like onStartOfEverything and onEndOfEverything as arguments in p:fileUpload tag, but ah well.

Related

Bypassing functions that do not exist

how would it be possible to bypass functions that are not existing in DM
such that the main code would still run? Try/catch does not seem to work, e..g
image doSomething(number a,number b)
{
try
{
whateverfunction(a,b)
}
catch
{
continue
}
}
number a,b
doSomething(a,b)
Also conditioning wont work, e.g..
image doSomething(number a,number b)
{
if(doesfunctionexist("whateverfunction"))
{
whateverfunction(a,b)
}
}
number a,b
doSomething(a,b)
thanks in advance!
As "unknown" commands are caught by the script-interpreter, there is no easy way to do this. However, you can construct a workaround by using ExecuteScriptCommand().
There is an example tutorial to be found in this e-book, but in short, you want to do something like the following:
String scriptCallStr = "beep();\n"
scriptCallStr = "MyUnsaveFunctionCall();\n"
number exitVal
Try { exitVal = ExecuteScriptString(scriptCallStr ); }
Catch { exitVal = -1; break; }
if ( -1 == exitVal )
{
OKDialog("Sorry, couldn't do:\n" + scriptCallStr )
}
else
{
OKDialog( "All worked. Exit value: " + exitVal )
}
This works nicely and easy for simple commands and if your task is only to "verify" that a script could run.
It becomes clumsy, when you need to pass around parameters. But even then there are ways to do so. (The 'outer' script could create an object and pass the object-ID per string. Similarly, the 'inner' script can do the same and return the script-object ID as exit-value.)
Note: You can of course also put doesfunctionexist inside the test-script, if you do only want to have a "safe test", but don't actually want to execute the command.
Depending on what you need there might also be another workaround solution: Wrapper-functions in a library. This can be useful if you want to run the same script on different PCs with some of which having the functionality - most likely some microscope - while others don't.
You can make your main-script use wrapper methods and then you install different versions of the wrapper method script scripts as libraries.
void My_SpecialFunction( )
{
SpecialFunction() // use this line on PCs which have the SpecialFunction()
DoNothing() // use alternative line on PCs which don't have the SpecialFunction()
}
My_SpecialFunction( )
I have used this in the past where the same functionality (-stage movement-) required different commands on different machines.

How do i stop SSIS Script component to process data

i am processing a ragged semicolon delimited file using script component as transformation.
The component is able to process the data and load to oledb destination. But when error is found it should stop processing further. As i am using try catch block the component doesn't fail and continue to process till the end.
Is there any way i could stop the processing further without failing the component/package?
Let me know if any other information/details required?
sample code:
str.split(";");
if(column[0] == "H")
{
col1=Column[3];
}
if(column[0] != "T")
{
try
{
Row.col1=Column[0];
Row.col2=Column[1];
.....
}
catch
{
update the variable to check if we have error in file.
}
}
Thank you for your time.
The general idea will be that you want to use try/catch blocks to ensure the data processing itself doesn't abort. Once you know your script isn't reporting a failure back to the engine, it's a simple process to not call the AddRow()
Pseudocode
foreach(line in fileReader)
{
try
{
// perform dangerous operations here
// Only add row if you have been able to parse current line
Output0Buffer.AddRow();
Output0Buffer.Col1 = parsedContent;
}
catch
{
// Signal that we should break out of the loop
// do not propagate the error
// You might want to do something though so you know you
// have an incomplete load
break;
}
}
If you are looking to just skip the current bad line, you can substitute continue for the break above.
C# loop - break vs. continue
I didn't get any help from anywhere, But as a work around i have placed a return statement in the code. It checks the error variable if it's true then i will return without processing further. But the thing still is it processes the whole file :(. But it works!!!

Metro c++ async programming and UI updating. My technique?

