MSMQ complaining about format name while reading messages - vb.net

I have a non transacitonal private queue(errors) on a remote machine(10.3.35.3), running xp. I am trying to read messages from a machine which runs windows 2008.
I am using "FormatName:Direct=tcp:10.3.35.3\Private$\errors" to access the queue.
I can connect to it.
I can peek.
I have a eventHandler for ReceiveCompleted event, and it get fired once there is a message received from queue, however when I try to convert "source" object to messageQueue.
Friend Sub MyReceiveCompleted(ByVal [source] As [Object], ByVal asyncResult As ReceiveCompletedEventArgs)
Dim objMessageQueue As MessageQueue
Try
objMessageQueue = New MessageQueue
objMessageQueue = CType([source], MessageQueue)
At this point when I try to convert "source" object to MessageQueue object I got exception "The specified format name does not support the requested operation. For example, a direct queue format name cannot be deleted.".
full stack trace of exception
at System.Messaging.MessageQueue.GenerateQueueProperties()
at System.Messaging.MessageQueue.get_QueuePath()
at System.Messaging.MessageQueue.get_QueueName()
at MyReceiveCompleted(Object source, ReceiveCompletedEventArgs asyncResult)
I have tried different format names, no luck. can anyone please explain what is wrong in here? is there any other format name I need to use? can we know what formatname a queue will like beforehand?
Note: in here someone said to use id instead, when I look for id in properties of queue I got all 0s in "Type ID:" field.

Ok I give up on this, it is still not working becuase it is part of a very messy old code. I created my own little application(using the same code, same .net framework) and it can connect to remote queues and read/write/peek. so I believe this was an example of maintenance nightmare of a very very old code base.
during my research I have found some useful links, which may help someone who lands here in future. John Breakwell has following to contribute about remote queue
There is a new security in MSMQ4.0
A registry key in MSMQ3.0
some ports info regarding msmq
some more info about remote msmq 4.0 processing
To see if your msmq is installed in workgroup mode or other one, goto HKLM->Software-> Microsoft->MSMQ->Parameters check REG_DWORD workgroup.
1 is workgroup mode.
0 is AD mode.
and if you want to know the version of your msmq, check version section of this wiki page
I almost forgot to mention that as a rule of thumb I believe we should always read local and write remote, not other way round.

Related

Is it possible to write a plugin for Glimpse's existing SQL tab?

Is it possible to write a plugin for Glimpse's existing SQL tab?
I'm trying to log my SQL queries and the currently available extensions don't support our in-house SQL libary. I have written a custom plugin which logs what I want, but it has limited functionality and it doesn't integrate with the existing SQL tab.
Currently, I'm logging to my custom plugin using a single helper method inside my DAL's base class. This function looks takes the SqlCommand and Duration in order to show data on my custom tab:
// simplified example:
Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
sqlCommand.Connection = sqlConnection;
sqlConnection.Open();
object result = sqlCommand.ExecuteScalar();
sqlConnection.Close();
sw.Stop();
long duration = sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
LogSqlActivity(sqlCommand, null, duration);
This works well on my 'custom' tab but unfortunately means I don't get metrics shown on Glimpse's HUD:
Is there a way I can provide Glimpse directly with the info it needs (in terms of method names, and parameters) so it displays natively on the SQL tab?
The following advise is based on the fact that you can't use DbProviderFactory and you can't use a proxied SqlCommand, etc.
The data that appears in the "out-of-the-box" SQL tab is based on messages of given types been published through our internal Message Broker (see below on information on this). Because of the above limitations in your case, to get things lighting up correctly (i.e. your data showing up in HUD and the SQL tab), you will need to simulate the work that we do under the covers when we publish these messages. This shouldn't be that difficult and once done, should just work moving forward.
If you have a look at the various proxies we have here you will be above to see what messages we publish in what circumstances. Here are some highlights:
DbCommand
Log command start - here
Log command error - here
Log command end - here
DbConnection:
Log connection open - here
Log connection closed - here
DbTransaction
Log Started - here
Log committed - here
Log rollback - here
Other
Command row count here - Glimpses calculates this at the DbDataReader level but you could do it elsewhere as well
Now that you have an idea of what messages we are expecting and how we generate them, as long as you pass in the right data when you publish those messages, everything should just light up - if you are interested here is the code that looks for the messages that you will be publishing.
Message Broker: If you at the GlimpseConfiguration here you will see how to access the Broker. This can be done statically if needed (as we do here). From here you can publish the messages you need.
Helpers: For generating some of the above messages, you can use the helpers inside the Support class here. I would have shifted all the code for publishing the actual messages to this class, but I didn't think there would be too many people doing what you are doing.
Update 1
Starting point: With the above approach you shouldn't need to write your own plugin. You should just be able to access the broker GlimpseConfiguration.GetConfiguredMessageBroker() (make sure you check if its null, which it is if Glimpse is turned off, etc) and publish your messages.
I would imagine that you would put the inspection that leverages the broker and published the messages, where ever you have knowledge of the information that needs to be collected (i.e. inside your custom lib). Normally this would require references inside your lib to glimpse (which you may not want), so to protect against this, from your lib, you would call a proxy (which could be another VS proj) that has the glimpse dependency. Hence your ado lib only has references to your own code.
To get your toes wet, try just publishing a couple of fake connection and command messages. Assuming the broker you get from GlimpseConfiguration.GetConfiguredMessageBroker() isn't null, these should just show up. Then you can work towards getting real data into it from your lib.
Update 2
Obsolete Broker Access
Its marked as obsolete because its going to change in v2. You will still be able to do what you need to do, but the way of accessing the broker has changed. For what you currently need to do this is ok.
Sometimes null
As you have found this is really dependent on where in the page lifecycle you are currently at. To get around this, I would probably change my original recommendation a little.
In the code where you are currently creating messages and pushing them to the message bus, try putting them into HttpContext.Current.Items. If you haven't used it before, this is a store which asp.net provides out of the box which lasts the lifetime of a given request. You could have a list that you put in there, still create the message objects that you are doing, but put them into that list instead of pushing them through the broker.
Then, create a HttpModule (its really simple to do) which taps into the PostLogRequest event. Within this handler, you would pull the list out of the context, iterate through it and push the message into the message broker (accessing the same way you have been).

