I'd like to generate a list of key bindings that are unpopulated in SlickEdit 18.0.0+
Is there a simple way to do this?
Currently, when I write a new macro, I have to hunt and peck trying various combinations to find if there is a key sequence I can live without.
The only thing I found on the interweb was a mailing list feature request for this, and the SlickEdit employee recommended using the command line interface instead of a bound hotkey. Not quite what I'm hoping for.
I am using v17 but 'unused keys' is an infinite set since it is a multi-key hotkey system. I imagine it can be done based on the existing key-tree, but I would not want to write it.
If you are looking for a quick manual way to find empty key-paths, use the following:
// list keys in sorted fashion to new buffer
_command list_keydefs()
// Find command assigned to a key-path
_command what_is()
// Find commands assigned to key-paths
_command what_are()
// Find key-paths assigned to command
_command where_is(_str commandName='', _str quiet='',_str separatorChar=',') name_info(COMMAND_ARG',')
// Bind to a key
_command bind_to_key(_str commandName='') name_info(COMMAND_ARG',')
// Bind current word (proc name) to key
_command bind_cur_word_alt(){
if (command_state()) {
return(0);
}
_str s=cur_word(0);
if (s==''||!is_cmd(s)) {
s=current_proc_name(false);
}
if (!is_cmd(s)) {
_message_box(s' is not a command');
return(0);
}
_str sa=letter_prompt('Number of Keys or 0 to Quit','1234567890');
if (sa==''||sa=='0') {
_message_box(1);return(0);
}
_str ss='-'sa' -r 's;
bind_to_key(ss);
ss=where_is(s,1);
sticky_message(ss);
}
// utils
_command is_cmd(...){
_str p=current_proc(false);//was current_proc_name
if (arg()==1) {
p=arg(1);
}
return(find_index(p,COMMAND_TYPE)!=0);
}
Related
Say I have something like a support ticket system (simplified as example). It has many users and organizations. Each user can be a member of several organizations, but the typical case would be one org => many users, and most of them belong only to this organization. Each organization has a "tag" which is to be used to construct "ticket numbers" for this organization. Lets say we have an org called StackExchange that wants the tag SES.
So if I open the first ticket of today, I want it to be SES140407-01. The next is SES140407-02 and so on. Doesn't have to be two digits after the dash.
How can I make sure this is generated in a way that makes sure it is 100% unique across the organization (no orgs will have the same tag)?
Note: This does not have to be the document ID in the database - that will probably just be a Guid or similar. This is just a ticket reference - kinda like a slug - that will appear in related emails etc. So it has to be unique, and I would prefer if we didn't "waste" the sequential case numbers hilo style.
Is there a practical way to ensure I get a unique ticket number even if two or more people report a new one at almost the same time?
EDIT: Each Organization is a document in RavenDB, and can easily hold a property like LastIssuedTicketId. My challenge is basically to find the best way to read this field, generate a new one, and store this back in a way that is "race condition safe".
Another edit: To be clear - I intend to generate the ticket ID in my own software. What I am looking for is a way to ask RavenDB "what was the last ticket number", and then when I generate the next one after that, "am I the only one using this?" - so that I give my ticket a unique case id, not necessarily related to what RavenDB considers the document id.
I use for that generic sequence generator written for RavenDB:
public class SequenceGenerator
{
private static readonly object Lock = new object();
private readonly IDocumentStore _docStore;
public SequenceGenerator(IDocumentStore docStore)
{
_docStore = docStore;
}
public int GetNextSequenceNumber(string sequenceKey)
{
lock (Lock)
{
using (new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Suppress))
{
while (true)
{
try
{
var document = GetDocument(sequenceKey);
if (document == null)
{
PutDocument(new JsonDocument
{
Etag = Etag.Empty,
// sending empty guid means - ensure the that the document does NOT exists
Metadata = new RavenJObject(),
DataAsJson = RavenJObject.FromObject(new { Current = 0 }),
Key = sequenceKey
});
return 0;
}
var current = document.DataAsJson.Value<int>("Current");
current++;
document.DataAsJson["Current"] = current;
PutDocument(document);
{
return current;
}
}
catch (ConcurrencyException)
{
// expected, we need to retry
}
}
}
}
}
private void PutDocument(JsonDocument document)
{
_docStore.DatabaseCommands.Put(
document.Key,
document.Etag,
document.DataAsJson,
document.Metadata);
}
private JsonDocument GetDocument(string key)
{
return _docStore.DatabaseCommands.Get(key);
}
}
It generates incremental unique sequence based on sequenceKey. Uniqueness is guaranteed by raven optimistic concurrency based on Etag. So each sequence has its own document which we update when generate new sequence number. Also, there is lock which reduced extra db calls if several threads are executing at the same moment at the same process (appdomain).
