Complex conditional SQL statement in SQLite - sql

I'm trying to build a support system in which I now face a complex query. I've got a couple tables in my SQLite table wich look like so (slightly simplified):
CREATE TABLE "assign" (
"id" INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
"created" DATETIME NOT NULL,
"is_assigned" SMALLINT NOT NULL,
"user_id" INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES "user" ("id")
);
CREATE TABLE "message" (
"id" INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
"created" DATETIME NOT NULL,
"user_id" INTEGER REFERENCES "user" ("id") ,
"text" TEXT NOT NULL
);
CREATE TABLE "user" (
"id" INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
"name" VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL
);
I now want to do a query which gives me *a list of users for which the last created Assign.is_assigned == False and the last created Message is later than the last created Assign*. So I now have the following (pseudo) query:
SELECT *
FROM user
WHERE ((IF (
SELECT is_assigned
FROM assign
WHERE assign.user_id = user.id
ORDER BY created DESC LIMIT 1
) = False)
AND ((
SELECT created
FROM message
WHERE message.user_id = user.id
ORDER BY created DESC
LIMIT 1
) > (
SELECT created
FROM assign
WHERE assign.user_id = user.id
ORDER BY created DESC
LIMIT 1))
);
This makes sense to me, but unfortunately not to the computer. I guess I need to make use of case statements or even joins or something but I have no clue how. Does anybody have a tip on how to do this?

You don't need the IF in there, and SQLite has no False, but otherwise, your query is quite correct:
SELECT *
FROM "user"
WHERE NOT (SELECT is_assigned
FROM assign
WHERE user_id = "user".id
ORDER BY created DESC
LIMIT 1)
AND (SELECT created
FROM message
WHERE user_id = "user".id
ORDER BY created DESC
LIMIT 1
) > (
SELECT created
FROM assign
WHERE user_id = "user".id
ORDER BY created DESC
LIMIT 1)

Try following query I have created in mysql
SELECT u.id AS 'user',u.name AS 'User_Name', ass.created AS 'assign_created',ass.is_assigned AS 'is_assigned',
msg.created AS 'message_created'
FROM `user` AS u
LEFT JOIN `assign` AS ass ON ass.`user_id` = u.`id`
LEFT JOIN `message` AS msg ON msg.`user_id` = u.id
LEFT JOIN (SELECT u.id AS 'user_id',u.name AS 'username',ass.created AS 'max_ass_created',ass.is_assigned AS 'assigned'
FROM `user` AS u
LEFT JOIN `assign` AS ass ON ass.`user_id` = u.`id`
LEFT JOIN `message` AS msg ON msg.`user_id` = u.`id`
GROUP BY u.id ORDER BY ass.created DESC) AS sub ON sub.user_id = u.id
WHERE (sub.assigned IS FALSE AND msg.created < sub.max_ass_created)
check SQL Fiddle of your scenario
hope this will solve your problem !

Related

What's the best way to compare the results of 2 Subselects on the same table?

