Something happened on my development workstation (Windows 8.1) in the last few weeks which require me to either run my App Pools with the "Load User Profile" setting at False or not run with the identity set to ApplicationPoolIdentity. If I were to create a new app pool, using ApplicationPoolIdentity as the identity and with loadUserProfile=true, the following happens when trying to load the application in a browser:
A number of errors in the Windows Event Log (both System and Application types):
Warning event 1509 - Windows cannot copy file \\?\C:\Users\Default\AppData\Local\Microsoft\VSCommon\12.0\SQM\sqmdata-7236-039-00000.sqm to location \\?\C:\Users\[Name of App Pool]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\VSCommon\12.0\SQM\sqmdata-7236-039-00000.sqm. This error may be caused by network problems or insufficient security rights.
Error event 1511 - Windows cannot find the local profile and is logging you on with a temporary profile. Changes you make to this profile will be lost when you log off.
Another 1509 warning
Error event 1500 - Windows cannot log you on because your profile cannot be loaded. Check that you are connected to the network, and that your network is functioning correctly. DETAIL - Only part of a ReadProcessMemory or WriteProcessMemory request was completed.
5 x event 5022 warnings - The Windows Process Activation Service failed to create a worker process for the application pool '[App Pool Name]'. The data field contains the error number.
Finally an error 5002 - Application pool '[App Pool Name]' is being automatically disabled due to a series of failures in the process(es) serving that application pool.
The App Pool is shut down, as the error 5002 said
"HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable." is then seen in the browser. Any further requests are met with the same (which makes sense since the app pool is shut off).
I've seen a common "fix" for this here and here which basically say to turn off profile loading. Yes it makes the problem go away, but this doesn't get to the root cause. I know that it is possible to run with this configuration as a I have a Windows 2012 machine which supports the configuration just fine. In this case, hitting an app with a new app pool set to ApplicationPoolIdentity and loadUserProfile=true actually creates the new user profile (I can watch as the profiles folder is created in C:\Users) and the app runs merrily. What's worse is I know this configuration worked on the problem machine just a few weeks ago. I have a number of App Pools I created which have their own profiles and folder under the C:\Users folder. These app pools work just fine NOW with the ApplicationPoolIdentity and loadUserProfile=true settings. It's just that NEW app pools refuse to run and load a user profile.
Does anyone have any insight to what might be going on?
Edit: I read the bottom of this recent article. It's a bit contradictory in saying that the setting can be turned on, but also says:
Only the standard application pools (DefaultAppPool and Classic .NET AppPool) have user profiles on disk. No user profile is created if the Administrator creates a new application pool.
However, if you want, you can configure IIS application pools to load the user profile by setting the LoadUserProfile attribute to "true".
I'm very confused.
The SQM file listed in the event log warning was created by a Windows or Visual Studio update. When the user profile service or application pool runs and tries to create a new profile, it tries to copy the file to the profile. The SQM file requires administrator permissions to copy. The user profile service or application pool does not have sufficient permissions to copy the file, an error is generated, and the user profile is not created. Without a user profile, the application pool cannot run because it doesn't have an isolated secure place to store data.
Remove or delete the SQM file from the source directory, and the user profile will be created successfully when the app pool is initialized. You can also change the permissions on the SQM file, but I'm not sure what the appropriate permissions should be. The user profile service runs as "LocalSystem Account". See its documentation for permission info. It's unclear to me whether the application pool identity itself is being used to perform the copy operation, or the local system account.
If you remove the file from the source directory, you could also manually copy the file where it was trying to go as well.
After a very brief search about what SQM is, it seems like it is traditionally used as "service quality management". Usually it would contain information to send back to the program authors with metrics, logs, or somesuch. I don't know if this is the case with this file or not. So it doesn't seem like it's important to include it in the new profile.
I can't take 100% credit for this answer, as I was tipped off by a comment attached to an answer on some other question. I can't find the link to it in the 50 browser tabs open for troubleshooting this. That guy deserves a thank you, because I believe this is a much better solution than compromising the security of a server by pooling all the resources together like in IIS 6.
P.S. As noted in your comment, a bug report has been filed.
