I want to find the rows which are similar to each other, and update a field if a row has any similar row. My table looks like this:
OrderID | Price | Minimum Number | Maximum Number | Volume | Similar
1 45 2 10 250 0
2 46 2 10 250 0
3 60 2 10 250 0
"Similar" in this context means that the rows that have same Maximum Number, Minimum Number, and Volume. Prices can be different, but the difference can be at most 2.
In this example, orders with OrderID of 1 and 2 are similar, but 3 has no similar row (since even if it has same Minimum Number, Maximum Number, and Volume, but its price is not within 2 units from orders 1 and 2).
Then, I want to update the filed "Similar" for orders 1 and 2 from the default value (0) to 1. So, the output for the example above would be:
OrderID | Price | Minimum Number | Maximum Number | Volume | Similar
1 45 2 10 250 1
2 46 2 10 250 1
3 60 2 10 250 0
Here is one method that is ANSI standard SQL that will work in most databases, including Oracle. It implements the logic that you set out using a correlated subquery:
update table t
set similar = 1
where exists (select 1
from table t2
where t2.minimum = t.minimum and
t2.maximum = t.maximum and
t2.volume = t.volume and
abs(t2.price - t.price) <= 2 and
t2.OrderId <> t.OrderId
);
EDIT:
It occurs to me that the "similar" field might be the minimum OrderId of the similar fields. You can extend the above idea to:
update table t
set similar = (select min(orderId)
from table t2
where t2.minimum = t.minimum and
t2.maximum = t.maximum and
t2.volume = t.volume and
abs(t2.price - t.price) <= 2 and
t2.OrderId <> t.OrderId
)
where exists (select 1
from table t2
where t2.minimum = t.minimum and
t2.maximum = t.maximum and
t2.volume = t.volume and
abs(t2.price - t.price) <= 2 and
t2.OrderId <> t.OrderId
);
Although if this were the case, the default value should be NULL and not 0.
Related
i've have a MS-SQL table which contains the following columns:
ID, SKU, StockID, StockQTY
The columns/rows are filled like:
ID
SKU
StockID
StockQTY
1
1111
1
12
2
1111
13
20
3
2222
1
0
4
2222
13
5
5
3333
1
0
6
3333
13
4
Now i need a SQL query which show all SKU (second column) which have a StockQTY = 0 in StockID = 1 AND a StockQTY > 1 in StockID 13. All other rows should not be shown (in this example row 1 and 2 should not be shown in the result).
Have anyone an idea how to realize this?
You can use a correlated subquery to test for skus that have 0 qty in StockID 1 and then just keep anything that has a qty greater than 1 in your StockID 13.
SELECT SKU
FROM yourtable yt
WHERE Stockid = 13
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM yourtable WHERE StockID = 1 AND yt.SKU = SKU)
HAVING Sum(StockQty) > 1
Try something like:
SELECT SKU FROM yourTableName WHERE
(StockQTY = 0 AND StockID = 1) OR (StockQTY > 1 AND StockID = 13);
To pull data obviously it is a SELECT statement, you could use * instead of SKU if you want ALL the data instead of just the SKU number. Exchange yourTableName with the actual table name. The WHERE clause is the meat of your question. This use of OR and AND can be confusing. We have 2 cases we are testing. One where the stock is 0 but the ID is 1, but we use the OR so that regardless if that is found or not, we can then do the next part where the StockQTY is 1 and the StockID is 13. You need the and for both conditions in the own case, and you want OR so that either of these two cases will pull up.
I have following tables.
Part
id
name
1
Part 1
2
Part 2
3
Part 3
Operation
id
name
part_id
order
1
Op 1
1
10
2
Op 2
1
20
3
Op 3
1
30
4
Op 1
2
10
5
Op 2
2
20
6
Op 1
3
10
Lot
id
part_id
Operation_id
10
1
2
11
2
5
12
3
6
I am selecting the results from Lot table and I want to select a column last_Op which is based on the order value of the operation_id. If value of order for the operation_id is the highest for the respective part_id, return 1 else return 0
SELECT
id,
part_id,
operation_id,
last_Op
FROM Lot
expected result set based on the tables above.
id
part_id
operation_id
last_op
10
1
2
0
11
2
5
1
12
3
6
1
In above example, first row returns last_op = 0 because operation_id = 2 is associated with part_id = 1 and it has the highest order = 30. Since operation_id for this part is not pointing towards the highest order value, 0 is returned.
The other two rows return 1 because operation_id 5 and 6 are associated with part_id 2 and 3 respectively and they are pointing towards the highest 'order' value.
If value of order for the operation_id is the highest for the respective part_id, return 1 else return 0
This sounds like window functions will help:
select l.*,
(case when o.order = o.max_order then 1 else 0 end) as last_op
from lot l left join
(select o.*,
max(o.order) over (partition by o.part_id) as max_order
from operations o
) o
on l.operation_id = o.id;
Note: order is a very poor name for a column because it is a SQL keyword.
Here's the case: I have one table myTable which contains 3 columns:
ID int, identity
Group varchar(2), not null
value decimal(18,0), not null
Table looks like this:
ID GROUP VALUE Prev_Value Result
------------------------------------------
1 A 20 0 20
2 A 30 20 10
3 A 35 30 5
4 B 100 0 100
5 B 150 100 50
6 B 300 200 100
7 C 40 0 40
8 C 60 40 20
9 A 50 35 15
10 A 70 50 20
Prev_Value and Result columns should be custom columns. I need to make it on view. Anyone can help? please... Thank you so much.
