I am a bit confused about the different options to handle file downloads on iOS.
I want to be able to handle > 2.000 downloads a time, so some kind of parallelism would be nice
I want a download to be started immediately when fired
I want a download not to be paused or stopped when sending the app to the background
The concrete scenario is a bunch of downloads which are made initially after the user logs into the application. Here I have to download that many files which are mainly small images.
Currently I am using NSURLSessionConfiguration's defaultSessionConfiguration, but going this way the downloads get paused when the user suspends the app (which is likely as the full process needs some minutes).
NSURLSessionConfiguration backgroundSessionConfiguration seems to be the better way to go, but I am seeing delays of up to 20-30 seconds before anything happens after initializing. That's propably okay for some scenarios, but not for mine.
So is there a way to get a workaround to that delay issue? Otherwise I will propably go the "old way" and just download the files in background threads on my own with the 10 minutes limitation.
Related
I am using the UI Automation COM-to-.NET Adapter to read the contents of the target Google Chrome browser that plays a FLASH content on Windows 7. It works.
I succeeded to get the content and elements. Everything works fine for some time but after few hours the elements become inaccessible.
The (AutomationElement).FindAll() returns 0 children.
Is there any internal undocumented Timeout used by UIAutomation ?
According to this IUIAutomation2 interface
There are 2 timeouts but they are not accessible from IUIAutomation interface.
IUIAutomation2 is supported only on Windows 8 (desktop apps only).
So I believe there is some timeout.
I made a workaround that restarts the searching and monitoring of elements from the beginning of the desktop tree but the elements are still not available.
After some time (not sure how much) the elements are available again.
My requirements are to read the values all the time as fast as possible but this behavior makes a damage to the whole architecture.
I read somewhere that there is some timeout of 3 minutes but not sure.
if there is a timeout, is it possible to change it ?
Is it possible to restart something or release/dispose something ?
I can't find anything on MSDN.
Does anybody have any idea what is happening and how to resolve ?
Thanks for this nicely put question. I have a similar issue with a much different setup. I'm on Win7, using UIAutomationCore.dll directly from C# to test our application-under-development. After running my sequence of actions & event subscriptions and all the other things, I intermittently observe that the UIA interface stops working (about 8-10min in my case, but I'm heavily using the UIA interface).
Many different things including dispatching the COM interface, sleeping at different places failed. The funny revelation was I managed to use the AccEvent.exe (part of SDK like inspect.exe) during the test and saw that events also stopped flowing to AccEvent, too. So it wasn't my client's interface that stopped, but it was rather the COM-server (or whatever the UIAutomationCore does) that stopped responding.
As a solution (that seems to work most of the time - or improve the situation a lot), I decided I should give the application-under-test some breathing point, since using the UIA puts additional load on it. This could be a smartly-put sleep points in your client, but instead of sleeping a set time, I'm monitoring the processor load of the application and waiting until it settles down.
One of the intermittent errors I receive when the problem manifests itself is "... was unable to call any of the subscribers..", and my search resulted in an msdn page saying they have improved things on CUIAutomation8 interface, but as this is Windows8 specific, I didn't have the chance to try that yet.
I should also add that I also reduced the number of calls to UIA by incorporating more ui caching (FindAllBuildCache), as the less the frequency of back-and-forth the better it is for the uia. Thanks to the answer of Guy in another question: UI Automation events stop being received after a while monitoring an application and then restart after some time
we are facing a problem.
we have background requests that are downloading files constantly (up to 5MB each file). meanwhile, we have a UI that most navigations require REST calls.
we limited the number of background downloads so it won't suffocate the operationQueue that RESTkit uses.
when several files are downloaded in background, we see the network usage with 1->2 MB (which is understandable).
The problem is: the user navigates through the app, and each navigation calls a quick REST call that should return very little data. but because of the background downloads, the UI call is taking forever (~10 seconds).
Priority did not help, i saw that the UI call i make instantly is handled by the operation queue (because we limited the downloads limit and the NSOperationQueue had more space to fulfill other requests.
when we limited the concurrent REST download calls to 5 - the REST calls from the UI took 10 seconds.
when we limited the concurrent REST download calls to 2 - everything worked fine.
the issue here is that because we let only 2 downloads occur in the background - the whole background operation of downloading files will take forever.
the best scenario would be that every UI call would be considered as most important network-wise and even pause the background operations and let only the UI call to be handled - then resume the background operation - but i'm not sure it's possible.
any other idea to address this issue?
You could use 2 RKObjectManagers so that you have 2 separate queues, then use one for 'UI' and the other for 'background'. On top of that you can set the concurrent limits for each queue differently and you could suspend the background queue. Note that suspending the queue doesn't mean already running operations are paused, it just stops new operations from being started.
By doing this you can gain some control, but better options really are to limit the data flow, particularly when running on a mobile data network, and to inform the user what is happening so they can accept the situation or pause it till later.
