If I have an object like Browsers.Item("iexplore") and if it has a property called IsOpen ,
how to print it in test complete log
I am using Jscript for scripting
Test complete is version 9
If you need to check whether a browser is running, you can do this in the following manner:
function test()
{
var b = Sys.WaitBrowser("iexplore");
if (b.Exists == true)
Log.Message("Internet Explorer is running");
else
Log.Message("Internet Explorer is not running");
}
To get a value of an object's property, just address this property using the dot notation: object.property. To post this value to the test log, call the Log.Message method. Use the Log.Warning and Log.Error methods to post warnings and errors correspondingly.
Log.Message(obj.MyProperty);
You could use any of these:
var yourObject = ..
console.info(yourObject);
console.log(yourObject);
console.log(yourObject.yourProperty);
Related
I need a method that should return a string type value to the caller. For that, I have written the following script.
String getMethodValue = ReturnCountryName("US");
String ReturnCountryValue(String CName)
{
CName = "Mauritius";
return CName;
}
// Assign values to the global properties and call the servive
com.eviware.soapui.SoapUI.globalProperties.setPropertyValue( "CountryName", getMethodValue )
// Call GetCitiesByCountry service to run
def testStep = testRunner.testCase.testSteps['GetCitiesByCountry'];
testStep.run(testRunner,context);
// Message
log.info("Testcase execution is completed successfully.")
I'm not able to find the solution for the error message as shown in the following screenshot.
What shall I do to overcome this error in the script?
Thanks,
Karunagara Pandi G
You declare a method ReturnCountryValue
String ReturnCountryValue(String CName) {
CName = "Mauritius";
return CName;
}
but call ReturnCountryName. Change the name of the method or the name of the invocation.
I would like to pass a complete JSON object to a java adapter in worklight. This adapter will call multiple other remote resources to fulfill the request. I would like to pass the json structure instead of listing out all of the parameters for a number of reasons. Invoking the worklight procedure works well. I pass the following as the parameter:
{ "parm1": 1, "parm2" : "hello" }
Which the tool is fine with. When it calls my java code, I see a object type of JSObjectConverter$1 being passed. In java debug, I can see the values in the object, but I do not see any documentation on how to do this. If memory serves me, the $1 says that it is an anonymous inner class that is being passed. Is there a better way to pass a json object/structure in adapters?
Lets assume you have this in adapter code
function test(){
var jsonObject = { "param1": 1, "param2" : "hello" };
var param2value = com.mycode.MyClass.parseJsonObject(jsonObject);
return {
result: param2value
};
}
Doesn't really matter where you're getting jsonObject from, it may come as a param from client. Worklight uses Rhino JS engine, therefore com.mycode.MyClass.parseJsonObject() function will get jsonObject as a org.mozilla.javascript.NativeObject. You can easily get obj properties like this
package com.mycode;
import org.mozilla.javascript.NativeObject;
public class MyClass {
public static String parseJsonObject(NativeObject obj){
String param2 = (String) NativeObject.getProperty(obj, "param2");
return param2;
}
}
To better explain what I'm doing here, I wanted to be able to pass a javascript object into an adapter and have it return an updated javascript object. Looks like there are two ways. The first it what I answered above a few days ago with serializing and unserializing the javascript object. The other is using the ScriptableObject class. What I wanted in the end was to use the adapter framework as described to pass in the javascript object. In doing so, this is what the Adapter JS-impl code looks like:
function add2(a) {
return {
result: com.ibm.us.roberso.Calculator.add2(a)
};
The javascript code in the client application calling the above adapter. Note that I have a function to test passing the javascript object as a parameter to the adapter framework. See the invocationData.parameters below:
function runAdapterCode2() {
// x+y=z
var jsonObject = { "x": 1, "y" : 2, "z" : "?" };
var invocationData = {
adapter : "CalculatorAdapter",
procedure : 'add2',
parameters : [jsonObject]
};
var options = {
onSuccess : success2,
onFailure : failure,
invocationContext : { 'action' : 'add2 test' }
};
WL.Client.invokeProcedure(invocationData, options);
}
In runAdapterCode2(), the javascript object is passed as you would pass any parameter into the adapter. When worklight tries to execute the java method it will look for a method signature of either taking an Object or ScriptableObject (not a NativeObject). I used the java reflection api to verify the class and hierarchy being passed in. Using the static methods on ScriptableObject you can query and modify the value in the object. At the end of the method, you can have it return a Scriptable object. Doing this will give you a javascript object back in the invocationResults.result field. Below is the java code supporting this. Please note that a good chunk of the code is there as part of the investigation on what object type is really being passed. At the bottom of the method are the few lines really needed to work with the javascript object.
