Gradle - Jacoco - JMockit - Tests are hanging not progressing - testing

I'm using Gradle (Gradle 1.6 -upto 1.9) to build a Java project. Tried with both Java 1.6 or 1.7.
src/java - contains Java source code
test/java - contains test java code
Project compiles/builds successfully. During the build time, Junit UNIT test(s) runs successfully as well. I have only one test and it uses JMockit library. Please NOTE: This same jacoco code works fine in any other project where I don't have test which needs JMockit library.
JMockit groupid:artifactid:version is:
jmockit:jmockit:1.1
I wanted to have Jacoco code coverage enabled. Jacoco version that I have tried so far is shown in the code below, this code exists in my Gradle build script.
I added the following lines to my project's build.gradle file.
apply plugin: 'jacoco'
jacoco {
//toolVersion = "0.6.2.201302030002"
toolVersion = "0.7.0.201403182114"
//toolVersion = "0.7.1.201404171759" --- trying to find how to make version this working.
// reportsDir = file("$buildDir/customJacocoReportDir")
}
test {
ignoreFailures = true
testReportDir = file("$buildDir/reports/tests/UT")
testResultsDir = file("$buildDir/test-results/UT")
// Uncomment the following if you need more detailed output.
//testLogging.showStandardStreams = true
//onOutput { descriptor, event ->
// logger.lifecycle("Test: " + descriptor + " produced standard out/err: " + event.message )
//}
//Following Jacoco test section is required only in Jenkins instance extra common file
jacoco {
//The following vars works ONLY with 1.6 of Gradle
destPath = file("$buildDir/jacoco/UT/jacocoUT.exec")
classDumpPath = file("$buildDir/jacoco/UT/classpathdumps")
//Following vars works only with versions >= 1.7 version of Gradle
//destinationFile = file("$buildDir/jacoco/UT/jacocoUT.exec")
// classDumpFile = file("$buildDir/jacoco/UT/classpathdumps")
}
}
task integrationTest( type: Test) {
//Always run tests
outputs.upToDateWhen { false }
ignoreFailures = true
testClassesDir = sourceSets.integrationTest.output.classesDir
classpath = sourceSets.integrationTest.runtimeClasspath
testReportDir = file("$buildDir/reports/tests/IT")
testResultsDir = file("$buildDir/test-results/IT")
//Following Jacoco test section is required only in Jenkins instance extra common file
jacoco {
//This works with 1.6
destPath = file("$buildDir/jacoco/IT/jacocoIT.exec")
classDumpPath = file("$buildDir/jacoco/IT/classpathdumps")
//Following works only with versions >= 1.7 version of Gradle
//destinationFile = file("$buildDir/jacoco/IT/jacocoIT.exec")
// classDumpFile = file("$buildDir/jacoco/IT/classpathdumps")
}
}
jacocoTestReport {
group = "Reporting"
description = "Generate Jacoco coverage reports after running tests."
ignoreFailures = true
executionData = fileTree(dir: 'build/jacoco', include: '**/*.exec')
reports {
xml{
enabled true
//Following value is a file
destination "${buildDir}/reports/jacoco/xml/jacoco.xml"
}
csv.enabled false
html{
enabled true
//Following value is a folder
destination "${buildDir}/reports/jacoco/html"
}
}
//sourceDirectories = files(sourceSets.main.allJava.srcDirs)
sourceDirectories = files('src/java')
classDirectories = files('build/classes/main')
//------------------------------------------
//additionalSourceDirs = files('test/java')
//additionalSourceDirs += files('src/java-test')
//additionalClassDirs = files('build/classes/test')
//additionalClassDirs += files('build/classes/integrationTest')
//additionalClassDirs += files('build/classes/acceptanceTest')
//------------------------------------------
}
My questions:
1. When I'm not using "apply plugin: 'jacoco'", then :test task runs successfully (I have only one test). BUT, when I enable apply plugin: 'jacoco', then during :test task, I see the following line during build output and the process just hangs there and sits for hours and doesn't proceed.