Is there a better way to compare the result of 2 Sub-Selects on the same Table, than using 2 separate Queries?
In the following Query, I'd like to select all incidents where the "client" of the "creator" is not equal to the "client" of another user which I pass later on.
SELECT
*
FROM
incident i
WHERE
i.client_id = 150
AND ( --can this AND be shortend?
SELECT
ur1.CLIENT_ID
FROM
USER ur1
WHERE
ur1.USER = upper(i.CREATOR)
) != (
SELECT
ur2.CLIENT_ID
FROM
USER ur2
WHERE
ur2.USER = upper('other')
)
Minimal reproducable example
Users inside the USER-Table are always Uppercase
Every User is unique
1 User can only have 1 Client_Id
https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=oracle_18&fiddle=99ac066a9abd339cd9a80a5b78716138
If you have the constraints:
ALTER TABLE "USER" ADD CONSTRAINT
user__id_user__pk PRIMARY KEY ("USER");
ALTER TABLE "USER" ADD CONSTRAINT
user__id_user__u UNIQUE (client_id, "USER");
ALTER TABLE incident ADD CONSTRAINT
incident__id_creator__fk FOREIGN KEY (client_id, creator)
REFERENCES "USER" (client_id, "USER");
Then you can use:
SELECT *
FROM incident i
WHERE i.client_id = 150
AND NOT EXISTS (
SELECT u.client_id
FROM "USER" u
WHERE u."USER" = upper('joe')
AND u.client_id = i.client_id
)
If you do not have the foreign key constraint (and just have the unique/PK constraints on the USER table) then:
SELECT *
FROM incident i
WHERE i.client_id = 150
AND EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM "USER" u
WHERE u."USER" IN (i.creator, upper('joe'))
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT client_id) > 1
)
db<>fiddle here
Maybe self join? Something like this:
SELECT i.*
FROM incident i
JOIN USER u1 ON u1.USER = i.creator
JOIN USER u2 ON u2.client_id <> u1.client_id
WHERE i.client_id = 150
AND u2.USER = 'OTHER'
I think you can do it this way,
SELECT i.*
FROM incident i, user ur1, user ur2
WHERE i.client_id = 150
AND ur1.user = UPPER(i.creator)
AND ur2.user = UPPER(‘other’)
AND ur1.client_id != ur2.client_id

Duplicate rows returned even though group by is used

This is my query
SELECT p.book FROM customers_books p
INNER JOIN books b ON p.book = b.id
INNER JOIN bookprices bp ON bp.book = p.book
WHERE b.status = 'PUBLISHED' AND bp.currency_code = 'GBP'
AND p.book NOT IN (SELECT cb.book FROM customers_books cb WHERE cb.customer = 1)
GROUP BY p.book, p.created_date ORDER BY p.created_date DESC
This is the data in my customers_books table,
I expect only 8,6,1 of books IDs to return but query is returning 8,6,1,1
table structures are here
CREATE TABLE "public"."customers_books" (
"id" int8 NOT NULL,
"created_date" timestamp(6),
"book" int8,
"customer" int8,
);
CREATE TABLE "public"."books" (
"id" int8 NOT NULL,
"created_date" timestamp(6),
"status" varchar(255) COLLATE "pg_catalog"."default",
)
CREATE TABLE "public"."bookprices" (
"id" int8 NOT NULL,
"currency_code" varchar(255) COLLATE "pg_catalog"."default",
"book" int8
)
what do you think I am doing wrong here.
I really dont want to use p.created_date in group by but I was forced to use because of order by
You have too many joins in the outer query:
SELECT b.book
FROM books b INNER JOIN
bookprices bp
ON bp.book = p.book
WHERE b.status = 'PUBLISHED' AND bp.currency_code = 'GBP' AND
NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM customers_books cb
WHERE cb.book = p.book AND cb.customer = 1
) ;
Note that I replaced the NOT IN with NOT EXISTS. I strongly, strongly discourage you from using NOT IN with a subquery. If the subquery returns any NULL values, then NOT IN returns no rows at all. It is better to sidestep this issue just by using NOT EXISTS.