For your case you can use it this way:
var sequenceKey = string.Format("{0}{1:yyMMdd}", yourCompanyPrefix, DateTime.Now);
var nextSequenceNumber = new SequenceGenerator(yourDocStore).GetNextSequenceNumber(sequenceKey);
var nextSequenceKey = string.Format("{0}-{1:00}", sequenceKey, nextSequenceNumber);
I have a document that has a ReferenceMany attribute to another document. The reference is setup fine, and the data is returned from the query fine, but each document in the arraycollection is returned as a proxy. On this site, I saw it was mentioned I should add ->prime(true) in order to return the actual referenced documents.
When that ArrayCollection of documents is returned, I am running a loop of ids I have submitted to the server to remove them from the referenced collection. The removeElement method is not working b/c the returned documents are proxies, and I am comparing an actual document vs. those proxies. So basically I am trying to:
Look up a single document
Force all documents in the ReferenceMany attribute to be actual documents and not Proxy documents
Loop through my array of id's and load each document
Send the document to the removeElement method
On the first getSingleResult query method below, I am getting an error cannot modify cursor after beginning iteration. I saw a thread on this site mention you should prime the results in order to get actual documents back instead of proxies, and in his example, he used getSingleResult.
$q = $this->dm->createQueryBuilder('\FH\Document\Person')->field('target')->prime(true)->field('id')->equals($data->p_id);
$person = $q->getQuery()->getSingleResult();
foreach($data->loc_id as $loc) {
$location = $this->dm->createQueryBuilder('\FH\Document\Location')->field('id')->equals(new \MongoId($loc))->getQuery()->getSingleResult();
$person->removeTarget($location);
}
....
....
....
public function removeTarget($document)
{
$this->target->removeElement($document);
return $this;
}
If I remove ->prime(true) from the first query, it doesn't throw an error, yet it doesn't actually remove any elements even though I breakpoint on the method, compare the two documents, and the data is exactly the same, except in $this->target they are Location Proxy documents, and the loaded one is an actual Location Document.
Can I prime the single result somehow so I can use the ArrayCollection methods properly, or do I need to just do some for loop and compare ids?
UPDATE
So here is an update showing the problem I am having. While the solution below would work just using the MongoId(s), when I submit an actual Document class, it never actually removes the document. The ArrayCollection comes back from Doctrine as a PersistentCollection. Each element in $this->coll is of this Document type:
DocumentProxy\__CG__\FH\Document\Location
And the actual Document is this:
FH\Document\Location
The removeElement method does an array_search like this:
public function removeElement($element)
{
$key = array_search($element, $this->_elements, true);
if ($key !== false) {
unset($this->_elements[$key]);
return true;
}
return false;
}
So because the object types are not exactly the same, even though the proxy object should be inheriting from the actual Document I created, $key always returns 0 (false), so the element is not removed. Everything between the two documents are exactly the same, except the object type.
Like I said, I guess I can do it by MongoId, but why isn't it working by submitting the entire object?
Don't worry about the prime(true) stuff for just now. All that does is tell doctrine to pull the referenced data now, so it doesn't have to make multiple calls to the database when you iterate over the cursor.
What I would do is change your removeTarget method to do the following.
$this->dm->createQueryBuilder('\FH\Document\Person')->field('id')->equals($data->p_id);
$person = $q->getQuery()->getSingleResult();
$person->removeTargets($data->loc_id);
Person.php
public function removeTargets($targets)
{
foreach ($targets as $target) {
$this->removeTarget($target);
}
}
public function removeTarget($target)
{
if ($target instanceof \FH\Document\Location) {
return $this->targets->removeElement($target);
}
foreach ($this->targets as $t) {
if ($t->getId() == $target) {
return $this->targets->removeElement($t);
}
}
return $this;
}
This would mean you don't have to perform the second query manually as doctrine will know it needs to pull the data on that reference when you iterate over it. Then you can make this operation quicker by using the prime(true) call to make it pull the information it needs in one call rather than doing it dynamically when you request the object.
