Please take a look at the picture below.
You can see that Samsung integrates SATA 3 into the Exynos 5 Dual. So does that mean that smartphones which use Exynos 5 will be able to connect to hard drives or optical drives by using SATA interface ? Do I misunderstand anything ?
And also, does DMA in the figure ("32x DMA") refer to "Direct Memory Accessing" ?
Exynos is a general SoC (System on chip solution) that is mainly used in Samsung's high-end smartphones, but it is still not exclusively design for smartphones. Like most SoC platforms, it packs a whole lot of peripherals and features, most of which are not likely used in one application, but are there to be used in another application if needed (like a NAS device - network attached storage). This is the general nature of SoC chips.
Related
I work with an embedded device that has a USB host port. I would like to connect an iPhone to it and communicate via USB. I have done development on this and ported the functionality to connect to usbmux on the iPhone and have successful communication, however there is another problem.
All development was done with the iPhone connected to a powered USB hub that was connected to my device, as soon as I connected it directly, after enumeration it starts to drain the battery of my embedded device and causes a tension (voltage) drop that causes my device to turn off.
I know that after enumeration usb devices can draw up to 500 mA from the usb port, but I was wondering if there was a way to limit that to 100 mA (while still having the iPhone registered).
I found various questions regarding controlling voltage on the data pins or vcc from the usb port and I understand that's not possible, I'm looking for a software solution (although hardware solutions are welcome).
tl;dr: Is there a way to supply the iPhone with less than 500 mA after enumeration? Could I do this in software? Or do I need a hardware solution? I don't want to turn the port on/off, just limit the power draw of the iPhone.
NOTE: I am using Windows CE 6.0, if it is something that can only be done by modifying the drivers, or having direct access, there is no problem.
P.S. also, if there is a way to do this in *nix (or some other open source OS) that I could look at the source code and port it to Windows CE please let me know.
When a device shares its available configurations (see USB chapter 9), it specifies how much power it requires for each configuration. The host should look at all the available configurations and choose which one it wants.
In practice, however, these things don't work so smoothly.
The last time I looked at this, Windows always chose the first configuration. MacOS always chose the lowest power configuration (or highest, I can't remember). I never looked at WinCE or Linux.
If you're writing/modifying the driver, you can set your own rules for which configuration to choose, including looking for one that's 'self powered'. The iPhone, however, might only have one descriptor that always requests 500mA, bus powered. If so, then you're pretty much screwed since there's no way to let the iPhone know it's not OK to draw power.
That being said, I believe all the iPhone accessories are actually USB host (as opposed to USB device), and given that they don't always supply power, the iPhone must be capable of enumerating self powered.
I like the answer by Russ Schultz but I want to add another one:
No.
The descriptor of the peripheral device, iPhone in this case contains bMaxPower. If you enumerate this device, you also accept the power demand. It is not possible to only supply less, lets say 300 mA, if you already enumerated the device with the 500 mA desriptor. If this is what you wanted.
If the device provides multiple configurations, you are as mentioned by Russ free to write a driver which selects the configuration with less power. Hopefully, the device will then only consume the granted power.
Many peripheral devices just don't care. Most devices only provide one configuration with 500 mA. And there are a lot of devices which just consume more than they say ...
I would like to know if there's any controller such as arduino or any other microcontroller that can be programmed to run VLC player embedded in its system. It is probably the best open source player. It would be nice if it could run on a standalone controller, and just plug in your usb to the controller and play videos.
The barebone mini systems are way too expensive around 200 to 400 dollars, and that would be an easy approach, but not cost effective.Thanks for reading.
Generally speaking, no, as most "microcontrollers" lack the memory (or external memory bus) and horsepower needed to do software video decoding.
That generally is a task which falls more to "system on a chip" (SOC) designs, which today are increasingly packaged with hundreds of megabytes of memory stacked on top of a several hundred MHz processor, which may have additional special function hardware acceleration. Things like the beaglebone family, raspberry pi, and recent set top boxes and smart phones, and of course pocket cameras would be examples.
Note that some of the SOC based boards are not really any more expensive than an Arduino, especially by the time you add I/O shields to the latter. That's because they are able to leverage modern high density integration and the economies of scale of the consumer-device chip marketplace, to inexpensively put a lot of functionality on one or two chips, which would be far, far more expensive to crudely duplicate using a lot of physically discrete parts in the manner of an Arduino + accessories solution. And an Arduino is so many orders of magnitude too slow that the first accessory you would have to add to it would be a stand-alone hardware video decoding IC.
I agree with Chris.
Microcontrollers doesn't have enough memory to decode videos. You need to select some microprocessor with video processing available. On the other side you can get some cheap processors with android capability.They are available for 35-40 $. And gives smooth HDMI output. (Not sure about Plug into USB)
The barebone mini systems are way too expensive around 200 to 400
dollars, and that would be an easy approach, but not cost effective.
Raspberry Pi, about $30 give or take. Beaglebone black $45, white $89. pcDuino Lite, $39, pcDuino Dev $59, I could do this all day...
