Compiling LESS files with broccolisj - broccolijs

I am trying to get broccolijs to compile a directory of less files using broccoli-less. I have altered the "preprocess" function as follows:
var compileLess = require('broccoli-less')
var pickFiles = require('broccoli-static-compiler')
function preprocess (tree) {
tree = filterTemplates(tree, {
extensions: ['hbs', 'handlebars'],
compileFunction: 'Ember.Handlebars.compile'
})
tree = filterCoffeeScript(tree, {
bare: true
})
tree = compileLess(tree, {
compress: false,
})
return tree
}
In my project folder I have a directory called 'less' which I include in Brocfile.js:
var lessStyles = 'less'
lessStyles = pickFiles(lessStyles, {
srcDir: '/',
files: ['main.less'],
destDir: 'appkit'
})
lessStyles = preprocess(lessStyles)
var sourceTrees = [app, styles, vendor, lessStyles]
if (env !== 'production') {
sourceTrees.push(tests)
}
sourceTrees = sourceTrees.concat(findBowerTrees())
Trying to build this project yields the error:
$ broccoli serve
Serving on http://localhost:4200
path.js:360
throw new TypeError('Arguments to path.join must be strings');
^
TypeError: Arguments to path.join must be strings
at path.js:360:15
at Array.filter (native)
at Object.exports.join (path.js:358:36)
at tryPathIndex (/home/kyrre/beekeeper-frontend/node_modules/broccoli-less/node_modules/less/lib/less/index.js:223:37)
at callback.type (/home/kyrre/beekeeper-frontend/node_modules/broccoli-less/node_modules/less/lib/less/index.js:226:29)
at Object.oncomplete (fs.js:107:15)

Sounds like you're probably looking for broccoli-less-single instead of broccoli-less
From the README:
This plugin is designed to compile a single, primary input file into a
single output file, with a tree of #importd dependencies. This differs
from broccoli-less, which compiles each .less file individually into a
.css file and doesn't support #imports or a single output file
depending on multiple inputs.
As an aside, it looks like you're working with Ember.js -- if so, I would strongly recommend using ember-cli instead of rolling your own build pipeline. It easily supports less and provides lots of other features.

Related

How to configure Create-react-app less module with customize-cra(2.x)?

I used create-react-app(typescripts) to build a project, and added antd#3.26.13 with customize-cra as the website I was following told me.
I would like use the module.css, and I want to use module.less, like css, but encountered some error messages:
./src/layout/basic.module.less (./node_modules/css-loader/dist/cjs.js??ref--6-oneOf-8-1!./node_modules/postcss-loader/src??postcss!./node_modules/less-loader/dist/cjs.js??ref--6-oneOf-8-3!./src/layout/basic.module.less)
ValidationError: Invalid options object. CSS Loader has been initialized using an options object that does not match the API schema.
- options has an unknown property 'localIdentName'. These properties are valid:
object { url?, import?, modules?, sourceMap?, importLoaders?, localsConvention?, onlyLocals?, esModule? }
My code follows:
const {
override,
addWebpackAlias,
fixBabelImports,
addLessLoader,
addDecoratorsLegacy
} = require('customize-cra');
module.exports = override(
addWebpackAlias({
"#":require('path').resolve(__dirname,"src")
}),
fixBabelImports('import',{
libraryName:'antd',
libraryDirectory:'es',
style:true
}),
addLessLoader({
javascriptEnabled:true,
modifyVars:{'#primary-color':'#1DA57A'},
}),
addDecoratorsLegacy()
);
The current version of customize-cra isn't compatible with the latest version of create-react-app, to be precise with css-loader. Try to install customize-cra#next to get alpha version. They fixed that issue there.