Apache-ODE ProcessManagement

I can access this API/WS through
http://localhost:8080/ode/processes/ProcessManagement?wsdl.
I would like to get the Process Info of a Process through this service and active it.
The serivce has the matching operations getProcessInfo and activate.
With listAllProcesses I get all Processes of a delpoyed package.
For getProcessInfo/activate I need the Process pid.
I get a <ns:pid>, using this gets me a load of Exceptions.
Using the name of the process and other stuff I receive earlier doesn't work either.
The pid is of type QName, perhaps thats the root of the problem.
However I don't now how to typecast here.
(Tried all with the eclipse Web Services Explorer and soapUI)
question: How does a proper request for both Operations look like?
When I try to consume the webservice with axi2 via eclipse, there is a undeclared variable local in the AnySimpleType class. I'm not keen on using the service this way.
But since I'm already writing a Client for the DeploymentService I thought about this approach.
question: How do I properly access the ProcessManagement?
EDIT: I have a simular problem with the DeploymentService and the undeploy Operation.
EDIT2: I figured the Problem with the DeploymentService undeploy out.
I had to get the Packagename as String. Then a made a javax.xml.namespace.QName out of it. Then I used the setPackageName of said undeploy operation.
Answer to question number 1:
soapUI with listAllProcesses returns
<ns:pid>{ode/bpel/unit-test}HelloWorld2-1</ns:pid>
getProcessInfo wants
<pmap:getProcessInfo>
<pid>?</pid>
</pmap:getProcessInfo>
Now I replaced <pid>?</pid> with
<pid xmlns:odetest="http://ode/bpel/unit-test">odetest:HelloWorld2-1</pid>
and it worked like a charm.
I remember that there was an issue with parameter ordering when using the Axis2 generated WSDL. Could you try if building a request against the original WSDL located at http://localhost:8080/ode/deployment/services/ProcessManagement works?
EDIT: Now that I got the question correctly, the problem is that ODE expects the QName to be serialized differently, i.e. in the XML way instead of the Java way. Thus, instead of <ns:pid>{ode/bpel/unit-test}HelloWorld2-1</ns:pid> the correct notation is <ns:pid xmlns:odetest="ode/bpel/unit-test">odetest:HelloWorld2-1</ns:pid>.