Starting process 'Gradle Worker 1'. Working directory: /production/jenkinsAKS/workspace/MyProjectSvc Command: /production/jdk1.6.0_03/bin/java -Djava.security.manager=jarjar.org.gradle.processinternal.child.BootstrapSecurityManager -javaagent:build/tmp/expandedArchives/org.jacoco.agent-0.7.0.201403182114.jar_2kiqpmj1hlqbuth11j0qnuarhs/jacocoagent.jar=destfile=build/jacoco/UT/jacocoUT.execappend=true,dumponexit=true,output=file,classdumpdir=build/jacoco/UT/classpathdumps,jmx=false -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -ea -cp /production/jenkins/.gradle/caches/1.6/workerMain/gradle-worker.jar jarjar.rg.gradle.process.internal.launcher.GradleWorkerMain
An attempt to initialize for well behaving parent process finished.
Successfully started process 'Gradle Worker 1'
Gradle Worker 1 executing tests.
> Building > :test
I googled around and it seems like there's some incompatibility between Jacoco and JMockit libraries in the current latest version and there's a fix coming to get this issue resolved. The new version of Jacoco 0.7.1.xxxxx has the fix but I don't know when it'll be available in Maven repository.
Any idea, how can I set the javaagent to ignore the test/test class file for JACOCO and still apply jacoco plugin. In my case, apply plugin: 'jacoco' will later exist in a global file i.e. inside /init.d/global-common.gradle file within allProjects { .... } section.
I tried the following but still, the build process hangs at :test task until I uncomment exclude below. If I comment out the whole jacoco subsection within test section, build process still hangs at :test task (seems like as apply plugin: 'jacoco' is there). If I uncomment exlude, then I don't see error but then no test runs i.e. index.html for test reports shows nothing ran.
test {
include "**/*"
jacoco {
//exclude "**/util/Test*"
}
}
2. How can I use the jacoco 0.7.1.xxxx version (non-release aka nightly release which has the fix for this issue) in my build.gradle file. When I used 0.7.1.xxx version after uncommenting it (as shown above), it errored out saying can't find dependency jacoco:0.7.1.xxxx
3. To get rid of this issue, I think I can set a jacoco agent parameter i.e. when it runs, it'll ignore the JMOckit/JUnit .jar library or something. See/Found the following links:
http://javaee.ch/2012/10/09/jmockit-with-maven-sonar-jacoco-and-jenkinshudson/
https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/pull/35
Acc. to the second link:
A workaround which avoids the problem is to exclude the JUnit classes from JaCoCo's consideration. I used the following JVM initialization parameter in my testing, excluding both JUnit and TestNG classes: -javaagent:/jacoco-0.7.1/lib/jacocoagent.jar=excludes=junit.:org.junit.:org.testng.
The good news is that the fix I described in my previous comment also solves this deadlock problem, because then the JUnit classes will be ignored by JaCoCo as they get instrumented by JMockit.
I'm trying to find what variable in jacoco { ... } or within test { ... } I can set to do the same until I get the new version of Jacoco or JMockit (which has the fix). Seems like it's within test section i.e. test { ..here jvmArgs '...'will be set. jacoco { ... } .. }
http://stevendick.github.io/blog/2012/01/22/jacoco-and-gradle/
4. If I exclude the test class file by using "exclude "com/xxx/yyy/a/b/c/util/Testname.class", then it works and I don't see an error but then I found that due the this exclude, my test never run!!!
that's why it didn't hang. Well, I want the test to run and don't want Jacoco to process it.
Just by having apply plugin: 'jacoco' in build.gradle is hanging the build at :test task. I need jacoco as Development team would like to see the code coverage details as well.
At this time, I'm trying to find answers to the above ?s, appreciate your inputs.

