I am creating a PDF using iTextSharp. This is a reporting tool. Everything is working fine, only the space between two chunks is slighly greater that what I want. I tried to find some help on StackOverflow and got to know SetLeading(fixed, multiplied); but it is not coming with chunk in case.
The reason I need it in chunk is that I have multiple chunks which I am adding into paragraph proceeding to which adding all into Document at a single shot.
public static void createPDF(Paragraph para)
{
string imagepath = "12.pdf";
Document doc = new Document();
try
{
Paragraph p = para;
Rectangle[] COLUMNS = {
new Rectangle(36, 36, 290, 806),
new Rectangle(305, 36, 559, 806)
};
//This is what i have tried
// p.SetLeading(0.4f,0.8f);
p.SpacingBefore = 0.0f;
p.SpacingAfter = 0.1f;
PdfReader inputPdf = new PdfReader(#"");
PdfWriter writer2 = PdfWriter.GetInstance(doc, new FileStream(imagepath, FileMode.Create));
doc.Open();
PdfContentByte canvas = writer2.DirectContent;
for (int ij = 1; ij <= 3; ij++)
{
doc.SetPageSize(inputPdf.GetPageSizeWithRotation(ij));
doc.NewPage();
PdfImportedPage page = writer2.GetImportedPage(inputPdf, ij);
int rotation = inputPdf.GetPageRotation(ij);
if (rotation == 90 || rotation == 270)
{
canvas.AddTemplate(page, 0, -1f, 1f, 0, 0, inputPdf.GetPageSizeWithRotation(ij).Height);
}
else
{
canvas.AddTemplate(page, 1f, 0, 0, 1f, 0, 0);
}
}
doc.NewPage();
ColumnText ct = new ColumnText(canvas);
int side_of_the_page = 0;
ct.SetSimpleColumn(COLUMNS[side_of_the_page]);
int paragraphs = 0;
int i = 0;
while (paragraphs < p.Count-1)
{
string TEXT = p[i].ToString();
ct.AddElement(p[i]);
while (ColumnText.HasMoreText(ct.Go()))
{
if (side_of_the_page == 0)
{
side_of_the_page = 1;
canvas.MoveTo(297.5f, 36);
canvas.LineTo(297.5f, 806);
canvas.Stroke();
}
else
{
side_of_the_page = 0;
doc.NewPage();
}
ct.SetSimpleColumn(COLUMNS[side_of_the_page]);
}
i++;
paragraphs++;
}
doc.Close();
}
catch {
}
}
Please read chapter 2 of my book. The Chunk object is called the atomic building block among iText's high-level objects. By design, you cannot define a leading on the level of a Chunk.
I quote from page 23:
A Chunk isn't aware of the space that is needed between two lines.
The leading is defined at the level of a Phrase (and, of course, its superclasses, such as Paragraph). If you want to change the spacing between Chunk objects, you need to wrap Chunks in Phrases or Paragraphs (as you already indicate) and define the leading for those phrases or paragraphs.
Note that the documentation also states:
In normal circumstances you'll use Chunk objects to compose other text objects, such as Phrases and Paragraphs. Typically, you won't add Chunk objects directly to a Document.
Which special circumstance do you have that requires making an exception to this rule?
Extra remarks
You are importing an existing PDF in a way that throws away all existing interactivity. This is suboptimal.
You first compose a paragraph p, you set the leading for p, then you decompose p throwing away the leading you've defined and then you complain that there's no leading.
This is what you are doing wrong:
while (paragraphs < p.Count-1)
{
ct.AddElement(p[i]);
...
}
The object p knows its leading; the separate components of this object (p[0], p[1],...), don't know anything about the leading.
Hence you should do something like this:
ColumnText ct = new ColumnText(canvas);
int side_of_the_page = 0;
ct.SetSimpleColumn(COLUMNS[side_of_the_page]);
ct.AddElement(p);
while (ColumnText.HasMoreText(ct.Go()))
{
if (side_of_the_page == 0)
{
side_of_the_page = 1;
canvas.MoveTo(297.5f, 36);
canvas.LineTo(297.5f, 806);
canvas.Stroke();
}
else
{
side_of_the_page = 0;
doc.NewPage();
}
ct.SetSimpleColumn(COLUMNS[side_of_the_page]);
}
As you have defined the leading at the level of the p object, you must add the p object as an element to the ColumnText.
