I have three tables jobs,categories and job_categories with similar to below structure:
**jobs**
id title desc
**categories**
id name
**job_categories**
id job_id category_id
So I want to retrieve all the jobs belongs to a particular category. For that I wrote an action view() in CategoriesController.php
function view($category_id = NULL)
{
if($category_id != NULL)
{
$conditions['JobCategory']['category_id'] = $category_id;
$all_jobs = $this->Job->find('all',array('conditions' => $conditions));
$this->set('all_jobs',$all_jobs);
}
}
And added a $hasMany to Category.php model:
class Category extends AppModel {
var $name = 'Category';
var $hasMany = array('JobCategory');
}
But when I checked the view , it shows error:
Error: SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column 'JobCategory' in 'where clause' and the query it generates :
SELECT Job.id, Job.job_title, Job.job_description,
Job.job_skills, Job.contact_number, Job.contact_email,
Job.qualification_id, Job.experience, Job.categories,
Job.remarks, Job.support_image, Job.freshers_apply,
Job.added_on, Job.status, Qualification.id,
Qualification.name FROM cakead.jobs AS Job LEFT JOIN
cakead.qualifications AS Qualification ON
(Job.qualification_id = Qualification.id) WHERE JobCategory =
('1')
try this
//AppModel.php
public $actAs = array('Containable');
//Category.php
class Category extends AppModel {
var $name = 'Category';
var $hasAndBelongsTo = array('Category');
}
//CategoriesController.php
function view($category_id = NULL)
{
if($category_id != NULL)
{
$conditions['Category']['id'] = $category_id;
$all_jobs = $this->Category->find('all',array('conditions' => $conditions));
$this->set('all_jobs',$all_jobs);
}
}
Related
[HttpGet]
public JsonResult GetData()
{``
ApplicationDbContext db = new ApplicationDbContext();
var course = db.Courses
.Include(d=>d.Competences)
.Include(d=>d.Sequences)
.ToList().Select(p => new { Id = p.Id, Titre = p.Titre, ShortDescription = p.ShortDescription, Price = p.Price, CategorieId = p.CategorieId });
var query = from q in db.Courses
join cat in db.Categories.AsEnumerable()
on q.CategorieId equals cat.Libelle
enter code here
return Json(new { data = course },
JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
It is my first apex class and i don't really know how to implement a proper test class.
My goal is to achieve test coverage of 75%.
I updated based on the comments but i managed to achieve only 70 %. I don't have other idea how to improve this more.
Here is what i did :
Apex class:
public with sharing class AccountController {
#AuraEnabled
public static List<Account> findAll() {
User userDetails =[SELECT Id, Name, Email, Profile.Name, UserRole.Name FROM User
where Id=:userinfo.getUserId() ];
// Theme4t is theme that is used by mobille app for android or iphone
if(((userDetails.UserRole.Name).equals('yon')|| (userDetails.UserRole.Name).equals('bon')|| (userDetails.UserRole.Name).contains('non')
|| (userDetails.UserRole.Name).contains('go')) && UserInfo.getUiTheme() != 'Theme4t'){
return [SELECT id, name, AccountStatus__c, ShippingLatitude, ShippingLongitude, ShippingCity
FROM Account
WHERE ShippingLatitude != NULL AND ShippingLongitude != NULL
LIMIT:22000];
}else {
return [SELECT id, name, AccountStatus__c, ShippingLatitude, ShippingLongitude, ShippingCity
FROM Account
WHERE OwnerId =: UserInfo.getUserId() AND ShippingLatitude != NULL AND ShippingLongitude != NULL
LIMIT:5000];
}
}
Apex test class:
#isTest
public class AccountControllerTest
{
static testMethod void testMethod1()
{
Account acc = new Account();
acc.Name='Test';
insert acc;
User userDetails =[SELECT Id, Name, Email, Profile.Name, UserRole.Name FROM User
where Id=:userinfo.getUserId() ];
List<Account> lstAcc = AccountController.findAll();
UserRole ur =new UserRole();
userDetails.UserRoleId=[select Id from UserRole where Name='yon'].Id;
System.runAs(userDetails){
List<Account> lstAcc1 = AccountController.findAll();
}
userDetails.UserRoleId=[select Id from UserRole where Name='bon'].Id;
System.runAs(userDetails){
List<Account> lstAcc2 = AccountController.findAll();
}
userDetails.UserRoleId=[select Id from UserRole where Name='non'].Id;
System.runAs(userDetails){
List<Account> lstAcc3 = AccountController.findAll();
}
userDetails.UserRoleId=[select Id from UserRole where Name='go'].Id;
System.runAs(userDetails){
List<Account> lstAcc4 = AccountController.findAll();
}
}
Please complete the below trailhead to learn the unit test in Salesforce.