intern.js How to test legacy non modular code

I'm using intern.js as a test framework to test dojo modules and it works well.
Now I have to test some non modular legacy code but I can't.
This is an example of a simple file to test:
var Component = function() {
this.itWorks = function() {
return true;
}
};
And this is the test
define([
'intern!object',
'intern/chai!assert',
'intern/order!controls/component',
], function (registerSuite, assert) {
registerSuite({
name: 'test legacy code',
'simple test': function () {
console.log(Component);
}
});
});
The test fails sayng that "Component is not defined".
I've notice that it works only if I write
window.Component = Component
At the bottom of file to test.
I can't modify all the file to test, is it possible to test the file in a different way?
This should work fine. One possible issue is where you're loading component from. The 'controls/component' dependency in 'intern/order!controls/component' is, barring any special loader config, relative to the file doing the loading. That means that if the project is setup like this:
project/
controls/
component.js
tests/
intern.js
componentTest.js
and component is being loaded from componentTest.js, then the dependency should be 'intern/order!../controls/component.js'. (It will actually work without the '../' in this case since controls is a top level directory in the project.)
Another potential issue is that a non-AMD identifier should use the .js suffix. This tells the loader that the thing being loaded is a generic script rather than an AMD module.
Also note that the order plugin is only needed to load multiple legacy files in a specific order. If order doesn't matter, or you're just loading one script, you can just use the script itself '../controls/component.js' as the dependency.
<"/"https://stackoverflow.com/tags" term="legacy" /">
<"/!-- begin snippet: js hide: false console: true babel: false --"/">
"var Component" = function() {
"this.itWorks" = function() {
return=true;
}
};
<"/"!-- end snippet --"/">

Using Bower with Express

I'm a late arrival to the Bower scene. I thought I'd try it with my current Express project. I installed it, and created the .bowercc and bower.json file per instructions. I installed a Bootstrap skin I planned on using, which brought with it jQuery. The thing is, you get tons of files, and I'd like to use just the minified versions of JS, CSS and fonts.
After scowering the net, I found a lot about using gulp or grunt to sift through the files, and pipe them to the /public folder Express provides. My question is: how do you do it properly? How do I get just the files I need there? Or am I better off foregoing bower and just downloading the zip file, picking up the end result and placing in the /public folder?
Looking at the comments, it seems like the answer is yes - manual job is required to get your components distributeables to your public folder. Using gulp will automate it, but basically it'd be a hit-and-miss at first, requiring some fine tuning. In case someone lands on this question, here's the solution I went with:
1) Provide package overrides in the bower.json file to ake sure only the minified files are exposed:
{
"name": "charlie",
"dependencies": {
"bootstrap-material-design": "~0.3.0"
},
"overrides": {
"bootstrap-material-design": {
"main": ["**/dist/js/*.min.js", "**/dist/css/*.min.css", "**/dist/fonts/*"]
},
"jquery": {
"main": "**/dist/jquery.min.js"
}
}
}
2) Use the main-bower-files gulp package to grab those "mains" and distribute them to the final locations. Here's my gulpfile.json (just the bower part:
var bower = require('main-bower-files');
var gulpFilter = require('gulp-filter');
var uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
var minifyCSS = require('gulp-minify-css');
var clean = require('gulp-clean');
var debug = require('gulp-debug');
var getDist = function(vendor) {
var publicDir = 'public';
var dist = vendor ? publicDir + '/vendor' : publicDir;
return {
dir: dist,
css: dist + '/css/',
js: dist + '/js/',
fonts: dist + '/fonts/'
};
};
gulp.task('cleanVendor', function() {
return gulp.src(getDist(true).dir, {read: false})
.pipe(clean());
});
gulp.task('bower', ['cleanVendor'], function() {
var dist = getDist(true);
var jsFilter = gulpFilter('**/*.js');
var cssFilter = gulpFilter('**/*.css');
var fontsFilter = gulpFilter(['**/*.woff*', '**/*.eot', '**/*.svg', '**/*.ttf']);
return gulp.src(bower())
.pipe(fontsFilter)
.pipe(gulp.dest(dist.fonts))
.pipe(fontsFilter.restore())
.pipe(jsFilter)
.pipe(gulp.dest(dist.js))
.pipe(jsFilter.restore())
.pipe(cssFilter)
.pipe(gulp.dest(dist.css))
.pipe(cssFilter.restore());
});
3) In your HTML file, include /vendor/js/blah.min.js or /vendor/css/blah.min.css
Note: the annoying part was that I had to specify every font extension in the fontsFilter. I tried using '**/fonts/*' but main-bower-files returns a flat list of files, and if you provide the {base: 'mybase'} parameter, it returns a tree, meaning you get the entire tree structure per file - anyone who can come up with a fix, is invited to submit an answer.

