I implemented an NSArrayController subclass to implement row reordering with bindings, using the code included in this post as a starting point. In the -tableView:acceptDrop:row:dropOperation: method, I perform the following:
[self removeObjectAtArrangedObjectIndex:removeIndex];
[self insertObject:object atArrangedObjectIndex:insertIndex];
The above code updates the model twice (one for each statement).
For my purposes, I would like to have only one update.
Is there any way to achieve this?
Thanks.
There's always the possibility of replacing the entire array if you want to incorporate many changes to an array into a single operation.
This might have unexpected effects for e.g. objects in the UI bound to your array, though.
I ended up doing the following:
[_content removeObject: [objects objectAtIndex: removeIndex]]; // < Here's the hack
[self insertObject:object atArrangedObjectIndex:insertIndex];
Where _content is in fact the content array of the controller.
The above works fine in my case (as described in my question).
Related
I've got a NSMutableArray (containing NSMutableDictionary instances) bound to an NSArrayController (the NSArrayController is in turn bound to NSTableView columns).
What is the most Cocoa-, and KVO- friendly way of, programmatically :
adding a new empty object (NSMutableDictionary) to the array?
removing currently selected object? (after removing, the previous item - if exists - should be selected)
I've always been doing this in a way I don't particularly like - and I'm sure it's not the best way around (too many lines of code for something so simple : in Cocoa that indicates a wrong take on the subject :-)).
My code (quite an overkill, actually) :
Adding to the Array
NSMutableArray* oldParams = [paramsArray mutableCopy];
[oldParams addObject:[NSMutableDictionary dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys:#"Parameter",#"Parameter",#"",#"Value", nil]];
[self setParamsArray:oldParams];
[paramsController setSelectionIndex:[paramsArray count]-1];
Removing currently selected object from the Array
if ([paramsArray count]>0)
{
int s = [paramsController selectionIndex];
NSMutableArray* oldParams = [paramsArray mutableCopy];
[oldParams removeObjectAtIndex:s];
[self setParamsArray:oldParams];
if (s<=[paramsArray count]-1)
[paramsController setSelectionIndex:s];
else
[paramsController setSelectionIndex:[paramsArray count]-1];
}
So, what are your opinions on that?
Given that the array controller is bound to a property named paramsArray on some object, the best approach is to define the key-value coding indexed accessors on that object's class. Then, use those accessors to mutate the to-many relationship represented by the property in a KVO-compliant manner.
For example, implement -insertObject:inParamsArrayAtIndex: and then use that to add an object. If you like the convenience of NSMutableArray's -addObject: method, you can write an -addObjectToParamArray method that forwards to -insertObject:inParamsArrayAtIndex:.
By the way, "paramsArray" is a poor name for a property. The property name shouldn't encode the type used to implement it. If you look at the templates for the indexed accessor names, you'll see that Apple is expecting to-many relationship properties to just be a plural noun like "params" (no "Array"). For example, -paramsAtIndexes: is better than -paramsArrayAtIndexes:.
You have to think of your array as the controller's backing store, and that it's managing it for you.
Adding an object:
[[self accountsArrayController] addObject:accountDictionary];
Removing the currently selected object:
[[self accountsArrayController] remove:nil];
You'll have to write another line or two to make that previous item selected, but that's an exercise I leave to you.
I have some code that loops through an array of NSManagedObjects and stops when it finds a certain record that is stored in an instance variable. The only way I can manage to see if they are the same record (not an equivalent record, the specific record) is by comparing the URIRepresentations of the objectIDs. This surely cannot be the best way of doing it. I'm doing:
if ([[[obj1 objectID] URIRepresentation] isEqualTo: [[_obj2 objectID] URIRepresentation]]) {
NSLog(#"Match");
}
The following code never matches even when I NSLog the objectIDs and see that they are in fact exactly the same.
if ([[obj1 objectID] isEqualTo: [_obj2 objectID]]) {
NSLog(#"Match");
}
The commenter is correct, isEqualTo: will not work in this case since they are different instances of NSManagedObjectID.
The way you are doing this is actually the best way, the objectID is CoreData's unique identifier for a given managed object, it's the only way to tell if two instances of NSManagedObject point to the same record in the persistent store.
Clarification:
ImHuntingWabbits refers to isEqual:, but then advises Nick to stick with his first example, which actually uses isEqualTo:.
Per Peter Hosey's comment to the post isEqual vs isEqualTo, there is a difference and you're better off using isEqual:.
Following the present posts, I originally used isEqualTo: to compare objectID URLs, which worked fine in Cocoa, but when I moved this code over to iOS, I got warnings that "NSURL may not respond to isEqualTo." When I changed to isEqual:, the warnings went away.
So if you're following these examples, you should probably do this:
if ([[[obj1 objectID] URIRepresentation] isEqual:[[_obj2 objectID] URIRepresentation]] {
NSLog(#"Match");
}
-isEqual: has been implemented correctly for NSManagedObjectID in CoreData. We use collections with -contains: all the time. It seems that the original poster confused -isEqual: with -isEqualTo: The latter should not be used.
I have used sortUsingSelector to sort an NSMutableArray of custom objects.
Now I'm trying to sort an NSMutableArray containing NSMutableArrays of custom objects.
Can you use sortUsingSelector on an NSMutableArray, or does it only work for custom classes?
If you can use blocks, the most straightforward way using sortUsingComparator:. Otherwise, you'll need to use sortUsingFunction:.