https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/content/learn/modules/apex_testing/apex_testing_intro
And also as you are trying to create a user after account insertion it will throw Mixed DML error. you need to use system.runAs() method. follow the below URL for using the method.
https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.apexcode.meta/apexcode/apex_testing_tools_runas.htm
Let me know if still, you need any help on this.
Here is the code for your class and test class. Please follow the best practices from http://blog.shivanathd.com/2013/11/Best-Practices-Test-Class-in-Salesforce.html
This time I am providing the code to you to understand how to create a test class, but next time onwards please follow the steps and documents I have shared.
public with sharing class AccountController {
//using a test visible variable for setting the ui theme check.
#TestVisible static Boolean isTheme4t = UserInfo.getUiThemeDisplayed() == 'Theme4t';
#AuraEnabled
public static List<Account> findAll() {
User userDetails =[SELECT Id, Name, Email, Profile.Name, UserRole.Name FROM User where Id=:userinfo.getUserId()];
// Theme4t is theme that is used by mobille app for android or iphone
if(((userDetails.UserRole.Name).equals('yon')|| (userDetails.UserRole.Name).equals('bon')|| (userDetails.UserRole.Name).contains('non') || (userDetails.UserRole.Name).contains('go')) && !isTheme4t){
return [SELECT id, name, AccountStatus__c, ShippingLatitude, ShippingLongitude, ShippingCity FROM Account WHERE ShippingLatitude != NULL AND ShippingLongitude != NULL LIMIT 22000];
}else {
return [SELECT id, name, AccountStatus__c, ShippingLatitude, ShippingLongitude, ShippingCity FROM Account WHERE OwnerId =: UserInfo.getUserId() AND ShippingLatitude != NULL AND ShippingLongitude != NULL LIMIT 5000];
}
}
}
#isTest
public class AccountControllerTest
{
//Use setup data method to create data and query it in testmethod
#testSetup static void setup() {
UserRole r = new UserRole(DeveloperName = 'yon', Name = 'yon');
insert r;
User u = new User(
ProfileId = [SELECT Id FROM Profile WHERE Name = 'System Administrator'].Id,
LastName = 'last',
Email = 'puser000#amamama.com',
Username = 'puser000#amamama.com' + System.currentTimeMillis(),
CompanyName = 'TEST',
Title = 'title',
Alias = 'alias',
TimeZoneSidKey = 'America/Los_Angeles',
EmailEncodingKey = 'UTF-8',
LanguageLocaleKey = 'en_US',
LocaleSidKey = 'en_US',
UserRoleId = r.Id
);
insert u;
System.runAs(u){
Account acc = new Account();
acc.Name = 'Test Account';
acc.ShippingLatitude = 75.46;
acc.ShippingLongitude = 45.46;
acc.AccountStatus__c = 'test';
insert acc;
}
}
static testMethod void testMethod1(){
user u = [select Id from User where email = 'puser000#amamama.com' limit 1];
system.runAs(u){
Test.startTest();
List<Account> acc = [select Id,AccountStatus__c,ShippingLatitude,ShippingLongitude from Account where Name = 'Test Account'];
List<Account> lstAcc4 = AccountController.findAll();
system.assert(lstAcc4.size()>0);
Test.stopTest();
}
}
static testMethod void testMethod2(){
user u = [select Id from User where email = 'puser000#amamama.com' limit 1];
system.runAs(u){
AccountController.isTheme4t = true;
Test.startTest();
List<Account> acc = [select Id,AccountStatus__c,ShippingLatitude,ShippingLongitude from Account where Name = 'Test Account'];
List<Account> lstAcc4 = AccountController.findAll();
system.assert(lstAcc4.size()>0);
Test.stopTest();
}
}
}
select case statement in linq query.