Hello Shopfiy Developers!
I'm having an issue with the notes attributes via API call. It used to work up until a month ago and then things start to go sideways. Has any syntax changed? Here is a snippet of my code that returns an error in the for loop.
Error message "Undefined index: note_attribute right at the foreach line"
// Overwrite custom status field if it's defined in note-attributes
if(array_key_exists('note-attributes', $o))
{
// For whatever reason, the note-attributes are formatted
// differently if there's only one key => value pair
// ( * see examples at end of this file )
// If the note-attribute array has the key 'name' in it, it's just a single pair.
// Otherwise, the note-attribute array would be numerically indexed with keys 0,1,2.. etc
if(array_key_exists('name',$o['note-attributes']['note_attribute']))
{
if($o['note-attributes']['note_attribute']['name'] == "custom_status")
$arr_tmp[7] = $o['note-attributes']['note_attribute']['value'] ;
}
else
{
foreach($o['note-attributes']['note_attribute'] as $na) //Fails here
{
if($na['name'] == "custom_status")
$arr_tmp[7] = $na['value'] ;
}
}
}
Your help is much appreciated. Thank you.
The issue here was due to a change in XML node syntax; Shopify had a regression that changed note-attributes to note_attributes in the response and it was changed back.
In my program, a Die (dice for embroidery) is a class with different fields. One of them is of the type String and it is called haveIt. So, if the user of the program enters the word "Yes" on the haveIt field, he should be able to track a list of all the Dies he has, on the myInventory list.
How do I do this? Should I create the myInventory ArrayList<Die> on the fields and constructor of my Contoller class or should I built it inside a special method in that class?
I have tryed everything and nothing works. But I am really new on this.
Here is my last attempt, creating a loop to create the new ArrayList<Die> (that has "Yes" on the haveIt field) from a special getMyInventory method in my Controller class:
public ArrayList<Die> getMyInventory(Die anyDie) {
for (int counting = 0; counting <
diesBigList.Count ; counting++);
{
if
(((Die)diesBigList[counting]).doIHaveIt.contains("Yes"))
myInventory.add(diesBigList[counting]);
return myInventory;
}
}
It does not compile. It tells me that the result should be an Array type but it is resolved as ArrayList... (and I do not comprendo that).
Thanks in advance.
Your missing a return statement. What if this is never true?
if (((Die)diesBigList[counting]).doIHaveIt.contains("Yes"))
you never reach your return statement
Here is the answer
public ArrayList<Die> getMyInventory(Die anyDie) {
ArrayList<Die> myInventory = new ArrayList<Die>();
for (int counting = 0; counting < diesBigList.Count; counting++) {
if (((Die)diesBigList[counting]).doIHaveIt.contains("Yes")) {
myInventory.add(diesBigList[counting]);
}
}
return myInventory;
}
Also there could be a problem with this: diesBigList.Count I have no idea where you got that object or what it's methods looks like but I presume in my code your making that call correctly.
I'm getting crazy, cause I cannot find what are the "default" keys you would have in a PDF Document.
For example, if I want to retrieve an hyperlink from a CGPDFDocument, I do this:
CGPDFStringRef uriStringRef;
if(!CGPDFDictionaryGetString(aDict, "URI", &uriStringRef)) {
break;
}
In this case, the key is "URI". Is there a document explaining what are the keys of a CGPDFDictionary?
It's absurd that you would have to go read 1300 page long specs just to find what keys a dictionary contains, a dictionary that could contain anything depending on what kind of annotation it is.
To get a list of keys in a CGPDFDictionaryRef you do:
// temporary C function to print out keys
void printPDFKeys(const char *key, CGPDFObjectRef ob, void *info) {
NSLog(#"key = %s", key);
}
In the place where you're trying to see the contents:
CGPDFDictionaryRef mysteriousDictionary; // this is your dictionary with keys
CGPDFDictionaryApplyFunction(mysteriousDictionary, printPDFKeys, NULL);
// break on or right after above, and you will have the list of keys NSLogged
The Adobe PDF Reference describes all of the keys.
The keys in a dictionary depend on the actual object the dictionary represents (a page dictionary has other keys than an annotation dictionary). The Adobe PDF reference describes all these objects and their keys.