SignalR Siverlight Cliet side code - vb.net

I am trying to write a simplest silverlight client code for method which can be called from server without parameters. Bellow is my code in VB:
hubProxy.On(Of String)("received", Function() Context.Post(Sub() textBox.Text += "Notified!", Nothing))
But I am getting error “Expression does not produce a value”.
Any help please.

In VB.NET Functions must return a value. Since your anonymous function only has one expression, Context.Post(Sub() textBox.Text += "Notified!", Nothing), the value produced by that expression is returned by the Function. The problem is that your one expression doesn't produce a value at all.
Since Context.Post is itself a Sub (or void-returning in C/C# parlance) instead of a Function, there is no value to return from the Function you pass to hubProxy.On.
Long story short: the Function you are passing into hubProxy.On should really be a Sub since it doesn't return a value. You are already using an anonymous Sub in your call to Context.Post:
hubProxy.On(Of String)("received",
Sub() Context.Post(Sub() textBox.Text += "Notified!", Nothing)

Related

vb.net Ignore stepping through certain functions when using F5

When I use the debugger and F5 to follow along what is currently being called in my app, I have some functions which I don't want the debugger to go through.
These functions are not important to me, and I know what they are doing. Having the debugger step through each line of this function is just taking my time.
How could I make it so that the debugger ignores the function?
Thank you!
With the help of #Jimi, I found a VB.net solution.
One has to add
<DebuggerStepThrough()>
over the first line of the function.
For example:
<DebuggerStepThrough()>
Public Function StrLen(ByVal uString As String) As Integer
If (Not uString Is Nothing) AndAlso (Not uString = String.Empty) Then
Return uString.Length
Else
Return 0
End If
End Function

Change color of created plane [duplicate]

I am getting the 800A0414 error in lines 7 and 12 of this script:
Module Module1
Dim p
Sub Main()
CreateObject("Wscript.Shell").Run("program.bat", 0, True)
p = Process.GetProcessesByName("program")
If p.Count > 0 Then
WScript.Sleep(300000)
Else
CreateObject("Wscript.Shell").Run("program clean up.bat", 0, True)
End If
End Sub
Private Function WScript() As Object
Throw New NotImplementedException
End Function
End Module
I am trying to run a batch script, that starts a process, then wait until the process terminates, then run another batch script. I also do not want any command boxes being shown. If their is a easier way please let me know.
Thanks for your help
When you enclose a procedure's argument list in parentheses, you must use the Call keyword:
Call CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run("program.bat", 0, True)
If you omit the Call keyword, you must also drop parentheses:
CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run "program.bat", 0, True
To complete what's been said before:
When Call keyword is used to call a procedure (i.e. sub or function) the arguments must be enclosed in parentheses, except when the procedure has no arguments in which case the parentheses are optional. For example all the statements:
Call test()
Call test
Call test(1,2)
are valid, but not this one:
Call test 1
When calling a procedure without using the Call keyword, the parentheses can only be used when either the procedure has zero or one argument or the procedure has a return value (i.e. is a function) and its value is used in the same statement. For example all the statements:
test()
test(1)
test(1,2)
a = test
a = test(1,2)
a = test(test(1,2),2)
are valid, except the third one which has more than one argument. In case it's not clear, the inner call of "test" in the last statement is valid because its return value is used as an argument to another call.
Note that whenever parentheses is used in this text, it is meant to imply the possible comma-separated values as well.
Seems to me this is a VB.NET, not VBScript code.
You have Shell function in VB.NET (and other methods).
Anyway, Run returns any error code returned by the program, and if you
store that result in a variable, you can use parentheses in this case.
Dim lResult As Long
lResult = CreateObject("Wscript.Shell").Run("program.bat", 0, True)
The rest was answered by #Helen.

VB.NET GetProcessesByName method is missing

I'm building a program in VB whose purpose is to run in the background and automatically update other programs I've created. To do this, it has to check if those programs are still running and, if they are, wait for them to close.
Unfortunately, the program won't compile. The exception states: GetProcessesByName is not a member of String. (The string it refers to is the Process parameter shown in the code below.)
I can't understand why this is happening, because this method has always worked without problems. I'm using Visual Studio 2015. For your reference, here's the code block:
Private Function CheckIfRunning(Process As String) As Boolean
Dim MyProcess() As Process
MyProcess = Process.GetProcessesByName("ProcessName")
If MyProcess.Count > 0 Then
Return True
Else
Return False
End If
End Function
Try using System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcessesByName("ProcessName")
Since you've declared Process as a string parameter, Process.GetProcessesByName refers to the string instead of the System.Diagnostics method. Alternatively, you can use a different name for the string parameter.