Here is the query on sql:
select case when DATEDIFF(day,convert(varchar,Min([Order].CreatedOnUtc),101),convert(varchar,Max([Order].CreatedOnUtc),101)) = 0 then
Sum([Order].OrderSubtotal)
else
case when (DATEDIFF(day,convert(varchar,Min([Order].CreatedOnUtc),101),convert(varchar,Max([Order].CreatedOnUtc),101))/30) = 0 then Sum([Order].OrderSubtotal) else
Sum([Order].OrderSubtotal)/
(DATEDIFF(day,convert(varchar,Min([Order].CreatedOnUtc),101),convert(varchar,Max([Order].CreatedOnUtc),101))/30)
end
end as 'Account Value' from [order] where And Account.ID = #Act_ID
I am trying the code here:
var query = _orderRepository.Table;
query = query.Where(o => o.AccountId == accountId);
In query i am getting my value.
After query statement what should i write??
how do i write for case statement using linq???
#Manoj, may be the below code helps you. This sample C# project may solve the problem you have.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace DateDiffIssue
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Preparing data
var data = new Order[] {
new Order { AccountID = 1, CreatedOnUtc = DateTime.Parse("1.01.2017 10:00"), OrderSubtotal = 100 },
new Order { AccountID = 1, CreatedOnUtc = DateTime.Parse("1.01.2017 12:00"), OrderSubtotal = 150 },
new Order { AccountID = 1, CreatedOnUtc = DateTime.Parse("1.01.2017 14:00"), OrderSubtotal = 150 }
};
// Selection
var selected = (from item in data
let accountData = data.Where(w => w.AccountID == 1)
let minDate = accountData.Min(m => m.CreatedOnUtc).Date
let maxDate = accountData.Where(w => w.AccountID == 1).Max(m => m.CreatedOnUtc).Date
let isSameDate = minDate == maxDate
let basedOn30Days = (maxDate - minDate).TotalDays / 30
let isInside30Days = (int)basedOn30Days == 0
let accountDataSum = accountData.Sum(s => s.OrderSubtotal)
select new
{
AccountValue = isSameDate ? accountDataSum :
isInside30Days ? accountDataSum :
accountDataSum / basedOn30Days
}).Distinct();
// Print each order
selected.ToList().ForEach(Console.WriteLine);
// Wait for key
Console.WriteLine("Please press key");
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
internal class Order
{
public int AccountID { get; set; }
public DateTime CreatedOnUtc { get; set; }
public int OrderSubtotal { get; set; }
}
}
I have the following code:
public class WorkOrderByUserId : AbstractMultiMapIndexCreationTask<WorkOrderByUserId.Result>
{
public WorkOrderByUserId()
{
this.AddMap<WorkOrder>(items
=> from item in items
select new Result
{
OwnerId = item.OwnerId,
WorkOrder = new WorkOrderLookupDto
{
Id = item.Id,
Name = item.EventName
},
WorkOrders = null
});
this.AddMap<Invoice>(items
=> from item in items
select new Result
{
OwnerId = item.WorkOrder.OwnerId,
WorkOrder = new WorkOrderLookupDto
{
Id = item.WorkOrder.Id,
Name = item.WorkOrder.EventName
},
WorkOrders = null
});
this.Reduce = results => from result in results
group result by result.OwnerId
into g
select new Result
{
OwnerId = g.Key,
WorkOrders = g.Select(x => x.WorkOrder),
WorkOrder = null
};
this.Indexes.Add(x => x.OwnerId, FieldIndexing.Default);
}
public class Result
{
public string OwnerId { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<WorkOrderLookupDto> WorkOrders { get; set; }
public WorkOrderLookupDto WorkOrder { get; set; }
}
}
It gets me very close to where I want to be, however I seem to be missing something and I'm losing information and I'm not sure why.