#SuppressWarnings({ "unused", "rawtypes" })
public static ScriptableObject add2(ScriptableObject obj) {
// code to determine object class being passed in and its heirarchy
String result = "";
Class objClass = obj.getClass();
result = "objClass = " + objClass.getName() + "\r\n";
result += "implements=";
Class[] interfaces = objClass.getInterfaces();
for (Class classInterface : interfaces) {
result += " " + classInterface.getName() ;
}
result += "\r\nsuperclasses=";
Class superClass = objClass.getSuperclass();
while(superClass != null) {
result += " " + superClass.getName();
superClass = superClass.getSuperclass();
}
// actual code working with the javascript object
String a = (String) ScriptableObject.getProperty((ScriptableObject)obj, "z");
ScriptableObject.putProperty((ScriptableObject)obj, "z", new Long(3));
return obj;
}
Note that for javascript object, a numeric value is a Long and not int. Strings are still Strings.
Summary
There are two ways to pass in a javascript object that I've found so far.
Convert to a string in javascript, pass string to java, and have it reconstitute into a JSONObject.
Pass the javascript object and use the ScriptableObject classes to manipulate on the java side.
I'm getting the Instance ID of an object from collision_line()
Now that I have this instance, I want to get it's image_angle, but I get an 'unknown variable' message when I try that.
What should I do?
what is the value of this collision_line()? The collision_line() function returns an instance id - however when nothing is found it returns noone (-4).. So you'll have to test for that first:
var inst, imgangle;
inst = collision_line(...);
if (inst != noone) {
imgangle = inst.image_angle;
//etc etc
}
or alternativelly (more cleanly in GM), we can "abuse" the with statement. With executes all following code from the perspective of the given instance id (or for all instances of a certain object when given the object id).
However the value noone will automatically prevent any execution.
var inst, imgangle;
inst = collision_line(...);
with (inst) {
imgangle = image_angle;
//note that we do no longer have to put "inst." before getting a variable
//etc etc
}
I am using RhinoMocks 3.6 and would like to use the multimock feature to implement both a class and a interface.
var mocks = new MockRepository();
var project = mocks.StrictMultiMock(
typeof(Project),
typeof(INotifyCollectionChanged));
using (mocks.Record())
{
((INotifyCollectionChanged)project).CollectionChanged += null;
LastCall.Constraints(Is.NotNull()).Repeat.Any();
}
The LastCall is working though. I get this message :
System.InvalidOperationException : Invalid call, the last call has been used or no call has been made (make sure that you are calling a virtual (C#) / Overridable (VB) method).
What am I doing wrong here??
Have you actually checked that the Project class has methods you can override as the error message indicates? I'll assume you have. :-)
I'd suggest you switch to using the AAA syntax instead of record/replay as shown here:
I assume you're wanting to know if the class under test reacts the right way when the CollectionChanged event is fired? If that's the case, you can do it something like this:
var project = MockRepository.GenerateMock<Project, INotifyPropertyChanged>();
project.Expect(p => p.SomeMethod())
.Repeat.Any()
.Raise(p => ((INotifyCollectionChanged)p).CollectionChanged += null,p,new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs());
I have a Document class that loads variables from Facebook with the use of stage.loaderInfo
var connect:FacebookConnectObject = new FacebookConnectObject( facebook, API_KEY, this.stage.loaderInfo );
But when I change the Document class (with another one responsible for the layout of my app), and try call the above from a movieclip that exists in my application with the use:
var facebook_class:FacebookAp = new FaceBppkApp
addChild(facebook_class) I get error
TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference.
I believe the error comes fro this line
this.stage.loaderInfo
since I changed the scope...
How I am supposed to fix that?
According to a post by Devonair: Seems 99 times out of a 100 when people have a problem with a 1009 error, it's because the stage property is inaccessible.
so I used this snippet
public function start() {
if
{(stage) init();}
else
{ addEventListener(Event.ADDED_TO_STAGE, init);
}
}
private function init(event:Event = null):void {
removeEventListener(Event.ADDED_TO_STAGE, init);
// everything else...
}
In case sb has the same problem...