As everyone has already said, you wont port such a heavily operating system dependent program to a microcontroller, for a number of reasons, memory, processor requirements, video, and so on.
if you could say take a stm32f4 or something on the high end of microcontrollers, and create some video player for specific format or formats, the man hours involved would take a fair number of sales to overcome the cost. Why spend a few months on a project when you can have a raspberry pi or beaglebone shipped in a couple of days? (or a Roku or Apple TV at a local store).
I am new to the locating hardware side of embedded programming and so after being completely overwhelmed with all the choices out there (pc104, custom boards, a zillion option for each board, volume discounts, devel kits, ahhh!!) I am asking here for some direction.
Basically, I must find a new motherboard and (most likely) re-implement the program logic. Rewriting this in C/C++/Java/C#/Pascal/BASIC is not a problem for me. so my real problem is finding the hardware. This motherboard will have several other devices attached to it. Here is a summary of what I need to do:
Required:
2 RS232 serial ports (one used all the time for primary UI, the second one not continuous)
1 modem (9600+ baud ok) [Modem will be in simultaneous use with only one of the serial port devices, so interrupt sharing with one serial port is OK, but not both]
Minimum permanent/long term storage: Whatever O/S requires + 1 MB (executable) + 512 KB (Data files)
RAM: Minimal, whatever the O/S requires plus maybe 1MB for executable.
Nice to have:
USB port(s)
Ethernet network port
Wireless network
Implementation languages (any O/S I will adapt to):
First choice Java/C# (Mono ok)
Second choice is C/Pascal
Third is BASIC
Ok, given all this, I am having a lot of trouble finding hardware that will support this that is low in cost. Every manufacturer site I visit has a lot of options, and it's difficult to see if their offering will even satisfy my must-have requirements (for example they sometimes list 3 "serial ports", but it appears that only one of the three is RS232, for example, and don't mention what the other two are). The #1 constraint is cost, #2 is size.
Can anyone help me with this? This little task has left me thinking I should have gone for EE and not CS :-).
EDIT: A bit of background: This is a system currently in production, but the original programmer passed away, and the current hardware manufacturer cannot find hardware to run the (currently) DOS system, so I need to reimplement this in a modern platform. I can only change the programming and the motherboard hardware.
I suggest buying a cheap Atom Mini-ITX board, some of which come with multi - 4+ RS232 ports.
But with Serial->USB converters, this isn't really an issue. Just get an Atom. And if you have code, port your software to Linux.
Here is a link to a Jetway Mini-Itx board, and a link to a 4 port RS232 expansion module for it. ~$170 total, some extra for memory, a disk, and a case and PSU. $250-$300 total.
Now here is an Intel Atom Board at $69 to which you could add flash storage instead of drives, and USB-serial converters for any data collection you need to do.
PC104 has a lot of value in maximizing the space used in 19" or 23" rackmount configurations - if you're not in that space, PC104 is a waste of your time and money, IMHO.
The BeagleBoard should have everything you need for $200 or so - it can run Linux so use whatever programming language you like.
A 'modern' system will run DOS so long as it is x86, I suggest that you look at an industrial PC board from a supplier such as Advantech, your existing system may well run unchanged if it adheres to PC/DOS/BIOS standards.
That said if your original system runs on DOS, the chances are that you do not need the horsepower of a modern x86 system, and can save money by using a microcontroller board using something fairly ubiquitous such as an ARM. Also if DOS was the OS, then you most likely do not need an OS at all, and could develop the system "bare-metal". The resources necessary just to support Linux are probably far greater than your existing application and OS together, and for little or no benefit unless you intend on extending the capability of the system considerably.
There are a number of resources available (free and commercial) for implementing a file system and USB on a bare-metal system or a system using a simple real-time kernel such as FreeRTOS or eCOS which have far smaller footprints than Linux.
The Windows embedded site ( http://www.microsoft.com/windowsembedded/en-us/default.mspx )
has a lot of resources and links to hardware partners, distributors and development kits. There's even a "Spark" incubation project ( http://www.microsoft.com/windowsembedded/en-us/community/spark/default.mspx )
What's also really nice about using windows ce is that it now supports Silverlight as a development environment.
I've used the jetway boards / daughter cards that Chris mentioned with success for various projects from embedded control, my home router, my HTPC front end.
You didn't mention what the actual application was but if you need something more industrial due to temperature or moisture constraints i've found http://www.logicsupply.com/ to be a good resource for mini-itx systems that can take a beating.
A tip for these board is that given your minimal storage requirements, don't use a hard drive. Use an IDE adapter for a compact flash card as the system storage or an SD card. No moving parts is usually a big plus in these applications. They also usually offer models with DC power input so you can use a laptop like or wall wart external supply which minimizes its final size.
This http://www.fit-pc.com/web/ is another option in the very small atom PC market, you'd likely need to use some USB converters to get to your desired connectivity.
The beagle board Paul mentioned is also a good choice, there are daughter cards for that as well that will add whatever ports you need and it has an on board SD card reader for whatever storage you need. This is also a substantially lower power option vs the atom systems.