Using the Map/Reduce Visualizer I notice the MAP is displaying the Results (i.e. WorkOrders is populated, and WorkOrder is null)
As this point I was expecting to have a bunch of items with NULL WorkOrders and a valid WorkOrder, which I expected to reduce down into the WorkOrders collection.
When I look at the final reduce in the visualizer, I notice my WorkOrder is NULL and my WorkOrders are missing entirely.
And when I look at the FINAL result of the Index I see what I'm looking for, just without the actual data I'm looking for.
What do I need to change to get my final WorkOrders to NOT be NULL?
I was able to get my desired result using the following code:
public class WorkOrderByUserId : AbstractMultiMapIndexCreationTask<WorkOrderByUserId.Result>
{
public WorkOrderByUserId()
{
this.AddMap<WorkOrder>(items
=> from item in items
select new Result
{
OwnerId = item.OwnerId,
WorkOrders = new[]
{
new WorkOrderLookupDto
{
Id = item.Id,
Name = item.EventName
}
}
});
this.AddMap<Invoice>(items
=> from item in items
select new Result
{
OwnerId = item.WorkOrder.OwnerId,
WorkOrders = new[]
{
new WorkOrderLookupDto
{
Id = item.WorkOrder.Id,
Name = item.WorkOrder.EventName
}
}
});
this.Reduce = results => from result in results
group result by result.OwnerId
into g
select new Result
{
OwnerId = g.Key,
WorkOrders = g.SelectMany(x => x.WorkOrders)
};
this.Indexes.Add(x => x.OwnerId, FieldIndexing.Default);
}
public class Result
{
public string OwnerId { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<WorkOrderLookupDto> WorkOrders { get; set; }
}
}
I'm trying to work with grouped data coming back from SQL.
The method I'm writing is to provide the data for a "Case Status Overview" screen.
It must produce a nested XML document.
Now, I could do it the easy way, but I'm trying to learn whether it's possible to use the linq "group by" statement and then to project the data already nested. (the easy way would be just to pull back the data in a tabular fashion from the database and then for-loop through it forming the Xml document for output)
Here is the data hierarchy:
Every Case has a DebtType and every DebtType has a Client.