Related
I have a simple VB.net console application that displays the current user, waits for key input, and then exits. It uses the following call to display the information:
System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent.Name.ToString()
If I create a remote app hosting this application, and create an azure user that has rights to run the remote app such as;
thisisa#test.onmicrosoft.com
When this user connects to the remote app the output of the line of code above would look something like;
YLSDAAYU0007\thisisa_000
Is there anyway of reading the user running the remoteapp at the time? in this case, I am looking to obtain thisisa#test.onmicrosoft.com ?
Catalin from the RemoteApp team here. You have stumbled across one of our implementation details here :)
Windows does not allow automatic login with Azure Active Directory (AAD) users: they only allow users that have Microsoft Accounts or domain accounts in case the collection is domain joined. We are working around this limitation by creating a local user on the VM and logging in with that user instead of the AAD user.
If you have any more questions about this, feel free to contact me: catalda ＠ microsoft com
BLUF
Our application is attempting to write a file to a UNC folder using an ASP.NET web service running under .NET 4.5, IIS 7.5, and Windows Server 2008 R2. However, any attempt to write the file to the desired location results in an access denied exception.
The task seems simple however me and my team have been troubleshooting this for a while now and we are stumped as to what may be causing the error. Below are the details of our setup and what we have tried and found so far. Names have been changed to protect the innocent.
Environment Setup
The web server, mywebserver, has a website named My.Site.Com with a corresponding application pool named My.Site.Com. The application pool is configured as shown below.
.NET Framework Version : v4.0
Enable 32-bit Applications : False
Managed Pipeline Mode : Integrated
Name : My.Site.Com
Identity : ApplicationPoolIdentity
Load User Profile : False
The UNC path we are attempting to write to is \myotherserver\mydirectories\output where mydirectories is the actual share. On this share a domain group named mygroup-www has been granted full permissions to the share and all subfolders. The machine account (i.e., mywebserver) is a member of this mygroup-www group.
NOTE: For the moment, this UNC path actually lives on the same
machine, mywebserver. However, this will eventually be moved to a machine other
than mywebserver in our test environment and in the production environment
when that it is ready. Currently, I only have the one test environment to troubleshoot with.
The error can be replicated by executing the following code.
[WebMethod]
[ScriptMethod(UseHttpGet = false, ResponseFormat = ResponseFormat.Json)]
public string ExportReport(int reportId)
{
try
{
string output = ConfigHelper.OutputPath + "test.html"; // UNC path
string url = ConfigHelper.VirtualPath + "test.html";
string[] lines = { "Hello", "World!" };
File.WriteAllLines(output, lines); // Access Denied!
return url;
}
catch (System.Exception ex)
{
Logger.ErrorException("Error exporting report", ex);
throw;
}
}
Troubleshooting
Failed Attempts
We tried various combinations of group/user permissions on the folders (listed below). When running these tests we also ran Process Monitor. For each configuration we saw the same result. The w3wp.exe process attempted to create the file in the desired location but reported a result of ACCESS DENIED. The user of each configuration was IIS APPPOOL\My.Site.Com as expected.
Granting mydomain\mymachine$ full permissions to \myotherserver\mydirectories
Granting mydomain\mymachine$ full permissions to \myotherserver\mydirectories\output
NOTE: I have also tried modifying the code so that it would read a
simple file from \myotherserver\mydirectories\output. When
attempting to read the file, the process fails with an ACCESS DENIED
message as it did when writing the file.
Successful Attempts
We also tried several configurations that worked.
Grant the local IIS APPPOOL\My.Site.Com permissions
The first configuration to work was to grant the IIS APPPOOL\My.Site.Com full permissions to \myotherserver\mydirectories The file was successfully written however the process's user was quite unexpectedly a domain account that was set up for a web application on the same machine in another website. This remains very confusing but worked as the 'other' account also has write permissions to the share.
This won't work in production as we cannot use local accounts to grant access to networked resources but is an interesting data point nonetheless.
Change the App Pool Identity to Domain User
The second configuration that worked was to change the My.Site.Com application pool's identify to domain account that had full permissions to \myotherserver\mydirectories. This was a 'vanilla' domain account that was manually created by us. We did not capture what the user of the process was but that may be another useful data point.