SQL SELECT composite primary key

I have 2 tables User1 and Relationship and it's some kind of user-friends relationship. I need to find all the friends of a user.
For example: I have a user with ID=3 and I need to find all the users who have Relationship.STATUS = 1 with this user.
FYI, I'm a beginner in SQL, so I know it's quite simple task but I can't handle it.
I’ve tried to use JOIN but it wasn't successfully.
SELECT *
FROM USER1
RIGHT JOIN RELATIONSHIP R on USER1.USER1_ID = R.USER_ID_FROM OR USER1.USER1_ID = R.USER_ID_TO
WHERE R.USER_ID_FROM = :id
OR R.USER_ID_TO = :id AND R.STATUS = :status AND USER1_ID != :id;
My tables:
TABLE USER1
(
USER1_ID NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
USER_NAME NVARCHAR2(64),
REAL_NAME NVARCHAR2(64),
EMAIL NVARCHAR2(64),
PHONE_NUMBER NVARCHAR2(64),
BIRTH_DATE TIMESTAMP,
POST_ID NUMBER,
PASSWORD NVARCHAR2(16)
);
TABLE RELATIONSHIP
(
USER_ID_FROM NUMBER NOT NULL,
USER_ID_TO NUMBER NOT NULL,
STATUS SMALLINT DEFAULT 0,
CONSTRAINT FK_USER_ONE FOREIGN KEY (USER_ID_FROM) REFERENCES USER1 (USER1_ID),
CONSTRAINT FK_USER_TWO FOREIGN KEY (USER_ID_TO) REFERENCES USER1 (USER1_ID),
CONSTRAINT PK_RELATIONSHIP PRIMARY KEY (USER_ID_FROM, USER_ID_TO)
);
If you just want the ids then you can use conditional logic to which which of the user ids you want:
select (case when user_id_from = 1 then user_id_to else user_id_from
end) as other_user_id
from relationship r
where 1 in (user_id_from, user_id_to) and
status = 3;
If you actually want all the user information, I would suggests exists:
select u.*
from user1 u
where exists (select 1
from relationship r
where r.status = 3 and
( (r.user_id_from = 1 and r.user_id_to = u.id) or
(r.user_id_to = 1 and r.user_id_from = u.id)
)
);
Hum not sure but I would try something like this:
SELECT u.* FROM USER1 u LEFT JOIN RELATIONSHIP r ON r.USER_ID_FROM = :id AND r.STATUS = 1 AND u.USER1_ID = r.USER_ID_TO;
Where the id is the ID of the user you want to find the friends.
SELECT *
FROM USER1 U
LEFT JOIN RELATIONSHIP R ON R.USER_ID_FROM = U.ID AND R.[STATUS] = 1
LEFT JOIN USER1 F ON R.[USER_ID_TO] = F.[ID]
WHERE U.[Id] = your_id
Then simply filter the users. Left join is used because a user may not have any friends. And I understood that you want to find the user and any friends for that users.
Try this:
(SELECT *
FROM USER1 u
LEFT JOIN RELATIONSHIP f ON u.USER1_ID = f.USER_ID_FROM
WHERE f.USER_ID_TO= 3 AND f.STATUS = 1)
union
(SELECT *
FROM USER1 o
LEFT JOIN RELATIONSHIP t ON o.USER1_ID = t.USER_ID_TO
WHERE t.USER_ID_FROM= 3 AND t.STATUS = 1)

Select rows with highest version for a shared key

Here's the Schema in mysql:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `labs_test`.`games` (
`game_id` INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT ,
`key` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL ,
`config` BLOB NOT NULL ,
`game_version` BIGINT NOT NULL DEFAULT 1 ,
PRIMARY KEY (`game_id`) ,
INDEX `key` (`key`(8) ASC) ,
INDEX `version` (`game_version` ASC) )
ENGINE = InnoDB
DEFAULT CHARACTER SET = utf8
I've tried using MAX(game_version) to no avail. Should I give up the dream and use a sub query?
Use:
SELECT g.*
FROM GAMES g
JOIN (SELECT t.key,
MAX(t.game_version) AS max_version
FROM GAMES t
GROUP BY t.key) x ON x.key = g.key
AND x.max_version = g.game_version
Should I give up the dream and use a sub query?
Some would call what I used in my answer a subquery, but it'd be more accurate to call it a derived table/inline view. Unless I'm missing something, I don't see how you can get the records without some form of self-join (joining the same table onto itself). Here's the EXISTS alternative:
SELECT g.*
FROM GAMES g
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT NULL
FROM GAMES t
WHERE t.key = g.key
GROUP BY t.key
HAVING MAX(t.game_version) = g.game_verion
Use the EXPLAIN plan to determine which performs best, rather than be concerned with whether or not to use a subquery.