Here is the SQL that retrieves the data:
SELECT ClientNames.ClientID ,
ClientNames.ClientCode ,
ClientNames.ClientName ,
DebtTypes.DebtTypeID ,
DebtTypes.DebtTypeShortDesc ,
DebtTypes.DebtTypeLongDesc ,
Cases.CurrentStateCode ,
SUM(1 - CAST(Cases.CaseClosed AS INT)) AS OpenCaseCount ,
SUM(CAST(Cases.CaseClosed AS INT)) AS ClosedCaseCount ,
SUM(CAST(Cases.CaseOnHold AS INT)) AS OnHoldCaseCount ,
SUM(CAST(Cases.CaseReferred AS INT)) AS ReferredCaseCount ,
COUNT(Cases.CaseID) AS TotalCaseCount ,
SUM(Cases.CaseTotalPaid) AS TotalAmountPaid ,
SUM(Cases.CaseCurrentOutstandingAmount) AS TotalAmountOutstanding,
SUM(Cases.CaseTotalDebtWrittenOff) AS TotalAmountWrittenOff ,
SUM(Cases.CaseTotalDebtCancelled) AS TotalAmountCancelled
FROM ClientNames
INNER JOIN ClientDebtTypes
ON ClientNames.ClientID = ClientDebtTypes.ClientID
INNER JOIN DebtTypes
ON ClientDebtTypes.DebtTypeID = DebtTypes.DebtTypeID
INNER JOIN Cases
ON ClientDebtTypes.ClientDebtTypeID = Cases.CaseClientDebtTypeID
GROUP BY ClientNames.ClientID ,
ClientNames.ClientCode ,
ClientNames.ClientName ,
DebtTypes.DebtTypeID ,
DebtTypes.DebtTypeShortDesc,
DebtTypes.DebtTypeLongDesc ,
Cases.CurrentStateCode
ORDER BY ClientNames.ClientID,
DebtTypes.DebtTypeID,
CurrentStateCode
Using Linqer it converts it to:
from clientnames in db.ClientNames
join clientdebttypes in db.ClientDebtTypes on clientnames.ClientID equals clientdebttypes.ClientID
join debttypes in db.DebtTypes on clientdebttypes.DebtTypeID equals debttypes.DebtTypeID
join cases in db.Cases on new { ClientDebtTypeID = clientdebttypes.ClientDebtTypeID } equals new { ClientDebtTypeID = cases.CaseClientDebtTypeID }
group new {clientnames, debttypes, cases} by new {
clientnames.ClientID,
clientnames.ClientCode,
clientnames.ClientName1,
debttypes.DebtTypeID,
debttypes.DebtTypeShortDesc,
debttypes.DebtTypeLongDesc,
cases.CurrentStateCode
} into g
orderby
g.Key.ClientID,
g.Key.DebtTypeID,
g.Key.CurrentStateCode
select new {
ClientID = (System.Int32?)g.Key.ClientID,
g.Key.ClientCode,
g.Key.ClientName1,
DebtTypeID = (System.Int32?)g.Key.DebtTypeID,
g.Key.DebtTypeShortDesc,
g.Key.DebtTypeLongDesc,
g.Key.CurrentStateCode,
OpenCaseCount = (System.Int64?)g.Sum(p => 1 - Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseClosed)),
ClosedCaseCount = (Int32?)g.Sum(p => Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseClosed)),
OnHoldCaseCount = (Int32?)g.Sum(p => Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseOnHold)),
ReferredCaseCount = (Int32?)g.Sum(p => Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseReferred)),
TotalCaseCount = (Int64?)g.Count(p => p.cases.CaseID != null),
TotalAmountPaid = (System.Decimal?)g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseTotalPaid),
TotalAmountOutstanding = (System.Decimal?)g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseCurrentOutstandingAmount),
TotalAmountWrittenOff = (System.Decimal?)g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseTotalDebtWrittenOff),
TotalAmountCancelled = (System.Decimal?)g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseTotalDebtCancelled)
}
Now as I mentioned, I could stop there and right a for loop to create the Xml data.
But I'm trying to create a nested group (IGrouping<ClientName,IGrouping<DebtType,SummaryClass>>)
and then project the data in a nested format.