This option may be possible, however it breaks away from best practices with IIS 7.5 and may not be allowed in our production environment due to fairly stringent IT policies.
Run the Site On My Development Machine
The third test was to run the site locally on my development machine, mydevmachine. My local IIS configuration is identical to mywebserver with the exception that I am running Windows 7 instead of Windows Server 2008. I granted full permissions for mydomain\mydevmachine to the \myotherserver\mydirectories and ran the application. The file was successfully written. According to Process Monitor the user for the process was correctly set to IIS APPPOOL\My.Site.Com.
Conclusion
We would like to enable write access as designed using the machine account of mywebserver. We have read ApplicationPoolIdentity user cannot modify files in shared folder in Windows Server 2008 and Permissions for Shared Folder for IIS 7 Application Pool Identity Across Domain and Application Pool Identities.
According to this information we should be able use the machine account to grant read and write access to networked resources such as the UNC path. In fact, I can do this in the desired manner when running the web site from my development machine.
There are a couple thoughts that come to mind. Perhaps there is something wrong with the machine account of the test web server. Or perhaps that 'other' software is interfering with the process somehow.
Any thoughts as to what may be causing this issue? What else should we do to troubleshoot?
Reboot your 'mywebserver'.
Marvel at the now mysteriously functional ApplicationPoolIdentity.
Install MS HotFix KB2545850 and learn the details about this bug in KB2672809 which also shows the steps to reproduce and demonstrate this apparently random problem. Direct download link here.
Speculate why Microsoft has not managed to release a normal windows update for this in the 3 years since that hotfix was published. While people still continue running into it and pulling their hair out because of this obscure problem.
Learn about the other folks who have shared and enjoyed this gift from MS that still continues to keep on giving:
IIS application using application pool identity loses primary token?
DirectoryServicesCOMException 80072020 From IIS 7.5 Site Running Under ApplicationPoolIdentity
ApplicationPoolIdentity cannot access network resources
ApplicationPoolIdentity IIS 7.5 to SQL Server 2008 R2 not working
Windows Authentication Failed when using application pool identity
IIS 7.5 stops using machine account to connect to network resource when using AppPoolIdentity
Your Windows 7 dev machine probably worked fine because it reboots more often than the server. Congrats on your very well written and thorough bug report. I rarely see that here.
I had similar problem accessing a network share using AppPoolIdentity in an ASP.NET application (access denied).
Using NetworkService account or other domain account worked but these were not the best solution.
I performed almost all the tests you did but finally found something that worked.
I figured out that the Network Service account was not used when accessing the shares, just like you did (i expected domain\machine$ account)
This worked for us:
On your IIS web site, go to Authentication and change the Anonymous Authentication item to "Application Pool Identity". It's by default set to "IUSR". This solved our problem.
Also maybe activating ASP.NET impersonation (still in Authentication menu) may help.
Thibault
I have faced same issue, I resolved by creating one domain account for each environemt (QA, STAGE, PRODUCTION). In Application pool identity I have set custom account and I used domain user for respective account. Now It gives me the ability to write and read the files from UNC Path.
I have a MVC Web Application deployed to a 2003 Server running IIS 6. There is an inconsistent behavior that started this week when we created a new Domain service account with God rights to be used as the identity for the Application Pool and the Anonymous User for the Website with Integrated Authentication set. This Service account has also been added to the SQL users with full rights to the data.
The inconsistent behavior is that the Web Application will run fine, hitting the data, etc..., then out of the blue the Application Pool gets automatically disabled. I check the event logs on the server and sure enough I see two warnings and an error saying that the Identity is INVALID and that the pool was disabled.
I turn it back on and then try to browse to the Website again and BOOM! It does it again. We finally after three attempts lock the account out and have to unlock it. Then it spirals back to the same issue.
Any ideas? Because I'm at my wits end!
This problem might be solved because the question is old, but anyway.
Try manual login with username and password, then
reapply the identity on the application pool, answer yes to apply user rights if questioned, restart the application pool and check the eventlog for errors.