Mysql - help me optimize this query

About the system:
-The system has a total of 8 tables
- Users
- Tutor_Details (Tutors are a type of User,Tutor_Details table is linked to Users)
- learning_packs, (stores packs created by tutors)
- learning_packs_tag_relations, (holds tag relations meant for search)
- tutors_tag_relations and tags and
orders (containing purchase details of tutor's packs),
order_details linked to orders and tutor_details.
For a more clear idea about the tables involved please check the The tables section in the end.
-A tags based search approach is being followed.Tag relations are created when new tutors register and when tutors create packs (this makes tutors and packs searcheable). For details please check the section How tags work in this system? below.
Following is a simpler representation (not the actual) of the more complex query which I am trying to optimize:- I have used statements like explanation of parts in the query
============================================================================
select
SUM(DISTINCT( t.tag LIKE "%Dictatorship%" )) as key_1_total_matches,
SUM(DISTINCT( t.tag LIKE "%democracy%" )) as key_2_total_matches,
td.*, u.*, count(distinct(od.id_od)), `if (lp.id_lp > 0) then some conditional logic on lp fields else 0 as tutor_popularity`
from Tutor_Details AS td JOIN Users as u on u.id_user = td.id_user
LEFT JOIN Learning_Packs_Tag_Relations AS lptagrels ON td.id_tutor = lptagrels.id_tutor
LEFT JOIN Learning_Packs AS lp ON lptagrels.id_lp = lp.id_lp
LEFT JOIN `some other tables on lp.id_lp - let's call learning pack tables set (including
Learning_Packs table)`
LEFT JOIN Order_Details as od on td.id_tutor = od.id_author LEFT JOIN Orders as o on
od.id_order = o.id_order
LEFT JOIN Tutors_Tag_Relations as ttagrels ON td.id_tutor = ttagrels.id_tutor
JOIN Tags as t on (t.id_tag = ttagrels.id_tag) OR (t.id_tag = lptagrels.id_tag)
where `some condition on Users table's fields`
AND CASE WHEN ((t.id_tag = lptagrels.id_tag) AND (lp.id_lp > 0)) THEN `some
conditions on learning pack tables set` ELSE 1 END
AND CASE WHEN ((t.id_tag = wtagrels.id_tag) AND (wc.id_wc > 0)) THEN `some
conditions on webclasses tables set` ELSE 1 END
AND CASE WHEN (od.id_od>0) THEN od.id_author = td.id_tutor and `some conditions on Orders table's fields` ELSE 1 END
AND ( t.tag LIKE "%Dictatorship%" OR t.tag LIKE "%democracy%")
group by td.id_tutor HAVING key_1_total_matches = 1 AND key_2_total_matches = 1
order by tutor_popularity desc, u.surname asc, u.name asc limit
0,20
=====================================================================
What does the above query do?
Does AND logic search on the search keywords (2 in this example - "Democracy" and "Dictatorship").
Returns only those tutors for which both the keywords are present in the union of the two sets - tutors details and details of all the packs created by a tutor.
To make things clear - Suppose a Tutor name "Sandeepan Nath" has created a pack "My first pack", then:-
Searching "Sandeepan Nath" returns Sandeepan Nath.
Searching "Sandeepan first" returns Sandeepan Nath.
Searching "Sandeepan second" does not return Sandeepan Nath.
======================================================================================
The problem
The results returned by the above query are correct (AND logic working as per expectation), but the time taken by the query on heavily loaded databases is like 25 seconds as against normal query timings of the order of 0.005 - 0.0002 seconds, which makes it totally unusable.
It is possible that some of the delay is being caused because all the possible fields have not yet been indexed, but I would appreciate a better query as a solution, optimized as much as possible, displaying the same results
==========================================================================================
How tags work in this system?
When a tutor registers, tags are entered and tag relations are created with respect to tutor's details like name, surname etc.
When a Tutors create packs, again tags are entered and tag relations are created with respect to pack's details like pack name, description etc.
tag relations for tutors stored in tutors_tag_relations and those for packs stored in learning_packs_tag_relations. All individual tags are stored in tags table.
====================================================================
The tables
Most of the following tables contain many other fields which I have omitted here.