Regarding the wrong way you're copying the original document: The AddLongTable example shows how to do it correctly. You get a PdfReader object for the existing document. You create a PdfStamper to create a new document. You get the number of pages in the existing document, and then you use insertPage() as many time as needed to add extra content.
Related
I fear I'm trying to reinvent the wheel here. I'm putting Objects into my SQFL database:
https://pub.dev/packages/sqflite
some of the object fields are Lists of ints others are Lists of Strings. I'm encoding these as plain Strings to place in a TEXT field in my SQFL database.
At some point I'm going to have to turn them back, I couldn't find anything on Google, which is surprising because this must be a very common occurrence with SQFL
I've started coding the 'decoding', but it's rookie dart. Is there anything performant around I ought to use?
Code included to prove I'm not totally lazy, no need to look, edge cases make it fail.
List<int> listOfInts = new List<int>();
String testStringOfInts = "[1,2,4]";
List<String> intermediateStep2 = testStringOfInts.split(',');
int numListElements = intermediateStep2.length;
print("intermediateStep2: $intermediateStep2, numListElements: $numListElements");
for (int i = 0; i < numListElements; i++) {
if (i == 0) {
listOfInts.add(int.parse(intermediateStep2[i].substring(1)));
continue;
}
else if ((i) == (numListElements - 1)) {
print('final element: ${intermediateStep2[i]}');
listOfInts.add(int.parse(intermediateStep2[i].substring(0, intermediateStep2[i].length - 1)));
continue;
}
else listOfInts.add(int.parse(intermediateStep2[i]));
}
print('Output: $listOfInts');
/* DECODING LISTS OF STRINGS */
String testString = "['element1','element2','element23']";
List<String> intermediateStep = testString.split("'");
List<String> output = new List<String>();
for (int i = 0; i < intermediateStep.length; i++) {
if (i % 2 == 0) {
continue;
} else {
print('adding a value to output: ${intermediateStep[i]}');
//print('value is a: ${(intermediateStep[i]).runtimeType}');
output.add(intermediateStep[i]);
}
}
print('Output: $output');
}
For the integers your could make the parsing like:
void main() {
print(parseStringAsIntList("[1,2,4]")); // [1, 2, 4]
}
List<int> parseStringAsIntList(String stringOfInts) => stringOfInts
.substring(1, stringOfInts.length - 1)
.split(',')
.map(int.parse)
.toList();
I need more information about how the Strings are saved in some corner cases like if they contain , and/or ' since this will change how the parsing should be done. But if both characters are valid in the string (especially ,) I will recommend you to change the storage format into JSON instead which makes it a lot easier to encode/decode and without the risk of using characters which can give you issues).
But a rather naive solution can be made like this if we know each String does not contain ,:
void main() {
print(parseStringAsStringList("['element1','element2','element23']"));
// [element1, element2, element23]
}
List<String> parseStringAsStringList(String stringOfStrings) => stringOfStrings
.substring(1, stringOfStrings.length - 1)
.split(',')
.map((string) => string.substring(1, string.length - 1))
.toList();
I made simplest index with one document using LuceneTestCase. My goal is to write numbers to payload for each position of each term, that will be used in custom scoring formula implemented in custom Query/Scorer.
I used SimpleTextCodec and checked, that freq, positions and payload was really written to index.
But when I'm reading freq from the PostingEnum it returns 0, payload() returns null, nextPosition() throws an exception:
java.lang.AssertionError: got line=field model
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D334C9D1B5C155E3:2AAE4BE5481F4C8F]:0)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.simpletext.SimpleTextFieldsReader$SimpleTextPostings Enum.nextPosition(SimpleTextFieldsReader.java:455)
Here is how I'm reading the postings in the custom Query:
for (String field: fieldScores.keySet()) {
final Terms fieldTerms = reader.terms(field);
if (fieldTerms == null) {
continue;
}
if (!fieldTerms.hasPositions())
throw new IllegalStateException("Index does not contain positions");
if (!fieldTerms.hasPayloads())
throw new IllegalStateException("Index does not contain payloads");
final TermsEnum te = fieldTerms.iterator();
for (int j = 0; j < terms.length; j++) {
final Term t = terms[j];
if (t.field().equals(field) && te.seekExact(t.bytes())) {
PostingsEnum postingsEnum = te.postings(null, PostingsEnum.ALL);
int pos = postingsEnum.nextPosition();
BytesRef payload = postingsEnum.getPayload();
// assert payload.bytesEquals(new BytesRef(new byte[]{1}));
// TODO: use payload in scoring formula
fldScorers.add(new ConstTermScorer(this, t,
fieldScores.get(field) * termScores.get(t.text()),
postingsEnum));
}
}
}
I've found the reason. nextPosition(), freq() and payload() return 0 (or null) values because postingsEnum (iterator) is just created and not positioned on concrete document yet. postingsEnum.nextDoc() wasn't called and postingsEnum.docID() is -1. Stupid situation, but it would be better may be if nextPosition(), freq() and payload() would check postingsEnum.docID.
