I have two tables (A and B) that contain ID's however in table B some records have these ID's grouped together e.g the IDExec column may consist of a record that looks like 'id1 id2'. I'm trying to find the ID's in table A that do not appear in table B. I thought that by using something like:
SELECT *
FROM A
WHERE NOT EXISTS( SELECT *
FROM B
WHERE Contains(A.ExecID, B.ExecID))
This isn't working as contains needs the 2nd parameter to be string, text_lex or variable.
Do you guys have a solution to this problem?
To shed more light on the above problem the table strucutres are as follows:
Table A (IDExec, ProdName, BuySell, Quantity, Price, DateTime)
Table B (IDExec, ClientAccountNo, Quantity)
The C# code I've created to manipulate the buysell data in Table A groups up all the buysell's of the same product on a given day. The question now is how would you guy normalise this so I'm not bastardizing IDExec? Would it be better to create a new ID column in Table B called AllocID and link the two tables like that? So something like this:
Table A (IDExec, AllocID, ProdName, BuySell, Quantity, Price, DateTime)
Table B (AllocID, ClientAccountNo, Quantity)
This data should be normalized, storing multiple values in one field is a bad idea.
A workaround is using LIKE:
SELECT *
FROM A
WHERE NOT EXISTS( SELECT *
FROM B
WHERE ' '+B.ExecID+' ' LIKE '% '+A.ExecID+' %')
This is using space delimited values per your example.
This is kind of crude, but it will give you all of the entries in A that are not contained in B.
SELECT * FROM A WHERE A.ExecID not in (SELECT ExecID from B);
I have a very simple solution. It's called normalization. Proper modeling can work wonders for query simplicity and accuracy.
However, you may be stuck with what you have. Assuming ExecID is a string in both tables, try this:
select *
from A
where not exists(
select *
from B
where ExecID like '%' || a.ExecID || '%';
This is a horrible query as it performs a complete table scan of B for every row in A and the subquery is susceptible to false hits, so maybe you can do better, but your best course ultimately is a touch of database refactoring.
Related
I'm trying to write a SP that will allow users to search on multiple name strings, but supports LIKE functionality. For example, the user's input might be a string 'Scorsese, Kaurismaki, Tarkovsky'. I use a split function to turn that string into a table var, with one column, as follows:
part
------
Scorsese
Kaurismaki
Tarkovsky
Then, normally I would return any values from my table matching any of these values in my table var, with an IN statement:
select * from myTable where lastName IN (select * from #myTableVar)
However, this only returns exact matches, and I need to return partial matches. I'm looking for something like this, but that would actually compile:
select * from myTable where CONTAINS(lastName, select * from #myTableVar)
I've found other questions where it's made clear that you can't combine LIKE and IN, and it's recommended to use CONTAINS. My specific question is, is it possible to combine CONTAINS with a table list of values, as above? If so, what would that syntax look like? If not, any other workarounds to achieve my goal?
I'm using SQL Server 2016, if it makes any difference.
You can use EXISTS
SELECT * FROM myTable M
WHERE
EXISTS( SELECT * FROM #myTableVar V WHERE M.lastName like '%'+ V.part +'%' )
Can your parser built the entire statement? Will that get you what you want?
select *
from myTable
where CONTAINS
(lastName,
'"Scorsese" OR "Kaurismaki" OR "Tarkovsky"'
)
This can be done using CHARINDEX function combined with EXISTS:
select *
from myTable mt
where exists(select 1 from #myTableVar
where charindex(mt.lastName, part) > 0
or charindex(part, mt.lastName) > 0)
You might want to omit one of the conditions in the inner query, but I think this is what you want.
I have an issue where to create a report, I need two tables to join that don't have any way to join. I did find a way they could potentially join, but it's complicated.