The problem: I'm crashing when I want to render my incoming data which was retrieved asynchronously.
The app starts and displays some dialog boxes using XAML. Once the user fills in their data and clicks the login button, the XAML class has in instance of a worker class that does the HTTP stuff for me (asynchronously using IXMLHTTPRequest2). When the app has successfully logged in to the web server, my .then() block fires and I make a callback to my main xaml class to do some rendering of the assets.
I am always getting crashes in the delegate though (the main XAML class), which leads me to believe that I cannot use this approach (pure virtual class and callbacks) to update my UI. I think I am inadvertently trying to do something illegal from an incorrect thread which is a byproduct of the async calls.
Is there a better or different way that I should be notifying the main XAML class that it is time for it to update it's UI? I am coming from an iOS world where I could use NotificationCenter.
Now, I saw that Microsoft has it's own Delegate type of thing here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh755798.aspx
Do you think that if I used this approach instead of my own callbacks that it would no longer crash?
Let me know if you need more clarification or what not.
Here is the jist of the code:
public interface class ISmileServiceEvents
{
public: // required methods
virtual void UpdateUI(bool isValid) abstract;
};
// In main XAML.cpp which inherits from an ISmileServiceEvents
void buttonClick(...){
_myUser->LoginAndGetAssets(txtEmail->Text, txtPass->Password);
}
void UpdateUI(String^ data) // implements ISmileServiceEvents
{
// This is where I would render my assets if I could.
// Cannot legally do much here. Always crashes.
// Follow the rest of the code to get here.
}
// In MyUser.cpp
void LoginAndGetAssets(String^ email, String^ password){
Uri^ uri = ref new URI(MY_SERVER + "login.json");
String^ inJSON = "some json input data here"; // serialized email and password with other data
// make the HTTP request to login, then notify XAML that it has data to render.
_myService->HTTPPostAsync(uri, json).then([](String^ outputJson){
String^ assets = MyParser::Parse(outputJSON);
// The Login has returned and we have our json output data
if(_delegate)
{
_delegate->UpdateUI(assets);
}
});
}
// In MyService.cpp
task<String^> MyService::HTTPPostAsync(Uri^ uri, String^ json)
{
return _httpRequest.PostAsync(uri,
json->Data(),
_cancellationTokenSource.get_token()).then([this](task<std::wstring> response)
{
try
{
if(_httpRequest.GetStatusCode() != 200) SM_LOG_WARNING("Status code=", _httpRequest.GetStatusCode());
String^ j = ref new String(response.get().c_str());
return j;
}
catch (Exception^ ex) .......;
return ref new String(L"");
}, task_continuation_context::use_current());
}
Edit: BTW, the error I get when I go to update the UI is:
"An invalid parameter was passed to a function that considers invalid parameters fatal."
In this case I am just trying to execute in my callback is
txtBox->Text = data;
It appears you are updating the UI thread from the wrong context. You can use task_continuation_context::use_arbitrary() to allow you to update the UI. See the "Controlling the Execution Thread" example in this document (the discussion of marshaling is at the bottom).
So, it turns out that when you have a continuation, if you don't specify a context after the lambda function, that it defaults to use_arbitrary(). This is in contradiction to what I learned in an MS video.
However by adding use_currrent() to all of the .then blocks that have anything to do with the GUI, my error goes away and everything is able to render properly.
My GUI calls a service which generates some tasks and then calls to an HTTP class that does asynchronous stuff too. Way back in the HTTP classes I use use_arbitrary() so that it can run on secondary threads. This works fine. Just be sure to use use_current() on anything that has to do with the GUI.
Now that you have my answer, if you look at the original code you will see that it already contains use_current(). This is true, but I left out a wrapping function for simplicity of the example. That is where I needed to add use_current().