Function in VB that doesn't have a return type

I am not much familiar with Visual Basic 6.0 and am not having a VB compiler installed, but I was looking at some VB code for some debugging and saw this:
Private Function IsFieldDeleted(oLayoutField As Object)
Dim oColl As Collection
Set oColl = GetFieldIdsForField(oLayoutField)
IsFieldDeleted = (oColl.Count = 0)
Set oColl = Nothing
End Function
In other functions I see they define the return type with an "As" for example "As Boolean" but this one does not have an "As" :D and then how they have used it is like this:
If Not IsFieldDeleted(oRptField.GetUCMRLayoutField) Then
Call oCollection.Add(oRptField, oRptField.ObjectKeyString)
Call AddToNewLineSeperatedString(sCaseFldDescMsg, oFld.FieldDescription)
End If
How is this working? Is it just like rewriting it and saying that the function returns an integer and compare the return type to be either 0 or 1? Or are there some other hidden tips in there?
When no type is specified, in VB.NET it assumes Object for the return type. In VB6, it assumes Variant. In VB.NET you can make things much more obvious by turning Option Strict On, but I don't believe that option was available in VB6.
The value that is returned, in reality, is still typed as a Boolean, but you are viewing the returned value as a Variant. So, to do it "properly", you really ought to cast the return value like this:
If Not CBool(IsFieldDeleted(oRptField.GetUCMRLayoutField)) Then
....
End If
Calling CBool casts the value to a Boolean instead of a Variant. This is unnecessary, though, since VB will use late-binding to determine the type of the return value is a boolean.
The best thing to do in this case is to change the function to As Boolean. Doing so will not break any existing code since that's all it ever returned anyway. However, if it's a public member in a DLL, that would break compatibility.

Syntax: "Exit Sub" or "Return" in VB.NET subroutines

Both "Exit Sub" or "Return" seem to accomplish the same thing -- exit a subroutine. Is there any difference in how they work under the covers?
That is,
Private Sub exitNow()
Exit Sub
End Sub
or
Private Sub exitNow()
Return
End Sub
From the doc:
In a Sub or Set procedure, the Return statement is equivalent to an Exit Sub or Exit Property statement, and expression must not be supplied.
So they're the same in this context.
(Return (<value>) is used in functions and property.get's. Obviously slightly different in that context).
I tend to prefer Return over Exit Sub. Because once in a while you change from Sub to Function. In this case Exit Sub could be converted to Exit Function, but this assumes that there was a previous assignment to the function name (alike VB 6), which most probably didn't happen. Return would catch this situation - if the method should return a value, Return with no argument will fail at compile time.
If you inspect the IL output of the 2 statements, they are the same. However, since ’return’ is meant for pushing something back to the caller, so strictly speaking, ‘Exit Sub’ is more suitable for using in a Sub.
They are the same in this context.
However, from the code readability point of view, "Exit Sub" would be clearer since the "Return" indicates that something some value is being used as an output (which is not the case with Sub-routines).
First of all, Procedures comes with sub, we should know that we are working on specific procedures that don't return a specific value with the ability of passing some specific parameters or even without passing any parameter. Such as:
Print something().
Calculate the factorial of integer number CalcFact(X).
Do some processes for a specific task.
Function is a specific process programmed to achieve a specific task by also passing some specific parameters, and it has to return some value that can be used to to complete the overall task, such as validation the user name and user pass.
In short Sub Doesn't return value and we call it directly "Print HelloWorld()" , whereas functions do such as:
ValidUsersNameAndPass("Johne","jOhNe13042019") ' This could return a Boolean value.
ValidUsersNameAndPass("Johne","jOhNe13042019"); // This could return a Boolean value.
I wanted to confirm that they act the same in lambda expressions too, and they do:
Sub test()
Dim a As Action = Sub() Exit Sub
Dim b As Action = Sub() Return
a()
b()
MsgBox("Yes they do!")
End Sub
While there are exceptions like guard clauses, in most cases I would consider either a sign that the method is too long.