There is table A, which contains a column called select_criteria. Here are some examples of 3 values it contains:
SELECT DISTINCT SUM(TRANSCRIPTDETAIL.CREDIT_BILLING) FROM SOMETABLE WHERE (( STUDENTFINANCIAL.TUITION_EXEMPTION = 'EMPFT' ) OR ( STUDENTFINANCIAL.TUITION_EXEMPTION = 'EMPPT' )))
SELECT DISTINCT SUM(TRANSCRIPTDETAIL.CREDIT_BILLING) FROM SOMETABLE WHERE ( STUDENTFINANCIAL.TUITION_EXEMPTION = 'PART50' )
In table B, I have a column called tuition_exemption, which contains values like:
EMPFT
EMPPT
PART50
At the tail end of the whole value within the column in table A, there are the tuition exemption codes that match the values in table B.
Is there a way using MSSQL where I can parse out the codes from the long statement in select_criteria, so that they perfectly match the codes from table B? This is my thought on a way to join up table A and table B like I need to do. The other complication is that there is a 1:many connection between select_criteria and a tuition_exemption value, but a 1:1 connection between a tuition_exemption value and a select_criteria value.
So in the end, the join between the two tables should print, in one example, the same select_criteria value twice (I am referencing the first value in my list above from table A), but in those two rows, the two different tuition_exemption values (EMPFT and EMPPT). Or in the case of table A example 2, it would be printed once and match up to PART50 once.
I am stuck here. I have a statement that successfully grabs the select_criteria values I want:
SELECT select_criteria
WHERE (
select_criteria LIKE '%EMPFT%' OR
select_criteria LIKE '%EMPPT%' OR
select_criteria LIKE '%PART50%' OR
)
But what I need to do is this. When it grabs the select_criteria values I want, I then want to print to a new column in this table the code it matches up to. Those codes are values in table B like 'EMPFT', 'EMPPT' and 'PART50'. That is why I was thinking of basically parsing out the codes from select_criteria, and printing them into the new column in table A. That way table A and table B have a value to match up on and I write run my report. I just don't now how to do it in SQL. I kind of know in Perl, but was hoping to just do all of this in SSMS 2012.
Thanks for any help!
byobob
You can use any expression which returns a boolean as a join criteria. Since LIKE returns a bool, you should be able to just do this:
select *
from tableA
join tableB
on tableA.select_criteria like '%' + tableB.codecolumn + '%'
I am trying to compare a table T1 and a view v1 and find the missing records from the table T1 and display the results in a excel when a button is clicked. I am trying the wrap up the situation into a stored procedure and call it from vba code. I am not sure on how to start this.. The field names are different in both the tables, although it has same data. Any help will be much appreciated. I have tried many code samples , but I didn't achieve what I want..
Table T1
alpha.FileID
Master Policy Number
Insurance Name
View V1
FileID
PolNO
InsName
These are the few columns. Though, they have different field names, the data are the same. Some times the records are missing in the table v1, and I need to compare the two tables and find the missing records of the table v2.
SELECT View_v1.[Insured Name]
FROM View_v1
WHERE View_v1.alpha.FileID NOT IN
(
SELECT Table_t1.FileID
FROM Table_t1
)
An except clause is the easiest way to do this:
SELECT FileID, PolNO, InsName
FROM View V1
EXCEPT
SELECT FileID, MasterPolicyNumber, InsuranceName
FROM Table T1
This will give you the rows in the first select that do not exist in the second select (depending on your desired results you might flip the top and bottom selects). As long as the data types and number of columns are the same, the name of each field doesn't matter. Your result set will show the field names of the first select.
Also since you didn't specify your dbms, "MINUS" is used instead of "EXCEPT" for some dbms's like Oracle.
I believe this is what you're looking for based on your description.
I'm comparing every field, not just FileID as your example appears to be attempting. So, if you truly want to look only for missing FileIDs, just remove the other join on conditions.