I'm reading PDF by iTextSharp-5.5.7.0, PdfTextExtractor.GetTextFromPage() works well in most of files until this: sample PDF
I can't read any number from it, for example: only return 'ANEU' from 'A0NE8U', they are fine in Adobe Reader to copy out. Code is here:
public static string ExtractTextFromPdf(string path)
{
using (PdfReader reader = new PdfReader(path))
{
StringBuilder text = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 1; i <= reader.NumberOfPages; i++)
{
text.Append(PdfTextExtractor.GetTextFromPage(reader, i));
}
return text.ToString();
}
}
The font in question has a ToUnicode map which is used for text extraction. Unfortunately, though, iText(Sharp) reads it only partially, and digits are located after the mappings read.
In detail:
The cause for the issue is the implementation of AbstractCMap.addRange (I'm showing the iText Java code as iText also has this issue and I'm more into the Java version):
void addRange(PdfString from, PdfString to, PdfObject code) {
byte[] a1 = decodeStringToByte(from);
byte[] a2 = decodeStringToByte(to);
if (a1.length != a2.length || a1.length == 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid map.");
byte[] sout = null;
if (code instanceof PdfString)
sout = decodeStringToByte((PdfString)code);
int start = a1[a1.length - 1] & 0xff;
int end = a2[a2.length - 1] & 0xff;
for (int k = start; k <= end; ++k) {
a1[a1.length - 1] = (byte)k;
PdfString s = new PdfString(a1);
s.setHexWriting(true);
if (code instanceof PdfArray) {
addChar(s, ((PdfArray)code).getPdfObject(k - start));
}
else if (code instanceof PdfNumber) {
int nn = ((PdfNumber)code).intValue() + k - start;
addChar(s, new PdfNumber(nn));
}
else if (code instanceof PdfString) {
PdfString s1 = new PdfString(sout);
s1.setHexWriting(true);
++sout[sout.length - 1];
addChar(s, s1);
}
}
}
The loop only considers the range in the least significant byte of from and to. Thus, for the range in question:
1 beginbfrange
<0000><01E1>[
<FFFD><FFFD><FFFD><0020><0041><0042><0043><0044>
<0045><0046><0047><0048><0049><004A><004B><004C>
...
<2248><003C><003E><2264><2265><00AC><0394><03A9>
<00B5><03C0><00B0><221E><2202><222B><221A><2211>
<220F><25CA>]
endbfrange
it only iterates from 0x00 to 0xE1, i.e. only the first 226 entries of the 482 mappings.
There actually are some peculiar restrictions in CMaps, e.g. there may only be up to 100 separate bfrange entries in the same section, and in the alternative bfrange entry syntax
n beginbfrange
srcCode1 srcCode2 dstString
endbfrange
which is handled by the same method addRange, there is the restriction
When defining ranges of this type, the value of the last byte in the string shall be less than or equal to 255 − (srcCode2 − srcCode1).
Probably a misunderstanding of this restriction made the developer believe, srcCode2 and srcCode1 also would merely differ in the least significant byte.
But maybe there are even more restrictions which I merely did not find...
Meanwhile (as of iText 5.5.9, tested against a development SNAPSHOT) this issue seems to have been fixed.
Sorry for asking a really basic question, but it's probably the first time for a number of years I feel really confused.
Windows provides two set of controls: Windows.UI.Xaml namespace (I thinks this is referred as Metro), used for Windows Store Apps, and System.Windows (WPF) for Desktop.
Since I am going to develop Windows Store Apps mainly for Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 phones, I will have to stick to Windows.UI.Xaml, and this has not only a separate set of UI elements, but also separate set of bitmaps, brushes, etc. (Windows.UI.Xaml.Media vs System.Windows.Media).
I found that Windows.UI.Xaml provides a very limited support for graphics, much less than provided by WPF, Android or (even!) iOS platform. To start with, I got stuck with a simple task: tiling a background!
