I've a list of users used, with a managed bean noted with #ApplicationScoped; The problème is when i check my list i've founded something weird.
there is a difference between when i access with the both adresses ::
localhost:8080/myAPP and 127.0.0.1:8080/myAPP
The problem is caused by importing from the wrong package. If you try a refresh on either localhost:8080/myAPP or 127.0.0.1:8080/myAPP you should see that the bean instance changes everytime, even on the same hostname.
You have to import javax.enterprise.context.ApplicationScoped to make it work.
See also:
JSF application scope instantiation and injection
Why are there different bean management annotations
Java EE 6 #javax.annotation.ManagedBean vs. #javax.inject.Named vs. #javax.faces.ManagedBean
Related
I'm trying to build a dynamic database connection via Agroal inside a native image. It's not possible to use the default config params because I don't know the connection params at compile time. Is that even possible right now?
The connection is built like this at runtime:
AgroalDataSource.from(
AgroalDataSourceConfigurationSupplier()
...)
I'm currently seeing this error:
Class io.agroal.pool.ConnectionHandler[] is instantiated reflectively but was never registered.
Register the class by using org.graalvm.nativeimage.hosted.RuntimeReflection
The installed features include: [agroal, cdi, jdbc-h2, jdbc-mysql, jdbc-postgresql, kotlin, narayana-jta, resteasy, resteasy-jackson]
It runs fine on the JVM, but not using Graal. It feels like it should be possible and I'm probably missing something here. I was hoping adding agraol extension would be sufficient but obviously isn't picked up correctly.
The current situation is that we configure Agroal for native images only if you have a datasource defined using Quarkus configuration.
Thus for your use case, for now, you will have to do what we do automatically manually. What we do being registering some classes for reflection and including some resources in the native image.
See https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/master/extensions/agroal/deployment/src/main/java/io/quarkus/agroal/deployment/AgroalProcessor.java#L91 and https://quarkus.io/guides/writing-native-applications-tips#using-a-configuration-file.
Obviously, that's not ideal. Could you open an issue on our GitHub so that we can discuss it internally and see if we should/can improve the situation?
In the end, you would still need some reflection registration for your JDBC driver though.
This is what I get when I run atlas-create-jira-plugin followed by atlas-create-jira-plugin-module selecting option 1: Component Import.
The problem is that all tutorial examples appear to have plugin descriptor generated by old SDK version (that won't deploy with newer versions of SDK/Jira at all), which do not feature Atlassian-Plugin-Key, so I can't find my way to import a component.
I'm using SDK 6.2.3 and Jira 7.1.1.
Any hint - how to get this sorted out?
anonymous is correct. The old way of doing things was to to put the <component-import> tag in your atlassian-plugin.xml. The new way and also recommended is to use Atlassian Spring Scanner. When you create your add-on using atlas-jira-create-plugin and your pom.xml has the <Atlassian-Plugin-Key> tag and the dependencies atlassian-spring-scanner-annotation and atlassian-spring-scanner-runtime then you are using the new way.
If you have both the dependencies, you are using Atlassian Spring Scanner version 1.x. If you only have atlassian-spring-scanner-annotation then you are using version 2.x.
You don't have to omit/comment out Atlassian-Plugin-Key in your pom.xml and you don't have to put component-import in your atlassian-plugin.xml.
For example, you want to add licensing for your add-on and need to import the component PluginLicenseManager. You just go straight to the code and your constructor might look like this:
#Autowired
public MyMacro(#ComponentImport PluginLicenseManager licenseManager) {
this.licenseManager = licenseManager;
}
And your class like this:
#Scanned
public class MyMacro implements Macro {
If memory serves me right, be sure to check for null because sometimes Atlassian Spring Scanner can't inject a component. I think on version 1, writing an #EventListener, it could not inject a ConversionContext. But when writing a Macro, it was able to inject a ConversionContext.
According to
https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/atlassian-spring-scanner
component-import is not needed. You can replace it by #ComponentImport annotation in your Java.
Found answer here: https://developer.atlassian.com/docs/advanced-topics/configuration-of-instructions-in-atlassian-plugins
It looks like I've somehow been missing that Atlassian-Plugin-Key can be omitted, and it must be done when you need to import components.
This key just tells spring not to 'transform' plugin's Spring configuration, which must happen as part of components import process..
In the past I have been able to apply advice chain handlers on different outbound channel adapters. I am trying to do the same on int-aws:s3-outbound-channel-adapter but its not allowing that. Does this component not allows this behavior. Basically I am interested in finding out when the adapter completes the upload of a file to S3.
<int-aws:s3-outbound-channel-adapter
id="s3-outbound" channel="files" bucket="${s3.bucket}"
multipart-upload-threshold="5192" remote-directory="${s3.remote.dir}"
accessKey="${accessKey}" secretKey="${secretKey}">
THIS DOESNT WORKS - throws an error !!!
<int:request-handler-advice-chain>
</int:request-handler-advice-chain>
</int-aws:s3-outbound-channel-adapter>
Right, that isn't allowed by the XSD. Feel free to raise a JIRA on the matter.
But that doesn't matter that it doesn't work at all.
If you are on Spring Integration 4.x already you can move that <int-aws:s3-outbound-channel-adapter> to the Java & Annotation configuration using #Bean and #ServiceActivator for the AmazonS3MessageHandler.
Where #ServiceActivator has adviceChain attribute to specify bean references to your Advices.
... or you can do that using generic <int:outbound-channel-adapter> and specify AmazonS3MessageHandler as raw <bean> for the ref of the first one.
HTH
When I start the server I get an exception like :
bitronix.tm.Configuration
cannot get this JVM unique ID. Make sure it is configured and you only use ASCII characters. Will use IP address instead (unsafe for production usage!)
What is the reason for this kind of exception and how can I fix this, when loading my component to production instance?
This is part of Bitronix configuration, the "bitronix.tm.serverId" property in the bitronix-default-config.properties file. See the docs for more details here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/BTM/Configuration2x
I'm new to testing and I'm trying to create a test for my Plone product for the first time.
I'm on Plone 3.3.
The basic test suite works, I can execute it without errors.
I followed this documentation : http://plone.org/documentation/kb/testing
...except that I'm writing my tests in Python classes instead of doctests.
My problem is that I cannot seem to access the views defined in my app (I get ComponentLookupError).
The problem seems to be with the "browserlayer" defined by my applications.
When I remove the layer="..." attribute from my configure.zcml, the test can access the views without problem. However, if I add it back, it doesn't work.
I guess that's because de browserlayer interface doesn't get applied to the request.
The only reference to this problem I found is in the tests for googlesitemap : http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/googlesitemap/googlesitemap.common/trunk/googlesitemap/common/tests?rev=
The author seems to have made a custom ZCML file for the test, in which the layer="..." attribute has been removed. (which would work but it seems very bad having to maintain a separate zcml file for the tests)
In my test, I have included the following (taken from the googlesitemap tests), which passes :
from jambette.site.interfaces import IJambetteLayer # this is my browserlayer
from plone.browserlayer.utils import registered_layers
self.assertTrue(IJambetteLayer in registered_layers())
So I think my skin and browserlayer are registered correctly.
Is there anything I need to do so that the browserlayer will be applied to the request?
Browser layer interfaces are simply 'painted' onto the request with directlyProvides. Simply do so in your test setup before you look up the view:
from zope import interface
from jambette.site.interfaces import IJambetteLayer
...
directlyProvides(request, IJambetteLayer)