I'm trying to do a findAllByAttributes using a related model column as one of the criteria, but I keep getting a CDbException stating the column cannot be found.
Here's my model Relationship:
public function relations() {
return array(
'MetaData' => array(self::BELONGS_TO, 'ProjectMeta', 'wbse_or_io'),
);
}
And here's my attempted query:
$listing = ProjectIndex::model()->with('MetaData')
->findAllByAttributes(array(
'report_date'=>$reportDate,
'MetaData.cost_centre'=>$costCentre
)
);
From what I've read through Google/StackOverflow/these forums, I should be able to reference the cost_centre column in the MetaData relationship. But I keep getting the following error:
Table "tbl_project_index" does not have a column named "MetaData.cost_centre"
How do I reference the related table column?
Check this out
$listing = ProjectIndex::model()->with(
'MetaData'=>array(
'condition'=>'cost_centre = :cost_centre',
'params'=>array('cost_centre'=>$costCentre))
)
->findAllByAttributes(array('report_date'=>$reportDate));
The attributes in the attributes array cannot be for the related models. You can look at the source for findAllByAttributes for a better explanation. You can, however, pass the related attribute as a condition string or CDbCriteria array, in addition to Alex's answer.
$listing = ProjectIndex::model()->with('MetaData')->findAllByAttributes(
array('report_date'=>$reportDate),
'cost_centre = :cost_centre',
array(':cost_centre'=> $costCentre)
);
Or
$listing = ProjectIndex::model()->with('MetaData')->findAllByAttributes(
array('report_date'=>$reportDate),
array(
'condition' =>'cost_centre = :cost_centre',
'params'=>array(':cost_centre'=> $costCentre)
),
);
Related
I have seen many questions related to how you can return a limited set of fields from a single EF entity with anonymous types. My issue is about the opposite of that. I want to return values from related tables along with all of the fields in my entity table:
IQueryable<EntityModels.TBLEFFORT> query = db.TBLEFFORT.AsQueryable();
query = query.Where(a => a.EFFDELETE == "0");
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(sGuid))
{
query = query.Where(a => a.TBLEFFORTLINK.Any(b => b.TBLSHS.TBLTACT.Any(c => c.CGUID == sGuid)));
}
query.Select(x => new EffortSearchResult()
{
Efguid = x.EFGUID,
Efstatus = x.EFSTATUS
});
Here my base entity is TBLEFFORT and i query directly against it on the EFFDELETE field and then i query against it with a related table TBLSHS.
However, in my anon return object i only have fields from TBLEFFORT (EFGUID and EFSTATUS). How can i include fields from the related TBLSHS entity in my anonymous return object?
The related tables are lookups so they will be 1:1. I'm not looking to return complex sets based on a FK field in TBLEFFORT
I figured it out. you just extend out in your anon type and dig for what you need from the related tables:
Shguid = x.TBLEFFORTLINK.Select(b => b.TBLSHS.SOMEFIELD).FirstOrDefault(),
I have this Object model with 'has_many' relation to Variables
public function relations()
{
return array(
'variables' => array(self::HAS_MANY, 'Variables', 'variable_id')
);
}
Now i want to use the variables to order my data like
$criteria->with = array('variables');
$criteria->order = 'variables.id DESC';
But it doesn't work.
Is there a way to do something like this? Thanks.
You can define the relation directly with an order if you want, in this case you can do.
public function relations()
{
return array(
'variables' => array(self::HAS_MANY, 'Variables', 'object_id', 'order'=>'variables.id DESC')
);
}
What you wrote it is not working because you have a 1 to many relation. The criteria will run 2 queries, 1 to get the main record, the second time to get the relations. That is why your order is not working.
If you want it to work like you said you should do a ->join instead of ->with.
There is quite a difference between the 2 so take care how you are writing the criteria.
I think the issue is with foreign key binding, if you are adding a relationship in object table (Object model) which has many variables having object_id as foreign key in variable table (Variable model) then you need to define relationship as follows:
public function relations()
{
return array(
'variables' => array(self::HAS_MANY, 'Variables', 'object_id') // check the change in foreign key column
);
}
I have a system where all tables in the MySQL database are populated with external data (synchronized with another system every 5 minutes). All tables have a column DELFLAG which is used to mark disabled entries.
So I have about 15 AR models in Yii that are linked to those tables. Whenever I make a query, I need to add something like $criteria->addCondition('DELFLAG=0'). This gets ugly if there are multiple tables present in the query, as every one of them has the flag. Also, there's a potential for error if I forget one of those conditions.
Here's how I do it now:
public function search($showtype = NULL) {
$criteria=new CDbCriteria;
if (isset($showtype)) {
$criteria->with = array(
'TSSSHOW',
'TSSSHOW.TSSSHOWTYPEITEM',
'TSSSHOW.TSSSHOWTYPEITEM.TSSSHOWTYPE'
);
$criteria->compare('TSSSHOWTYPEITEM.TSSSHOWTYPEID', $showtype);
$criteria->addCondition('TSSSHOW.DELFLAG=0');
$criteria->addCondition('TSSSHOWTYPEITEM.DELFLAG=0');
}
$exp = new CDbExpression("`TSSEVENT_START_DATETIME` > NOW()");
$criteria->addCondition($exp);
$criteria->addCondition('t.DELFLAG=0');
$criteria->together = true;
$criteria->order = 't.TSSEVENT_START_DATETIME ASC';
return new CActiveDataProvider($this, array(
'criteria'=>$criteria,
'pagination' => array(
'pageSize' => 15,
),
));
}
Is there a convenient way to include this condition into every query that includes these tables? Perhaps a special class which my models shall descend from (as opposed to the default CActiveRecord)?