Since Windows.UI.Xaml.Media.ImageBrush do not support tiling, I wanted to to do that "manually". Some sites suggest making numerous number of children, each holding a tile. Honestly, it looks as a rather awkward approach to me, so I decided to do it in what appears a more natural way: create an off-screen tiled image, assign it to a brush and assign the brush as the background for a panel.
The tiling code is rather straightforward (it probably has mistakes, possibly won't even not run on a phone, because of some unavailable classes used).
int panelWidth = (int) contentPanel.Width;
int panelHeight = (int) contentPanel.Height;
Bitmap bmpOffscreen = new Bitmap(panelWidth, panelHeight);
Graphics gOffscreen = Graphics.FromImage(bmpOffscreen);
string bmpPath = Path.Combine(Windows.ApplicationModel.Package.Current.InstalledLocation.Path, "Assets/just_a_tile.png");
System.Drawing.Image tile = System.Drawing.Image.FromFile(bmpPath, true);
int tileWidth = tile.Width;
int tileHeight = tile.Height;
for (int y = 0; y < panelHeight; y += tileHeight)
for (int x = 0; x < panelWidth; x += tileWidth)
gOffscreen.DrawImage(tile, x, y);
Now I presumably have the tiled image in bmpOffscreen. But how assign it to a brush? To do that I need to convert Bitmap to BitmapSource, while I couldn't find something similar to System.Windows.Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromHBitmap available for WPF structure!
Well, first of all System.Drawing namespace is not available in Windows Universal Platform, so you won't be able to use Bitmap class
But, all hope is not lost - you can use
Windows.UI.Xaml.Media.Imaging.WriteableBitmap
If you look at example included on this page, you will see that at one point image data is extracted to a byte array - all you need to do is copy it according to your needs
Please let me know if you want me to include a complete code sample.
Edit:
StorageFile file = await StorageFile.GetFileFromPathAsync(filePath);
Scenario4WriteableBitmap = new WriteableBitmap(2000, 2000);
// Ensure a file was selected
if (file != null)
{
using (IRandomAccessStream fileStream = await file.OpenAsync(Windows.Storage.FileAccessMode.Read))
{
int columns = 4;
int rows = 4;
BitmapDecoder decoder = await BitmapDecoder.CreateAsync(fileStream);
// Scale image to appropriate size
BitmapTransform transform = new BitmapTransform()
{
ScaledHeight = Convert.ToUInt32(Scenario4ImageContainer.Height),
ScaledWidth = Convert.ToUInt32(Scenario4ImageContainer.Width)
};
PixelDataProvider pixelData = await decoder.GetPixelDataAsync(
BitmapPixelFormat.Bgra8, // WriteableBitmap uses BGRA format
BitmapAlphaMode.Straight,
transform,
ExifOrientationMode.IgnoreExifOrientation, // This sample ignores Exif orientation
ColorManagementMode.DoNotColorManage);
// An array containing the decoded image data, which could be modified before being displayed
byte[] sourcePixels = pixelData.DetachPixelData();
// Open a stream to copy the image contents to the WriteableBitmap's pixel buffer
using (Stream stream = Scenario4WriteableBitmap.PixelBuffer.AsStream())
{
for (int i = 0; i < columns * rows; i++)
{
await stream.WriteAsync(sourcePixels, 0, sourcePixels.Length);
}
}
}
// Redraw the WriteableBitmap
Scenario4WriteableBitmap.Invalidate();
Scenario4Image.Source = Scenario4WriteableBitmap;
Scenario4Image.Stretch = Stretch.None;
}
Thank you, Arkadiusz. Since Australian time goes slightly ahead of Europe,
I had an advantage and seen the code before you posted it. I downloaded
MSDN XAML images sample and it helped me a lot. I gave a +1 to you but someone apparently put -1, so it compensated each other. Don't be upset I get -1 so often, that I stopped paying attention on that :)
So I've managed to do tiling with Windows Universal Platform! On my Lumia 532 phone it works magnifique. I felt like re-inventing a wheel, because all this stuff must be handled by SDK, not by a third-party developer.
