I have a very confusing problem with my mediawiki at the moment. I was about to set up some new permissions in the localsettings.php and included the Namespace Protection plugin. But for some reason, I now have a new group where I can give permissions to the users which is called "Benutzer". It's the german translation for Users but i have no clue why it was created. Here a link to my actual localsettings.php: Link
When I look at the userrighs list, I also have to groups named "Benutzer". One is created by mediawiki and the other one I don't know...
Well, that wasn't the problem, but I fixed it now. In the localsettings.php, I wrote "$wgGroupPermissions['User']" instead of "$wgGroupPermissions['user']" so mediawiki thought i wanted to create a new group, and the big problem was, it localized it also, so I didn't saw my mistake.
But thanks for trying to help me :)
When displayed on special pages, the names of user groups are localized, so if your language i German, and the user group is called Benutzer, then everything is working as it should.
User group message documentation
Related
I would like to move from Redmine to GitHub by importing my repositories and issues.
In my commits I referenced issues by using issues numbers like #343.
Since issues number are cross project inside Redmine, I would like to change issue id in GitHub to match the same as in Redmine.
Is it possible?
Not easily. You create an issue by POSTing to /repos/:owner/:repo/issues. You can set title, body, assignee, milestone, and labels - that's it.
You might want to instead append the Redmine issue number to the GitHub title, like:
Button doesn't click [Redmine #1234]
You could also link to the old issue in the body of the issue.
See the create an issue API documentation for more details.
If that's not good enough, you should know that issue#s are auto-incrementing, so you could keep the number by POSTing them in the correct order, and POSTing and DELETEing throwaway issues for gaps in the sequence.
For better security, I would like to rename the login url of my blog to something other than /wp-login.php. I found a plugin that would do the Job
http://wordpress.org/plugins/rename-wp-login/
But the problem is that it works only with non-default permalinks, which is a problem for me, because I use unicode names for my topics, which could make the link very long and messy with percent encoding. I wouldn't want to translate every link name to english... that's tedious!
Is there a way to hide wp-login.php and wp-admin from hackers without having to change the permalink form?
Thank you.
You can now use Rename wp-login.php plugin with any kind of permalink structure! ;)
I can suggest one great plugin that have plenty useful things in it and also what you want. And it uses other technique, that is not dependent on permalinks (in two words - it uses htaccess for all the magic).
It's called Better WP Security.
Here is the link
Why don't you use a permalink structure like this?
/%post_id%/
From long time i was tackiling with one issue.
some one trying to access my website using random password.
i got report of ip addresss, who hits wp-login.php files.
beside that i found .sd0 file in my root folder.
that file filled with some encrypted code.
I removed this and change my wp-login.php to wp-login-xx.php
After changed this file you required to change below file also to get proper execution.
search for wp-login.php and replace this with your assign name (wp-login-xx.php)
wp-login.php
wp-includes/general-template.php
wp-includes/pluggable.php
for better security also update wordpress with latest one.
I'm having a problem when trying to A/B test certain nodes in my node-tree in Umbraco.
What I want to do is to copy a node in the node-tree to a specific spot and use that B-structure to see which of the structures works best, using Google analytics.
For example we have two node structures, let's call them "Private" and "Sweden".
Their structure with childnodes and properties are exactly the same. The only difference between them is the propertyvalues (content). The "Private"-URL is www.mysite.com/Private and the "Sweden"-URL is www.mysite.com/Sweden.
What I would like to do is to change every link on the B-structure, so that it points to its match at the A-structure. The problem is that since it's two different structures, it will have two different alternative links.
With other words, it should be a coinsidence that it enters the B-structure, then be moved back to the A-structure in the next click.
We manage what page it should load (either the A-node or the B-node) with scripts, so that it has a 50% chance for each node, and if it lands on the B-node, Google analytics will save data. What we can't manage is that every link on that page will be to the A-node.
I'd appreciate any help I can get.
Regards,
David
There's a couple of ways that seem likely to give you a start at least.
The /config/urlrewriting.config file allows you to set up multiple redirect rules within umbraco so a section like the following might work in sending all requests (whether (/sweden/pagename/ or /private/pagename/) back to the private structure. Not sure how GA will handle it:
rewriteUrlParameter="ExcludeFromClientQueryString" destinationUrl="http://www.mysite.com/private/$1" redirect="Domain" redirectMode="Permanent" ignoreCase="true" />
Secondly a simple httpmodule (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307996) can process all page requests and redirect as required - you could do a gaq_push here directly or indirectly.
I'd be interested to know how you get on - it seems a good area for extension to Umbraco.
I'm not sure I have understood perfectly what you need to do, so please excuse any assumptions that may prove mistaken. Here's what I think:
Since A & B nodes should share the same html content (besides the links of course), why don't you make the link href attribute dynamic by using a bit of razor in the template or macro:
#{var isANode = CurrentPage.Parent.Name == "Sweden"; }
A similar approach would work if you are using web forms.
We finally came to the final decision to use the alternative template-solution. Since there seem to be no generic solution for my case of this problem we had to create an alternative template with specific macros to render the different information for every documenttype we're using.
Creating dynamic links for every page is a hell of a job in this stage in the project, since there are so many pages and links. Also some links are made in javascript, so there's another problem.
I copied the a-structure to another node, only for the reason to be able to change propertyvalues. There might be a problem logging and track the information with Google Analytics though, so that's the next step for us in this project. In our alternative templates we're getting the propertyvalues from the b-structure.
Still, if anyone have some better solution I'd highly appreciate it!
Regards,
David
I have recently added Explanation text to certain fields on the SRM Contract screen (both standard and cusom fields). The user that I unit tested with worked fine, however most other users do not work. After investigation I've found that it is not just the Explanation Text that I've added, but all Explanation Text that is missing.
According to the sap help entry the behaviour is similar to what I would expect for Help mode = off.
Is it possible to turn Help mode on or off on a per user (or role) basis, and where should I look to find this?
you already found it: SAP Help says:
"You can activate the help mode either in the personal settings in the portal or in the associated URL Parameter" ... means in personal Settings, but I feel that you want it globally not on personal base or in the associated URL Parameter. The latter means you'll have to find the application in the Portal Content, there you can find URL Parameter and i would try adding HELPMODE=ON... does this help you?
start by rightclicking you application "Technical Help" or "..Help" and see what application you are looking for. Then Google the application and add +"Portal Content", I think then you'll find it.
regards, zy
I'm using an open source software called LDAP Account Manager to manage ldap users, groups, and hosts for my company. I'm having a weird problem though, and I was hoping someone could give me an idea what's happening on the LDAP side of things as opposed to the actual software.
So here's the problem in a nutshell.
The software can find all users at the following suffix:
ou=Users,ou=Accounts,dc=xxxx,dc=com
When I try to view the details of one of these users, I get an error that says:
Bad search filter
Here's the weird part. When I add a new user, the entry appears with the other users at the same suffix.
ou=Users,ou=Accounts,dc=xxxx,dc=com
In other words, all of the users (the old ones that were already in the LDAP tree, and the new one I added, exist in the same place).
I can navigate to the new user at:
CN=User, Test,ou=Users,ou=Accounts,dc=xxxxx,dc=com
But I can't navigate to any of the existing users at this location (I get the Bad Search Filter error):
CN=Fakename, John,ou=Users,ou=Accounts,dc=xxxxx,dc=com
This seems inconsistent, and I'm trying to brainstorm what could be happening. The users exist in the same location, but I get an error when accessing some, but not others. Could this be a permissions issue, or is there something I am missing?
It sounds very much like your software has troubles encoding the , (comma) separating the name and the surname in the create command or in the search filter.