DatabaseFactory.CreateConnection() throws Object reference not set to an instance of an object

I have a client application consuming a WCF service throws an Error
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Details:
I am using WCF service with Microsoft Enterprise library for database connectivity, the service runs fine in the self hosted environment but throws an error if hosted as a windows service. I am not able to debug the WCF service, since it is hosted as windows service, so i tried using try catch blocks to find out, where the problem is.
I came across these two lines which i found to be most suspicious
Database db = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase();
DbConnection conn = db.CreateConnection();
I have already set my default database in config file. i think the second line must be the cause.
Please help.
Tried to find similar question on stack overflow but failed, hence posted.
Appended Question statement with error snap + stack trace...
stack trace
at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.DatabaseConfigurationView.get_DefaultName()
at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.DatabaseMapper.MapName(String name, IConfigurationSource configSource)
at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Common.Configuration.ObjectBuilder.ConfigurationNameMappingStrategy.BuildUp(IBuilderContext context, Type t, Object existing, String id)
at Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder.BuilderBase`1.DoBuildUp(IReadWriteLocator locator, Type typeToBuild, String idToBuild, Object existing, PolicyList[] transientPolicies)
at Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder.BuilderBase`1.BuildUp(IReadWriteLocator locator, Type typeToBuild, String idToBuild, Object existing, PolicyList[] transientPolicies)
at Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder.BuilderBase`1.BuildUp[TTypeToBuild](IReadWriteLocator locator, String idToBuild, Object existing, PolicyList[] transientPolicies)
at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Common.Configuration.ObjectBuilder.EnterpriseLibraryFactory.BuildUp[T](IReadWriteLocator locator, IConfigurationSource configurationSource)
at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Common.Configuration.ObjectBuilder.EnterpriseLibraryFactory.BuildUp[T](IConfigurationSource configurationSource)
at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Common.Configuration.ObjectBuilder.NameTypeFactoryBase`1.CreateDefault()
at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase()
at WCFService.Service1.ExecuteSFDS(Cmd CmdObj, Int32 executionType) in D:\Projects\WCFService\WCFService\Service1.cs:line 32
I am almost positive this is because the app.config is not copied to the output. Make sure that the config file is in the directory where your process runs from with the following name "YourServiceName".exe.config
If it is, while debugging see if you can use the ConfigurationManager to get the connection string, also, make sure the name of your connection string is correct.
EDIT
End result from comment:
I was missing the connection string in the output config file, and secondly i had defined the same endpoint and base Address, so i just changed the EndPoint address to "".
A Windows Service generally run under an identity of "Local System" or "Network System".
If your database connection using Windows Integrated Security, you will find it failing to connect to the database.
A quick work around is to run your service under named user on your workgroup/domain that has access to the database.

WCF Catastrophic Failure

I've got a real lemon on my hands. I hope someone who has the same problem or know how to fix it could point me in the right direction.
The Setup
I'm trying to create a WCF data service that uses an ADO Entity Framework model to retrieve data from the DB. I've added the WCF service reference and all seems fine. I have two sets of data service calls. The first one retrieves a list of all "users" and returns (this list does not include any dependent data (eg. address, contact, etc.). The second call is when a "user" is selected, the application request to include a few more dependent information such as address, contact details, messages, etc. given a user id. This also seems to work fine.
The Lemon
After some user selection change, ie. calling for more dependent data from the data service, the application stops to respond.
Crash error:
The request channel timed out while waiting for a reply after 00:00:59.9989999. Increase the timeout value passed to the call to Request or increase the SendTimeout value on the Binding. The time allotted to this operation may have been a portion of a longer timeout.
I restart the debugging process but the application will not make any data service calls until after about a minute or so, VS 08 displays a message box with error:
Unable to process request from service. 'http://localhost:61768/ConsoleService.svc'. Catastrophic failure.
I've Googled the hell out of this error and related issues but found nothing of use.
Possible Solutions
I've found some leads as to the source of the problem. In the client's app.config:
maxReceivedMessageSize > Set to a higher value, eg. 5242880.
receiveTimeout > Set to a higher value, eg. 00:30:00
I've tried these but all in vain. I suspect there is an underlying problem that cannot be fixed by simply changing some numbers. Any leads would be much appreciated.
I've solved it =P.
Cause
The WCF service works fine. It was the data service calls that was the culprit. Every time I made the call, I instantiated a new reference to the data service, but never closed/disposed the service reference. So after a couple of calls, the data service reaches its maximum connection and halts.
Solution
Make sure to close/dispose of any data service reference properly. Best practice would be to enclose in a using statement.
using(var dataService = new ServiceNS.ServiceClient() )
{
// Use service here
}
// The service will be disposed and connection freed.
Glad to see you fixed your problem.
However, you need to be carefull about using the using statement. Have a look at this article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa355056.aspx