Final answer:
Both Jmockit and Jacoco instruments the class files. Jmockit does it first during the build process and when jacoco tries the same (later in the process) it says "oh oh, can't instrument an already instrumented class file". This issue happened with older versions of jacoco and jmockit. To see this error, enable --stacktrace option during Gradle build or --debug.
Now, using the latest jacoco and jmockit versions, we can solve this issue easily.
If you use jacoco:
toolVersion="0.7.1.201405082137"
or
toolVersion="0.7.2.201409121644"
See this: changes that went in 0.7.1 version
http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/changes.html
For JMockit, you have to use jmockit version: 1.8 at least or later (1.9 to 1.13).
org.jmockit:jmockit:1.8
See this: changes that went under 1.8 version: http://jmockit.github.io/changes.html

Answer 1: Setting jacoco subsection (within test section) -- enabled field to "false" did the trick. I'm not getting the code coverage (which I can live with until I get the new versions out for both JMockit / Jacoco) but now I see valid test report index.html file (i.e. test ran successfully) and still apply plugin: 'jacoco' can stay effective in /init.d/global-common.gradle file ...
test {
jacoco {
enabled false
}
}
For Answer 2: NOT found so far, will share.
Answer 3: Didn't resolve the error - but how you set it up is given at the link: http://stevendick.github.io/blog/2012/01/22/jacoco-and-gradle/
I tried giving, may be I didn't use it correctly. jvmArgs '....: ,....:.. ,....:....,exclude="com.:org.gradle.;jmockit.:mockit.:junit.*"
Answer 4: Answer 1 will suffice.

I'm not too familiar with gradle, so I'm not sure I can help with questions 1, 3, or 4...
But question 2, I can help - the version string for JaCoCo 0.7.1 is not 0.7.1.201404171759 but rather 0.7.1.201405082137. This version has been formally released, in case you hadn't noticed.
If you want the latest nightly build, the convention is to simply refer as 0.7.2-SNAPSHOT (make sure you are pointing at the snapshot repository at https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/).