I'd suggest declaring named scope for these models:
public function scopes()
{
return array(
'disabledEntry'=>array(
'condition'=>'DELFLAG=1',
),
);
}
Using the named scope: Model::model()->disabledEntry()->findAll();
You can provide scope when relaring to model in the with() statement as well: ModelA::model()->with('model:disabledEntry')->findAll();
But if you have to set this condition each time, you may set defaultScope:
public function defaultScope()
{
return array(
'condition' => 'DELFLAG=0',
);
}
Thus, this model by default would have this condition.
Update: Since you have the identically named columns in several models, YII can have some column name ambiguity troubles while building sql-query. If it is the case, use alias in scope declaration or use the following statement to set current table alias explicitly while declaring scope 'condition' => $this->getTableAlias(false, false) . '.DELFLAG=0',
You can create Your own class e.g. CustomActiveRecord extends CActiveRecord
then You should override findAll, findByPk methods with your criteria..
Other solution is to run this query 'DELETE FROM table_name WHERE DELFLAG=1' after every import..
Hi I am using Yii to create an Application
I have modified the search() in model and I have come up with a problem.
Users can log in as admins, managers, clients
When a user is logged as a manager, he can view clients only from the store they both belong. So far so good, I've managed to accomplish that.
Now the problem is when I try to prevent managers from viewing other managers from the same store (and therefore edit each other's accounts) in CGridView.
The relations
/**
* #return array relational rules.
*/
public function relations()
{
// NOTE: you may need to adjust the relation name and the related
// class name for the relations automatically generated below.
return array(
'authitems' => array(self::MANY_MANY, 'Authassignment', 'authassignment(userid, itemname)'),
'additionalContacts' => array(self::HAS_MANY, 'AdditionalContact', 'Client_Id'),
'store' => array(self::BELONGS_TO, 'Store', 'Store_Id'),
'user' => array(self::BELONGS_TO, 'User', 'User_Id'),
'genericPoints' => array(self::HAS_MANY, 'GenericPoint', 'Client_Id'),
);
}
The Custom model search
public function searchCustom()
{
// Warning: Please modify the following code to remove attributes that
// should not be searched.
$criteria=new CDbCriteria;
$criteria->addCondition('t.id !='.$this->id);
$criteria->compare('t.Created',$this->Created,true);
$criteria->compare('t.Updated',$this->Updated,true);
$criteria->compare('t.Discount',$this->Discount,true);
$criteria->compare('t.Discount_Type',$this->Discount_Type,true);
$criteria->addCondition('t.Store_Id ='.$this->Store_Id);
//$criteria->addCondition('t.id !='.$this->id);
//GET FIELDS FROM USER IN SEARCH
$criteria->with=array('user');
$criteria->compare('user.id',$this->User_Id,true);
$criteria->compare('user.First_Name',$this->First_Name,true);
$criteria->compare('user.Last_Name',$this->Last_Name,true);
$criteria->compare('user.Username',$this->Username,true);
$criteria->compare('user.Email',$this->Email,true);
$criteria->addCondition('user.Status = 1');
$criteria->with=array('authitems');
$criteria->compare('authitems.userid',$this->id,false);
$criteria->compare('authitems.itemname','client',false);
$criteria->together = true;
$criteria->order = 't.Created DESC';
return new CActiveDataProvider($this, array(
'criteria'=>$criteria,
));
}
And this the error I am getting
CDbCommand failed to execute the SQL statement: SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column 'user.Status' in 'where clause'. The SQL statement executed was: SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT `t`.`id`) FROM `client` `t` LEFT OUTER JOIN `authassignment` `authitems_authitems` ON (`t`.`id`=`authitems_authitems`.`userid`) LEFT OUTER JOIN `authassignment` `authitems` ON (`authitems`.`itemname`=`authitems_authitems`.`itemname`) WHERE (((((t.id !=2) AND (t.Store_Id =1)) AND (user.Status = 1)) AND (authitems.userid=:ycp0)) AND (authitems.itemname=:ycp1))
I know it has something to do with the relations the gii set up for me but I can't pinpoint it.
Perhaps authitems' MANY_MANY relation stops the user relation from loading?
Instead of making another assignement for $criteria->with (which will override the previous one), you should simply try :
$criteria->with=array('user', 'authitems');
I'm using Kohana v3 and ORM, I have two models, Model_A and Model_B related by "has_many" through a pivot table, which has an additional column. I can save data in that column in the pivot table using the third parameter of the add() function, but I can't figure out how to read that column using ORM.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
You need to create a Model that is based on that pivot table if you want to access that additional column, let say we name it Model_A_B.
class Model_A_B extends ORM {
protected $_belongs_to = array(
'A' => array(),
'B' => array()
);
}
Then, if $a is an instance of Model_A and $b is an instance of Model_B, we get the Model_A_B instance by calling:
$ab = ORM::factory('A_B', array('A_id' => $a, 'B_id' => $b));
if ($ab->loaded()) {
// do stuff
}