Now we're using LinqToXsd to create strong type wrappers for out Xml documents, but essentially all this means is that out output type is:
private class ClientSummary
{
public string ClientName { get; set; }
public IList<DebtTypeSummary> DebtTypes { get; set; }
}
private class DebtTypeSummary
{
public string DebtType { get; set; }
public IList<StateCodeSummary> StateCodes { get; set; }
}
private class StateCodeSummary
{
public string StateCode { get; set; }
public int TotalCount { get; set; }
public decimal TotalAmountPaid { get; set; }
//etc
//etc
//etc
}
Now I got as far as writing the following Linq:
var grouping = from cases in db.Cases
join clientdebttypes in db.ClientDebtTypes on cases.CaseClientDebtTypeID equals clientdebttypes.ClientID
join debttypes in db.DebtTypes on clientdebttypes.DebtTypeID equals debttypes.DebtTypeID
group cases by new ClientDebtTypePair() { ClientDebtType = clientdebttypes, DebtType = debttypes } into casesByClientDebtTypes
join clientnames in db.ClientNames on casesByClientDebtTypes.Key.ClientDebtType.ClientName equals clientnames
group casesByClientDebtTypes by clientnames;
var projected = from casesByClientDebtTypes in grouping
let client = casesByClientDebtTypes.Key
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType()
{
Client = new Client()
{
ClientID = client.ClientID,
DisplayName = client.ClientName1,
},
DebtTypes = from cases in casesByClientDebtTypes
let debttype = cases.Key.DebtType
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType.DebtTypesLocalType()
{
DebtType = new DebtType()
{
DebtTypeID = debttype.DebtTypeID,
Description = debttype.DebtTypeLongDesc,
DisplayName = debttype.DebtTypeShortDesc,
},
StatesCodes = from cases2 in cases
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType.DebtTypesLocalType.StatesCodesLocalType()
{
ClosedCasesCount = cases2.Sum(p => Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseClosed))
which joins and groups the database tables and then tries to project the result a ClientSummary (the class names are different but that's because the above is a simplified view of the output classes). I fail completely when I've drilled all the way down to the Cases table and I find that I don't really understand how to do agregate functions. They appear to only be available on IGrouping<K, T>s and it seems I've just got confused.
I need to also ensure that the summaries are calculated server side, pulling back millions of cases would be bad.
Can anybody help me with this one? Is this even possible?
Regards,
James.
-------### UPDATE 1 ###-------
OK, been working on this again today.
I decided to use Linq2SQL to pull pack 2D data and then reformat it using Linq2Objects.
Here is what I started with:
var sql = from clientnames in db.ClientNames
join clientdebttypes in db.ClientDebtTypes on clientnames.ClientID equals clientdebttypes.ClientID
join debttypes in db.DebtTypes on clientdebttypes.DebtTypeID equals debttypes.DebtTypeID
join cases in db.Cases on new { ClientDebtTypeID = clientdebttypes.ClientDebtTypeID } equals new { ClientDebtTypeID = cases.CaseClientDebtTypeID }
group new { clientnames, debttypes, cases } by new
{
clientnames.ClientID,
clientnames.ClientCode,
clientnames.ClientName1,
debttypes.DebtTypeID,
debttypes.DebtTypeShortDesc,
debttypes.DebtTypeLongDesc,
cases.CurrentStateCode
} into g
orderby
g.Key.ClientID,
g.Key.DebtTypeID,
g.Key.CurrentStateCode
select new
{
Client = new Client{ ClientID = g.Key.ClientID, DisplayName = g.Key.ClientName1 },
DebtType = new DebtType{ DebtTypeID = g.Key.DebtTypeID, DisplayName = g.Key.DebtTypeShortDesc, Description = g.Key.DebtTypeLongDesc },
StateSummary = new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType.DebtTypesLocalType.StatesCodesLocalType()
{
StateCode = g.Key.CurrentStateCode,
OpenCasesCount = g.Sum(p => 1 - Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseClosed)),
ClosedCasesCount = g.Sum(p => Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseClosed)),
OnHoldCasesCount = g.Sum(p => Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseOnHold)),
ReferredCasesCount = g.Sum(p => Convert.ToInt32(p.cases.CaseReferred)),
TotalCasesCount = g.Count(p => p.cases.CaseID != null),
TotalAmountPaid = g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseTotalPaid),
TotalAmountOutstanding = g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseCurrentOutstandingAmount),
TotalAmountWrittenOff = g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseTotalDebtWrittenOff),
TotalAmountCancelled = g.Sum(p => p.cases.CaseTotalDebtCancelled),
}
};
var res = sql.ToList();
output.Clients = (from results in res
group results by results.Client into resultsByClient
from resultsByDebtType in
(from results in resultsByClient
group results by results.DebtType)
group resultsByDebtType by resultsByClient.Key into resultsByDebtTypeByClient
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType()
{
Client = resultsByDebtTypeByClient.Key,
DebtTypes = (from resultsByDebtType in resultsByDebtTypeByClient
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType.DebtTypesLocalType()
{
DebtType = resultsByDebtType.Key,
StatesCodes = (from results in resultsByDebtType
let summary = results.StateSummary
select results.StateSummary).ToList()
}).ToList()
}).ToList();
That runs, but produces one Client/DebtType/Summary set for every result. So even though there is only one client in this case, I end up with 1300 clients, all identical.