Make sure the useraccount has the appropriate user rights , there will be complaints in the eventlog otherwise. Also make sure allow login to on the user account has the server entered or allow any.
Thanks
Andreas
Mainly looking to answer my question #1 below, but more knowledge would be appreciated.
I tried to use these resources during my investigation, but was unsuccessful:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/sqldatabaseengine/thread/f5eb164d-9774-4864-ae05-cac99740949b (For this error: Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to failure in retrieving the user's local application data path. Please make sure the user has a local user profile on the computer. The connection will be closed.)
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/sqlexpress/thread/6dfdcc22-7a81-4e8f-a947-c1ce6982d4b3/ (For this error: CREATE DATABASE permission denied in database master. An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file ? failed. A database with the same name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share.)
Questions
1.) Why does this error occur while running the Telerik Rad Controls for ASP.NET AJAX "Live Demos" project with IIS 7 (Running Telerik Live Demos works fine using ASP.NET Development Server with this connection string)
Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to failure in retrieving the user's local application data path. Please make sure the user has a local user profile on the computer. The connection will be closed.
2.) How is creating a SQL Server Express instances different in IIS 7, from ASP.NET Development Server & SSMSE
3.) Are there certain attributes of a SQL connection string not allowed when running a website on different contexts (based on #2).
Environment:
I'm not running the "Live Demos" .NET 3.5 ASP.NET web application via the ASP.NET Development Server (feature that pops up in your system tray and picks a port for you after clicking play in Visual Studio). That works just fine! I'm running the website on IIS 7. SQL Server Express is using the NETWORK SERVICE user in Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Services > SQL Server (SQLExpress).
Using this connection string provided with the installed "Live Demos" web application demo project:
<add name="NorthwindConnectionString"
connectionString="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|Northwind.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
I've tried setting "User Instance=False", but that just throws another error:
CREATE DATABASE permission denied in database master. An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file ? failed. A database with the same name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share.
(where "?" is the path of the *.mdf file - C:\Users\\MyDocuments\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\TelerikDemos\Telerik\RadControls for ASP.NET AJAX Q2 2011\Live Demos\App_Data\Northwind.mdf .. Stack Overflow italics is broken with some of those characters, so I had to remove that path)
Someone answered me on a previous question to set this "User Instance=False", but it appears User instances have nothing to do with whether or not you use SQL Express. User Instances are simply a feature of SQL Express that allows a very unprivileged user to host a database instance in it's own user context.
Note, this Northwind database is stored in an *.mdf file in the App_Data folder (under the "Live Demos" root application directory) along with the *.ldf (log file). I did previously try attaching the *.mdf files as actual databases under the "Databases" folder (in the SSMSE Object Explorer tree), but later removed them.
Web application "Live Demos" root folder (and nested folders/files) have the following users assigned with ALL privileges:
- IIS APPPOOL\Telerik ("Telerik" is the name of my application pool in IIS 7 for this site)
- IUSR
- NETWORK SERVICE
Making a note for myself about this SQLExpress master database query:
SELECT * FROM sys.dm_os_child_instances
Also tried different combinations of *.mdf & *.ldf permissions while also changing the user on the SQL Server (SQLExpress) Windows 7 service (Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Services) .. and also restarted the service after making those changes.
To reproduce:
download the Telerik Rad Controls for ASP.NET AJAX. Set the permimssions I mentioned in the "Live Demos" folder under Program Files\Telerik, change the .NET version of the web application to .NET 3.5, switch out their 3.5 web.config file with the normal web.config file in that folder. You have to use Visual Studio 2010, but I am running this in Visual Studio 2008 (with a little grunt work I did because our company is not yet on VS2010). Also switch out the proper Bin35 assemblies into the "Live Demos" folder Bin folder. Compile the solution. Create an IIS 7 website. Add Windows authentication. Enabled anonymous and Windows authentication.. all others are disabled. Set application pool to use Classic and 32 bit.
Then navigating to this URL and clicking the "First Look" image.
http://localhost/combobox/examples/overview/defaultcs.aspx
====================
More evidence will be provided if requested.