There are a ton of single board computers that would fit your needs. When searching you'll normally find that they don't keep many interface connectors on the processor board itself but rather you need to look at the stackable daughter cards they offer which would provide whatever connections you need (RS-232, etc.). This is often why you see just "serial port" in the description as the final physical layer for the serial port will be defined on the daughter card.
There are a ton of arm based development boards you could also use, to many to list, these are similar to the beagle board. Googling for "System on module" is a good way to find many options. These again are usually a module with the processor/ram/flash on 1 card and then offer various carrier boards which the module plugs into which will provide the various forms of connectivity you need.
In terms of development, the atom boards will likely be the easiest if your more familiar with x86 development. ARM is strongly supported under linux though so there is little difficulty in getting these up and running.
Personally i would avoid windows for a headless design like your discussing, i rarely see a windows based embedded device that isn't just bad.
Take at look at one of the boards in the Arduino line, in particular the Arduino Mega. Very flexible boards at a low cost, and the Mega has enough I/O ports to do what you need it to do. There is no on-chip modem, but you can connect to something like a Phillips PCD3312C over the I2C connector or you can find an Arduino add-on board (called a "shield") to give you modem functionality (or Bluetooth, ethernet, etc etc). Also, these are very easy to connect to an external memory device (like a flash drive or an SD card) so you should have plenty of storage space.
For something more PC-like, look for an existing device that is powered by a VIA EPIA board. There are lot of devices out there that use these (set-top boxes, edge routers, network security devices etc) that you can buy and re-program. For example, I found a device that was supposed to be a network security device. It came with the EPIA board, RAM, a hard drive, and a power supply. All I had to do was format the hard drive, install Linux (Debian had all necessary drivers already included), and I had a complete mini-computer ready to go. It only cost me around $45 too (bought brand new, unopened on ebay).
Update: The particular device I found was an EdgeSecure i10 from Ingrian Networks.
I've got quite a fun challenge / work assignment. I'm to monitor a couple of 5V light bulbs (warning lights) on a machine standing far out in no man's land. I'm looking for an affordable device with an input which allows me to hook into the light bulb circuit to tell whether it's lit or not.
Requirements:
GPRS
Inputs for at least two light bulbs
Programmable in C or something similar.
Bonus (not required, but it would be kind a nice):
Waterproof casing / chassis (I could make this my self, but it would be nice if I didn't have to)
Option to add other sensors like humidity, temperature and gps.
Any tips?
I'd recommend an arduino
Arduino is an open-source electronics prototyping platform based on flexible, easy-to-use hardware and software. It's intended for artists, designers, hobbyists, and anyone interested in creating interactive objects or environments.
Arduino can sense the environment by receiving input from a variety of sensors and can affect its surroundings by controlling lights, motors, and other actuators. The microcontroller on the board is programmed using the Arduino programming language (based on Wiring) and the Arduino development environment (based on Processing). Arduino projects can be stand-alone or they can communicate with software on running on a computer (e.g. Flash, Processing, MaxMSP).
there's an article here on hooking one up with gps
http://www.arduino.cc/playground/Tutorials/GPS
and for more information on the arduino platform in general, and where to buy
http://www.arduino.cc/
Edit: just noticed you were looking mainly for GPRS and not GPS - doh, however, quick look on google brings up this: http://www.libelium.com/squidbee/index.php?title=New_GPRS_module_for_Arduino_%28Hilo_-_Sagem%29 which is a GPRS module for the arduino :]
Have you looked at Arduino?
in fact, what you are asking already exists: many companies which produces electrical component for the industry provides a rail-mounted GPRS modem for remote signaling.
here is one example, made by phoenix contact
another one from another company
the tele-control range of product from wago
telit is well-known for its GSM chips, and provides a complete module with GPRS and programmable in python.
you can find some fancier systems including GPS and linux-based, here for example
there are countless other solutions...
I would buy the Terminus from Janus RC it is based on a telit module. It is a cell modem with 9 GPIO and you can program it using python.
Interface
9 Bi-directional CMOS I/Os
Power Monitor
1 ADC
ITU-T V.24 serial link through UART
Python Script Support
Integrated Python script interpreter (V1.5.2+)
2 MB of non-volatile memory
1.2 MB of RAM reserved for Python engine usage
Powerful built-in libraries makes accessing hardware easy
Working on a PoC of a project that streams data from USB via Wifi:
I need a development kit with WLan (preferably 802.11g) and HighSpeed USB device.
Don't mind the CPU type, memory size etc.
(Even a kit with only Ethernet 100M will do)
If anyone can recommend one or even suggest a place to ask, I will be most obliged.
Regards,
Murkin
If you're ok with linux and adding a third party wifi module, you might want to look at the ATSTK5xx. Mouser sells them for as low as eighty bucks and the wifi might run you another fifty. The Atmel FAE is probably a good place to start.
If you're willing to spend a bit more money, you might also look at buglabs.net and gumstix.com
I would look at the gunstix boards, and the beagle board. Both use linux and have various peripherals you can attach.
A little more expensive are the omap3530 eval board from LogicPD which I believe has wifi, bluetooth, and usb hw on the board.