I have an application where I need to create local notifications via polling without doing push - primarily due to client infrastructure limitations and their security model.
I've read: http://www.objc.io/issue-5/multitasking.html, I've seen David Chan's WWDC presentation - where single push messages kick off download tasks - but what I truly need is background fetch - on a regular basis - like every ten minutes - in iOS 7.
I've seen the VOIP hacks. No. What non-hack way is there to do this without user interaction or push messages? Any examples you can point me to?
Here's what I know:
Background data tasks will work in the debugger but if you can get a console on an IPA, you'll quickly find out they really are prohibited (thereby invalidated many examples).
Background URL tasks require custom delegates - but fetch completion handlers are iffy. This too I found with an IPA and console.
I would love to avoid using the AFNetworking lib - for something quite simple.
Background fetch is not a reliable solution - you are at the mercy of the OS, and it is not very merciful. Abusing iOS background modes is not a reliable solution - Apple is known to reject applications that enable background modes, such as location, VOIP and music playback, without a legitimate reason. Background URL tasks are not something you can rely upon to wake your app; they will wake it, but the app will not be awake enough in the background to enqueue a background URL task.
Your best and most intended method is still background fetch, but be prepared to be disappointed. Your app will not be woken app in the interval you need. Also, the user can kill the app in the app switcher screen, causing your app to never wake up until opened.
No real reliable method other than push. You need to insist with your client for the sake of user experience.
Unfortunately there is no "reliable" way to do that on iOS. With the background fetch API you are not guaranteed to have process run when you would like it run. As you've said, you've already looked at the API so i'm probably telling you something that you already know. A local notification wouldn't solve your issue either as this isn't a way that you can wake your application up and kick off network events. This is behavior that Apple doesn't want as this would negate the whole purpose of their background task coalescing.
You really need to have a push mechanism in place for something like this, so if this is something that is needed, then you may have to stress that to the client.
this is a question we've all wondered about a number of times, and no one seems to have a good answer.
How do apps like DataMan run on a regular basis in the background, indefinitely, and still get into the app store?
The app allows a user to turn on "precise data tracking" and select a frequency at which the app updates it's data usage counters with zero user interaction - the intervals are once every minute, once every 10 minutes, and once every 20 minutes.
Yes, I've read all the associated Apple Documentation on background processes and implemented many of them successfully. I've also explored the ins and outs of this old post, but it's old enough now that many of those "loop holes" have been patched and the documented stuff works better anyway.
While I've had great luck with registering my app as a VOIP app and requesting a keep-alive at certain intervals, it's not app-store-ok unless it's a VOIP app (DataMan isn't). Furthermore, registering for VOIP keep-alives doesn't actually exhibit the same behavior as DataMan...VOIP keep-alive calls come at somewhat-random intervals, or at least at the frequency you select without syncing up to clock time. DataMan actually falls in line with clock-mandated intervals and updates its data counters at the :10, :20, :30 minute marks, etc.
Any ideas?
According to their support site, their pro version just got pulled by apple. I would bet that their other versions are next.
Just because you manage to sneak something past the review team doesn't mean they won't catch it later, or that other people will succeed. What they're doing is clearly against Apple's guidelines if they are not also offering one of the approved background services.
I have created a web-service app and i want to populate my view controllers according to the response i fetch(via GET) in main thread. But i want to create a scheduled timer which will go and control my server, if there becomes any difference(let's say if the count of an array has changed) i will create a local notification. As far as i read from here and some google results, i cant run my app in background more then ten minutes expect from some special situations(Audio, Vo-IP, GPS).. But i need to control the server at least one per minute.. Can anyone offer some idea-or link please?
EDIT
I will not sell the app in store, just for a local area network. Let's say, from the server i will send some text messages to the users and if a new message comes, the count of messages array will increment, in this situation i will create a notification. I need to keep this 'controlling' routing alive forever, whether in foreground or background. Does GCD give such a solution do anyone have any idea?
Just simply play a mute audio file in loop in the background, OR, ping the user's location in the background. Yes, that will drain the battery a bit, but it's a simple hack for in-home applications. Just remember to enable the background types in your Info.plist!
Note: "[...] I fetch (via GET) in main thread." This is not a good approach. You should never fetch any network resources on the main thread. Why? Because your GUI, which is maintained by the main thread, will become unresponsive whenever a fetch isn't instantaneous. Any lag spike on the network results in a less than desirable user experience.
Answer: Aside from the listed special situations, you can't run background apps. The way I see it:
Don't put the app in the background. (crappy solution)
Try putting another "entity" between the app and the "server". I don't know why you "need to control the server at least one per minute" but perhaps you can delegate this "control" to another process outside the device?
.
iOS app -> some form of proxy server -> server which requires
"babysitting" every minute.