SELECT View_v1.FileID, View_v1.PolNO, View_v1.InsName
FROM View_v1
LEFT JOIN Table_t1
on View_v1.FileID = Table_t1.FileID
and View_v1.PolNO = Table_t1.[Master Policy Number]
and View_v1.InsName = Table_t1.[Insurance Name]
WHERE Table_t1.FileID is null
Is there any way to let two tables act as one? I have two identical tables, the only difference is that one contains recent data and the other one older data. Is there any way to do something like this?
select *
from customers a,
(rentals union archrentals) r
where a.serno = r.custserno
and r.rentaldate > YYYYMMDD;
Why don't you create a view like this?
CREATE VIEW v_allRentals
AS
SELECT * form rentals
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM archrentals
In this way you can use v_allRentals without worrying every time you create a query that you are forgetting the old ones.
Thanks,
Mucio
Use a temporary table
select *
INTO #allcustomers
from customers a,
(rentals union archrentals) r
where a.serno = r.custserno
and r.rentaldate > YYYYMMDD;
then you can use the temptable to query the results.
I am trying to find a way, if possible, to use IN and LIKE together. What I want to accomplish is putting a subquery that pulls up a list of data into an IN statement. The problem is the list of data contains wildcards. Is there any way to do this?
Just something I was curious on.
Example of data in the 2 tables
Parent table
ID Office_Code Employee_Name
1 GG234 Tom
2 GG654 Bill
3 PQ123 Chris
Second table
ID Code_Wildcard
1 GG%
2 PQ%
Clarifying note (via third-party)
Since I'm seeing several responses which don't seems to address what Ziltoid asks, I thought I try clarifying what I think he means.
In SQL, "WHERE col IN (1,2,3)" is roughly the equivalent of "WHERE col = 1 OR col = 2 OR col = 3".
He's looking for something which I'll pseudo-code as
WHERE col IN_LIKE ('A%', 'TH%E', '%C')
which would be roughly the equivalent of
WHERE col LIKE 'A%' OR col LIKE 'TH%E' OR col LIKE '%C'
The Regex answers seem to come closest; the rest seem way off the mark.
I'm not sure which database you're using, but with Oracle you could accomplish something equivalent by aliasing your subquery in the FROM clause rather than using it in an IN clause. Using your example:
select p.*
from
(select code_wildcard
from second
where id = 1) s
join parent p
on p.office_code like s.code_wildcard
In MySQL, use REGEXP:
WHERE field1 REGEXP('(value1)|(value2)|(value3)')
Same in Oracle:
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(field1, '(value1)|(value2)|(value3)')
Do you mean somethign like:
select * FROM table where column IN (
SELECT column from table where column like '%%'
)
Really this should be written like:
SELECT * FROM table where column like '%%'
Using a sub select query is really beneficial when you have to pull records based on a set of logic that you won't want in the main query.
something like:
SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE TableA_IdColumn IN
(
SELECT TableA_IdColumn FROM TableB WHERE TableA_IDColumn like '%%'
)
update to question:
You can't combine an IN statement with a like statement:
You'll have to do three different like statements to search on the various wildcards.
You could use a LIKE statement to obtain a list of IDs and then use that in the IN statement.
But you can't directly combine IN and LIKE.
Perhaps something like this?
SELECT DISTINCT
my_column
FROM
My_Table T
INNER JOIN My_List_Of_Value V ON
T.my_column LIKE '%' + V.search_value + '%'
In this example I've used a table with the values for simplicity, but you could easily change that to a subquery. If you have a large list (like tens of thousands) then performance might be rough.
select *
from parent
where exists( select *
from second
where office_code like trim( code_wildcard ) );
Trim code_wildcard just in case it has trailing blanks.
You could do the Like part in a subquery perhaps?
Select * From TableA Where X in (Select A from TableB where B Like '%123%')
tsql has the contains statement for a full-text-search enabled table.
CONTAINS(Description, '"sea*" OR "bread*"')
If I'm reading the question correctly, we want all Parent rows that have an Office_code that matches any Code_Wildcard in the "Second" table.
In Oracle, at least, this query achieves that:
SELECT *
FROM parent, second
WHERE office_code LIKE code_wildcard;
Am I missing something?