public static async Task<bool> setupTiledBackground(Panel panel, string tilePath)
{
Brush backgroundBrush = await createTiledBackground((int)panel.Width, (int)panel.Height, TilePath);
if (backgroundBrush == null) return false;
panel.Background = backgroundBrush;
return true;
}
private static async Task<Brush> createTiledBackground(int width, int height, string tilePath)
{
StorageFile file = await StorageFile.GetFileFromApplicationUriAsync(new Uri("ms-appx:///" + tilePath));
byte[] sourcePixels;
int tileWidth, tileHeight;
using (IRandomAccessStream inputStream = await file.OpenAsync(Windows.Storage.FileAccessMode.Read))
{
if (inputStream == null) return null;
BitmapDecoder tileDecoder = await BitmapDecoder.CreateAsync(inputStream);
if (tileDecoder == null) return null;
tileWidth = (int)tileDecoder.PixelWidth;
tileHeight = (int) tileDecoder.PixelHeight;
PixelDataProvider pixelData = await tileDecoder.GetPixelDataAsync(
BitmapPixelFormat.Bgra8, // WriteableBitmap uses BGRA format
BitmapAlphaMode.Straight,
new BitmapTransform(),
ExifOrientationMode.IgnoreExifOrientation,
ColorManagementMode.DoNotColorManage);
sourcePixels = pixelData.DetachPixelData();
// fileStream.Dispose();
}
WriteableBitmap backgroundBitmap = new WriteableBitmap(width, height);
int tileBmpWidth = tileWidth << 2;
int screenBmpWidth = width << 2;
int tileSize = tileBmpWidth * tileHeight;
int sourceOffset = 0;
using (Stream outputStream = backgroundBitmap.PixelBuffer.AsStream())
{
for (int bmpY=0; bmpY < height; bmpY++) {
for (int bmpX = 0; bmpX < screenBmpWidth; bmpX += tileBmpWidth)
await outputStream.WriteAsync(sourcePixels, sourceOffset, Math.Min(screenBmpWidth - bmpX, tileBmpWidth));
if ((sourceOffset += tileBmpWidth) >= tileSize)
sourceOffset -= tileSize;
}
}
ImageBrush backgroundBrush = new ImageBrush();
backgroundBrush.ImageSource = backgroundBitmap; // It's very easy now!
return backgroundBrush; // Finita la comédia!
}
Just one remark: if you do it on form start, you should not wait for it.
This doesn't work:
public MainPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
bool result = setupTiledBackground(contextPanel, TilePath).Result;
}
This works:
private Task<bool> backgroundImageTask;
public MainPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
backgroundImageTask = setupTiledBackground(contextPanel, TilePath);
}
I followed the code provided by Robert Levy at this link: http://channel9.msdn.com/coding4fun/kinect/Display-Kinect-color-image-containing-only-players-aka-background-removal
I tried implementing it into my existing code, and have had inconsistent results. If the user is in the kinect's field of view when the program starts up it will remove the background some of the time. If the user walks into the field of view it will not pick them up.
namespace KinectUserRecognition
{
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
//Kinect Runtime
Runtime kinect = Runtime.Kinects[0];
PlanarImage colorImage;
PlanarImage depthImage;
bool isDepthImage;
WriteableBitmap player1;
private void Window_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
isDepthImage = false;
//UseDepthAndPlayerIndex and UseSkeletalTracking
kinect.Initialize(RuntimeOptions.UseDepthAndPlayerIndex | RuntimeOptions.UseColor);// | RuntimeOptions.UseSkeletalTracking);
//register for event
kinect.VideoFrameReady += new EventHandler<ImageFrameReadyEventArgs>(nui_VideoFrameReady);
kinect.DepthFrameReady += new EventHandler<ImageFrameReadyEventArgs>(nui_DepthFrameReady);
//Video image type
kinect.VideoStream.Open(ImageStreamType.Video, 2, ImageResolution.Resolution640x480,
ImageType.Color);
//DepthAndPlayerIndex ImageType
kinect.DepthStream.Open(ImageStreamType.Depth, 2, ImageResolution.Resolution320x240,
ImageType.DepthAndPlayerIndex);
}
void nui_VideoFrameReady(object sender, ImageFrameReadyEventArgs e)
{
colorImage = e.ImageFrame.Image;
image1.Source = BitmapSource.Create(colorImage.Width, colorImage.Height, 96, 96,
PixelFormats.Bgr32, null, colorImage.Bits, colorImage.Width * colorImage.BytesPerPixel);
if (isDepthImage)
{
player1 = GeneratePlayerImage(e.ImageFrame, 1);
image3.Source = player1;
}
}
void nui_DepthFrameReady(object sender, ImageFrameReadyEventArgs e)
{
