I need to update a column in table after any record is added in same table
Here is my sql code
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[EmployeeInsert]
ON [dbo].[APP_Employees]
AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE #EmployeeID AS bigint
SELECT #EmployeeID = ID FROM inserted
UPDATE [dbo].[APP_Employees]
SET [EmployeeTotalNumberOfAnnualLeave] = [EmployeeBalanceTheInitialNumberOfDaysOfAnnualLeaveIn]
WHERE ID=#EmployeeID
END
GO
and showing error
Msg 2714, Level 16, State 2, Procedure EmployeeInsert, Line 17
There is already an object named 'EmployeeInsert' in the database.
The error you're getting is because you have that trigger already, in your database. So if you want to create it again, you need to first drop the existing trigger (or use ALTER TRIGGER instead of CREATE TRIGGER to modify the existing trigger).
BUT: your fundamental flaw is that you seem to expect the trigger to be fired once per row - this is NOT the case in SQL Server. Instead, the trigger fires once per statement, and the pseudo table Inserted might contain multiple rows.
Given that that table might contain multiple rows - which one do you expect will be selected here??
SELECT #EmployeeID = ID FROM inserted
It's undefined - you might get the values from arbitrary rows in Inserted.
You need to rewrite your entire trigger with the knowledge the Inserted WILL contain multiple rows! You need to work with set-based operations - don't expect just a single row in Inserted !
-- drop the existing trigger
DROP TRIGGER [dbo].[EmployeeInsert]
GO
-- create a new trigger
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[EmployeeInsert]
ON [dbo].[APP_Employees]
AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
-- update your table, using a set-based approach
-- from the "Inserted" pseudo table which CAN and WILL
-- contain multiple rows!
UPDATE [dbo].[APP_Employees]
SET [EmployeeTotalNumberOfAnnualLeave] = i.[EmployeeBalanceTheInitialNumberOfDaysOfAnnualLeaveIn]
FROM Inserted i
WHERE [dbo].[APP_Employees].ID = i.ID
END
GO
Related
I created a new trigger that would let me create a log after updating, however even though i think it should work i get the following error:
The maximum nesting level of views, stored procedures, functions or triggers was exceeded (limit: 32).
Is it possible that it has something to do with how the trigger is written?
ALTER TRIGGER [TR_Log_Notes]
ON ALUMNS
AFTER UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE #Note_Text VARCHAR (30)
SET #Note_Text = 'Fields were updated'
INSERT INTO Log_Notes(Alumn_ID, Note_Text)
SELECT i.Alumn_ID, #NoteText
FROM INSERTED i
END
You are inserting into log_notes after updating a row in the same table. Is that really what you intend?
If you do intend the same table, then you should use a for trigger, and update each row before it goes into the table. However, I suspect that you want to create the trigger on a different table.
I'm going to create a trigger for update. Purpose of this trigger is that If muadurum column is changed , take the old value of mua_tarih in table fkayitlar and insert to another table mua_tarihleri.
My code block like;
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[trgr_fkayit_update]
ON [dbo].[fkayitlar]
AFTER UPDATE
AS
DECLARE #mua_durum_once NVARCHAR(10)
DECLARE #mua_durum_sonra NVARCHAR(10)
DECLARE #mua_tarih_once DATE
DECLARE #mua_yapan_once NVARCHAR(25)
DECLARE #kisi_id INT
Take the old value;
SELECT
#kisi_id=kayitid,
#mua_durum_once=muayenedurum,
#mua_tarih_once=muayenetarih,
#mua_yapan_once=mua_yapan
FROM deleted
Take the new value;
SELECT #mua_durum_sonra=muayenedurum FROM inserted
Check if value is changed ; if changed, Insert #mua_tarih to table mua_tarihleri with #kisi_id and #mua_yapan_once
IF #mua_durum_once='OLDU'
AND #mua_durum_sonra='OLMADI'
AND #mua_tarih_once IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
INSERT INTO mua_tarihleri(kayitid,mua_tarihi,mua_yapan)
VALUES(#kisi_id,#mua_tarih_once,#mua_yapan_once)
END
My problem is When I update more than one row in table fkayitlar,Trigger is working, but I see only one inserted row in table mua_tarihleri (only working once). I need to see more than one.(should be working more than once) Are not Triggers working on more than one process? or How can I solve this my problem?
The trigger only occurs once when the table is updated, no matter how many rows are updated. Therefore, you have to write your trigger body to operate on a set of rows, not a single row as you have done.