I simplified it to the following:
output.Clients = (from results in res
group results by results.Client into resultsByClient
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType()
{
Client = resultsByClient.Key,
DebtTypes = null,
}).ToList();
That produces 1300 clients. Next I tried this:
output.Clients = (from results in res
group results by results.Client.ClientID into resultsByClient
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType()
{
Client = new Client { ClientID = resultsByClient.Key },
DebtTypes = null,
}).ToList();
And THAT produces ONE client (hurray!). Except I loose all the client information (boo!)
Guessing that as it's comparing client by refernce instead of by content I wrote the following:
public partial class Client
{
public static bool operator ==(Client left, Client right)
{
return left.ClientID == right.ClientID;
}
public static bool operator !=(Client left, Client right)
{
return left.ClientID != right.ClientID;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return ClientID;
}
}
That did nothing. It repeatedly calls GetHashCode(), which I fudged to force it to return the same hash code for any matching ClientID, but it still created 1300 Client groups.
Regards,
James.
-------### UPDATE 2 ###-------
OK, I thought I would have a go at making the Linq2Sql output only simple values for grouping by:
g.Key.ClientID,
g.Key.ClientName1,
g.Key.DebtTypeID,
g.Key.DebtTypeShortDesc,
g.Key.DebtTypeLongDesc,
And then changed the test Linq2Objects to:
output.Clients = (from results in res
group results by new { ClientID = results.ClientID, DisplayName = results.ClientName1 } into resultsByClient
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType()
{
Client = new Client { ClientID = resultsByClient.Key.ClientID, DisplayName = resultsByClient.Key.DisplayName },
DebtTypes = null,
}).ToList();
That works. So anonymous types compare in the way I want them to, by content not reference (apparently)
This does not:
output.Clients = (from results in res
group results by new SiDemClient { ClientID = results.ClientID, DisplayName = results.ClientName1 } into resultsByClient
select new LoadCaseStatusOverviewScreenOutput.ClientsLocalType()
{
Client = resultsByClient.Key,//new Client { ClientID = resultsByClient.Key.ClientID, DisplayName = resultsByClient.Key.DisplayName },
DebtTypes = null,
}).ToList();
That still creates 1300 groups.
So, anonymous types compare in a magical way that I don't understand. How can I make my Client class compare like an anonymous type?
Regards,
James.
-------### SOLUTION FOUND ###-------
-------### MANY THANKS TO Enigmativity ###-------
I needed to override the Equals() method instead of implementing the == operator.
Now the grouping works and I have a wonderful Xml document to reutrn!
public partial class SiDemClient
{
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
if (obj is SiDemClient)
{
return this.ClientID.Equals(((SiDemClient)obj).ClientID);
}
return false;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return ClientID;
}
}
Many Thanks,
James.
When you override GetHashCode you must also override Equals. The == & != operators are irrelevant.
Try with this:
public partial class Client
{
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
if (obj is Client)
{
return this.ClientID.Equals(((Client)obj).ClientID);
}
return false;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return this.ClientID.GetHashCode();
}
}
See if that helps.