Using gon with jasmine-rails

Our backbone app uses gon. When we try to run our tests, we are getting a gon is undefined error in the console of the browser. Our layout file includes a call to include_gon, but that file is not being loaded by jasmine, so jasmine is failing in our first javascript file that contains gon. We tried creating a helper to assign the gon variable to an empty hash (like a fixture), but the helper was called after the first call to gon and therefore didn't fix our issue.
The secret was to use the asset pipeline to define the load order of my files. I commented out these lines from jasmine.yml
# path to parent directory of src_files
# relative path from Rails.root
# defaults to app/assets/javascripts
#src_dir: "app/assets/javascripts"
# list of file expressions to include as source files
# relative path from src_dir
#src_files:
# - "application.{js.coffee,js,coffee}"
And created spec.js.coffee with these lines:
#= require application
#= require jasmine-jquery
Now my js files get loaded in order and I am good to go.
What worked for me was to define window.gon = {} inside the test like so:
describe("A suite is just a function", function() {
beforeEach(function() {
window.gon = {}
gon.test = "this"
})
it ("should find gon", function() {
expect(gon.test).toBe("this")
})
})

Including dojo/dom library to Spring Roo

How is it possible to include and use the dojo/dom library in Spring roo.
This:
<script type="text/javascript">
dojo.require('dojo/dom');
dojo.ready(function remAttr(){
dojo.removeAttr('theId', 'value');
}
);
</script>
results in:
"NetworkError: 404 Introuvable - http://localhost:8131/suivitrc/resources/dojo/dom.js"
dom.js
Could not load 'dojo/dom'; last tried '../dojo/dom.js'
Can anyone please help?
I think the version of dojo in roo is currently less than 1.7. This means you can remove the following line from your code because the remoteAttr function is part of dojo.js:
dojo.require('dojo/dom');
see here: http://dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/1.7/dojo/removeAttr.html
The namespace => to module path is retreived by replacing periods (.), in short - you need to replace the slash with a dot. Your require should be
dojo.require('dojo.dom'); // blocking call? djConfig.async must be false
Since the error is in regards to the dojo.require specified path, this means your dojo.js is found and loaded (dojo.require is not undefined) - and baseUrl is not of concern to dojo modules.
The thing is, youre using the legacy loader to pull in an AMD module, in 1.7+ the require statement has a different look to it.
// AMD loader form is
function callbackFunctionOnComplete(dojoDom) { }
require([ "dojo/dom" ], callbackFunctionOnComplete); // non-blocking
So, how dojo.require works is following, assume that the parameter we pass as string is called 'module;
dojo.require = function(module) {
var parts = module.split('.');
1 - get toplevel namespace (global)
var packageName = parts.shift(); // first part is the package name
2 - get the filename (minus .js)
var id = parts.pop(); // the last bit
3 - translate everything in between to a path (relative to packagelocation)
var mid = parts.join("/");
4 - lookup package (from toplevel) location
var fullpath = // in pseudo
foreach dojoconfig.packages
iff obj.name == packageName
set to obj.location
5 append the rest and start downloading module
fullpath += mid + id + '.js'
transport.get(..... fullpath .....)
You need to configure dojo with dojo config. I prefer the form explained here:
http://dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/1.7/dojo/_base/config.html#explicitly-creating-a-dojoconfig-object-before-including-the-dojo-core.
And you need to tell dojo where to find its stuff. An example:
var dojoConfig =
{
baseUrl : "/yourApp/js", // defines the js folder in your webapp
tlmSiblingOfDojo: false,
async: true,
parseOnLoad:true,
packages: [
{ name: "app", location: "app"}, // where it is in the js folder
{ name: "dojo", location: "lib/dojo" }, // where it is in the js folder
{ name: "dijit", location: "lib/dijit" },
{ name: "dojox", location: "lib/dojox" }
]
};
Also the require form you are using is deprecated. See http://livedocs.dojotoolkit.org/dojo/require