Should be something like:
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[trgr_fkayit_update]
ON [dbo].[fkayitlar]
AFTER UPDATE
AS
INSERT INTO mua_tarihleri(kayitid,mua_tarihi,mua_yapan)
SELECT deleted.kayitid, deleted.muayenedurum, deleted.muayenetarih, deleted.mua_yapan
FROM deleted
JOIN inserted ON deleted.kayitid = inserted.kayitid
WHERE deleted.muayenedurum='OLDU'
AND inserted.muayenedurum='OLMADI'
AND muayenetarih IS NOT NULL
I am trying to create an auditing table. I have a table called person.address in the AdventureWorks 2012 database.
I am using a trigger to capture changes to the table, the only problem is I do not know if it is possible to use a trigger to capture a row BEFORE it is edited. I am trying to save resources and overheads so trying to not use a shadow table. I know there is no "Before Insert" trigger. But is there any way to capture the information contained in a row, and when someone does an insert or update, this row can be written to my audit.table before the insert is completed?
Thank you.
Given a simplistic table with two rows:
CREATE TABLE dbo.foo(a INT PRIMARY KEY);
INSERT dbo.foo(a) VALUES(1),(2);
Then an update trigger simply to demonstrate:
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.trfoo ON dbo.foo FOR UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT a FROM inserted;
SELECT a FROM deleted;
END
GO
The result of an action, such as:
UPDATE dbo.foo SET a += 1;
Results in:
a -- this is the *new* version of these rows
----
3
2
a -- this is the *old* version of these rows
----
2
1
Also, there is an INSTEAD OF INSERT trigger, which allows you to perform actions before the insert (they're not called BEFORE triggers because you still have to perform the insert yourself). More info here.
Here is one very interesting problem. I am using SQL Server 2008.
I have two triggers on one common table say 'CommonTable'. one trigger is on update and other one is on insert/update/delete.
In first trigger "Trigger1", I do the checks/rollback sometime change the new inserted value based on business logic.
here is sample code
-
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[Trigger1] ON [dbo].[CommonTable]
FOR UPDATE
UPDATE [CommonTable]
SET
[StatusCode] = 'New Value'
WHERE
[RecId] = 'rec id value'
In second trigger "Trigger2", I store the new inserted/deleted/updated value from 'CommonTable' table to another table 'CommonTable_History' for history tracking purpose.
here is sample code
-
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[Trigger2] ON [dbo].[CommonTable]
FOR INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE
--based on logic read the value from DELETED or INSERTED table and store in other table.
SELECT #RowData = (SELECT * FROM DELETED AS [CommonTable] WHERE [RecId] = #RowRecId FOR XML AUTO, BINARY BASE64 , ELEMENTS)
--and then insert #RowData in 'CommonTable_History' table.
With the help of 'sp_settriggerorder', I have set the order of execution of these triggers, so first "Trigger1" get executed and then "Trigger2".
Second trigger "Trigger2" works well for insert/delete values. It works fine for new inserted value if new inserted values has not been changed by first trigger "Trigger1".
But if in some cases, inserted values has been changed in "Trigger1". say [StatusCode] = 'New Value' and old values was 'Old Value' then "Trigger2" still store the 'Old Value' instead of 'New Value'.
Why because "Trigger1" change the value but that value still has not been store in database and before that "Trigger2" get executed on Insert.
Now my requirement is, here I want to store "New Value".
So I thought, lets make "Trigger2" to use "AFTER" keywords. But "FOR" and "AFTER" behave same could not solve the problem.
Then I thought, lets make "Trigger2" to use "INSTEAD OF" keyword. But "INSTEAD OF" gives following error
"Cannot CREATE INSTEAD OF DELETE or INSTEAD OF UPDATE TRIGGER. This is because the table has a FOREIGN KEY with cascading DELETE or UPDATE."
I can not remove FOREIGN KEY with cascading DELETE or UPDATE for table 'CommonTable'.
Please let me know if you people have any other alternate solution.
-Vikram Gehlot
I think your second trigger needs to use the values from the actual table, not the inserted/deleted tables to populate the log table - inserted/deleted will always have the unaltered, original values, while your altered values will appear in the table. Make the second trigger an "After" trigger, so you will not have to use the sp_settriggerorder. Like this, for example:
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[trg_Trig1]
ON [dbo].[TestTable]
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
update TestTable
set [value] = 10
where [value] = 25
END
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[trg_Trig2]
ON [dbo].[TestTable]
AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
-- Insert statements for trigger here
insert into log_TestTable
(id, description, [value])
select tt.id, tt.description, tt.[value]
from inserted i
LEFT JOIN TestTable tt
ON tt.id = i.id
END
It may not be the cleanest solution but can you simply combine the two triggers into one? That way both pieces of SQL would know about each other's changes.