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `users` (
`id_user` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`name` varchar(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`surname` varchar(155) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
PRIMARY KEY (`id_user`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=636 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tutor_details` (
`id_tutor` int(10) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`id_user` int(10) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
PRIMARY KEY (`id_tutor`),
KEY `Users_FKIndex1` (`id_user`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=51 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `orders` (
`id_order` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
PRIMARY KEY (`id_order`),
KEY `Orders_FKIndex1` (`id_user`),
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=275 ;
ALTER TABLE `orders`
ADD CONSTRAINT `Orders_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`id_user`) REFERENCES `users`
(`id_user`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `order_details` (
`id_od` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`id_order` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`id_author` int(10) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
PRIMARY KEY (`id_od`),
KEY `Order_Details_FKIndex1` (`id_order`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=284 ;
ALTER TABLE `order_details`
ADD CONSTRAINT `Order_Details_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`id_order`) REFERENCES `orders`
(`id_order`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `learning_packs` (
`id_lp` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`id_author` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
PRIMARY KEY (`id_lp`),
KEY `Learning_Packs_FKIndex2` (`id_author`),
KEY `id_lp` (`id_lp`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=23 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tags` (
`id_tag` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`tag` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id_tag`),
UNIQUE KEY `tag` (`tag`),
KEY `id_tag` (`id_tag`),
KEY `tag_2` (`tag`),
KEY `tag_3` (`tag`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=3419 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tutors_tag_relations` (
`id_tag` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`id_tutor` int(10) DEFAULT NULL,
KEY `Tutors_Tag_Relations` (`id_tag`),
KEY `id_tutor` (`id_tutor`),
KEY `id_tag` (`id_tag`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
ALTER TABLE `tutors_tag_relations`
ADD CONSTRAINT `Tutors_Tag_Relations_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`id_tag`) REFERENCES
`tags` (`id_tag`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `learning_packs_tag_relations` (
`id_tag` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`id_tutor` int(10) DEFAULT NULL,
`id_lp` int(10) unsigned DEFAULT NULL,
KEY `Learning_Packs_Tag_Relations_FKIndex1` (`id_tag`),
KEY `id_lp` (`id_lp`),
KEY `id_tag` (`id_tag`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
ALTER TABLE `learning_packs_tag_relations`
ADD CONSTRAINT `Learning_Packs_Tag_Relations_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`id_tag`)
REFERENCES `tags` (`id_tag`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION;
===================================================================================
Following is the exact query (this includes classes also - tutors can create classes and search terms are matched with classes created by tutors):-
SELECT SUM(DISTINCT( t.tag LIKE "%Dictatorship%" )) AS key_1_total_matches,
SUM(DISTINCT( t.tag LIKE "%democracy%" )) AS key_2_total_matches,
COUNT(DISTINCT( od.id_od )) AS tutor_popularity,
CASE
WHEN ( IF(( wc.id_wc > 0 ), ( wc.wc_api_status = 1
AND wc.wc_type = 0
AND wc.class_date > '2010-06-01 22:00:56'
AND wccp.status = 1
AND ( wccp.country_code = 'IE'
OR wccp.country_code IN ( 'INT' )
) ), 0)
) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS 'classes_published',
CASE
WHEN ( IF(( lp.id_lp > 0 ), ( lp.id_status = 1
AND lp.published = 1
AND lpcp.status = 1
AND ( lpcp.country_code = 'IE'
OR lpcp.country_code IN ( 'INT' )
) ), 0)
) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS 'packs_published',
td . *,
u . *
FROM tutor_details AS td
JOIN users AS u
ON u.id_user = td.id_user