Related

Gradle Kotlin FileCollection JavaExec classpath

I'm attempting to create a gradle kotlin based SoapUI launcher of sorts sans plugins using native gradle functionality for incorporating SoapUI tests into our ci/cd pipeline. So far I have the following:
val soapui: Configuration by configurations.creating
dependencies {
// Old version is intentional
soapui("com.smartbear.soapui:soapui:5.4.0")
}
var clazzpath: List<Any> = mutableListOf()
var files: FileCollection = project.files()
task("soapui", JavaExec::class) {
doFirst {
// Validating iteration causes resolution
soapui.forEach { clazzpath += it }
// Validating contents of List
//clazzpath.forEach { println(it) }
// Creating a FileCollection from my List
files = project.files(clazzpath)
// Validating contents of my FileCollection
//files.forEach { println(it) }
}
// My first thought which does not work
//classpath = soapui
// My second thought which also does not work
//classpath = project.files(clazzpath)
// My third thought which also does not work
classpath = files
systemProperties = mapOf(
"soapui.properties.MyProject" to "src/test/integration/environments/my.properties")
main = "com.eviware.soapui.SoapUI"
// Will be invoked for automated test runs
//main = "com.eviware.soapui.tools.SoapUITestCaseRunner"
args = listOf("src/test/integration/my_project.xml")
}
I've found that iterating over a configuration causes gradle to resolve the configuration allowing for all the transitive dependencies to be discovered. The commented println statements validate that.
When using classpath = soapui, the SoapUI main jar file is put on the classpath, the main class is found, and the SoapUI GUI starts up fine. However, none of it's transient dependencies end up on the classpath and test cases fail when their assertions are performed.
When I try constructing the classpath explicitly, nothing ends up on the classpath and the SoapUI GUI fails to load because the main class is not found.
> Task :soapui FAILED
Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
Error: Could not find or load main class com.eviware.soapui.SoapUI
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.eviware.soapui.SoapUI
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':soapui'.
> Process 'command 'C:\<path to JDK\bin\java.exe'' finished with non-zero exit value 1
* Try:
Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or --debug option to get more log output. Run with --scan to get full insights.
* Get more help at https://help.gradle.org
BUILD FAILED in 1s
1 actionable task: 1 executed
<list of transitive dependencies on one line with no path separation characters (;)>
That last line of output may be what was used as the classpath, which consists of a list of all the transitive dependencies printed one after another without any path separation characters (semicolons).
Based off of my investigation and reading of the documentation, I'm clearly misunderstanding how this is supposed to work. What am I missing?
Time for me to publicly eat some crow. Turns out, the error I'm investigating has nothing to do with gradle or my understanding of it. Firstly, in the question I mention that the last line of output is a list of all the SoapUI 5.4.0 dependencies on one line without any path separators. It turns out that was being caused by my lack of experience with gradle. In the gradle build file I was working with, I had the following task defined as part of my investigation of gradle.
task("soapuiDependencies") {
soapui.forEach { print(it.toString()) }
}
Since the code is not inside a doFirst {} or doLast{} block, it is executed when the task is realized, and does not need to be called explicitly for the output to be sent to the console. Lesson learned. What I should have had was
task("soapuiDependencies") {
doLast {
soapui.forEach { print(it.toString()) }
}
}
Or some such. Second lesson has to do with dependency versions. Soapui 5.4.0 is packaged with json-path-0.9.1.jar (yikes, that's old) which contains the file
com/jayway/jsonpath/spi/JsonProvider.class
while gradle is pulling in as a dependency json-path-2.7.0.jar which contains the file
com/jayway/jsonpath/spi/json/JsonProvider.class.
Causing a ClassNotFoundException on the JsonProvider class when invoked via gradle.
This is the root of my problem and has nothing to do with my understanding of how gradle FileCollections, JavaExec, or classpath parameters work. I know I'm treading with dinosaurs, but hopefully the lessons learned will be of help to someone else.

alternate way to set Build and run using IntelliJ IDEA

I am working with Java source code with TestNG and frequently see errors like no test found to run OR Test event were not received whenever I try to run test cases in IntelliJ IDEA.
Which I can fix with changing Build and run using IntelliJ IDEA from Gradle.
I am looking for alternative way using which can add this somewhere as configuration instead of going and changing this manually.
You can use gradle-idea-ext-plugin to set build and run actions right in the Gradle build script:
import static org.jetbrains.gradle.ext.ActionDelegationConfig.TestRunner.CHOOSE_PER_TEST
plugins {
...
id "org.jetbrains.gradle.plugin.idea-ext" version "1.0"
...
}
idea.project.settings {
delegateActions {
delegateBuildRunToGradle = true // Delegate Run/Build to Gradle
testRunner = CHOOSE_PER_TEST // Test execution: PLATFORM, GRADLE or CHOOSE_PER_TEST
}
}
But actually, the fact that it works with IDE runner, but does not work with Gradle runner may indicate problems. I would first check if it works from the command line Gradle - make sure you run the same test with it as from the IDE. If it works in terminal but does not work in IDE, I would report a bug at YouTrack with reproducible sample.

How to make Karate Tests run as a service [duplicate]

I am using karate 0.9.2 with gradle. My project requires to have all karate tests inside src/main/java. So I configured the gradle dependency as ‘compile’ instead of ‘testCompile’ and also modified the sourceSets to point to main instead of test. When I ran my runner class with above configuration I got empty test suite message.
build.gradle snippet:
compile 'com.intuit.karate:karate-junit4:0.9.3'
compile 'com.intuit.karate:karate-apache:0.9.3'
sourceSets {
test {
resources {
srcDir file('src/main/java')
exclude '**/*.java'
}
}
}
Additionally, I have is to run the karate tests from the deployable project jar. Please point me the resources I can refer to achieve the same.
Not something we directly support but teams have done this in Spring Boot etc. It should be possible, see if this thread helps: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/520
Also you may not need JUnit also: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/427
And see the sample project in this ticket as an example: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/529
EDIT - in 1.0 onwards we hope that class-loading from spring-boot JAR files is more reliable: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/751