You are using a connection string with trusted authentication = true. This means that the connection uses the security context of the calling process.
When you run with the development server you are running in the security context of the logged in user, so every thing works fine.
When you run in IIS you are in the security context of the application pool process, which is NETWORK SERVICE, which does not have a user profile, therefore it crashes.
You can fix it by either:
Change the identity of the application pool to a normal user with access to the database
Use a connection string with user name and password
IIS doesn't load the Windows user profile, but certain applications might take advantage of it anyway to store temporary data. SQL Express is an example of an application that does this. However, a user profile has to be created to store temporary data in either the profile directory or in the registry hive. The user profile for the Network Service account was created by the system and was always available. However, with the switch to unique Application Pool identities, no user profile is created by the system. Only the standard application pools (DefaultAppPool and Classic .NET AppPool) have user profiles on disk. No user profile is created if the Administrator creates a new application pool.
However, if you want, you can configure IIS application pools to load the user profile by setting the LoadUserProfile attribute to "true".
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/iis/manage/configuring-security/application-pool-identities
So here's a bit of context for the horror story:
Win 2003 SP2 64bit running on a VM exposed to outside world for web access.
SQL Server 2008 Std SP2 64bit with Reporting Services (RS) installed for native mode (i.e. not sharepoint mode).
IIS 6 .NET 3.5 web site app written to use the web services from RS. The site has been set to use Windows Authentication and nothing else.
To save writting custom authentication since I don't need it for this demo I have set-up a local account in Win 2003, i.e. servername\myDemoUser, effectively allow fake Windows Authentication.
Default.aspx lists folders on RS and the reports from each folder. It also has a link to the Report Builder 2 on the server.
The rsreportserver.config has been changed so that the only <AuthenticationType> is <RSWindowsNTLM> since <RSWindowsNegoiate> can't work since it's across the internet and users will not be on the same network (hence the local account myDemoUser).
The web site app has url of the form: http://mysite.mydomain.co.uk/ and the link on it to the Report Builder is of the form: http://mysite.mydomain.co.uk/services/reportbuilder/reportbuilder_2_0_0_0.application, in this case RS has been configured so the Web services virtual directory is "services".
The web.config for the website app has been set to <identity impersonate="true /> for <locations> for the ASPX pages that access the RS webservice. I even added a <location path="services/reportbuilder"> with the same thing and also to allow anonymous users.
So after all the above I go to the site from a machine that isn't on the network, I get prompted by IE8 for username/password and I enter servername\myDemoUser and the correct password. The homepage is displayed and correctly shows the list of folders and reports from RS. HOWEVER if I click the RS report builder link I get the pop window saying it's doing it's clickonce verfication stuff but after a couple of seconds it shows simple message box saying there was an authentication error. The details button then shows a text file with a bunch of stacktrace stuff in which eventually says that the server returned 401 while accessing the .application file mentioned above.
I turned on failure auditing for logins on the Win 2003 VM and I can see that when the clickonce fails it is trying to use the local machine account I logged into on the external (to my network) machine instead of the credentials I entered into the browser on that machine when testing it.
Much Googling and granting of permissions to Network service, everyone etc... on various folders involved later nothing the Report Builder bit just won't install via clickonce due to permissions or the incorrect use there of.
I'm looking into maybe changing something in the RS to try and grant permissions to the report builder to anonymous but at this point I'm pretty pessimistic that I'll actually find anything. The annoying thing about this is that this a test that doesn't represent the final thing (we'll be using custom authentication in RS) but unfortunately I have to do it, 8(.
Any ideas would be most appreciated.
It turns out that when using fake Windows authentication in this way when the machine you are accessing the site from a machine where you have not logged into the domain then clickOnce won't work because it won't pass the details you enter into the browser as found.
So the solution is to:
1) Log into a (any) domain on the machine that is going to access the clickonce link on your site.
2) In Control Panel go to User Accounts (XP)/Store Users and Passwords (Win 2003), and manage the network passwords for a user (XP) and add in the URL, username and password.
Whenever clickonce fires up for this URL it will pass the username/password specified as opposed to the local machine account.
Either of the above will solve this problem.