LEFT JOIN learning_packs_tag_relations AS lptagrels
ON td.id_tutor = lptagrels.id_tutor
LEFT JOIN learning_packs AS lp
ON lptagrels.id_lp = lp.id_lp
LEFT JOIN learning_packs_categories AS lpc
ON lpc.id_lp_cat = lp.id_lp_cat
LEFT JOIN learning_packs_categories AS lpcp
ON lpcp.id_lp_cat = lpc.id_parent
LEFT JOIN learning_pack_content AS lpct
ON ( lp.id_lp = lpct.id_lp )
LEFT JOIN webclasses_tag_relations AS wtagrels
ON td.id_tutor = wtagrels.id_tutor
LEFT JOIN webclasses AS wc
ON wtagrels.id_wc = wc.id_wc
LEFT JOIN learning_packs_categories AS wcc
ON wcc.id_lp_cat = wc.id_wp_cat
LEFT JOIN learning_packs_categories AS wccp
ON wccp.id_lp_cat = wcc.id_parent
LEFT JOIN order_details AS od
ON td.id_tutor = od.id_author
LEFT JOIN orders AS o
ON od.id_order = o.id_order
LEFT JOIN tutors_tag_relations AS ttagrels
ON td.id_tutor = ttagrels.id_tutor
JOIN tags AS t
ON ( t.id_tag = ttagrels.id_tag )
OR ( t.id_tag = lptagrels.id_tag )
OR ( t.id_tag = wtagrels.id_tag )
WHERE ( u.country = 'IE'
OR u.country IN ( 'INT' ) )
AND CASE
WHEN ( ( t.id_tag = lptagrels.id_tag )
AND ( lp.id_lp > 0 ) ) THEN lp.id_status = 1
AND lp.published = 1
AND lpcp.status = 1
AND ( lpcp.country_code = 'IE'
OR lpcp.country_code IN (
'INT'
) )
ELSE 1
END
AND CASE
WHEN ( ( t.id_tag = wtagrels.id_tag )
AND ( wc.id_wc > 0 ) ) THEN wc.wc_api_status = 1
AND wc.wc_type = 0
AND
wc.class_date > '2010-06-01 22:00:56'
AND wccp.status = 1
AND ( wccp.country_code = 'IE'
OR wccp.country_code IN (
'INT'
) )
ELSE 1
END
AND CASE
WHEN ( od.id_od > 0 ) THEN od.id_author = td.id_tutor
AND o.order_status = 'paid'
AND CASE
WHEN ( od.id_wc > 0 ) THEN od.can_attend_class = 1
ELSE 1
END
ELSE 1
END
GROUP BY td.id_tutor
HAVING key_1_total_matches = 1
AND key_2_total_matches = 1
ORDER BY tutor_popularity DESC,
u.surname ASC,
u.name ASC
LIMIT 0, 20
Please note - The provided database structure does not show all the fields and tables as in this query
=====================================================================================
The explain query output:-
Please see this screenshot
http://www.test.examvillage.com/Explain_query.jpg
Information on row counts, value distributions, indexes, size of the database, size of memory, disk layout - raid 0, 5, etc - how many users are hitting your database when queries are slow - what other queries are running. All these things factor into performance.
Also a print out of the explain plan output may shed some light on the cause if it's simply a query / index issue. The exact query would be needed as well.
You really should use some better formatting for the query.
Just add at least 4 spaces to the beginning of each row to get this nice code formatting.
SELECT * FROM sometable
INNER JOIN anothertable ON sometable.id = anothertable.sometable_id
Or have a look here: https://stackoverflow.com/editing-help
Could you provide the execution plan from mysql? You need to add "EXPLAIN" to the query and copy the result.
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM ...complexquery...
will give you some useful hints (execution order, returned rows, available/used indexes)
Your question is, "how can I find tutors that match certain tags?" That's not a hard question, so the query to answer it shouldn't be hard either.
Something like:
SELECT *
FROM tutors
WHERE tags LIKE '%Dictator%' AND tags LIKE '%Democracy%'
That will work, if you modify your design to have a "tags" field in your "tutors" table, in which you put all the tags that apply to that tutor. It will eliminate layers of joins and tables.
Are all those layers of joins and tables providing real functionality, or just more programming headaches? Think about the functionality that your app REALLY needs, and then simplify your database design!!
Answering my own question.
The main problem with this approach was that too many tables were joined in a single query. Some of those tables like Tags (having large number of records - which can in future hold as many as all the English words in the vocabulary) when joined with so many tables cause this multiplication effect which can in no way be countered.
The solution is basically to make sure too many joins are not made in a single query. Breaking one large join query into steps, using the results of the one query (involving joins on some of the tables) for the next join query (involving joins on the other tables) reduces the multiplication effect.
I will try to provide better explanation to this later.