Your second trigger appears to me as if it would not work properly is mulitple records are inserted in a set-based operations unloess you use a loop which is poor choice in a trigger. Fix that first!
Instead of select * from deleted, why not join the deleted or inserted table to the original table and take the values from there (except for the id value which you get from deleted or inserted, that should give you the most current values of all fileds and if you add other trigger logic later wil not break.
Is there anyway where I can create a trigger which will execute before the update/delete takes place( and then the actual update/delete takes place)? and how can I drop a trigger from a table?
to drop a trigger use:
--SQL Server 2005+, drop the trigger, no error message if it does not exist yet
BEGIN TRY DROP TRIGGER dbo.TrigerYourTable END TRY BEGIN CATCH END CATCH
GO
--drop trigger pre-SQl Server 2005, no error message if it does not exist yet
if exists (select * from sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[TrigerYourTable ]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsTrigger') = 1)
drop trigger [dbo].[TrigerYourTable ]
GO
OP said in a comment:
...suppose I have to check childcount of
a perticular user if that is more than
5 do not update the user.how can I do
that using instead of trigger?
You don't really need to prevent the original update, you can let it happen, and then in the trigger check for the problem and rollback if necessary. This is how to enforce the logic for one or many affected rows, when you need to JOIN to determine the childcount of the affected rows:
--create the trigger
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.TrigerYourTable ON dbo.YourTable
AFTER UPDATE
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
IF EXISTS (SELECT
1
FROM INSERTED i
INNER JOIN YourChildrenTable c ON i.ParentID=c.ParentID
GROUP BY i.ParentID
HAVING COUNT(i.ParentID)>5
)
BEGIN
RAISERROR('Count of children can not exceed 5',16,1)
ROLLBACK
RETURN
END
GO
It will throw the error if there is a violation of the logic, and the original command will be subject to a rollback.
If childcount is a column within the affected table, then use a trigger like this to enforce the logic:
--create the trigger
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.TrigerYourTable ON dbo.YourTable
AFTER UPDATE
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM INSERTED WHERE childcount>5)
BEGIN
RAISERROR('Count of children can not exceed 5',16,1)
ROLLBACK
RETURN
END
GO
If you just want to ignore the update for any rows that violate the rule try this:
--create the trigger
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.TrigerYourTable ON dbo.YourTable
INSTEAD OF UPDATE
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
UPDATE y
SET col1=i.col1
,col2=i.col2
,col3=i.col3
,.... --list all columns except the PK column!
FROM dbo.YourTable y
INNER JOIN INSERTED i on y.PK=i.PK
WHERE i.childcount<=5
GO
It will only update rows that have a child count less than 5, ignoring all affected rows that fail the requirement (no error message).
This article from microsoft explains the syntax of creating triggers.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189799.aspx
There isn't really a 'before' trigger, but you can use an INSTEAD OF trigger that allows you to jump in place of whatever action is attempted, then define your own action.
I've used that technique for versioning data.
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[Documents_CreateVersion]
ON [dbo].[Documents]
INSTEAD OF UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #DocumentID int
SELECT DocumentID = DocumentID FROM INSERTED
-- do something
END
INSERTED is a bit of a misnomer here, but it contains the details of the action before it occurs you can then define your own action with that data.
Edit:
As per comments below my response, my example can be dangerous if multiple rows are updated at once. My application doesn't allow for this so it's fine in this case. I would agree that the above is a bad practice regardless.
to drop trigger- use database_name
IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sysobjects
WHERE name = 'tgr_name' AND type = 'TR')
DROP TRIGGER tgr_name
GO
Here's a simple trigger that checks columns values, and fires before updating or inserting, and raises an error.
IF OBJECT_ID ('dbo.MyTableTrigger', 'TR') IS NOT NULL
DROP TRIGGER dbo.MyTableTrigger;
GO
CREATE TRIGGER MyTableTrigger
ON dbo.MyTable
FOR INSERT, UPDATE
AS
DECLARE #Col1ID INT
DECLARE #Col2ID INT
SELECT #Col1ID = Col1ID, #Col2ID = Col2ID FROM inserted
IF ((#Col1ID IS NOT NULL) AND (#Col2ID IS NOT NULL))
BEGIN
RAISERROR ('Col1ID and Col2ID cannot both be in MyTable at the same time.', 16, 10);
END