Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
This question appears to be off-topic because it lacks sufficient information to diagnose the problem. Describe your problem in more detail or include a minimal example in the question itself.
Questions concerning problems with code you've written must describe the specific problem — and include valid code to reproduce it — in the question itself. See SSCCE.org for guidance.
Improve this question
I have created a Site Pages library where all my application pages exist. The problem is I am seeing "Last Modified at [Date] by [User]" at the bottom of each page. I do not see this in my other Site Collection that uses the same template. The publishing feature is activated on both as well as versioning.
The class used to display the text I want to hide is ms-descriptiontext. I tried making this display:none but it is a class used throughout SharePoint and hides other pertinent content.
Calculated Column may work for you. Add a calculated column on the basis of Modified Date that only stores Date (without time stamp). Exclude original Modified Date column from the view, and include calculated column in view.
Visit http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb862071%28v=office.14%29.aspx for calculated column formulas.
I found a solution. It turns out when you create a page in the browser through the Site Pages doc lib, the Last Modified time stamp will display at the bottom (regardless of publishing, versioning etc). If you create the page through SharePoint designer, as a Web Part Page, there will be no modified time stamp at the bottom!
Related
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 11 days ago.
Improve this question
what happens is that when I make a consultation, it does not respect between mayor and minuscules and what I want is that the field to be consulted is sensitive to mayor and minuscules.
I was investigating and I saw that a solution was to create a binary field which I have already done, but at the time of consulting this does not return anything.
I leave the Querys, the tables and data you use:
My table:
enter image description here
Table data:enter image description here
Query used for consultation:enter image description here
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am the developer of Infermap.com. We are regularly monitoring and working on SEO and presence on Google SERPs. In the past 3-4 days we have seen a sudden steep drop in the number of Impressions on Google.
Can someone suggest me the possible reason of why might this happen and by what ways I can prevent it.
Also I have added around 11k urls to be indexed out of which only 1.5k has been indexed. What are the possible reasons for it?
(note: this question should probably be moved to Webmasters Stack Exchange)
Looks like your 11k new URLs have not been picked up as quality content by Google. You might even be cloaking, when I click on a result I get a completely different text on your site.
Ways to avoid it:
avoid cloaking
avoid adding similar looking pages without unique content, e.g. make sure your pages are unique enough before publishing them
feed new content that looks alike gradually, e.g. start with 100 pages, wait a week or two, and add another 200. Once you are confident your pages are picked up well you can add everything at once.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question appears to be off-topic because it lacks sufficient information to diagnose the problem. Describe your problem in more detail or include a minimal example in the question itself.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
good day to all. I just had a general question here and hope someone is available to help.
I have a database for employees and was wondering if I could make an app or program in Access or Excel where I can assign each employee a username and password so when they log in they can print out an employment letter for example.
Basically I have the list of employees and the templates of the letters and all and well its just a matter of checking the possibilities and how to go about doing this and with which office product.
Thanks,
Will
First, since you have a choice, I would use Access instead of Excel.
Create your table of users; populate it.
Create your Form; add controls for sign-in; add ComboBox for "Letter Type"; add command button to "Submit"
Is the letter going to be customized for the user (their name, address, etc.?) or just a standard form letter? If customized, you will need to create a "Mail Merge" Word document and pass the variables to it (i.e. use VBA code in the "Submit" button) Lots of resources for this if you Google "Access Word Mail Merge VBA"
How will the letter be sent? Email? If so, there is VBA for that also.
Good Luck.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
There is this link:
http://www.talentblend.com/projects/Female-Dancers-Needed-for-La-Bayadre-The-Royal-Ballet-Flanders/229
You search that in google, it will come up first (no surprise there). This means google has crawled and indexed that page.
But if you search the title of that page 'Female Dancers Needed for La Bayadère, The Royal Ballet Flanders' it will not come up anywhere. But you will see and other page from talentblend.com coming up somewhere on the first page, that is not relevant to the searched words (just vaguely contains that text somewhere on the page).
This has happened when i updated the code on the site. Since then all newly added content behaves like the above example. Old pages still come up high in google (even the ones i deleted since).
Google webmaster tools doesnt say any errors (crawl, security, robots). I also have Google Analytics running on the page.
Can somebody tell me why is this?
My guess is that there is very little actual content on this page. There's the one sentence and then a login form. Was there more content prior to your most recent update?
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a question regarding meta descriptions.
On pages other than the homepage, the meta description simply uses the post content (I'm using Wordpress). My question is, should I be trimming the content to 150 chars? That's what I normally do, and I even append a "..." to the end.
However I'm wondering if its more beneficial to forget about the 155 char limit to fit it perfectly in Google listings.
Any opinions?
Your description is just one of the sources Google considers when deciding what goes in the search result snippet.
Saying that, it is the most often used source so can be worth filling in, as it gives you a better chance of controlling what gets displayed.
Don't worry about its exact length or if it is different. The key thing is you have the chance to create a great snippet that encourages people to click to your article.
I'd install an SEO plugin that lets you override a default description. Then do that for your most popular articles so you can fine tune that snippet.
p.s. Don't append the "...". Google does that for you if your description is too long.
I think its okay. I don't know if they handle it as double content. For me it would be nicer to write a separate and real short intro with most important keywords that differs from content.
Otherwise you can leave out description on article pages and Google is picking an interesting part out by itself and this part is related to the users search terms, if I have seen this right?!
Also worth considering that the new style google site links lauinched within the last few weeks put an emphasis on the first circa 30 chars of the meta description.