The gist of what you need to do here is to join the table to itself, where part of the join condition is that the value column of the joined copy of the table is less than value column of the original. Then you can group by the columns from the original table and select the max value from the joined table to get your results:
SELECT t1.id, t1.[Group], t1.Value
, coalesce(MAX(t2.Value),0) As Prev_Value
, t1.Value - coalesce(MAX(t2.Value),0) As Result
FROM MyTable t1
LEFT JOIN MyTable t2 ON t2.[Group] = t1.[Group] and t2.Value < t1.Value
GROUP BY t1.id, t1.[Group], t1.Value
Once you can update to Sql Server 2012 you'll also be able to take advantage of the new LAG keyword.
I have a table MOUVEMENTS which has 3 columns :
ID IDREF NUMBER
1 1 5
2 1 3
3 1 4
4 1 2
5 2 1
I'd like to fetch the rows of this table with that constraints :
IDREF = 1
Ordered by ID ASC
and the X first SUM of NUMBER (by IDREF)
I imagine that we will first calculate the SUM. And then we will restrict with that column
ID IDREF NUMBER SUM
1 1 5 5
2 1 3 8
3 1 4 12
4 1 2 2
5 2 1 1
In this case, if we want to have 11, we will take the two first column + the third and we will change the number to have a coherent value.
So the result awaited :
ID IDREF NUMBER SUM
1 1 5 5
2 1 3 8
3 1 3 11
Please note the change in the third line on the NUMBER and SUM column.
Do you know how to achieve that ?
This query should work from sql 2000 to 2008 R2
I've created a solution here which uses a view: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!3/ebb01/15
The view contains a running total column for each IDRef:
CREATE VIEW MouvementsRunningTotals
AS
SELECT
A.ID,
A.IDRef,
MAX(A.Number) Number,
SUM (B.Number) RunningTotal
FROM
Mouvements A
LEFT JOIN Mouvements B ON A.ID >= B.ID AND A.IDRef = B.IDRef
GROUP BY
A.ID,
A.IDRef
If you can't create a view then you could create this as a temporary table in tsql.
Then the query is a self join on that view, in order to determine which is the last row to be include based on the Number you pass in. Then a CASE statement ensures the correct value for the last row:
DECLARE #total int
DECLARE #idRef int
SELECT #total = 4
SELECT #idRef = 1
SELECT
A.ID,
A.IDRef,
CASE
WHEN A.RunningTotal <= #total THEN A.Number
ELSE #total - B.RunningTotal
END Number
FROM
MouvementsRunningTotals A
LEFT JOIN MouvementsRunningTotals B ON
A.IDRef = B.IDRef
AND A.RunningTotal - A.Number = B.RunningTotal
WHERE
A.IDRef = #IDRef
AND (A.RunningTotal <= #total
OR (A.RunningTotal > #total AND B.RunningTotal < #total))
You can add more data in the Build Schema box and change the Number in the #total parameter in the Query box to test it.
select id, (select top 1 number from mouvements) as number, idref
from mouvements where idref=1 order by id asc
I have the following datasets (just a sample):
Table1:
ID MAX AMT SORTED
1 20 0 1
1 30 0 2
1 40 0 3
1 50 0 4
2 0 0 1
2 30 0 2
2 40 0 3
2 40 0 4
...
Table2:
ID AMT
1 75
2 70
...
I must update Table1.AMT from Table2.AMT using this rules:
Table1 and Table2 are joined on ID
Table1.AMT can't hold larger value than MAX
if Table2.AMT >= Table1.MAX then Table1.AMT = Table1.MAX... then on the next row update Table1.AMT with Table2.AMT - previous record AMT still using the above rules.
So the expected output would be
ID MAX AMT SORTED
1 20 20 1
1 30 30 2
1 40 25 3
1 50 0 4
2 0 0 1
2 30 30 2
2 40 40 3
2 40 0 4
...
How can one achieve that?
I thought of creating a temp table with an aggregated SUM() of Table1.MAX, and using that as a reference to update Table1.AMT (if SUM(MAX) < Table2.AMT then Table1.AMT = Table1.MAX else Table1.AMT = previous records SUM(MAX)).
But can it be done without a temp table? (Sadly I can't create functions and procedures in my work env.)
More efficient solution can be made using specifics or Oracle PL/SQL.
Here is a generic solution:
select t1.ID, min(t1.MAX) as MAX, least(min(t1.MAX),coalesce(min(t2.AMT),0)-coalesce(least(sum(t1p.MAX-t1p.AMT), min(t2.AMT)),0)+min(t1.AMT)) as AMT, t1.SORTED
from Table1 t1
left join Table2 t2 on t2.ID = t1.ID
left join Table1 t1p on t1p.ID = t1.ID and t1p.SORTED < t1.SORTED
group by t1.ID, t1.SORTED
order by t1.ID, t1.SORTED
explanation of calculating AMT:
AMT is smallest of "MAX for the row" and "How much is possible"
least(min(t1.MAX),"How much is possible")
"How much is possible": max available - how much was given for previous rows + how much we already have
coalesce(min(t2.AMT),0) - "how much was given for previous rows" + min(t1.AMT)
"how much was given for previous rows": smalles of how much required to fill and how much possible
coalesce(least(sum(t1p.MAX-t1p.AMT), min(t2.AMT)),0)