How to create a trigger to delete a record - sql

Looking for ideas on how to write a trigger that will delete a record when a condition is met.
I have some records being written to a SQL Server 2008 database table. These records that are being written are not important and I would like to see them removed. There are two columns that will have unique information when these records are written and I would like a trigger to remove them as soon as they are written.
I could run a daily job to delete all records that equal X and Y but my thought why not delete the records as they are written.
What would this kind of trigger look like?

If you are not able to change that at any app layer you can use an INSTEAD OF INSERT trigger and those rows will not even be inserted at all.
It will save the database from both inserting and deleting.

Related

SQL - Record Every Statement That Updated Table

I am working on a database used by separate applications. One of these applications is updating two fields in a table but I can't work out what one and don't have the source code for all the applications.
I am wondering if it is possible to write a log (to another table or elsewhere) to what the last update statement made against the table in question was. E.g. to record all SQL that has attempted to update the table automatically...
create a trigger before update on this table. Also create a new table. In that trigger store values before and after update in to a newly created table

Keep a shadow copy of a table while retaining records removed from the original

This is probably laughably easy for an SQL expert, but SQL (although I can use it) is not really my thing.
I've got a table in a DB. (Let's call it COMPUTERS)
About 10.000 rows. 25 columns. 1 unique key: Column ASSETS.
Occasionally an external program will delete 1 or more of the rows, but isn't supposed to do that, because we still need to know some info from those rows before we can really delete the items.
We can't control the behavior of the external application so we came up with a different idea:
We want to create a second identical table (COMPUTERS_BACKUP) and initially fill this with a one-on-one copy of COMPUTERS.
After that, once a day copy new records from COMPUTERS to COMPUTERS_BACKUP and update those records in COMPUTERS_BACKUP where the original in COMPUTERS has changed (ASSETS column will never change).
That way we keep the last state of a record deleted from COMPUTERS.
Can someone supply the code for a stored procedure that can be scheduled to run once a day? I can probably figure this out myself, but it would take me several hours or so and I'm very pressed for time.
just create a trigger for insert computers table
CREATE TRIGGER newComputer
ON [Computers]
AFTER INSERT
Begin
INSERT INTO COMPUTERS_BACKUP
SELECT * FROM Inserted
End
It'll work when you insert new computer to computers table and it'll also insert the record to bakcup table
When you update computers you could change computers backup too with update trigger
CREATE TRIGGER newComputer
ON [Computers]
AFTER UPDATE
Begin
//can access before updating the record through SELECT * FROM Deleted
//can access after updating the record through SELECT * FROM Inserted
UPDATE Computers_BACKUP SET
(attributes) = inserted.(attribute)
WHERE id = inserted.id
End
At the end I guess you don't want to delete the backup when original record is deleted from computers table. You can chech more examples from msdn using triggers.
When a record removed from computers table
CREATE TRIGGER computerDeleted ON [Computers] AFTER DELETE
Begin
INSERT INTO Computers_BACKUP
SELECT * FROM Deleted
End
Besides creating triggers, you may look into enabling Change Data Capture, which is available in SQL Server Enterprise Edition. It may be an overshot, but it should be mentioned and you may find it useful for other tables and objects.
IMHO a possible solution, if you never delete records (only update) from that table in your application, can be to introduce an INSTEAD OF DELETE trigger
CREATE TRIGGER tg_computers_delete ON computers
INSTEAD OF DELETE AS
DELETE computers WHERE 1=2;
It will prevent the deletion of the records.
Here is SQLFiddle demo.
A trigger for Before Delete event can help you to guard this table:
CREATE TRIGGER backup_row_before_delete ON COMPUTERS_Table FOR Delete
as
INSERT INTO Computers_Backup
SELECT deleted.* from deleted
You can change deleted.* for deleted.col1, deleted.col2 if you want to keep certain columns only.
will delete 1 or more of the rows, but isn't supposed to do that
Then you have permission and integrity issues.
You can most certainly use a trigger to record deletions (and updates of course) but I would not recommend you use it purely to keep a copy of stuff you didn't want deleted in the first place!
Remove delete permissions if you have to or beef up your data integrity if you can. Without your schema it's hard to tell exactly how though.
Finally, use your (INSTEAD OF) trigger to check whatever conditions you need to prevent the delete when appropriate.

sql server 2005 trigger after delete

I have written a trigger on a table after delete row to update some other table using a field from the 'deleted' (magic table). It works fine for single row delete.
But when I try to do deletes like
delete from tblIndentDetails
WHERE indentID=5;
(it is supposed to delete more than one records meeting the criterion), the delete operation is not performed due to trigger. How can I work around the situation?

SQL Trigger - help with fundamentals

I rarely write triggers. I can use help setting up the thing.
CREATE TRIGGER audit_tableName
ON dbo.tableNameAudit
AFTER CREATE, UPDATE, DELETE on tableName
AS
BEGIN
--Get Created,updated,deletes items
INSERT into dbo.tableNameAudit(columns) VALUES ([allCUDitems])
END
GO
How do I get an iterate any CREATED, UPDATED, DELETED items that caused the trigger?
check out this msdn article.
the short of it are there are 2 special tables, inserted and deleted, that are accessible in your trigger. inserted will contain updated rows and inserted rows, while deleted will contain updated rows and deleted rows.
make sure that you understand that for a batch operation a trigger is only fired one time, so be sure to handle the possibility of multiple rows being present in those tables.
Triggers have access to two pseudo tables: INSERTED and DELETED. As their name suggests, these pseudo tables will contain all the values added or removed from the table. An update will cause a row in each of the pseudo-tables. The structure of these pseudo-tables is identical with the structure of the table on which the table is declared.
In addition the UPDATE() function inside a trigger will return TRUE for columns that were updated.
You can use INSERTED.[COLUMN] OR
SELECT [COLUMN]
FROM INSERTED
This on SQL Server.
Hope it helps.

Multiple rows update trigger

If I have a statement
that updates multiple rows, only the trigger will fire only on the first or last row that is being updated (not sure which one). I need to make a trigger that fires for ALL the records that are being updated into a particular table
Assuming SQL Server, A trigger only fires once per update, regardless of the number of rows that are updated. If you need to carry out some additional logic based on updates to multiple rows you can access the changed records by looking at the INSERTED and DELETED logical tables that are accessible in the context of a trigger.
You have not specified the database .....
In Oracle a trigger can be defined to fire for individual rows and based on the type of transaction:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER BIUDR_MY_TABLE
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE
ON MY_TABLE
REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
pk PLS_INTEGER;
BEGIN
etc ....
You just need to indicate if your trigger needs to be executed "FOR EACH ROW" or "FOR EACH STATEMENT". Adding one of these two clauses in the trigger definition will tell the DBMS when to execute the trigger (most, but not all, DBMSs support it). If you don't indicate this clause then the DBMS uses the default option which in your case seems to be the FOR EACH STATEMENT option, and that's why your trigger only fires one for each update sentence, regardless of how many rows you are updating