Best way to find out if jqGrid is loaded and ready with Selenium

How are you finding out if jqGrid is loaded and ready to be used, via selenium.
Some details :
Im using C# driver
I have a method : new WebDriverWait(driver, new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 30)).Until(x => loadingdissapearedcondition) which im using to wait until Loading.. element is gone.
I also sometimes use this script :
private const string script = #"return ($('#{0}').jqGrid('getGridParam', 'reccount') !=x undefined) && ($('#{0}').jqGrid('getGridParam', 'reccount') != 0) && (!$('#load_{0}').is(':visible')) && (!$('#busyIcon').is(':visible'))";
private readonly string waitScript;
waitScript = string.Format(script, jqGridId);
public void WaitUntilLoadIconDissappears()
{
driver.WaitUntil(MAXWAIT, Wait);
}
public bool Wait()
{
var executeScript = ((IJavaScriptExecutor) driver).ExecuteScript(waitScript);
bool result;
bool tryParse = bool.TryParse(executeScript.SafeToString(), out result);
return tryParse && result;
}
to find if jqGrid has records and loading done.
I require something better - as even the above two does not make driver wait until load finishes, if we are using local data for jqGrid. Im also curious what is the best way, or at the minimum, how others are dealing with this problem.
I never used Selenium before, so I'm not sure that I understood your problem correctly. jqGrid will be first initialized and then (optionally) the data can be loaded from the server. During the initializing stage the original <table id="grid"></table> element will be converted to relatively complex HTML fragment which is the grid. At the end of the initialization the DOM element of the table (the $("#grid")[0]) will get the expando grid.
So you can use the test like
if ($("#grid")[0].grid) {
// grid is initialized
}
to determine that the grid is already initialized. jqGrid uses the same test internally (see here for example).
Here is solution for Java and jqgrid.
If grid data is not loaded yet then right pager has no value, so simply check its length. Methods such as isElementPresent, isDisplayed etc. seems not to work for grid right pager object. It's always present in page code while ajax, but text value is set when dynamic data is loaded.
public void waitForGridPagerRight(String gridName) throws Exception {
for (int second = 0;; second++) {
if (second >= 15) {
fail("Timeout.");
}
try {
if (driver
.findElement(By.id("pager_" + gridName + "_right"))
.getText().length() > 2)
break;
} catch (Exception e) {
}
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
}
Not sure why #Oleg's answer didn't work for me. It seemed like grid was being populated even before the ajax call was being made. It appears there's some change in newer versions maybe. It look like the last thing to happen in the ajax call is that the "loading" block is hidden, so instead I find that element and check it's display attribute a la:
def wait_for_jqgrid(self, t=20):
def check_jqgrid(driver):
#the last thing jqgrid does after the ajax call is to turn off the loading div
#so we find it and check to see if its display attribute is no longer set to 'none'
script = 'pid = $.jgrid.jqID($(".ui-jqgrid-btable").get(0).p.id); return $("#load_"+pid).get(0).style.display == "none";'
return driver.execute_script(script)
WebDriverWait(self.driver, t).until(check_jqgrid)
When the loading div is hidden, we are done. This is python but the same javascript bit should work in Java or whatever.

Async Web Service call from Silverlight 3

I have a question regarding the sequencing of events in the scenario where you are calling a wcf service from silverlight 3 and updating the ui on a seperate thread. Basically, I would like to know whether what I am doing is correct... Sample is as follows. This is my first post on here, so bear with me, because i am not sure how to post actual code. Sample is as follows :
//<summary>
public static void Load(string userId)
{
//Build the request.
GetUserNameRequest request =
new GetUserNameRequest { UserId = userId };
//Open the connection.
instance.serviceClient = ServiceController.UserService;
//Make the request.
instance.serviceClient.GetUserNameCompleted
+= UserService_GetUserNameCompleted;
instance.serviceClient.GetGetUserNameAsync(request);
return instance.VM;
}
/// <summary>
private static void UserService_GetUserNameCompleted(object sender, GetUserNameCompletedEventArgs e)
{
try
{
Controller.UIDispatcher.BeginInvoke(() =>
{
//Load the response.
if (e.Result != null && e.Result.Success)
{
LoadResponse(e.Result);
}
//Completed loading data.
});
}
finally
{
instance.serviceClient.GetUserNameCompleted
-= UserService_GetUserNameCompleted;
ServiceHelper.CloseService(instance.serviceClient);
}
}
So my question basically is, inside of my UI thread when I am loading the response if that throws an exception, will the "finally" block catch that ? If not, should i put another try/catch inside of the lambda where I am loading the response ?
Also, since I am executing the load on the ui thread, is it possible that the finally will execute before the UI thread is done updating ? And could as a result call the Servicehelper.CloseService() before the load has been done ?
I ask because I am having intermittent problems using this approach.
The finally block should get executed before the processing of the response inside the BeginInvoke. BeginInvoke means that the code will get executed in the next UI cycle.
Typically the best approach to this type of thing is to pull all the data you need out of the response and store it in a variable and then clean up your service code. Then make a call to BeginInvoke and update the UI using the data in the variable.