Runner.runFeature can't find the feature file path - karate 0.9.9.RC3-junit5 [duplicate]

I am using karate 0.9.2 with gradle. My project requires to have all karate tests inside src/main/java. So I configured the gradle dependency as ‘compile’ instead of ‘testCompile’ and also modified the sourceSets to point to main instead of test. When I ran my runner class with above configuration I got empty test suite message.
build.gradle snippet:
compile 'com.intuit.karate:karate-junit4:0.9.3'
compile 'com.intuit.karate:karate-apache:0.9.3'
sourceSets {
test {
resources {
srcDir file('src/main/java')
exclude '**/*.java'
}
}
}
Additionally, I have is to run the karate tests from the deployable project jar. Please point me the resources I can refer to achieve the same.
Not something we directly support but teams have done this in Spring Boot etc. It should be possible, see if this thread helps: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/520
Also you may not need JUnit also: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/427
And see the sample project in this ticket as an example: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/529
EDIT - in 1.0 onwards we hope that class-loading from spring-boot JAR files is more reliable: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/751

Gradle - Jacoco to only execute unit test without throwing device not found exception

I am trying to execute only unit test and genrate jacoco test report, but I see always a failure message saying
Execution failed for task ':App:connectedDebugAndroidTest'.
> com.android.builder.testing.api.DeviceException: No connected devices!
Gradle code:
apply plugin: 'jacoco'
jacoco {
toolVersion = "0.8.1"
}
task jacocoTestReport(type: JacocoReport, dependsOn: ['testTpsDebugUnitTest', 'create<build-vairant>DebugCoverageReport']) {
group = "reporting"
description = "Generate unified Jacoco code coverage report"
reports {
xml.enabled false
csv.enabled false
html.destination file("${buildDir}/reports/jacocoHtml")
}
def fileFilter = [
'**/*Test*',
'**/*_MembersInjector.class',
'**/*_Factory.class']
def debugTree = fileTree(dir: "${buildDir}/intermediates/classes/<build-variant>/debug", excludes: fileFilter)
def mainSrc = "${project.projectDir}/src/main/java"
sourceDirectories = files([mainSrc])
classDirectories = files([debugTree])
executionData = fileTree(dir: "$buildDir", includes: [
"jacoco/test<build-variant>DebugUnitTest.exec"
])
I execute with command:
./gradlew -Pcoverage clean jacocoTestReport
Please help to fix this issue, so it only executes unit test and doesnt ask for a device!
I saw this issue while debugging my Jacoco installation, and fortunately for me it was the beginning of the solution.
If you are running Unit Tests (including Jacoco Unit tests), a device should not be needed. AndroidTests require a device, not Unit Tests.
After installing all the Jacoco changes to the gradle and re-synced:
Open the gradle window of Android Studio (View -> Tool Windows -> Gradle) you will see an icon of an elephant (as of Android Studio Chipmunk).
Click on this icon and a command window will appear.
Type in the box as shown: gradle app:createDebugUnitTestCoverageReport and hit .
This will start the Jacoco process running. Since it generally relies on Unit Tests (assuming your gradle is configured correctly), it will force the Unit Tests to run first. You'll find your report in the location you specified in the gradle (default is something like ./app/build/reports/coverage/test/debug/index.html).
My problem was I was entering the wrong unit test in step 3. I typed gradle app:createDebug... and accepted the first suggestion. This was wrong! It put createDebugAndroidTestUnitCoverageReport, which was not what I wanted (and caused the error requesting a device).