Restart Service when Exception is thrown

I am writing a windows service that needs to be running 24/7. It is a pretty simple service that monitors a directory where files are dropped into and processes those files. I need to restart the service if an unhandled exception is thrown.
Is there a way for a service to restart itself in the event of an unhandled exception?
The Services applet has many different recovery features:
It can take different actions on the first, second, and subsequent failures:
Restart the service, after a configurable delay
Run a Program (passing command line parameters, possibly including the failure count)
Restart the Computer (after a configurable delay, and with a particular message being sent)
The program that runs should be able to look in the event log and see the reason for failure (especially if you log it), and should therefore be able to disable the service if the exception is one that is not recoverable.
And, of course, in the meantime, the service should be logging what's going on, which should enable any management tool to notify Operations of what's going on.
I agree that you should probably not configure "third and subsequent" to be "restart service", or you could wind up in a loop.
Have you tried using the Recovery tab of the Service entry - you can set rules for failures, including "Restart the Service" - by default this is on "No Action"
This is able to be done programatically if you wanted, this code was not written by me. I am posting the link to the Authors CodeProject page that contains the source / binaries. Below the link I have explained how I implemented the authors code.
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/install/sercviceinstallerext.aspx
Add a reference to the DLL.
Open ProjectInstaller.Designer.vb in notepad
In the InitializeComponent Sub
CHANGE
Me.ServiceProcessInstaller1 = New System.ServiceProcess.ServiceProcessInstaller
Me.ServiceInstaller1 = New System.ServiceProcess.ServiceInstaller
TO
Me.ServiceProcessInstaller1 = New System.ServiceProcess.ServiceProcessInstaller
Me.ServiceInstaller1 = New Verifide.ServiceUtils.ServiceInstallerEx
With the Friend Declarations in the ProjectInstaller.Designer.vb
CHANGE
Friend WithEvents ServiceProcessInstaller1 As System.ServiceProcess.ServiceProcessInstaller
Friend WithEvents ServiceInstaller1 As System.ServiceProcess.ServiceInstaller
TO
Friend WithEvents ServiceProcessInstaller1 As System.ServiceProcess.ServiceProcessInstaller
Friend WithEvents ServiceInstaller1 As Verifide.ServiceUtils.ServiceInstallerEx
CHANGE
Me.Installers.AddRange(New System.Configuration.Install.Installer() {Me.ServiceProcessInstaller1, Me.ServiceInstaller1})
TO
Me.Installers.AddRange(New System.Configuration.Install.Installer() {Me.ServiceInstaller1, Me.ServiceProcessInstaller1})
Import The Namespace On ProjectInstaller.vb
In ProjectInstaller.vb in the Public Sub New Function After Initialize component function has been called
ADD
'Set Reset Time Count - This Is 4 Days Before Count Is Reset
ServiceInstaller1.FailCountResetTime = 60 * 60 * 24 * 4
'ServiceInstaller1.FailRebootMsg = "Houston! We have a problem"
'Add Failure Actions
ServiceInstaller1.FailureActions.Add(New FailureAction(RecoverAction.Restart, 60000))
ServiceInstaller1.FailureActions.Add(New FailureAction(RecoverAction.Restart, 60000))
ServiceInstaller1.FailureActions.Add(New FailureAction(RecoverAction.None, 3000))
ServiceInstaller1.StartOnInstall = True
Build installer and install. Voila
Wrap your service code in a runner which can catch any errors and restart your service.
The best way is to wrap Try / Catch blocks around the methods in the service you can afford to let throw exceptions.
However, there may be serious exceptions thrown that should result in the service being stopped immediately. Don't ignore these! In these cases, handle the exception, log it, email it and then rethrow it. That way you will be informed that the exception has occurred and will know what went wrong. You can then fix the problem and re-start the service manually.
Just ignoring it could cause a major failure in your system which you would not know about. It could also be very expensive on CPU/RAM if the service stops then restarts then stops ad infinitum.
As suggested by "John Saunders" and "theGecko", you can monitor the service and restart it when it fails. The builtin Windows Service Recovery functionality will get you a long way, but if you find that you need some more advanced features (for example, CPU hogging and hang detection) then please check out Service Protector. It is designed to keep your important Windows Services operating 24x7.
Good luck!