In either case, you are going to need to write a custom block or function that takes two arrays as arguments and returns a sort order based on their contents (I'm not sure what logic you are using to determine if array A or array B is "before" or "after" the other).
You'd do something like:
static NSInteger MySorterFunc(id leftArray, id rightArray, void *context) {
... return ascending/descending/same based on leftArray vs. rightArray ...
}
Then:
[myArrayOfArrays sortUsingFunction: MySorterFunc context: NULL];
It sends the selector to the objects, so you'll need to use one of the other sorters. Probably sortUsingFunction:context:.
Of course you can also use sortUsingSelector:, it really doesn’t matter whats the object in your array as long as it responds to the selector you want to use. But NSMutableArray and NSArray don’t have any comparison methods themselves, so you’d have to extend them using a category to implement your compare method.
So you probably want to use the other sorting methods pointed out in the other answers here. It’s not impossible to use sortUsingSelector: but it is rather inconvenient and most people (including me) would argue that it’s bad style to write a category for that.
I've been attempting this for two days, and constantly running into dead ends.
I've been through Aaron Hillegass's Cocoa Programming for MAC OS X, and done all the relevant exercises dealing with NSTableview and mutable arrays, and I have been attempting to modify them to suit my needs.
However none of them seem to be using an array with objects as a data source, it seems to use the tableview as the datasource.
I'm trying to implement Jonas Jongejan's "reworking" of my code here, with a Cocoa front end to display the results.
Any pointers or suggestions I know this should be simple, but I'm lost in the wilderness here.
I can populate the table by setting the array
It's pretty simple really, once you get to understand it (of course!). You can't use an NSArray directly as a table source. You need to either create a custom object that implements NSTableViewDataSource or implement that protocol in some existing class - usually a controller. If you use Xcode to create a standard document based application, the document controller class - (it will be called MyDocument) is a good class to use.
You need to implement at least these two methods:
– numberOfRowsInTableView:
– tableView:objectValueForTableColumn:row:
If you have a mutable array whose values you'd like to use in a table view with one column, something like the following should do as a start:
– numberOfRowsInTableView: (NSTableView*) aTableView
{
return [myMutableArray count];
}
– tableView: (NSTableView*) aTableView objectValueForTableColumn: (NSTableColumn *)aTableColum row: (NSInteger)rowIndex
{
return [myMutableArray objectAtIndex: rowIndex];
}
It has just occurred to me that you could add the above two methods as a category to NSArray replacing myMutableArray with self and then you can use an array as a data source.
Anyway, with a mutable array, it is important that any time you change it, you need to let the table view know it has been changed, so you need to send the table view -reloadData.
If your table view has more than one column and you want to populate it with properties of objects in your array, there's a trick you can do to make it easier for yourself. Let's say the objects in your array are instances of a class called Person with two methods defined:
-(NSString*) givenName;
-(NSString*) familyName;
and you want your table view to have a column for each of those, you can set the identifier property of each column to the name of the property in Person that that column displays and use something like the following:
– tableView: (NSTableView*) aTableView objectValueForTableColumn: (NSTableColumn *)aTableColum row: (NSInteger)rowIndex
{
Person* item = [myMutableArray objectAtIndex: rowIndex];
return [item valueForKey: [tableColumn identifier]];
}
If you replace valueForKey: with valueForKeyPath: and your Person class also has the following methods:
-(Person*) mother;
-(Person*) father;
-(NSString*) fullName; // concatenation of given name and family name
you can add table columns with identifiers like: father.fullName or mother.familyName and the values will be automatically populated.
You could go the datasource route and do all of the heavy lifting yourself, or you could let bindings do all the heavy lifting for you. Add an NSArrayController to the nib file that has the table view in it. Make sure that the File's Owner of the nib is set to the same class that has the mutable array in it. Bind the contentArray of the array controller to File's Owner.myMutableArray. For each column bind Value to the array controller arrangedObjects and add the appropriate key path. This will allow you to get things like user sorting for free if you ever need it.
On the iPhone (I know you're talking about Mac, but maybe this could help) you have to use delegation for loading a tableView. It asks for a cell and you use your array to fill-in the data where needed.
I'm not sure if this works for the Mac, but it'd be worth looking into.
Maybe set dataSource to self and use those delegate methods to access your array based on the row and column #
Apple has a whole guide for Table View Programming so I suggest you start with the Using a Table Data Source section of the that guide.
I want to load a client object and then pull their related purchase orders based on whether they have been placed or not, purchase orders have an IsPlaced BOOL property.
So I have my client object and I can get all purchase orders like this, which is working great:
purchaseordersList =[[myclient.purchaseorders allObjects] mutableCopy];
But ideally I would actually like 2 array's - one for each order type: IsPlaced=YES and IsPlaced=NO
How do I do that here? Or do I need to do another fetch?
First, there is no reason to be turning the set into an array unless you are sorting it and there is no reason to be turning that array into a mutable array. Did you get that from some example code?
Second, you can filter an array or a set by using a predicate so you can create two sets (or arrays) easily via:
NSSet *placed = [[myclient purchaseorders] filteredSetUsingPredicate:[NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:#"isPlaced == YES"]];
NSSet *notPlaced = [[myclient purchaseorders] filteredSetUsingPredicate:[NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:#"isPlaced == YES"]];
If you are wanting to use this for a UITableView then look into a NSFetchedResultsController instead. It will save you a LOT of boiler-plate code.
Do you remember what example code you got that from? Been seeing that -mutableCopy a lot lately and would love to quash it. :)