//Convert depth information for a pixel into color information
byte[] ColoredBytes = GenerateColoredBytes(e.ImageFrame);
depthImage = e.ImageFrame.Image;
image2.Source = BitmapSource.Create(depthImage.Width, depthImage.Height, 96, 96, PixelFormats.Bgr32, null,
ColoredBytes, depthImage.Width * PixelFormats.Bgr32.BitsPerPixel / 8);
isDepthImage = true;
}
private WriteableBitmap GeneratePlayerImage(ImageFrame imageFrame, int playerIndex)
{
int depthWidth = kinect.DepthStream.Width;
int depthHeight = kinect.DepthStream.Height;
WriteableBitmap target = new WriteableBitmap(depthWidth, depthHeight, 96, 96, PixelFormats.Bgra32, null);
var depthRect = new System.Windows.Int32Rect(0, 0, depthWidth, depthHeight);
byte[] color = imageFrame.Image.Bits;
byte[] output = new byte[depthWidth * depthHeight * 4];
//loop over each pixel in the depth image
int outputIndex = 0;
for (int depthY = 0, depthIndex = 0; depthY < depthHeight; depthY++)
{
for(int depthX = 0; depthX < depthWidth; depthX++, depthIndex +=2)
{
short depthValue = (short)(depthImage.Bits[depthIndex] | (depthImage.Bits[depthIndex + 1] << 8));
int colorX, colorY;
kinect.NuiCamera.GetColorPixelCoordinatesFromDepthPixel(
imageFrame.Resolution,
imageFrame.ViewArea,
depthX, depthY, //depth coordinate
depthValue, //depth value
out colorX, out colorY); //color coordinate
//ensure that the calculate color location is within the bounds of the image
colorX = Math.Max(0, Math.Min(colorX, imageFrame.Image.Width - 1));
colorY = Math.Max(0, Math.Min(colorY, imageFrame.Image.Height - 1));
output[outputIndex++] = color[(4 * (colorX + (colorY * imageFrame.Image.Width))) + 0];
output[outputIndex++] = color[(4 * (colorX + (colorY * imageFrame.Image.Width))) + 1];
output[outputIndex++] = color[(4 * (colorX + (colorY * imageFrame.Image.Width))) + 2];
output[outputIndex++] = GetPlayerIndex(depthImage.Bits[depthIndex]) == playerIndex ? (byte)255 : (byte)0;
}
}
target.WritePixels(depthRect, output, depthWidth * PixelFormats.Bgra32.BitsPerPixel / 8, 0);
return target;
//return output;
}
private static int GetPlayerIndex(byte firstFrame)
{
//returns 0 = no player, 1 = 1st player, 2 = 2nd player...
//bitwise & on firstFrame
return (int)firstFrame & 7;
}
}
}
-Edit 1-
I think I've narrowed the problem down, but I'm not sure of a way to resolve it. I assumed that having only one person in the kinect's field of view would return a value of one from my "GetPlayerIndex" method. This is not the case. I was hoping to produce a separate image for each person with the background removed. What type of values should I assume to receive from:
-Edit 2-
From my tests I've noticed that I can a max value of 6 for the player index, but the index that I get isn't consistent. If there a way to know what player index will be assigned to a skeleton? For example, if I were the only person in the fov would there be a way to know that my player index would always be 1?
The player index is not guaranteed to be anything. Once it catches a skeleton, the index will stay the same for that skeleton until it loses sight of it, but you can't assume that the first player will be 1, the second 2, etc.
What you'll need to do is determine a valid skeleton index prior to the player1 = GeneratePlayerImage(e.ImageFrame, 1); call, or alter the GeneratePlayerImage function to find an index. If you're only interested in removing the background and leaving the pixels for all the people in the frame untouched, just change this:
output[outputIndex++] = GetPlayerIndex(depthImage.Bits[depthIndex]) == playerIndex ? (byte)255 : (byte)0;
to this, which will just check for ANY player, instead of a specific player:
output[outputIndex++] = GetPlayerIndex(depthImage.Bits[depthIndex]) != 0 ? (byte)255 : (byte)0;
The other two ways I can think of to do this for a specific player instead of all players:
Open the Kinect's Skeleton feed, and loop through the array of skeletons it gives you to find a valid index. Create a global integer to hold this index, then call the GeneratePlayerImage method with this global integer.
Change the GeneratePlayerImage method to check for a player index in each pixel, and if one is found use that index to remove the background for the entire image (ignore any other index it finds).